Okay now it just happens every single track. Its like Spotify knows it hasn't played you an ad lately, so it just keeps trying after every single song.
― jon /via/ chi 2.0, Wednesday, 24 August 2011 16:43 (fourteen years ago)
10 minute limit means White Light/White Heat with no "Sister Ray"
Yeah, although it sucks, there are at least a handful of positive aspects as well. Like that one.
― Hongroe (Geir Hongro), Wednesday, 24 August 2011 17:16 (fourteen years ago)
loooool
― markers, Wednesday, 24 August 2011 17:26 (fourteen years ago)
FUCK YOU SPOTIFY
In order to give Spotify users the best possible experience, we’re constantly improving the Spotify desktop application. Every so often, these advances push Spotify beyond the capabilities of some older Macintosh computers.
In a few months’ time, this process will affect Macs with the following system properties:
OS version: Mac OS X versions earlier than earlier than 10.5Processor: PowerPC Macintosh (regardless of OS version)
(You can find information about your own Mac by accessing "About this Mac" under the Apple menu.)
We’re really sorry if you’re affected by this change. For the time being, you can still use Spotify on these Macs – you just won’t receive new feature updates. Ultimately, Spotify will cease to be available for these systems, but not just yet.
Kind regards,The Spotify Team
― sleeve, Wednesday, 24 August 2011 22:54 (fourteen years ago)
it is really annoying when you hit clean versions of albums
― now I have to imagine your penis (DJP), Thursday, 25 August 2011 20:51 (fourteen years ago)
it'd be cool if there were some reverse parental controls type of feature where you could just say, if there's an explicit version of a song, give me the explicit version instead of the clean version
― markers, Thursday, 25 August 2011 20:53 (fourteen years ago)
Yep, fuck you Spotify. Now that I won't be able to use you on my home Mac you are completely useless to me. Kindly fuck off and I hope your business model is a failure.
― jon /via/ chi 2.0, Thursday, 25 August 2011 20:56 (fourteen years ago)
yay Spotify, thank you for catering to me and my technology magpie demographic
― now I have to imagine your penis (DJP), Thursday, 25 August 2011 20:57 (fourteen years ago)
jon why can't you use it on your home mac
― markers, Thursday, 25 August 2011 20:58 (fourteen years ago)
Well, I'm not 100% sure until I get home, but I thought I had 10.4. Now that I've done a little research, I might be okay though. But still, think that pretty much sucks that they'd just say "WHOOPS SORRY YOU CAN'T USE IT AT ALL", rather than at least trying to allow a slimmed down version or something.
― jon /via/ chi 2.0, Thursday, 25 August 2011 21:00 (fourteen years ago)
Who, in 2011, doesn't make their software at least a little backwards compatible?
Is it wrong to think this might be a little "fuck you" to Apple?
― jon /via/ chi 2.0, Thursday, 25 August 2011 21:01 (fourteen years ago)
why aren't you on 10.6?
― now I have to imagine your penis (DJP), Thursday, 25 August 2011 21:03 (fourteen years ago)
That's why I retracted a bit, I think that is what I have. Whatever, I still think its a bit of a dick move.
― jon /via/ chi 2.0, Thursday, 25 August 2011 21:03 (fourteen years ago)
spotify requires leopard, which was released in fall 2007 -- that seems reasonable
― markers, Thursday, 25 August 2011 21:03 (fourteen years ago)
It sucks, but at some point the diminishing returns of supporting older OS's and PowerPCs just don't make sense.
― L.P. Hovercraft (WmC), Thursday, 25 August 2011 21:06 (fourteen years ago)
I guess I don't understand not being on the most recent stable OS, esp in the Apple world where OS updates cost like $30
― now I have to imagine your penis (DJP), Thursday, 25 August 2011 21:07 (fourteen years ago)
like for Windows I totally get waiting until you upgrade the hardware since the OS upgrades are well over $100 but OSX is cheap
― now I have to imagine your penis (DJP), Thursday, 25 August 2011 21:08 (fourteen years ago)
I'm with you, I need to upgrade mine anyway.
I guess I just saw those numbers and thought they weren't going backwards as far as they actually are.
― jon /via/ chi 2.0, Thursday, 25 August 2011 21:11 (fourteen years ago)
― now I have to imagine your penis (DJP), Thursday, August 25, 2011 5:07 PM
this is how i break it down to an extent -- i was on lion the day it was released
i do get that some ppl have their reasons for not upgrading right away though
― markers, Thursday, 25 August 2011 21:13 (fourteen years ago)
ha yes, that is why I said "stable"
not going to Lion until 2012
― now I have to imagine your penis (DJP), Thursday, 25 August 2011 21:13 (fourteen years ago)
OTM
Sorry Spotify, I still <3 you.
― jon /via/ chi 2.0, Thursday, 25 August 2011 21:15 (fourteen years ago)
jeez they're up to 10.7 now? I never bothered to get Snow Leopard.
― dmr, Thursday, 25 August 2011 21:16 (fourteen years ago)
― now I have to imagine your penis (DJP), Thursday, August 25, 2011 11:07 PM (13 minutes ago) Bookmark
My Intel mac doesn't allow it to go beyond 10.4
― Vaginalogue Bubblebath (Le Bateau Ivre), Thursday, 25 August 2011 21:22 (fourteen years ago)
EXACTLY, and no I do not have money to buy even a used Mac from the last few years.
― sleeve, Thursday, 25 August 2011 22:33 (fourteen years ago)
same with my gf. to add to the misery, i recently bought her an iphone, but she can't put music on it because it requires a version iTunes that her Mac can't handle.
― IT IS EXECUTION (Z S), Friday, 26 August 2011 00:27 (fourteen years ago)
wait, you have an intel Mac that can't upgrade? I know the old power pc macs can't run certain software but I've never heard of an intel not being able to. Is it a ram thing? Ram is pretty cheap.
― brotherlovesdub, Friday, 26 August 2011 14:58 (fourteen years ago)
I have to believe that was a typo and he meant PowerPC.
― L.P. Hovercraft (WmC), Friday, 26 August 2011 15:04 (fourteen years ago)
yep mine is a lol 800 MHZ G4. I'm guessing I only have a year or two before I'll be forced to upgrade in some way.
― sleeve, Saturday, 27 August 2011 00:13 (fourteen years ago)
playing tracks w/o stopping today
― (gr8080), Saturday, 27 August 2011 00:14 (fourteen years ago)
listening to tori amos' boys for pele, headphones on, volume up to hear nuance, then: BOOM DANCE REMIX OF "PROFESSIONAL WIDOW" SUBBED IN FOR REGULAR TRACK!! heart attack, dead.
― FLIP FLOPPING HILL BILLY! (reddening), Saturday, 27 August 2011 08:36 (fourteen years ago)
there's nothing more amazing than watching your friends cross-pollinate on playlists
(this came up because one of my wife's opera grad school classmates is subscribed to Chris V's new jack swing playlist)
― now I have to imagine your penis (DJP), Tuesday, 30 August 2011 13:39 (fourteen years ago)
haha.
― Cindy Mancini can ride my lawnmower anytime (thebingo), Tuesday, 30 August 2011 13:52 (fourteen years ago)
If that David Guetta ad doesn't get off my screen I'm going to say a bad word.
― Halal Spaceboy (WmC), Wednesday, 31 August 2011 14:41 (fourteen years ago)
I can't wait until the get targeted ads that match up to what you listen to most often, tailored to your tastes a little better.
― jon /via/ chi 2.0, Wednesday, 31 August 2011 14:46 (fourteen years ago)
otm
the michelle branch and trancey "day-o" cover (sort of) always have me lolin' tho.
― original bgm, Wednesday, 31 August 2011 15:21 (fourteen years ago)
ugh, those two ads always have me lolin', that is.
I mean, I know its because they only have like a small handful of ads to rotate at this point, but it would be nice if the ads that popped were at least in the same genre as what you are listening to. I'd much rather have, say, an Iron Maiden ad pop up when I'm listening to a Decapitation album than Tinie Tempah, y'know? So jarring sometimes.
― jon /via/ chi 2.0, Wednesday, 31 August 2011 15:25 (fourteen years ago)
there's a pretty easy way to get rid of the ads you know...
― sonderangerbot, Wednesday, 31 August 2011 15:27 (fourteen years ago)
I've found it VERY difficult to listen to ambient/improv stuff on spotify because of the ads. totally kills the vibe.
― original bgm, Wednesday, 31 August 2011 15:27 (fourteen years ago)
can ppl REALLY not afford $5/month, cancelable at any time
― beemer douchebag (DJP), Wednesday, 31 August 2011 15:28 (fourteen years ago)
Its not the affording part, its the waiting a little bit longer for some of the bugs to be worked out before I start paying for it.
― jon /via/ chi 2.0, Wednesday, 31 August 2011 15:30 (fourteen years ago)
my excuse is that I don't have smartphone that can run the spotify app.
― original bgm, Wednesday, 31 August 2011 15:30 (fourteen years ago)
― jon /via/ chi 2.0, Wednesday, August 31, 2011 4:25 PM (6 minutes ago) Bookmark
blatant first world problems-bait
― HOOSy woosies (history mayne), Wednesday, 31 August 2011 15:32 (fourteen years ago)
is there only free and premium to choose from in the us?
― sonderangerbot, Wednesday, 31 August 2011 15:33 (fourteen years ago)
I have experienced exactly zero (0) of the bugs complained about on this thread and I jumped on the $5 train immediately. I think the ads are what is screwing people up!
Alan: the smartphone functionality is the $10 subscription; $5 kills the ads and gives you unlimited access to the library (apparently there is some time limit implementation on the free subscription level...?)
see here: https://www.spotify.com/us/get-spotify/overview/
― beemer douchebag (DJP), Wednesday, 31 August 2011 15:34 (fourteen years ago)
basically if you want the "bugs" to go away, give them $5/month!
otfm
― Crackle Box, Wednesday, 31 August 2011 15:35 (fourteen years ago)
yup the unlimited option is basically bug free, instead it's all about complaining about what albums they don't have
― sonderangerbot, Wednesday, 31 August 2011 15:36 (fourteen years ago)
they got rid of all the arthur russell reissues apart from that love is overtaking me compilation
:'( wahhh
― Crackle Box, Wednesday, 31 August 2011 15:38 (fourteen years ago)
bummer.
so, do the albums they offer drop off and come back sometimes a la netflix instant watch?
― original bgm, Wednesday, 31 August 2011 15:42 (fourteen years ago)