Ashlee Simpson: Emo or Oh no?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (372 of them)
If an alien from another world appeared and earnestly asked to be shown examples of Punk Rock, i wd point to alex's heroically changeless mr.dadrock-gets-uptight declamations down decades of ilm, and say, "punk is the OPPOSITE OF THAT"

mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 15 November 2005 19:40 (eighteen years ago) link

then the alien would say "BUT YR STANCE IN RE mr ALEX IS SURELY CHANGELESS ALSO" and i wd say "and that's punk also"

mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 15 November 2005 19:42 (eighteen years ago) link

and then the alien wd say "oh NOOO i don't get it :(:(:(" and would sigh vastly as i started to claim that haha THAT IS EVEN MORE PUNK

mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 15 November 2005 19:44 (eighteen years ago) link

i like to think that if im dealing with an alien, id have more important things to talk to him about than punk rock.

JD from CDepot, Tuesday, 15 November 2005 19:44 (eighteen years ago) link

"please give me an example of punk rock"

"not until you explain why bad things happen to good people!"

'Twan (miccio), Tuesday, 15 November 2005 19:47 (eighteen years ago) link

"Twenty years from now, I sincerely doubt anyone's going to still be discussing the arguable merits of..."

= i. i want my zimmer frame and i WANT IT NOW
= ii. haha if ilm has demonstrated ANYTHING it is that in 20 years time we will still be discussing the merits of EVERYONE

i.&ii. are nicely contradictory hence mark s = punk-as-fuck

mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 15 November 2005 19:50 (eighteen years ago) link

"ok let me get this straight, you have flown 8 billion light years just to put that probe up my butt and YOU'RE askin ME abt punk rock"

in communion (my second favourite film EVAH) christopher walken discovers the aliens DISCO DANCING

mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 15 November 2005 19:53 (eighteen years ago) link

I was thinking about this thread while glancing through the Listings in this week's New Yorker and realizing that Alex, in his writing job for them, has to be very clear and concise and specific and can't go around calling Ashlee Simpson "punk rock" just because it's an interesting idea to try on. Whereas Chuck and Frank, in writing for the Voice, can test the boundaries and play with readers' expectations a bit more.

jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 15 November 2005 20:02 (eighteen years ago) link

In other words, perhaps Alex's "alien from another planet" = New Yorker reader?

jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 15 November 2005 20:04 (eighteen years ago) link

DUN DUN DUN

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 15 November 2005 20:24 (eighteen years ago) link

"they're already here!"

s1ocki (slutsky), Tuesday, 15 November 2005 20:24 (eighteen years ago) link

punk sucks

detoxyDancer (sexyDancer), Tuesday, 15 November 2005 21:10 (eighteen years ago) link

OMG Mark: Eustace Tilly!

jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 15 November 2005 21:17 (eighteen years ago) link

If by "emo," you mean trite, "confessional" lyrics, shout-sung with "feeling" over generic MOR rock music, then yes, Ashlee is super-emo.

schwantz, Tuesday, 15 November 2005 22:34 (eighteen years ago) link

I feel better already.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 15 November 2005 22:39 (eighteen years ago) link

Alex, in his writing job for them, has to be very clear and concise and specific and can't go around calling Ashlee Simpson "punk rock" just because it's an interesting idea to try on.

In other words, I'm not allowed to muck around with FACTS, specifically the FACT that Ashlee Simpson in NO WAY Punk Rock.

If an alien from another world appeared and earnestly asked to be shown examples of Punk Rock, i wd point to alex's heroically changeless mr.dadrock-gets-uptight declamations down decades of ilm, and say, "punk is the OPPOSITE OF THAT"

I've never claimed to be the embodiment of Punk Rock.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Wednesday, 16 November 2005 00:28 (eighteen years ago) link

Well, The New Yorker sucks hairy doodoo and hasn't had a punk on staff since Ring Lardner died.

In any event, this thread has been terrific and has helped me greatly in pulling my thoughts together; especially thank you to Cunga and to Phil for your descriptions of the Ashlee image.

Also, thanks to me for suckering mark s back onto ILX.

Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Friday, 18 November 2005 04:25 (eighteen years ago) link

Well, I'm not on the staff either.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 18 November 2005 04:33 (eighteen years ago) link

yes this thread was super.

now let us never speak of it again.

'Twan (miccio), Friday, 18 November 2005 04:34 (eighteen years ago) link

But the thread is incomplete of course, due to the usual ILX fadeout.

I know that someone might jump on that and tell me that you can't separate your aesthetic perceptions from your background and your psychological makeup, but what would someone be trying to establish by saying something like this?

Tim, someone (i.e., me) isn't trying to "establish" anything but rather trying to cajole, incite, inspire, badger you folks into saying why you hear a particular piece of music in a particular way. And that involves (1) describing what's going on in the music when you hear glossiness or rawness of punk or whatever, and (2) what's going on in your life that makes you hear glossiness or rawness or punk (esp. when other people are hearing something else).

Maybe social categories are aesthetic categories; it doesn't really matter to me which you use to explain the other; it does matter that you make an effort to explain - that is to say that you make an effort to communicate your experience and your ideas and that you make an attempt to explore where those experiences and ideas come from and why you in particular have and hold them. Of course, you can just spend your time stating an opinion and holding it against all comers. That's what a lot of ILX threads are, basically.

Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Friday, 18 November 2005 05:04 (eighteen years ago) link

so does she take it up the ass in jail or what?

latebloomer (latebloomer), Friday, 18 November 2005 05:33 (eighteen years ago) link

I just downloaded "La La" and listened to it a few times. For people like myself and I would imagaine a decent number of others on here, I think you hear stuff like this and, as you follow it a little bit, you're thinking, "OK, now they're trotting out this cliche; now that cliche." And you just zone out! It's understandable; you experience so much crap music that is just dud-dud-dud that you don't always recognize when a particular use of a cliche is kind of transcendent in some way.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 18 November 2005 05:57 (eighteen years ago) link

or change the radio station before you realize that particular use of a cliche is kind of transcendent, etc.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 18 November 2005 06:08 (eighteen years ago) link

Actually, having read Sang Freud's posts more closely, I agree with very little that he says, though I think he's interesting. But I often don't get his point. Ashlee lives in a blue state, by the way; I suppose she represents the red states to you, though I wouldn't know if it's the red teenyboppers that have taken to her music more than the blue teenyboppers; I assume it's the preps-in-training more than the goths- or skaters-in-training, but I don't know that for a fact. But how would Ashlee be "bringing punk to a place where there are still some unconverted to preach to"? Unconverted to what? If you're converting someone to punk, are you converting him/her to "You're gonna cry, cry, cry, come on and let me see you cry"? To "Baby oh baby burn my heart/Baby oh baby burn my heart/Fall apart babe fall apart"? Why do you assume that some of Ashlee's audience might not be there already, you know, just by being alive (wherever "there" is)?

So, everyone who votes blue is a punk, and therefore is not eligible for "conversion"?

I don't think I've heard a Steve Earle song in my life, but I'll guess that one of the reasons that Montgomery Gentry might come across as "more punk" than Earle is that they're bullies and creeps and he apparently isn't a bully or a creep. (Nowadays Montgomery is dressing his creepiness in unctuousness and piety, which makes it even creepier.) Also, my guess is that Earle doesn't rock as hard as they do. That seems to be the general opinion. By the way, Montgomery Gentry are punk way way way way WAY more often than Ashlee is. I hadn't given a thought to Ashlee's being punk until I heard "I Am Me" a couple of weeks ago and read posted on this thread that her image apparently has something to do with punk as conceived by who knows who. Montgomery Gentry don't have punk in their image. They merely act like punks. (And I don't think anyone called them "punk" at all until a couple of days ago, when for half a sentence I did, when the discussion here spilled briefly back onto the Rolling Country thread. But I'm not seeing enough of the board these days, so you may be right, that they're being touted as punks.)

What in the world is "punk traditionalism"? What's a punk tradition? Killing your girlfriend? Dyeing your hair pink and purple? (I once saw Todd Rundgren with rainbow hair, in 1974. What a punk!)

I don't see Ashlee as doing much in the way of transgression either. So what?

"it sure looks and sounds like punk is something Ashlee picked up at the mall."

Again, so what? Where's she supposed to pick it up, in a whorehouse?

Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Friday, 18 November 2005 06:18 (eighteen years ago) link

Well, The New Yorker sucks hairy doodoo and hasn't had a punk on staff since Ring Lardner died.

pauline kael, j.d. salinger, james thurber = more punk than ashlee simpson

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Friday, 18 November 2005 06:25 (eighteen years ago) link

and i kind of want to add william shawn to that list.

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Friday, 18 November 2005 06:25 (eighteen years ago) link

>someone (i.e., me) isn't trying to "establish" anything but rather trying to cajole, incite, inspire, badger you folks into saying why you hear a particular piece of music in a particular way. And that involves (1) describing what's going on in the music when you hear glossiness or rawness of punk or whatever, and (2) what's going on in your life that makes you hear glossiness or rawness or punk (esp. when other people are hearing something else).

it doesn't really matter to me which you use to explain the other; it does matter that you make an effort to explain - that is to say that you make an effort to communicate your experience and your ideas and that you make an attempt to explore where those experiences and ideas come from and why you in particular have and hold them. Of course, you can just spend your time stating an opinion and holding it against all comers. That's what a lot of ILX threads are, basically.<

Frank, do you realize how preachy and self-righteous this sounds?

Looking back at your posts on this thread, I don't see as that you've done any of this either! Where does your idea that a song like "La La" is good come from? Why do you in particular think that this is so? What's going on in your life that makes you hear it as "good?"

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 18 November 2005 07:29 (eighteen years ago) link

Yay!

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Friday, 18 November 2005 07:31 (eighteen years ago) link

Montgomery Gentry are punks how Count Bishops were punks, or maybe Dr. Feelgood. (Maybe even Sham 69 or 4 Skins, come to think of it. But more r&b.) I wonder if Albini's heard them. He might like them. (And I swear I wrote that before I just remembered that both MG and Albini cover "Just Got Paid" by ZZ Top. Actually, he might LOVE them.)

Montgomery Gentry also remind me of the Ramones:

"You Beat Your Brat (I'll Beat Mine)"

xhuxk, Friday, 18 November 2005 14:20 (eighteen years ago) link

(Then again, at their New York show at BB Kings last Friday, MG seemed totally smiley and good-natured. When they played "Just Got Paid," which was great, and I pushed through the not-nearly-punk-enough and too-tall-to-see-through crowd {described by Tom Briehan as largely "tanned, khaki-clad exurban businessmen"} toward the front of the stage, and one woman warned me that somebody might punch me in the face for it, and I patted her shoulder and told her "thanks for the concern," I was being at least as punk as MG were, if not more.)

xhuxk, Friday, 18 November 2005 14:49 (eighteen years ago) link

See also "Somebody's Gonna Get (Their Head Kicked In Tonite)," if you have no idea what I'm talking about (Count Bishops version, natch, though the Rezillos or Fleetwood Mac versions would also do.)

xhuxk, Friday, 18 November 2005 14:59 (eighteen years ago) link

Ha ha, I am playing the reissue of D.O.A.'s *War on 45* now. I forgot how good it is. ASHLEE MAY BE PUNK BUT SHE IS DEFINITELY NOT OI!!!!

xhuxk, Friday, 18 November 2005 15:12 (eighteen years ago) link

Having reread some of Frank's earlier posts, and seen that his Ashlee==punk claims are far more measured than the reaction to them, I can understand the confusion about my earlier posts. It had seemed to me that Ashlee==punk was being floated as trial balloon, partially to tweak people with a more traditional attitude about what punk is (meaning Ramones, Sex Pistols, etc.). This pushed one of my buttons, because it seems to me that when this is done, that is, when a counterintuitive claim is made about an artist's genre, the intent is usually to tweak people with an urban, college educated, mostly liberal mindset (say, Village Voice readers). Or maybe a Rolling Stone magazine mindset. And who knows if I'm even right about that -- I certainly can't even come close to proving it. My guess is that most Rolling Stone readers wouldn't consider Ashee a punk. My point was that tweaking people's preconceptions is an important thing to do, so it would be a shame if the tweaking hardened into a predictable, knee-jerk, anti-liberal line. Because if the tweaking always comes from one direction, it limits the tweakee's pool of interesting artists to an equal and opposite extent as a Rolling Stone magazine mindset limits its readers. The last thing a counterintuitive proposal should be is predictable. But in retrospect, I was clearly fighting the wrong battle on the wrong thread.

I've got Ashlee on now. Yeah, there are elements of punk, I guess. I little burr in her voice, some attitude. No more or less than, maybe, Pat Benetar, or Nancy Sinatra. One song sounds strangely like the Cardigans. Nice CD.

Sang Freud (jeff_s), Friday, 18 November 2005 15:53 (eighteen years ago) link

i dunno man, most tweakers i know don't like ashlee simpson.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Friday, 18 November 2005 15:55 (eighteen years ago) link

I'm 47. I don't know *anyone* who likes Ashlee Simpson. Except myself.

Sang Freud (jeff_s), Friday, 18 November 2005 16:05 (eighteen years ago) link

>it seems to me that..when a counterintuitive claim is made about an artist's genre, the intent is usually to tweak people with an urban, college educated, mostly liberal mindset<

Sang, where exactly do you get this idea? Why wouldn't you just think that the intent is to describe how the music sounds, what it does?

xhuxk, Friday, 18 November 2005 16:14 (eighteen years ago) link

And if you're worried about "a predictable, knee-jerk, anti-liberal line," please realize that a significant number of the people who see punk in Ashlee Simpson on this thread also see punk in Living Things. (Or at least I do. I *think* Frank does. I do know he likes them.) (Actually, "Who's more punk, Ashlee of Living Things?", might be a pretty good question.) (Living Things might be interesting merely by virtue of being 2005 "punk rockers" who ARE actual punks.) (Actually.)

xhuxk, Friday, 18 November 2005 16:21 (eighteen years ago) link

I mean Ashlee OR Living Things (whose Commie mom allegedly only let them do protest songs whilst growing up, and she'd send them *The Autobiography of Malcolm X* through the laundry chute, and now they do lots of anti-war songs AND seem to want to search and destroy etc.)

xhuxk, Friday, 18 November 2005 16:25 (eighteen years ago) link

"so does she take it up the ass in jail or what? "

wonderful. like im gonna get any work done today with that image floating around my head.

JD from CDepot, Friday, 18 November 2005 16:33 (eighteen years ago) link

Though admittely the "punks = hoods/creeps/assholes" equation might conceivably rule out some liberals. I know dorks who still believe the Clash could never have been punks, since they were more concerned with saving the world than fucking it up. So the only "real" punks are, like, say, Rancid Vat and Antiseen and GG Allin and the Didjits and Skrewdriver or whoever (the first two of whom I actually like) (and the fourth of whom I know very little about, to be honest). I've always thought that claim was full of shit, but I have to admit that calling Montgomery Gentry punks might well open up a similar door. Not sure what the answer is. (Still, MG DO feel punk to me. And Earle doesn't. And Bruce Cockburn, who says if he had a rocket launcher some sonovabitch would die, really doesn't either. But it's not just that he's a lefty; like I said, so are the Clash and Living Things.)xp

xhuxk, Friday, 18 November 2005 16:35 (eighteen years ago) link

>Sang, where exactly do you get this idea? Why wouldn't you just think that the intent is to describe how the music sounds, what it does?

Intent is a tough thing to glean from a piece of writing, so it's more like a feeling, just based on having read lots of stuff in my life. I mean, I *wish* the intent were just to describe how the music sounds. But sometimes statements are made where the intent seems to be to incite, not describe. Like when Frank says up above that Ashlee "and Shanks rock harder than the Gang of Four and Franz Ferdinand, both of which sound like toy bands in comparison," it doesn't really help me understand what Ashlee's music sounds like. Admittedly that could be because I hear Ashlee differently than Frank does, so maybe it's just that his description doesn't connect with me. For instance, to me the Ashlee CD sounds like a lush studio construction, not a band at all, per se. Even when she gets angsty, every hair's still in place. Gang of Four sound positively ferocious by comparison. Certainly there's more money behind Ashlee than Go4, so yeah, the guitars are way fatter and the drums are deeper and the vocals are centered better in the mix. But the sound of Go4 is so completely different from Ashlee’s that the comparison isn’t useful to me on a descriptive level. To say that Frank is trying to “incite” Gang of Four fans with that statement is too strong, and probably baseless. But I think there is an element of that in there, of let’s push that button and have a little bit of fun with this.

Sang Freud (jeff_s), Friday, 18 November 2005 16:35 (eighteen years ago) link

I don't think I know who Ashlee Simpson is. Is she one of those people who is very popular in America and not very much known over here?

I imagine that she is very attractive, though who knows.

OK, just scrolled up the thread and saw a picture; yes, of course she is.

the bellefox, Friday, 18 November 2005 16:40 (eighteen years ago) link

i don't see what's at stake in ashers being punk or not punk -- that's what you'd have to explain to the alien. i wouldn't wind the alien up either, you never know.

pinefox -- 'la la' is the one song people (maybe including you?) have heard. it's really, really good.

Theorry Henry (Enrique), Friday, 18 November 2005 16:42 (eighteen years ago) link

Whereas calling the Living Things "punk" is uncontroversial, and wouldn't fall into the category of writing that I'm discussing. I'm not saying that people who like to throw out counterintuitive arguments are restricted to only liking one type of music. Just that when they choose bands to tweak people with, that particular set of bands always seems to come from the same place. Or maybe I'm just easily tweaked!

xpost

Sang Freud (jeff_s), Friday, 18 November 2005 16:45 (eighteen years ago) link

No one is disturbed by the fact that in that picture Ashlee is five fingers deep in the funhouse? She's like, wrist-deep in a Georgia O'Keeffe. (You guys, I just made the best rhyme ever!)
-- Je4nn3 ƒur¥ (j...), October 23rd, 2005.


by far the most intelligent thing said on this thread, yet it continues...

JD from CDepot, Friday, 18 November 2005 16:51 (eighteen years ago) link

>that particular set of bands always seems to come from the same place. <

So what "same place" do Ashlee and Montgomery Gentry come from again?(Like, the United States? So do Living Things!) You're stating a tautlogy, I think: "When certain writers define bands as part of genres the bands are usually not associated with, those bands come from genres other than the one they're being newly defined as."

xhuxk, Friday, 18 November 2005 17:28 (eighteen years ago) link

"La La" has one part that works: the chorus. The verses just sound like Pink and the bridge feels like a merely obligatory musical digression.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 18 November 2005 17:36 (eighteen years ago) link

>when Frank says up above that Ashlee "and Shanks rock harder than the Gang of Four and Franz Ferdinand, both of which sound like toy bands in comparison," it doesn't really help me understand what Ashlee's music sounds like<

Only if it out of context, and leave out:

>the clipped-short guitar crunch style from that very same song, and when it's not the Clash it's the Specials and Gang of Four (and Franz Ferdinand, for that matter) for Shanks' snapping-twig guitar riff that runs throughout the verse. And I think Shanks plays it more effectively than G of 4 or Franz Ferdinand, both of whose guitar work I like a lot. <

Frank was describing how the record *sounds,* Sang.

xhuxk, Friday, 18 November 2005 17:47 (eighteen years ago) link

Only if you TAKE IT out of the context.

(None of which to say that writers can't describe and incite at the same time. Nor that they shouldn't. Hell, inciting is punk rock too. {And right, it's the oldest cliche on earth, just like punk rock is.} But sorry, "that's not the way I hear it, therefore this guy must be trying to pull a fast one over on me" really doesn't hold much water.)

xhuxk, Friday, 18 November 2005 17:52 (eighteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.