ts for misspellings designed to infuriate sub-editors: joanna newsome v missy elliot
(the missy misspelling is far out in front because it has been going on for a DECADE now and shows no sign of slowing down EVEN THOUGH SHE SPELLS HER NAME CORRECTLY ON ALL HER SLEEVES)
i really really want to hear ys but i am not convinced that i'll like it and so am unwilling to spend money on it
― The Lex (The Lex), Thursday, 9 November 2006 10:35 (nineteen years ago)
― Nedpoleon (NedBeauman), Thursday, 9 November 2006 11:22 (nineteen years ago)
No one who's heard it here has spent any money on it, it's not out yet!
― Marmot (marmotwolof), Thursday, 9 November 2006 16:09 (nineteen years ago)
― The Lex (The Lex), Thursday, 9 November 2006 16:10 (nineteen years ago)
― NickB (NickB), Thursday, 9 November 2006 16:30 (nineteen years ago)
― Marmot (marmotwolof), Thursday, 9 November 2006 16:51 (nineteen years ago)
Dude, what kind of stick is stuck in your ass? Of COURSE people are qualified to critique her music without spelling her name correctly! What the hell does the spelling of her name have to do with her music? Moreover, my critique offered NO OPINION WHATSOEVER about whether her music was good or bad--I just said she sounded like Miss Kitty. And she does. That is all.
Touchy-ass fanboys. Sheesh.
― J (Jay), Thursday, 9 November 2006 18:43 (nineteen years ago)
― the pinefox (the pinefox), Thursday, 9 November 2006 19:05 (nineteen years ago)
― the pinefox (the pinefox), Thursday, 9 November 2006 19:07 (nineteen years ago)
― mike powell (mike powell), Thursday, 9 November 2006 19:16 (nineteen years ago)
― mike powell (mike powell), Thursday, 9 November 2006 19:18 (nineteen years ago)
Oh, I had no idea about that. I've totally been reading it as 'wise' - thought it might have been some sort of concept album about Ernie.
― NickB (NickB), Thursday, 9 November 2006 20:43 (nineteen years ago)
― Marmot (marmotwolof), Thursday, 9 November 2006 20:45 (nineteen years ago)
― bb (bbrz), Thursday, 9 November 2006 20:50 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 9 November 2006 20:57 (nineteen years ago)
― Marmot (marmotwolof), Thursday, 9 November 2006 21:01 (nineteen years ago)
yep
― bb (bbrz), Thursday, 9 November 2006 21:09 (nineteen years ago)
― Marmot (marmotwolof), Thursday, 9 November 2006 21:14 (nineteen years ago)
― Marmot (marmotwolof), Thursday, 9 November 2006 21:15 (nineteen years ago)
beep. I hit the wrong button.
(>>>>"not a defensive remark")
My apologies, son.
Of COURSE people are qualified to critique her music without spelling her name correctly! What the hell does the spelling of her name have to do with her music?
Wellll--and this observation is far removed your own neutral remark--there does seem to be an arguable correlation between the banal critiques of her vocal doses and that spare e.
― mox twelve (Mox twleve), Thursday, 9 November 2006 21:16 (nineteen years ago)
Well...searching through the thread, it looks like Edward said something about that:"The elegant sweep of movements in "Only Skin" are flattened into sequential morasses of sound. To give a specific instance, the cascasding runs during the "rolling along, among the reeds among the rushes" segment have less of an impact because of the accompanying orchestral surge."
The 16 minutes is something nice to hear when you're idle, but I would much rather repeat the live piano version because it dives right into that wonderful rhythm.
― mox twelve (Mox twleve), Thursday, 9 November 2006 21:33 (nineteen years ago)
― Space Is the Place (Space Is the Place), Friday, 10 November 2006 03:13 (nineteen years ago)
Haven't found the leaked version (HOW THE HELL aka yr torrent networks is garbage, son), so I'm just gonna pony the fuck up and buy it next week.
― Hoosteen (Hoosteen), Friday, 10 November 2006 03:21 (nineteen years ago)
― max (maxreax), Friday, 10 November 2006 05:24 (nineteen years ago)
― pisces (piscesx), Friday, 10 November 2006 12:45 (nineteen years ago)
― zippezappy (doomed), Friday, 10 November 2006 18:05 (nineteen years ago)
i agree with mark
― zippezappy (doomed), Friday, 10 November 2006 20:55 (nineteen years ago)
fantastic though isn't it? i mean head-fuckingly fantastic.
― pisces (piscesx), Monday, 13 November 2006 12:27 (nineteen years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 13 November 2006 15:34 (nineteen years ago)
It's not that I don't get it, I GET ITI just don't think it's very good
― zippezappy (doomed), Monday, 13 November 2006 15:35 (nineteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Monday, 13 November 2006 15:48 (nineteen years ago)
I swear, if she wasn't so hot, all these male rock critics wouldn't be gushing over her so much. I'm convinced they are (many of them) in love with her whole persona/image--not so much the music
People make music this amitious all the time, and much of it is worlds better, but it often comes from older trio of aging men, or a 35 year old finnish woman who's semi fat, and nobody cares...
Or they call it pretentious. It's just so ridiculous the unilateral praise for this
When I heard it back in august I thought for sure some critics would call it out for what it is, yet it seems everyone is drinking from the same fairy pool
― zippezappy (doomed), Monday, 13 November 2006 15:52 (nineteen years ago)
Long Suites, VDP and Smog peppered with harp and meandering vocals that if read without music, read like a college freshman poetry jam, don't equate = stop the world greatness.
It's just as though everyone is thinking "wow, well its' so LONG and who does that? and well, she's so young and her lyrics are so, wow! She sings about skipping stones in wading pools! and Come dance with me and monkeys and bears", and then those that think it's ridiculous train of thought garbage are dismissed as not "getting it"
I respect her intentions, but I'm more infuriated with the response
like boys just being like "I didn't know it could get this good!!"
― zippezappy (doomed), Monday, 13 November 2006 15:55 (nineteen years ago)
― pisces (piscesx), Monday, 13 November 2006 15:56 (nineteen years ago)
― Hoosteen (Hoosteen), Monday, 13 November 2006 17:59 (nineteen years ago)
Dude: they're lyrics. They're supposed to go with the music. Thus, you don't get to judge them as exterior to the music.
and then those that think it's ridiculous train of thought garbage are dismissed as not "getting it"
Dismissing it as "train of thought garbage" is exactly missing the point because her lyrics aren't "train of thought" or "stream of consciousness" which is what you mean i guess.
this isn't an exclusively male critic thing, either. Jessica Hopper (among others) loves the shit out of this album.
― max (maxreax), Monday, 13 November 2006 18:00 (nineteen years ago)
― bell labs (bell_labs), Monday, 13 November 2006 18:14 (nineteen years ago)
who's that?anyhow--I stand by what I said.
People are swooning over something I see as rather insincere, and sort of like an indie rock sham
― zippezappy (doomed), Monday, 13 November 2006 18:19 (nineteen years ago)
― pisces (piscesx), Monday, 13 November 2006 18:33 (nineteen years ago)
― kyle (akmonday), Monday, 13 November 2006 18:47 (nineteen years ago)
but insincere in what way? like, she doesn't believe what she's singing about? or like, she doesn't think what she's writing is actually very good? and not to be like a total crit douche but: since when is sincerity a mark of quality?
― max (maxreax), Monday, 13 November 2006 18:50 (nineteen years ago)
― bell labs (bell_labs), Monday, 13 November 2006 18:54 (nineteen years ago)
This is the stupid comment yet on this thread.
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Monday, 13 November 2006 18:56 (nineteen years ago)
Nevermind.
Hi Dom.
― jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 13 November 2006 18:58 (nineteen years ago)
― Marmot (marmotwolof), Monday, 13 November 2006 19:02 (nineteen years ago)
Yes, sincerity doesn't mean good or bad generally speaking. But in the case of something like this that everyone claims to be so heartfelt and real and wonderful and ground breaking and brave and bold, I just don't see that. It's a hollow shell of great artists spinning a very pretty but forgettable web around someone who knows how to sell herself and her whole wolf pelt hat freak folk wearing persona quite well.
― zippezappy (doomed), Monday, 13 November 2006 19:13 (nineteen years ago)
― Marmot (marmotwolof), Monday, 13 November 2006 19:15 (nineteen years ago)
other than the length of the songs and the orchestral arrangement I don't know what's different about this record than her last one or her earlier work. you're obviously unfamiliar with her so coming to her stuff at this point and making this declaration is more a statement on your ignorance than anything else.
― kyle (akmonday), Monday, 13 November 2006 19:32 (nineteen years ago)
you may not like my opinion, but my opinion doesn't make me ignorant you idiot
― zippezappy (doomed), Monday, 13 November 2006 20:09 (nineteen years ago)