what happens if SOPA passes?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1353 of them)

my job for awhile involved doing just that sort of thing with uploaded videos and film and i always felt it was a complete waste of time, b/c for every youtube or metacafe there are many others out there, and it doesn't matter. what we ended up doing was youtube's monetizing system had a built-in ID, so instead of the user who uploaded potentially making any revenue on views, the revenue went right to us and the video was left up.

omar little, Thursday, 19 January 2012 22:45 (fourteen years ago)

it comes down to megaupload saying "ok we'll take it down but we need to know that it belongs to you" and that shit takes time.

Yep. Wish I knew where I saw it now, but just a couple of weeks ago I read something about a new push to streamline this whole process with a new central right database, so that all content and IP ownership (worldwide?) can be identified quickly.

Autumn Almanac (Schlafsack), Thursday, 19 January 2012 22:45 (fourteen years ago)

central rights database

Autumn Almanac (Schlafsack), Thursday, 19 January 2012 22:46 (fourteen years ago)

my guess is the future of the industry might come down to the riaa teaming up with sites like that and making money on hits. you know, fractions of pennies for each listen or w/e but better than nothing. can't beat em, join em.

omar little, Thursday, 19 January 2012 22:46 (fourteen years ago)

what we ended up doing was youtube's monetizing system had a built-in ID, so instead of the user who uploaded potentially making any revenue on views, the revenue went right to us and the video was left up.

oh wow

Critique of Pure Moods (goole), Thursday, 19 January 2012 22:46 (fourteen years ago)

it IDed on either video or audio, only way users could fuck w/it was to alter the video somehow. if you ever see a youtube video that is slowed down a little bit, it might be because they're trying to dodge that system.

omar little, Thursday, 19 January 2012 22:48 (fourteen years ago)

my guess is the future of the industry might come down to the riaa teaming up with sites like that and making money on hits. you know, fractions of pennies for each listen or w/e but better than nothing. can't beat em, join em.

In a sensible world, yes, but the RIAA and all int'l equivalents are far too greedy and old-fashioned to make it work. They're playing an all-or-nothing game by a very old set of rules.

Autumn Almanac (Schlafsack), Thursday, 19 January 2012 22:48 (fourteen years ago)

it's actually really popular that. YouTube's categorisation is in the realms of spooky -- we had a demo of it once, and it will catch snippets of things even if you try and deliberately obscure them by fucking w/the video.

Then they give you, Mr Rights Holder, this giant interface that shows all the stuff on YouTube that they reckon infringes your copyright, and you can either click through one by one taking them down, or whack a button that says "put ads on these and send me the income" xp

stet, Thursday, 19 January 2012 22:49 (fourteen years ago)

the literal "right to copy" starts to break down when the ability to copy becomes so trivial and low-cost. that's basically the whole deal we're trying to talk about.

(i've hesitated to write something like this for days now cos it seems so pedantic)

not pedantic at all, imo. that's the crux, it doesn't get talked about much in such plain terms, and it's very hard to resolve. to what extend does (or can) the "right to copy" break down?

Little GTFO (contenderizer), Thursday, 19 January 2012 22:49 (fourteen years ago)

in the end, even that system had its faults and wasn't 100% but we caught most of them i believe.

xp i feel like the riaa will get to a point where they have to do it. barring a complete shutdown of the internet, there's no way to stop it.

omar little, Thursday, 19 January 2012 22:50 (fourteen years ago)

otm, and I'm sure this is not news to anyone here but http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect

Autumn Almanac (Schlafsack), Thursday, 19 January 2012 22:51 (fourteen years ago)

Justice.gov is down, whitehouse.gov under fire too by Anonymous in retaliation

I certainly wouldn't have, but hey. (Le Bateau Ivre), Thursday, 19 January 2012 22:53 (fourteen years ago)

copyright.gov, RIAA, UniversalMusic, MPAA, all under attack right now

I certainly wouldn't have, but hey. (Le Bateau Ivre), Thursday, 19 January 2012 22:53 (fourteen years ago)

http://gizmodo.com/5877679

I certainly wouldn't have, but hey. (Le Bateau Ivre), Thursday, 19 January 2012 22:54 (fourteen years ago)

Anon says fbi.gov is next

I certainly wouldn't have, but hey. (Le Bateau Ivre), Thursday, 19 January 2012 22:55 (fourteen years ago)

holy shit

Autumn Almanac (Schlafsack), Thursday, 19 January 2012 22:56 (fourteen years ago)

nice work but I fail to see how it's going to help anyone ever

Autumn Almanac (Schlafsack), Thursday, 19 January 2012 22:56 (fourteen years ago)

True, but the amount of fire-power is amazing

I certainly wouldn't have, but hey. (Le Bateau Ivre), Thursday, 19 January 2012 22:57 (fourteen years ago)

Anonymous Anonymous @YourAnonNews

Incoming Database Dump. Get Ready #OpMegaupload

I certainly wouldn't have, but hey. (Le Bateau Ivre), Thursday, 19 January 2012 23:01 (fourteen years ago)

Amazing firepower, absolutely, but it just gives the RIAA &c. an excuse to label everyone who's anti-SOPA a terrorist.

Autumn Almanac (Schlafsack), Thursday, 19 January 2012 23:04 (fourteen years ago)

and then we've bugger-all hope of stopping the legislation.

Autumn Almanac (Schlafsack), Thursday, 19 January 2012 23:04 (fourteen years ago)

lol shots fired

the smell of Whiney's cheap perfume (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 19 January 2012 23:05 (fourteen years ago)

hadopi.fr went down

Autumn Almanac (Schlafsack), Thursday, 19 January 2012 23:06 (fourteen years ago)

http://i.imgur.com/VIvQq.gif

I certainly wouldn't have, but hey. (Le Bateau Ivre), Thursday, 19 January 2012 23:06 (fourteen years ago)

Amazing firepower, absolutely, but it just gives the RIAA &c. an excuse to label everyone who's anti-SOPA a terrorist ... and then we've bugger-all hope of stopping the legislation.

― Autumn Almanac (Schlafsack), Thursday, January 19, 2012 3:04 PM (45 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

OTFM. turning this into a war isn't going to result in increased internet freedom for anyone.

Little GTFO (contenderizer), Thursday, 19 January 2012 23:07 (fourteen years ago)

at least not in the short run

Little GTFO (contenderizer), Thursday, 19 January 2012 23:08 (fourteen years ago)

that did say "raging vagina tractors" rite xxp

Autumn Almanac (Schlafsack), Thursday, 19 January 2012 23:08 (fourteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k82kAfNlZf0

puff puff post (uh oh I'm having a fantasy), Thursday, 19 January 2012 23:08 (fourteen years ago)

OTFM. turning this into a war isn't going to result in increased internet freedom for anyone.

― Little GTFO (contenderizer), vrijdag 20 januari 2012 0:07 (16 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

But today's extreme raid on Megaupload will?

I certainly wouldn't have, but hey. (Le Bateau Ivre), Thursday, 19 January 2012 23:09 (fourteen years ago)

Anonymous didn't start any war, the war has been going on for years already.

I certainly wouldn't have, but hey. (Le Bateau Ivre), Thursday, 19 January 2012 23:10 (fourteen years ago)

ct: yeah, it will just encourage govts to clamp down harder to stamp out the terrorists (and take us all down with them).

Autumn Almanac (Schlafsack), Thursday, 19 January 2012 23:10 (fourteen years ago)

my this thread has gotten exciting

sleeve, Thursday, 19 January 2012 23:18 (fourteen years ago)

We are getting a taste of what happens if SOPA passes imo

Autumn Almanac (Schlafsack), Thursday, 19 January 2012 23:20 (fourteen years ago)

yup. There's no way the MPAA can hire -all- of these 'hackers' in time.

Milton Parker, Thursday, 19 January 2012 23:21 (fourteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L4hQnI7gMnc&feature=related

the smell of Whiney's cheap perfume (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 19 January 2012 23:22 (fourteen years ago)

well I was reading this as 'SOPA obviously not gonna pass at this point, megaupload / prob some other big busts are the consolation prize'

iatee, Thursday, 19 January 2012 23:23 (fourteen years ago)

Yesterday I was thinking how short-sighted it was of the RIAA to belittle Wikipedia, given the sheer number of people who learn about the artists and albums they purchase by going straight to the Wikipedia pages. It's so daft. It's like if Sega were to write off EB Games as a waste of space.

Autumn Almanac (Schlafsack), Thursday, 19 January 2012 23:26 (fourteen years ago)

referring to this (thanks to Ned who put me onto it)

http://cache.gawkerassets.com/assets/images/4/2012/01/xlarge_2f76ed225a8572989bb77300a2bc8e98.jpg

Autumn Almanac (Schlafsack), Thursday, 19 January 2012 23:29 (fourteen years ago)

Okay, if we can focus SOPA so that it specifically targets The Oatmeal and nothing else, I would encourage my rep/senator to vote for it

Bam! Orgasm explosion in your facehole. (DJP), Thursday, 19 January 2012 23:30 (fourteen years ago)

Really tired of the convential wisdom that Wikipedia is a terrible resource plagued by constant errors and made up "facts". Yes, of course any student or anyone that uses it as a sole source for any sort of professional research is an idiot and deserves what they get, but its a great resource to begin with and branch off from there.

jon /via/ chi 2.0, Thursday, 19 January 2012 23:32 (fourteen years ago)

its a great resource to begin with and branch off from there.

Fucking otm. As with any resource, it's important to know how to use it, and how to use it includes checking the provided citations to ensure that facts are indeed facts.

Autumn Almanac (Schlafsack), Thursday, 19 January 2012 23:34 (fourteen years ago)

i've been telling some of my students: don't copy and paste, don't quote it, but you can use it to signpost you to stuff on the net that's perfectly solid

the smell of Whiney's cheap perfume (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 19 January 2012 23:35 (fourteen years ago)

the literal "right to copy" starts to break down when the ability to copy becomes so trivial and low-cost. that's basically the whole deal we're trying to talk about.

this is what i was driving at upthread! duplication is so cheap, and so immediate, that it has inherently devalued the original product. which, in the case of movies, is something that's been a long time coming. mega-budget SFX aside, there is really no reason for movies to be as expensive to produce as they are right now. the economics are archaic, and built on the assumption that films require armies of people and materiel, and can only be shown in purpose built structures, etc. etc. digital technology hasn't just up-ended the distribution of media, it's also done the same to the actual production.

cross post with the apple thread re: FCP moving to a completely digital workflow. yeah ok some people still work with tape and need to conform to certain broadcast standards and yadda yadda yadda. who cares: we're all gonna be watching stuff digitally soon if we aren't already.

i love pinfold cricket (gbx), Thursday, 19 January 2012 23:37 (fourteen years ago)

yeah, a close friend of mine was a teacher and always blasted wikipedia for being shoddy and i was like uh some of those articles have bibliographies with like 50 references. just because your stupid idiot students copied it doesn't make it a bad resource, it makes them bad researchers

i love pinfold cricket (gbx), Thursday, 19 January 2012 23:38 (fourteen years ago)

But today's extreme raid on Megaupload will?

i don't consider the raid on megaupload "extreme", at least not yet

Little GTFO (contenderizer), Thursday, 19 January 2012 23:39 (fourteen years ago)

and wikipedia is probably the best single information resource humanity has ever devised

Little GTFO (contenderizer), Thursday, 19 January 2012 23:39 (fourteen years ago)

probably

Little GTFO (contenderizer), Thursday, 19 January 2012 23:39 (fourteen years ago)

they raided on snowboards that were dropped from helicopters

iatee, Thursday, 19 January 2012 23:40 (fourteen years ago)

pretty extreme if you ask me

iatee, Thursday, 19 January 2012 23:40 (fourteen years ago)

Xtreme.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 19 January 2012 23:42 (fourteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.