Orbital C/D

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (401 of them)
Steve if you don't have a copy by the weekend let me know and hopefully I'll whack you up a CDR in time for Saturday.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 20:55 (twenty years ago) link

Leaving England in a few hours. Leaving all the CDs in storage. Thought I'd take a 'special' one. Couldn't decide, there's hundreds. Time running out. Which one did I really need, which one demanded to be taken? 'Insides' it was. Which under True-Life-Emotionally-Fraught-Situations testing qualifies it as my favorite CD of the last ten years. See y'all next time around.

dave q, Wednesday, 5 May 2004 21:53 (twenty years ago) link

Well goddamn. Dave Q trumps us all. Again.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 21:55 (twenty years ago) link

indeed, bon voyage mr q

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 22:22 (twenty years ago) link

WTF?! Dave Q is leaving England?

Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 6 May 2004 07:25 (twenty years ago) link

He is, sadly. I think he's off back to Canada.

Sick Nouthall (Nick Southall), Thursday, 6 May 2004 08:54 (twenty years ago) link

Is that where he's from originally? Where in Canada?

I'm listening to the whole of the Blue album for the first time. I admit I don't remember a thing about Middle of Nowhere, which was the last time I bothered listening to their work, but I know it was nowhere NEAR as interesting as this Blue album stuff. "Acid Pants" still hits me the wrong way - kind of a poor cousin to Satan and other things they've done in the same vein, I think, but other than that, I'm pretty well flabbergasted by this. There IS a small element of the first album in it, I think, in it's raw primitive weirdness. But I think this is a good thing.

I really owe you ilxors this, I mean, if it weren't for this thread, Orbital probably would have remained a very pleasant memory for me.
It feels really nice to return to them after so many years. I've also kindof put some demons in my personal life to rest lately, and it just feels right to revisit these guys who once meant the whole world to me. Thanks.

I'm terribly jealous of those who can catch the last shows, but I guess I shouldn't be. I saw them at least three times, and I feel lucky/grateful just for that.

bimble (bimble), Friday, 7 May 2004 03:24 (twenty years ago) link

Here's my theory concerning the song "Initiation": Orbital took every single molecule of LSD on the planet, melted it all down, poured it inside their instruments and...

bimble (bimble), Saturday, 8 May 2004 04:23 (twenty years ago) link

hmmmmm, dunno if this is better than The Altogether...

'You Lot' is classic Orbital tho, awesome stuff - it has that sinister aspect i tend to find unnerving, i find it very macabre tho of course that's the point - but there's that point where it all's really kicking off that must rank up there with all time great Orbital moments, and the effects on the vocal do remind me of BOC's '1969' too. 'Initiation' would be my other big fave. and i like 'Transient' as it's something a little different. find 'Acid Pants' a bit dull/done. 'One Perfect Sunrise' is too Dreadzone/new-agey for my liking.

stevem (blueski), Monday, 17 May 2004 13:33 (twenty years ago) link

boy i want this. boy i want this. FUCK i want this.

Forksclovetofu (Forksclovetofu), Monday, 17 May 2004 17:15 (twenty years ago) link

So essentially there are three tracklistings floating around at the moment

Make that four, woops five!!!

Po, Wednesday, 19 May 2004 13:30 (twenty years ago) link

Those two are just the one Matt DC had with "Technologique Park" and a couple of remixes/edits stuck on the end. I'm still favouring what it says at www.loopz.co.uk.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 14:00 (twenty years ago) link

Blimey, you could make a mini-LP with what's left after taking away the official tracklisting!!!!

Old Fart!!! (oldfart_sd), Wednesday, 19 May 2004 14:19 (twenty years ago) link

one month passes...
*bump*

(blue in shops today)

zebedee (zebedee), Monday, 21 June 2004 12:23 (nineteen years ago) link

Just got it and listened to it briefly on my dinner hour, it sounds okay but it lacks the class of the brown album and Insides.

Ste (Fuzzy), Monday, 21 June 2004 14:50 (nineteen years ago) link

only three tracks on 'Blue' i really like - 'Transient', 'You Lot' and 'Lost'

i want to hear the Ray Keith remix of 'Chime'. only just saw Dan's mentioning of it!

stevem (blueski), Monday, 21 June 2004 14:52 (nineteen years ago) link

'You Lot' is included on one of the CD singles for 'One Perfect Sunrise' which might just be the worst Orbital single ever. apparently the video is a montage of other Orbital videos and performances. They should've done that with 'Frenetic', and 'Frenetic' is really the perfect last Orbital single imo but i don't suppose they will play it at Glasto :(

stevem (blueski), Monday, 21 June 2004 14:54 (nineteen years ago) link

So is there an American release date offing over the horizon?

Leeefuse 73 (Leee), Saturday, 26 June 2004 22:20 (nineteen years ago) link

And which is the official tracklisting?

Barry Bruner (Barry Bruner), Saturday, 26 June 2004 23:48 (nineteen years ago) link

Come on now, pertinent questions awaiting!

Leeefuse 73 (Leee), Monday, 28 June 2004 22:21 (nineteen years ago) link

1. Transient
2. Pants
3. Tunnel Vision
4. Lost
5. You Lot
6. Bath Time
7. Acid Pants
8. Easy Serv
9. One Perfect Sunrise

Is the official tracklisting, and the awesome "What Happens Next" is a b-side.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 06:49 (nineteen years ago) link

barry, any idea when it's available up here¿

dyson (dyson), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 13:04 (nineteen years ago) link

Or down here, for that matter?

Leeefuse 73 (Leee), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 21:58 (nineteen years ago) link

but more importantly - up here¿

dyson (dyson), Tuesday, 29 June 2004 22:41 (nineteen years ago) link

Unfortunately I don't know ... since d/l'ing my version from slsk I haven't thought much about it.

Barry Bruner (Barry Bruner), Wednesday, 30 June 2004 02:50 (nineteen years ago) link

They've broken up.

the music mole (colin s barrow), Wednesday, 30 June 2004 02:51 (nineteen years ago) link

Oh right, sorry, shoulda read the thread.

the music mole (colin s barrow), Wednesday, 30 June 2004 03:16 (nineteen years ago) link

Hey Colin, supposedly they have a new album coming out!

Picard Maneuver (Leee), Wednesday, 30 June 2004 04:33 (nineteen years ago) link

When I asked my ye aulde shoppe, they said July. I don't want to believe this.

Picard Maneuver (Leee), Thursday, 1 July 2004 18:05 (nineteen years ago) link

Well, he could be forgiven. Time is running out to read threads, here.

Bimble (bimble), Thursday, 1 July 2004 20:37 (nineteen years ago) link

I used to rate Orbital in my fav 3 acts of all genres, but it's not regrettable that they decide to split up after all this time. A friend once told me she thought Orbital embodied that big fork in the road ca. 1992, when the rave scene split between those who defered to the tee-pees of electronica's alt 'sprituality', and those who stayed with the grittiness of the urban scene. I'd have to agree.

So much of their music is majestic and ethereal (my fav being the live version of Out There Somewhere - Irvine Plaza live mix), but it's that same tone that's increasingly made them feel a little too fuzzy to maintain their pull/relevance.

I've since developed more of an appetite for tension in sound and themes, to excite a sense of the present moment, rather than the remember-a-time-when-chillouts-were-so-psychedelic-man type nostalgia that pines for great present moment's of years passed.

Stephen Stockwell (Stephen Stockwell), Friday, 2 July 2004 01:53 (nineteen years ago) link

"Out There Somewhere" is fuzzy = the song takes several minutes to make its statement, the entire song is a big tease with little in the way of a euphoric moment like the opening notes of "Chime". Its great moments are smeared over several minutes, you have to wait a long time for the song to "deliver".

But that's just one song -- I'd say that "The Box" and "PETROL" (also from In Sides, of course) provide plenty of tension and immediacy.

(I may have completely misunderstood your argument, though)

Barry Bruner (Barry Bruner), Friday, 2 July 2004 03:16 (nineteen years ago) link

What do you mean by "relevance"?

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 2 July 2004 03:27 (nineteen years ago) link

I think he was saying that "OTS" takes so long to reach its climax that the rush becomes lost along the way. (I disagree with this, btw).

Let's face it -- "OTS" is as proggy as techno gets. Not everyone wants to sit through a 26 minute techno opus about alien abduction as an allegory for the crucifixion. Sometimes you just want to play the last four minutes of "Impact USA" over and over.

Barry Bruner (Barry Bruner), Friday, 2 July 2004 03:32 (nineteen years ago) link

Relevance as in - is there still a context for Orbital's kind of 'quirky'/playful/ethereal sound these days? How can it be used?

OTS might be a bit of an electro-cinematic extreme, but I'm also thinking of The Tranquilizer and Sad But New.

The most recent piece from them that I heard was "Ska'd For Life" on their Back to Mine mix. They were still all about exploring that gluey membrane between pop/electronica genres - which I've loved for many years - but while I agree a lot of their gear has a strong sense of immediacy, it just seems to suffer a lack of critical intensity that other producers seem to understand better.

Stephen Stockwell (Stephen Stockwell), Friday, 2 July 2004 04:20 (nineteen years ago) link

Excepting maybe Impact and Oolaa.

Stephen Stockwell (Stephen Stockwell), Friday, 2 July 2004 04:23 (nineteen years ago) link

I could imagine an alternate history Orbital post-Middle of Nowhere drifting closer and closer towards an expansive, "psychedelic" electro-techno sound that might have complemented nicely the more epic tendencies of the pearson/tiefschwarz/black strobe etc. etc. end of electro-house. Certainly tracks like "Know Where To Run" and "Nothing Left" had effective enough hooks, and the beats were on the whole pretty tough and simple.

I think I've said this before though.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Friday, 2 July 2004 04:28 (nineteen years ago) link

OK, I was way off base with my understanding of your comments (although I stand by the stuff I ended up writing).

The Altogether was far too quirky/playful for my liking. They were trying to recapture the spirit of 1990. Too much "hands in the air" stuff.

Barry Bruner (Barry Bruner), Friday, 2 July 2004 05:11 (nineteen years ago) link

"Technologicque Park" to thread, obviously.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Friday, 2 July 2004 05:14 (nineteen years ago) link

Regarding the "relevance" of the quirky/playful stuff, the popularity of "Music Has the Right To Children" (and it's many clones) and Kid606/Tigerbeat6 indicate that this sort of music remains relevant to some people. If this music focused more on the cinematic side and less on the quirky side, I might actually listen to more of it.

Barry Bruner (Barry Bruner), Friday, 2 July 2004 05:51 (nineteen years ago) link

"relevance" is a lie.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Friday, 2 July 2004 06:52 (nineteen years ago) link

Well, I think Stockwell raises a point that maybe needs to be said, and I don't think the brothers would be upset to hear it made: for whatever reason I do think Orbital have failed to essentially reinvent themselves. Sick Mouthy had said the new album was so good because it was a nice recap of many of their best previous moments. But they've broken no new interesting ground. Despite the fact that this break up appears to have been brought on more because of becoming just sick of each other rather than perhaps any musical reasons, I do think it might just be sheer folly for them to continue creating indefinitely more of the very same stuff they have before.

I love Orbital, but I love them like a precious beautiful piece of porcelain on the mantelpiece which will essentially always stay the same. They're just not one of those artists/acts/bands that are capable - at least with each other - of really moving beyond their own admittedly wonderful formula.

Incase anyone is offended by what I've said I will freely admit I haven't heard The Altogether or the soundtrack they did "Octane". But if The Altogether was their step forward, clearly to many it was little more than a step in the wrong direction.

Bimble (bimble), Friday, 2 July 2004 07:18 (nineteen years ago) link

i started making a 'farewell' mix of Orbital tracks that i might put online if it comes out good enough (a lot of the segues are niiiiiice)

stevem (blueski), Friday, 2 July 2004 09:03 (nineteen years ago) link

You see I don't get that idea of Orbital at all; with each of their albums up to and including Middle Of Nowhere they DID change what they were doing, alter the ideas they had and move forward. Sure, you could always tell it was Orbital, but this was because it was a development and progression rather than a revolution. Part of my problem with The Altogether was that it almost seemed as if they'd run out of ideas and ways to change, and had in part headed backwards ("Funny Break") and in part taken wrong decisions / given in to cliché (the David Gray thing / "Dr"). With the new one it's as if they recognise that this entropy was unassailable and so decided to make an album that didn't even TRY to broach new ground ("Transient" excepted), but rather sounded so much like their older material that it could almost be an homage or tribute, and thus give older fans a kind of retroactive buzz rather than the excitement of anything new.

But then I don't like to treat any music like "a precious beautiful piece of porcelain on the mantelpiece"; I want a certain amount of robustness alongside my beauty, a certain pragmatism with my idealism.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Friday, 2 July 2004 09:08 (nineteen years ago) link

Bath Time is horrendous

stevem (blueski), Friday, 2 July 2004 09:16 (nineteen years ago) link

the only problem with The Altogether for me is that there's just not enough to a lot of the tracks. 'Tension' should be even mightier than it is, MORE BASS MORE NOISE! things like 'Shadows' are too minimal. but 'Meltdown' and 'Last Thing' are pretty much spot on.

stevem (blueski), Friday, 2 July 2004 09:18 (nineteen years ago) link

Double XPost to Sick:

Well, I'm not sure it's fair to say they didn't *progress* along a certain path, and that's not what I meant. But let me use an example. (and you're free to say it's a bad one) I don't recall any of Orbital's albums hitting me in the gobsmackingly surprised way Radiohead's Kid A did. I do think The Box EP was the closest thing to what I might have called a real surprise from them, a broadening of the horizons. It takes a special kind of band/artist to grow to that extent, it might even take a certain brilliance they simply don't posess, and how could we fault them for that? Surely none of us are even a smidgen as brilliant as they are.

But imagine what they might do free of each other's tether? For this I am hopeful, as I'm sure they are themselves. If I felt like weeping, I don't anymore. Good for them, you know?

Bimble (bimble), Friday, 2 July 2004 09:23 (nineteen years ago) link

Oh aye, I totally agree that they've done absolutey the right thing in splitting (I actually think they would have been right to split [sorry, stop] at any point post MoN - the last two albums are nice but I could totally live without them [heck, I could live without ANY piece of music; I just doubt I would WANT to live without ANY MUSIC AT ALL]) and going seperate ways, and it'll be interesting to see what happens.

However I don't think Radiohead are a good comparison for a few reasons.

a; The 'group dynamic' is totally different to the 'fraternal duo dynamic', and almost necessitates a greater level of diverse creative input and intra-group friction leading to creative change.

b; The 'experimental rock band dynamic' is totally different to the 'techno duo' dynamic (related but different to above).

c; R'head consciously set out to change (with every record but especially) with Kid A for a myriad of reasons that would and could never influence Orbital's work.

d; Shocking and dramatic change is not necessarily more radical or worthy or 'changing' than slowly evolved, subtle change.

No two Orbital albums, to me, sound 'of a kind' in the way that Kid A and Amnesiac do.

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Friday, 2 July 2004 09:39 (nineteen years ago) link

On that last point, you are correct, however, I believe releasing Amnesiac was a mistake in the sense that it was just leftovers from the same sessions as Kid A. There is no comparison in Orbital history that I'm aware of. I'd also like to add just as a side note, that as my friends dragged me, sleeplessly along to this idea of seeing RH live, Amnesiac had just been released and was another reason why I was less than enthused about seeing them live. Bewildered, ho-hum and just trying to stay awake, RH then proceeded to completely blow my mind in a live setting, and my expectations were torn apart.

But since we're talking about Orbital, they may indeed be the kings of live performance, so...

Sick, before I peter out on this board, what's your opinion of Octane? Or is there a review I missed somewhere?

Bimble (bimble), Friday, 2 July 2004 09:50 (nineteen years ago) link

I've never really listened to it; what I've heard I see as "functional soundtrack" and little more. It's kinda like comparing my blog or Stylus with my cataloguing or "user-manual writing".

Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Friday, 2 July 2004 09:54 (nineteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.