New Joanna Newsom Album "Ys" Due Nov 14

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (699 of them)
People are swooning over something I see as rather insincere, and sort of like an indie rock sham

but insincere in what way? like, she doesn't believe what she's singing about? or like, she doesn't think what she's writing is actually very good? and not to be like a total crit douche but: since when is sincerity a mark of quality?

max (maxreax), Monday, 13 November 2006 18:50 (nineteen years ago)

i just think this falls into the same trappings of tori amos et al., except at least tori was raped.

bell labs (bell_labs), Monday, 13 November 2006 18:54 (nineteen years ago)

"i've read articles where she claims to have "studied composition" - why didn't she arrange her own album then?"

This is the stupid comment yet on this thread.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Monday, 13 November 2006 18:56 (nineteen years ago)

"i just think this falls into the same trappings of tori amos et al., except at least tori was raped."

Nevermind.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Monday, 13 November 2006 18:56 (nineteen years ago)

i just think this falls into the same trappings of tori amos et al., except at least tori was raped.

Hi Dom.

jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 13 November 2006 18:58 (nineteen years ago)

hahaha oh man i give up on ilm

Marmot (marmotwolof), Monday, 13 November 2006 19:02 (nineteen years ago)

sorry, i know i'm pretty much alone here I just think she's got a formula and I don't buy it. I don't think it's really HER behind all the VDP parks arrangements, fanciful lyrics, overwrought renaissance fair imagery, 10 minute songs. I think it's someone who knows how to sell themselves.

Yes, sincerity doesn't mean good or bad generally speaking. But in the case of something like this that everyone claims to be so heartfelt and real and wonderful and ground breaking and brave and bold, I just don't see that. It's a hollow shell of great artists spinning a very pretty but forgettable web around someone who knows how to sell herself and her whole wolf pelt hat freak folk wearing persona quite well.

zippezappy (doomed), Monday, 13 November 2006 19:13 (nineteen years ago)

Helen Jordan: If only I had been raped as a child! *Then* I would know authenticity!

Marmot (marmotwolof), Monday, 13 November 2006 19:15 (nineteen years ago)

i know i'm pretty much alone here I just think she's got a formula and I don't buy it. I don't think it's really HER behind all the VDP parks arrangements, fanciful lyrics, overwrought renaissance fair imagery, 10 minute songs.

other than the length of the songs and the orchestral arrangement I don't know what's different about this record than her last one or her earlier work. you're obviously unfamiliar with her so coming to her stuff at this point and making this declaration is more a statement on your ignorance than anything else.

kyle (akmonday), Monday, 13 November 2006 19:32 (nineteen years ago)

actually you're ignorant
I have her first album and I think it's equally as flawed , but in entirely different ways

you may not like my opinion, but my opinion doesn't make me ignorant you idiot

zippezappy (doomed), Monday, 13 November 2006 20:09 (nineteen years ago)

Helen Jordan: If only I had been raped as a child! *Then* I would know authenticity!


please...
i love how easily people dismiss other people's counter hive opinions
just b/c I"m not marching to the joanna piper, doesn't mean I believe rape=authenticy

zippezappy (doomed), Monday, 13 November 2006 20:11 (nineteen years ago)

uh, I was replying to bell labs. unless bell labs is your sock puppet.

Marmot (marmotwolof), Monday, 13 November 2006 20:22 (nineteen years ago)

zippezappy,

I really don't understand your comments about her sincerity or authenticity. You seem to think that she's just marketing an image (not sure what's wrong with that), but that any of the real musical work is being done by other people. Everything I've seen about the making of Ys indicates that she's heavily involved with the entire creative process to the point of obsession.

I'm not the type of person to get upset about this type of stuff, but I feel like a lot of the comments on here are getting really ugly and sexist. The whole idea that she is just a cute face and depends on "real artists" to hold her hand and do the real work strikes me as absurd and insulting.

Matt Olken (Moodles), Monday, 13 November 2006 20:38 (nineteen years ago)

i just don't get your opinion. I dont' understand what it is that makes you think she is "insincere," and I don't get the "indie rock sham" thing. I think you think about music is some completely alien way from how think and listen to music, maybe.

kyle (akmonday), Monday, 13 November 2006 20:40 (nineteen years ago)

Kyle, aren't the arrangments and length of songs enough to say this album is in fact different from the previous.

I think zippezappy is arguing that people are lavishing newsom with praise because of these qualities. And that she the ambitiousness of the album, or the work that went into it, has influenced critics' opinions of its merits.

I'm not saying this is true, but it's not that rediculous of an idea. I think alot of us got excited when we heard about Albini and VDP's involvment.

For me, it just doesn't excite me as much as her first. I understand that it requires a great deal of attention and time. I guess, I just don't feel like giving this album that much time. I guess her writing and vocals are similar to the first. But the arrangements and strings irritate me at times and take away from the simplistic qualities I liked about ms. newsom. I am not wording this well, but the strings seem to be overbearing at various parts throughout many of the songs, where they could stand to be a little more subtle.

Benjamin H (BillMartini), Monday, 13 November 2006 20:41 (nineteen years ago)

and yes, to agree with xpost, I think this betrays a kind of underlying sexism in your argument, that male critics only like her because she is cute. well I've seen her and she isn't that cute, so I don't know what you're talking about.

kyle (akmonday), Monday, 13 November 2006 20:41 (nineteen years ago)

i didn't know much abt. this album.

but this thread makes me want to hear it.

i hope it's really fanciful.

M@tt He1geson: Sassy and I Don't Care Who Knows It (Matt Helgeson), Monday, 13 November 2006 20:51 (nineteen years ago)

I'm even willing to accept that people like her more because she's attractive, but I don't like the insinuation that she is basically a helpless shell completely dependent on her collaborators to make anything.

I'm also waiting to hear about all these great artists making music that is far superior, but are being ingnored because they aren't pretty....

Matt Olken (Moodles), Monday, 13 November 2006 21:01 (nineteen years ago)

me!

M@tt He1geson: Sassy and I Don't Care Who Knows It (Matt Helgeson), Monday, 13 November 2006 21:04 (nineteen years ago)

9.4

...And we have a tie

MRZBW (MRZBW), Monday, 13 November 2006 21:22 (nineteen years ago)

Lots of lovely moments on this album and some intense images. But she's rather humorless about her whole shtick, no?

Roy Kasten (Roy Kasten), Monday, 13 November 2006 21:28 (nineteen years ago)

Does it take such a stretch of imagination to think that she believes in her work and doesn't see it as shtick?

Matt Olken (Moodles), Monday, 13 November 2006 21:49 (nineteen years ago)

Well, I think it's an intentionally more "serious" record, so maybe the humour isn't appropriate (I miss it too).

This thread is going downhill fast... but I sympathise with people finding it all a bit hollow and contrived, in a way that frequently actually repels an emotional connection.

Well for me anyway. Whether she's "sincere" or not I don't know, I wish I could finally understand why I just-about like this, and even then with doubts, whereas other people are finding it utterly rapturous & I assume, deeply satisfying.

Maybe it's because so little of her poetry strikes me as coming from the sub-conscious, it makes too much literal/poetic sense when it's understood, it reminds me of rap that I don't like, when there's piles upon piles of lyrical puzzles to untangle but not much blissful surrender. Which is unfair, as there are many moments of surrender here, but as a whole, the sheer concentration -of- it, and the concentration it feels like it needs to be absorbed is wearying. I tried letting this just wash over me too but that came out even less rewarding :(

I still have the horrible feeling this is going to click eventually and I'll have to eat my words... but I still wish the 5 parts didn't all sound so similar overall, without that differentiation, this record feels more like a half-remembered dream with an uncertain beginning and end, and not enough of a "journey" for me.

brr (fandango), Monday, 13 November 2006 21:54 (nineteen years ago)

Finally this thread has hit its Destroye's Rubies stride. zippezappy, please let us know yr favorite album of the year so we can all denigrate it k thx bye.

Edward III (edward iii), Monday, 13 November 2006 22:03 (nineteen years ago)

it's really great that everyone is arguing over what other critics think about this and calling each other stupid

a name means a lot just by itself (lfam), Monday, 13 November 2006 22:07 (nineteen years ago)

like, does this kind of music attract morons or does it just make you stupid

a name means a lot just by itself (lfam), Monday, 13 November 2006 22:08 (nineteen years ago)

?

a name means a lot just by itself (lfam), Monday, 13 November 2006 22:08 (nineteen years ago)

xpost:

I definitely see how her music can sound like it was labored over to an excessive degree. When an artist appears to be trying too hard, it becomes a big turn-off. In that sense, I understand a lot of the criticism here.

The part I don't get is the notion that she is pulling a fast one on her audience or playing some kind of confidence trick. That seems to be the implication of a lot of comments on this thread, and I find it kind of mystifying.

Matt Olken (Moodles), Monday, 13 November 2006 22:09 (nineteen years ago)

But all these criticisms are what I LIKE about the record--that it's baroque and affected and utterly contrived and totally unconvincing (I mean CHRIST it's a San Francisco hippie playing the harp over Van Dyke Parks string arrangements, WHAT PERSON ON EARTH is going to make a "serious emotional connection" (or whatever) to this besides seven-year-olds and elves or fairies or whatever??). The whole thing is a big fucking show--listen to the ridiculous words she's using, and the stories she's telling--and that's GREAT.

max (maxreax), Monday, 13 November 2006 22:51 (nineteen years ago)

Baroque and affected, sure, but why contrived?

Why are so many people convinced that there is a big disconnect (for good or ill) between her persona and her personality?

Is it so hard to believe that she is, in fact, that person?

Matt Olken (Moodles), Monday, 13 November 2006 23:12 (nineteen years ago)

yes it's pretty hard for me to believe she is indeed a milk maiden or whatever she fancies herself as. Obviously my comments are extreme, but I suppose that's just my reaction to the extreme and hyperbolic praise being given to this album.
the fact is the songs are long, but they ACTUALLY don't do THAT much

I mean think about how long she sings about "darling dance with me" over and over and over and over again for a good 3 minutes at the end of "bear and monkey"

Sure, get lost in it. Feel the magic. It's like a sandra bullock romantic comedy, (but sandra REALLY IS THAT CUTE IN REAL LIFE), you either get lost in it or you don't.

Obviously I don't and I guess the other major issue I'm taking here (and I'm more irritated by the fans/critics then the actual album) is that NOBODY else seems to be speaking up here. Is it required that everyone think what she's doing is fucking hands down 10/10 across the board album of the year.

I know now people are going to chime in with a one sentence "I don't love it" but seriously, I just can't believe so many people buy it.

I'm quickly turning into the resident joanna hater and that wasn't my intention. I admire her ambition. I think the record is FINE. It is what it is, but I can't stomach all these giddy male rock critics talking about how for some reason HER lyrics about skipping stones are so great and why random other artists singing equally as ridiculous (IMO ) lyrics , get the full brush over or deemed as "trite" and "cutesy"

why her?

zippezappy (doomed), Monday, 13 November 2006 23:40 (nineteen years ago)

T/S: Disagreeing with critical consenus cause you don't think it's THAT good vs. THE EMPEROR HAS NO CLOTHES SOUND TEH ALARM

Hoosteen (Hoosteen), Monday, 13 November 2006 23:43 (nineteen years ago)

yes it's pretty hard for me to believe she is indeed a milk maiden or whatever she fancies herself as

What makes you think that she sees herself this way? I have no way of knowing for sure, but I would guess that she sees herself as a musician. I've never seen her say anything that would indicate otherwise.

I just can't believe so many people buy it

This is what confuses me - why does liking this album = "buying" it? If I enjoy listening to her am I suspending my disbelief? Disbelief of what?

I can't stomach all these giddy male rock critics talking about how for some reason HER lyrics about skipping stones are so great and why random other artists singing equally as ridiculous (IMO ) lyrics , get the full brush over or deemed as "trite" and "cutesy"

I understand disagreeing with the critics, but why be angry at them? Why even care about them?

Matt Olken (Moodles), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 00:05 (nineteen years ago)

"Listen to the greed the monkey conveys in degrading, insulting, and controlling the bear, and the tight grip he keeps on her dignity so as not to lose her-- which, of course, by the end, he does."

THE GREEEEEED

MRZBW (MRZBW), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 00:32 (nineteen years ago)

there's an album like this every year.

don weiner (don weiner), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 00:50 (nineteen years ago)

ts: blueberry boat vs. ys

(same pitchfork reviewer, (nearly) same score, same 'epic' expansion upon promising first disc, same hype)

I can't see this being better than BB, myself, but I'll need to give it a listen.

You've Got Scourage On Your Breath (Haberdager), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 00:59 (nineteen years ago)

Louis, you know I loves me some Blueberry Boat.

This is...as good.

Plus VDP & Steve Albini & Jim O'Rourke.

Like whoa.

Hoosteen (Hoosteen), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 01:06 (nineteen years ago)

Blueberry Boat was ridiculously bad

Ys is a good album, though

Stephen Bush (Stephen B.), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 02:12 (nineteen years ago)

Charlatan.

Hoosteen (Hoosteen), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 02:37 (nineteen years ago)

You know, I tried listening to Ys a bit, and it's alright I guess for what it is, but her voice doesn't work for me at all. It's kinda like some perverse combination of Conor Oberst and someone trying to do jazz scat vocals or something. I wouldn't mind liking it, but I just don't think that's going to happen for me any time soon.

Matthew Perpetua! (Matthew Perpetua!), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 02:57 (nineteen years ago)

I like most of Blueberry Boat and some other stuff by Fiery Furnaces, but I think Joanna Newsom makes stronger, more consistent albums. Also, her lyrics are much better. I see the similarities, but the Furnaces seem to take a more haphazard, kitchen sink approach, whereas Newsom seems more focused and self-aware.

Matt Olken (Moodles), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 03:18 (nineteen years ago)

Wait, why would you compare the two? They are in different genres! I mean, at the heart of things, the Furnaces are writing verse/chorus/verse pop/rock songs. They screw around a lot, sure, but for the most part they really aren't that complicated.

Matthew Perpetua! (Matthew Perpetua!), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 04:13 (nineteen years ago)

troof. My statement that it's "as good" is 100% subjective and is not based on any real similarities between BB & Ys.

Hoosteen (Hoosteen), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 04:17 (nineteen years ago)

And to clarify, Louis was only T/Sing the two on the grounds of

(same pitchfork reviewer, (nearly) same score, same 'epic' expansion upon promising first disc, same hype)

I jumped in w/my "as good as" cause I know teh Jagger digs it lots, and then we miscommunicated shit all to hell.

Hoosteen (Hoosteen), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 04:21 (nineteen years ago)

The comparison makes some sense though:

A couple years ago, they were getting the same hype.

They do projects that seem either ambitious or crazy.

The lyrics are overly verbose or just plain long.

Matt Olken (Moodles), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 04:25 (nineteen years ago)

WHAT PERSON ON EARTH is going to make a "serious emotional connection" (or whatever) to this besides seven-year-olds

so i was hoping to get this for my 8-year old cousin who is a concert harpist... (no shit)... is there a lot of smog dick or it is bad mixed metaphor?

will she see through it? i was gonna make her a copy of the last record minus the song with the "whores" on it... cause i'm not sure if her folks would dig that...

any chance JN will be on a NOW! kids comp in the near future?
m.

msp (mspa), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 06:21 (nineteen years ago)

i would have eaten this shit up when i was 8. i still do. "peter and the wolf" comparisons are otm, as would be comparisons to rodgers and hammerstein.

max (maxreax), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 07:26 (nineteen years ago)

Goddamnit, the Fiery Furnaces are the worst fucking band on the planet, people

Stephen Bush (Stephen B.), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 09:09 (nineteen years ago)

i.e., please stop comparing Ys to Blueberry Boat, you jerks

Stephen Bush (Stephen B.), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 09:09 (nineteen years ago)

Sure, get lost in it. Feel the magic. It's like a sandra bullock romantic comedy, (but sandra REALLY IS THAT CUTE IN REAL LIFE), you either get lost in it or you don't.

Huh? Joanna Newsom? Sandra fucking Bullock? "CUTE IN REAL LIFE"? Is this some exercise in automatic writing?

Turangalila (Salvador), Tuesday, 14 November 2006 09:34 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.