The album w h o k i l l by tUnE-yArDs was just named record of the year by voters in the 2011 Pazz & Jop poll.I'm guessing this doesn't mean much to more than (maybe) 10,000 people in the entire country. In fact, if you effortlessly understood 100 percent of this article's opening sentence, you can probably skip the rest of the piece.
I'm guessing this doesn't mean much to more than (maybe) 10,000 people in the entire country. In fact, if you effortlessly understood 100 percent of this article's opening sentence, you can probably skip the rest of the piece.
Took him at his word, stopped there. Seemed like an okay article to me.
― this is funny u bitter dork (forksclovetofu), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 19:51 (fourteen years ago)
Is he paid by the adverb?
― Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 19:53 (fourteen years ago)
he's paid in Trident Layers
― I spend a lot of time thinking about apricots (DJP), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 19:55 (fourteen years ago)
tuneyards will have to keep making records in the next five years so people don't laugh about her in 10? did i read that right
― Critique of Pure Moods (goole), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 19:56 (fourteen years ago)
I think so. She has to stay relevant for a while or risk being remembered as the punch-line to a "what were we thinking?" joke in 10 years time.
― o. nate, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 20:01 (fourteen years ago)
the same advice Talking Heads got after Little Creatures topped the poll, right?
― Exile in lolville (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 20:03 (fourteen years ago)
Well, Talking Heads had already established their brand pretty well by that time. Klosterman cites Arrested Development, Fischerspooner and Cornershop (whom he professes to still like) as cautionary examples.
― o. nate, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 20:06 (fourteen years ago)
that was one of the worst pieces of published writing i've ever read
obviously you don't read Grantland often
― frogs you are the dumbest asshole (frogbs), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 20:08 (fourteen years ago)
i don't really get this. i still like all the music i liked 10 years ago; i'm not embarrassed by my taste at any point in my life. the worst part of "what were we thinking" may be the "we" -- thanks for including me in your own self-consciousness, dipshit.
― m white btw (get bent), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 20:09 (fourteen years ago)
frogbs don't hurt em
― J0rdan S., Wednesday, 25 January 2012 20:09 (fourteen years ago)
(not calling o.nate a dipshit, just to make that clear)
― m white btw (get bent), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 20:10 (fourteen years ago)
full disclosure tuneyards don't really do anything for me
but klosterman doesn't really bring any content here. i wrote out his argument in one sentence and it really doesn't hang together that way either
full disclosure i think he's a dunce
― Critique of Pure Moods (goole), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 20:12 (fourteen years ago)
lurking unexamined under his whole style is a lot of nixonoid worry about 'the direction of the culture'
― Critique of Pure Moods (goole), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 20:15 (fourteen years ago)
i wrote out his argument in one sentence and it really doesn't hang together that way either
Pretty much true of all the grand theories that Klosterman advances in his pieces. He's a poor man's Dave Barry not Foucault - don't over-think it.
― o. nate, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 20:17 (fourteen years ago)
Cornershop (whom he professes to still like)
i wonder if the album these guys came out with this year is better than w h o k i l l
― uncle acid and the absquatulators (Drugs A. Money), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 20:18 (fourteen years ago)
it's a really bizarre piece of writing--he goes in doing a sort of faux-naive i'm going to listen to this without context thing and proceeds to.....consider her career in a larger context!
― call all destroyer, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 20:21 (fourteen years ago)
merrill should call her next album "n a t u r e a b h o r s a v a c u u m"
― m white btw (get bent), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 20:24 (fourteen years ago)
When you read a critical assessment of a CD, movie, book, if the writer has done his or her job, at the end of the review, you will say to yourself, "I should listen to that CD" or "I should see that movie" (if it's a positive write-up). When one reads Chuck Klosterman, one doesn't think, "I really ought to see this movie." One thinks: "Gee, I sure would like to hit that fucking douche bag Chuck Klosterman in the head with a crowbar."
― frogs you are the dumbest asshole (frogbs), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 20:28 (fourteen years ago)
haha who said that
― Critique of Pure Moods (goole), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 20:29 (fourteen years ago)
theres a pretty great (and unnecessarily cruel) article on Klostermann up somewhere, which I didn't find, but I found this:
http://dmbysc.blogspot.com/2006/09/klosterfuck-or-if-this-is-voice-of-my.html
― frogs you are the dumbest asshole (frogbs), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 20:32 (fourteen years ago)
here's the thing about Klosterman, he actually wrote in a book that Rush were "tree huggers" and possibly a Christian band because they wrote the song "The Trees," which either proves he never ever paid attention to the lyrics or even heard the song, which is such an obvious Ayn Rand polemic it's not even funny
― the 500 gats of bartholomew thuggins (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 20:45 (fourteen years ago)
i wonder if the album Cornershop came out with this year is better than w h o k i l l
It's great!
― polyphonic, Wednesday, 25 January 2012 20:47 (fourteen years ago)
also big ups 2 brute heart!
― the 500 gats of bartholomew thuggins (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 20:47 (fourteen years ago)
this is really Klostermann's shtick, he often readily admits that he doesn't pay much attention to the stuff he reviews or doesn't care much about it, instead choosing to talk about himself and what it all means, man
― frogs you are the dumbest asshole (frogbs), Wednesday, 25 January 2012 20:50 (fourteen years ago)
man, i wish i could care about this. alas.
on a much lighter note; imagine my surprise when i navigated to ESPN to watch NBA highlights and saw a picture of tUNEYARDs. *triple-take*
write about sports, plz.
― dronestreet, Thursday, 26 January 2012 01:07 (fourteen years ago)
Folks who read Klosterman deserve everything they get.
Whokill was the 2011 version of Blueberry Boat for me. Inexplicable but compelling. I wish there were more albums like this out there than nth-generation indie rock landfill.
(ignoring the T-Y spelling restrictions. It reminds me of the Sarah Jessica Parker character in LA Story. Yes I spell fIREHOSE, Firehose.)
― Stockhausen's Ekranoplan Quartet (Elvis Telecom), Thursday, 26 January 2012 01:39 (fourteen years ago)
fight the real enemy http://i.imgur.com/zi7hd.gif
― dave cool, Thursday, 26 January 2012 01:43 (fourteen years ago)
nobody gives DâM-FunK shit for his capitalization. :-(
― m white btw (get bent), Thursday, 26 January 2012 01:44 (fourteen years ago)
or hyphenation, even.
dave cool, what is it that you don't like about tune yards, since you're being friendly
― this is funny u bitter dork (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 26 January 2012 02:19 (fourteen years ago)
Hey I wonder if I can listen to Blueberry Boat on Spotify...
― uncle acid and the absquatulators (Drugs A. Money), Thursday, 26 January 2012 02:27 (fourteen years ago)
(Sorry I didn't mean to cross post that!)
― uncle acid and the absquatulators (Drugs A. Money), Thursday, 26 January 2012 02:28 (fourteen years ago)
i haven't listened to that record in years. no idea what i would think of it now.
― call all destroyer, Thursday, 26 January 2012 02:39 (fourteen years ago)
dave cool, what is it that you don't like about tune yards, since you're being friendly --this is funny u bitter dork (forksclovetofu)
im not going to say anything bad about tune-yards. she works very hard and doesn't need people on the internet bringing her down!
― dave cool, Thursday, 26 January 2012 03:24 (fourteen years ago)
That's why they call him Dave Cool.
― do you not like slouching? (Eazy), Thursday, 26 January 2012 03:36 (fourteen years ago)
ha, i will need to get dinner with dave cool so we can discuss this in an a LESS COOL environment
― this is funny u bitter dork (forksclovetofu), Thursday, 26 January 2012 04:41 (fourteen years ago)
true story: i discovered ilx in 2003 by googling "chuck klosterman"
― fuckhead (latebloomer), Thursday, 26 January 2012 09:23 (fourteen years ago)
― dronestreet, Wednesday, January 25, 2012 7:07 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
NO! the only good thing about klosterman writing about music is that it prevents him from writing about sports!
― the 500 gats of bartholomew thuggins (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, 26 January 2012 18:03 (fourteen years ago)
I had no problem with it ideologically....
― EveningStar (Sund4r), Thursday, 26 January 2012 19:22 (fourteen years ago)
Seriously, the guy gets paid to write that shit?
Also WTF @here's the thing about Klosterman, he actually wrote in a book that Rush were "tree huggers" and possibly a Christian band because they wrote the song "The Trees," which either proves he never ever paid attention to the lyrics or even heard the song, which is such an obvious Ayn Rand polemic it's not even funny
Without even thinking, I can name five explicitly atheist Rush songs. It's one of their core lyrical themes! (And the singer's family background is Jewish on top of that.)
― EveningStar (Sund4r), Thursday, 26 January 2012 19:27 (fourteen years ago)
how can someone be a know-it-all and a know-nothing all at once?
i really liked the one klosterman piece in grantland about a crazy basketball game he saw at a ND junior college tournament. but it conspicuously had like three other SI staff listed under 'additional reporting'
― Critique of Pure Moods (goole), Thursday, 26 January 2012 19:31 (fourteen years ago)
"tUnE-yArDs/Phish Sandwich" is a new mash-up album that blends the Oakland crooner's eclectic stylings with the beloved jam band's extended improvs.
― A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Friday, 13 April 2012 16:34 (fourteen years ago)
lol omg i need to hear this
― heated debate over derpy hooves (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Friday, 13 April 2012 16:41 (fourteen years ago)
iiiiii think i'll pass
― boy, was that Dan Fielding hungry for some cake! (forksclovetofu), Friday, 13 April 2012 16:42 (fourteen years ago)
oh come on this could be the greatest musical team-up since Lulu.
― heated debate over derpy hooves (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Friday, 13 April 2012 16:50 (fourteen years ago)
google is not turning anything like this up right now though
― heated debate over derpy hooves (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Friday, 13 April 2012 16:51 (fourteen years ago)
weird
― A Little Princess btw (s1ocki), Friday, 13 April 2012 18:56 (fourteen years ago)
http://pitchfork.com/news/46613-tune-yards-uestlove-cover-fela-kuti-for-charity/
o_O do people not get what the lyrics to "Lady" are about?
― rob, Thursday, 24 May 2012 22:25 (fourteen years ago)
Considering how smart both Questo and Merrill are, I'm pretty sure they both know what they're doing.
― heated debate over derpy hooves (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 24 May 2012 22:28 (fourteen years ago)
ok, maybe these two are "smart" enough to have found a way in 2012 to cover a song that castigates Europeanized African women for claiming mastery over men while celebrating African women who know their proper subservient place. I'll admit I love "Lady" with all its problematic, macho, patriarchal awfulness--it's definitely, and unfortunately, one of his best songs--but I wouldn't go anywhere near it if I was a musician. the only way to redeem it is to put it in the context of Fela's anti-colonial sentiments, which I would guess would be hard to put across in a cover.
― rob, Thursday, 24 May 2012 22:55 (fourteen years ago)