― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Tuesday, 4 January 2005 23:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ken L (Ken L), Tuesday, 4 January 2005 23:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ken L (Ken L), Tuesday, 4 January 2005 23:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― blount, Tuesday, 4 January 2005 23:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― Riot Gear! (Gear!), Tuesday, 4 January 2005 23:07 (twenty-one years ago)
― Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 4 January 2005 23:08 (twenty-one years ago)
― miccio (miccio), Tuesday, 4 January 2005 23:09 (twenty-one years ago)
― blount, Tuesday, 4 January 2005 23:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 4 January 2005 23:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― blount, Tuesday, 4 January 2005 23:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― Riot Gear! (Gear!), Tuesday, 4 January 2005 23:16 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 4 January 2005 23:22 (twenty-one years ago)
Best you return to your crack pipe, blount. It's not going to lower the level on your paranoia meter any, but it may just mercifully shut you up for a spell or two.
I do thank you, however, for making me aware of a glaring critical omission in my tossed-off "dancing should be illegal" post. When I wrote that, I never once thought to cater to those who suffer from incomprehension. Meaning I never imagined that anyone would take it seriously.
As for my alleged many posts dismissing women as "cunts/twats", etc., that's certainly news to me -- and one hell of a slander. Putting the name "Lefty" into the search engine right now turned up 33 posts (not ten, as you claim). One of the "Lefty" posts is another Lefty, at that - so 32, then). One dig at Ashlee Simpson, yes, but characteristic of my posts? I think not.
And do stop calling me (and others) "bitch".
― Lefty, Tuesday, 4 January 2005 23:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― blount, Tuesday, 4 January 2005 23:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― artdamages (artdamages), Tuesday, 4 January 2005 23:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― blount, Tuesday, 4 January 2005 23:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― blount, Tuesday, 4 January 2005 23:31 (twenty-one years ago)
(will it get through?)
― Ken L (Ken L), Tuesday, 4 January 2005 23:34 (twenty-one years ago)
(why do you feel the need to so doggedly defend chuck anyway? he doesn't really need the help.)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 4 January 2005 23:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 4 January 2005 23:47 (twenty-one years ago)
― blount, Tuesday, 4 January 2005 23:59 (twenty-one years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 5 January 2005 00:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― blount, Wednesday, 5 January 2005 00:05 (twenty-one years ago)
I will give you credit for actually giving a relatively level-headed appraisal of chuck's style. tho you do give him a pass on his scattershot/random references style, which is something I personally find most irritating/unhelpful. but that's just me, and my opinions of chuck are well-known, etc.
let's talk about something else now....
― Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 5 January 2005 00:09 (twenty-one years ago)
― Riot Gear! (Gear!), Wednesday, 5 January 2005 00:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― blount, Wednesday, 5 January 2005 00:13 (twenty-one years ago)
What's kd lang got to do with anything?
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Wednesday, 5 January 2005 00:14 (twenty-one years ago)
http://www.angelfire.com/ky2/bbautos/zsundberg.jpg
― Riot Gear! (Gear!), Wednesday, 5 January 2005 00:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ken L (Ken L), Wednesday, 5 January 2005 00:17 (twenty-one years ago)
What's kd lang got to do with anything?Dom, now you're gonna confuse people who will think it's really her!
my opinions of chuck are well-known, etc.I think I read them on a Royal Trux Thread, 20 some-odd days ago
let's talk about something else now....We could try, but it's this thread so
http://www.europeanbook.com/media/images/2070368076.jpg
― Ken L (Ken L), Wednesday, 5 January 2005 00:18 (twenty-one years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 5 January 2005 00:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ken L (Ken L), Wednesday, 5 January 2005 00:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ken L (Ken L), Wednesday, 5 January 2005 00:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― polyphonic (polyphonic), Wednesday, 5 January 2005 00:32 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ken L (Ken L), Wednesday, 5 January 2005 00:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― don, Wednesday, 5 January 2005 01:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― miccio (miccio), Wednesday, 5 January 2005 01:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ken L (Ken L), Wednesday, 5 January 2005 01:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― miccio (miccio), Wednesday, 5 January 2005 02:00 (twenty-one years ago)
― miccio (miccio), Wednesday, 5 January 2005 02:01 (twenty-one years ago)
― Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 5 January 2005 02:01 (twenty-one years ago)
i hate reading positive reviews of Pavement. And I say this as a fan.
― miccio (miccio), Wednesday, 5 January 2005 02:03 (twenty-one years ago)
Why does my lameass g00g13pr00f!ng always bother you, manthony m1cc1o?
― Ken L (Ken L), Wednesday, 5 January 2005 02:09 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ken L (Ken L), Wednesday, 5 January 2005 02:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― don, Wednesday, 5 January 2005 02:14 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ken L (Ken L), Wednesday, 5 January 2005 02:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Wednesday, 5 January 2005 02:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Wednesday, 5 January 2005 02:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― Matos W.K. (M Matos), Wednesday, 5 January 2005 02:31 (twenty-one years ago)
― Riot Gear! (Gear!), Wednesday, 5 January 2005 02:33 (twenty-one years ago)