oh but yes Jay and I are brothers. and Quitty from the Tight Bros/Nudity/a million other Olympia bands is our cousin. and Ev and Ryan from 12 Rods are also our cousins.
and now you know the family tree
― Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 25 July 2008 23:24 (seventeen years ago)
I sent you a record? Great! even better that you dug it. I am not into bummer trips and the only good Flaming Lips is oooooooooold Flaming Lips
― Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 25 July 2008 23:25 (seventeen years ago)
my brother looks like this.
http://a739.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/55/l_4e620128eb9062dbd19cb35ace2a9922.jpg
― scott seward, Friday, 25 July 2008 23:26 (seventeen years ago)
"quebecor, who i work for, pretty much prints everything in existence"
We used to print there, but now we've switched to Transcontinental, who are in Boucherville, Quebec. Because Quebec PRINTS EVERYTHING EVER. (One of the funny things is that some of our issues, we can't sell in Canada, but we can print 'em there).
― I eat cannibals, Friday, 25 July 2008 23:28 (seventeen years ago)
and this:
http://a570.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/64/l_066f11729b0fa0ed6649f3492161ff51.jpg
― scott seward, Friday, 25 July 2008 23:28 (seventeen years ago)
my name is actually Rusty Shackleford
weird, that's my name, too!
i saw your ex-band play at cafe du nord circa 2001?
it was fun. there was a saxophone and stuff
you guys committed!
i don't ask for anything else
also, best flyer artwork ever!
― dell, Friday, 25 July 2008 23:29 (seventeen years ago)
aw thanks
― Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 25 July 2008 23:36 (seventeen years ago)
why ain't Dan been posting lately, Scott?
― Merdeyeux, Friday, 25 July 2008 23:46 (seventeen years ago)
I was gonna say - isn't that dan bunnybrains?!?
― Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 25 July 2008 23:47 (seventeen years ago)
I wish everyone used their real names.
― Mark Rich@rdson, Saturday, 26 July 2008 00:03 (seventeen years ago)
danny is busy on a top secret project that will blow the musikal underverse away. for real. and he is busy opening up a new store space in hudson.
― scott seward, Saturday, 26 July 2008 00:29 (seventeen years ago)
dell - yup, dale pendall is on the list, fer shure.
― jaybabcock, Monday, 4 August 2008 15:37 (seventeen years ago)
tl;dr
the interview just reads like the usual thing where someone gets bored of living somewhere but makes up some b.s. grandiose reasons for why they're moving. i do this all the time re: richmond, va., except in that case all the grandiose reasons are true
― n/a, Monday, 4 August 2008 15:43 (seventeen years ago)
n/a - yup, it does read that way, doesn't it?
― jaybabcock, Monday, 4 August 2008 15:49 (seventeen years ago)
kinda yeah
― remy bean, Monday, 4 August 2008 15:49 (seventeen years ago)
ny vs. la, sydney vs. melbourne, seattle vs. portland, zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
― Mackro Mackro, Monday, 4 August 2008 15:55 (seventeen years ago)
i don't mean that to be rude at all -- hell, i was an arthur subscriber and adherent -- but the thing is that any city, any town, any lugar is at best a muttly mix of neutral charges, plus charges, and minus charges. and when people leave a place, any place, they often try to encapsulate, crystellize, codify their experience in that geographic/cultural/political/social landscape too glibly, reductively, authoritatively in a way they would not if they still lived there. seeking closure through final judgement. metropolitan post-partum.
contributing to the characterization of a departed city is, i am certain, a predominantly biographical act. if homages (any stripe -- encomium or excoriating) are read as treatise on their location, taken immediately as what they're written, they are sure to come off as grandiose. if they are taken as personal narratives of leaving proxied through places they are ostensibly about, they can offer a whole lot more.
― remy bean, Monday, 4 August 2008 15:57 (seventeen years ago)
remy - coke v pepsi, blahblah. totally agree.
― jaybabcock, Monday, 4 August 2008 15:58 (seventeen years ago)
oops meant mackro not remy
― jaybabcock, Monday, 4 August 2008 15:59 (seventeen years ago)
remy - yup
― jaybabcock, Monday, 4 August 2008 16:02 (seventeen years ago)
Has anyone on here with a subscription already received the latest issue (the one with Spiritualized)?
I'm still waiting on mine...
― Moodles, Saturday, 23 August 2008 02:11 (seventeen years ago)
http://www.arthurmag.com/
01/09/2009A NOTE ABOUT ARTHUR MAGAZINE'S FUTURE, FROM ITS EDITOR/PUBLISHER.Hey gang--
I am done with self-publishing Arthur, which I've been doing since July, 2007. It's too much work for one person to edit, publish and manage a national magazine, month after month, year after year.
If/when a publishing partner appears, and so on, Arthur will return to print.
That could be in three days, three months or three years.
Or never, given how the internet plus leveraged capital has hollowed out almost all existing analog mass media in favor of stuff that, in almost all cases, is qualitatively worse for almost everybody.
Anyway, we're gonna hibernate the mag for the time being, and focus on the stuff that doesn't have as much financial risk or management burden. Thanks to the work of a lot of Arthur folks, the arthurmag internet presence will upgrade and expand greatly in the coming days. Also, two new cds and a dvd are being prepared, the book(s) are on the way, and so on.
We're staying busy, staying focused on what we can handle, and pushing homegrown counter-culture forward. We hope you can, too.
And if you need more Arthur mags right now...well, there's 31 back issues available in the store.
All love and R.I.P. Ron Asheton,
Jay Babcockeditor/publisher, Arthur Magazineedi✧✧✧@arthur✧✧✧.c✧✧
― maura, Friday, 9 January 2009 18:42 (seventeen years ago)
Hmmn.
― Alex in SF, Friday, 9 January 2009 18:45 (seventeen years ago)
Open an Arthur Store on the Mendocino Coast, have a little club next door, and all will be good.
― Eazy, Friday, 9 January 2009 19:00 (seventeen years ago)
Eazy - Hahahaha! Indeed
― jaybabcock, Friday, 9 January 2009 19:29 (seventeen years ago)
Arthur Store is currently my house if anyone's wondering where their orders are
― There was even a brief period when I preferred Sally Forth. (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 January 2009 19:33 (seventeen years ago)
HAHA
― Alex in SF, Friday, 9 January 2009 19:37 (seventeen years ago)
I'm serious!
― There was even a brief period when I preferred Sally Forth. (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 January 2009 19:40 (seventeen years ago)
I know I'm just imagining the little club next to your house.
― Alex in SF, Friday, 9 January 2009 19:51 (seventeen years ago)
Hey Shakey, is the shop open?
― (*゚ー゚)θ L(。・_・) °~ヾ(・ε・ *) (Steve Shasta), Friday, 9 January 2009 19:54 (seventeen years ago)
Like, can you come by and rifle through the back issues? Not exactly. I might make a special exception in your case though...
otherwise you gotta order through the website like any other joe lunchpail
― There was even a brief period when I preferred Sally Forth. (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 9 January 2009 19:58 (seventeen years ago)
Damn. Sorry about the shitty state of publishing, Jay and Arthur. You will be missed. :(
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Friday, 9 January 2009 20:04 (seventeen years ago)
note to business model: free is not money
― Calling All Creeps! (contenderizer), Friday, 9 January 2009 20:05 (seventeen years ago)
Creeps: Eyeballs equals ads equals revenue. Etc.
― jaybabcock, Friday, 9 January 2009 20:07 (seventeen years ago)
I know, just goofin. I love the idea of a free magazine anyway, and love Arthur more. So thanks, Jay, for everything, especially for giving me a way to see Arik Roper on a semi reg basis. And for the two guys who'd drink beers and listen to racords.
― Calling All Creeps! (contenderizer), Friday, 9 January 2009 20:10 (seventeen years ago)
Creeps - Ha! Cheers for all that. We'll see what happens. I'm getting some feelers.
― jaybabcock, Friday, 9 January 2009 20:11 (seventeen years ago)
back from the dead
― the choogler and the chosen one (Shakey Mo Collier), Monday, 13 August 2012 19:46 (thirteen years ago)
Meaning this?
http://arthurmag.tumblr.com/
― Ned Raggett, Monday, 13 August 2012 19:49 (thirteen years ago)
And almost ten years to the day this thread was started...
http://arthurmag.com/2012/11/15/arthur-returns-to-life-december-22-2012/
― Ned Raggett, Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:13 (thirteen years ago)
sweet! i don't know anything about the economics of putting something like this out, but doing away with the "free" model seems like a good idea? I mean, I'm certainly willing to pay $5 for it.
― tylerw, Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:21 (thirteen years ago)
yaay :)
― obliquity of the ecliptic (rrrobyn), Thursday, 15 November 2012 15:22 (thirteen years ago)
I'm certainly willing to pay $5 for it.
me too!
― sleeve, Thursday, 15 November 2012 16:41 (thirteen years ago)
Great news
― Trip Maker, Thursday, 15 November 2012 18:23 (thirteen years ago)
YES
― Z S, Thursday, 15 November 2012 18:24 (thirteen years ago)
tylerw - This business model will work for these times. The old model had a chance to succeed, but stuff happened, and I don't have the resources to try it again...and, also, I'm not sure it would work now, given what I know of the state of advertising budgets.
― jaywbabcock, Friday, 16 November 2012 15:14 (thirteen years ago)
This is great.
― in an English way (flamboyant goon tie included), Friday, 16 November 2012 15:20 (thirteen years ago)
AND -- in this new incarnation of Arthur, everyone who contributes to the magazine ACTUALLY GETS PAID and NOBODY GOES INTO $120K OF DEBT. Very grateful to our readers for making this new reality possible.
― jaywbabcock, Saturday, 17 November 2012 02:50 (thirteen years ago)
are you looking for contributors? because i could write a monthly column about neil young bootlegs.
― tylerw, Saturday, 17 November 2012 02:59 (thirteen years ago)
this is great news!
my first thought today was wondering what arthur's coverage is gon be like in 2012 considering the underground has long since moved on from crunchy folk nu-weird off the gridism and high-art-aspirational hipster metal and is now just I HAVE A TUMBLR AND A KAOSS PAD ON NOM NOM GIVE ME ALL THE MOUNTAIN DEW MONEY
― tome crues (Whiney G. Weingarten), Saturday, 17 November 2012 03:21 (thirteen years ago)
Whiney -
http://arthurmagdotcom.files.wordpress.com/2008/04/a29cover.jpg
― jaywbabcock, Saturday, 17 November 2012 04:26 (thirteen years ago)