Rolling Teenpop 2007 Thread

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (2325 of them)
...don't want to hear Lindsay do that thing, is what I meant to type.

Nia (girlboymusic), Friday, 26 January 2007 04:19 (nineteen years ago)

1. I know what Dave's point was but I reserve my right to recontextualize it by taking it at face value, god damn it. And I think they're acting like Brat Packers instead of Rock Stars anyway. They don't tour, they don't have to go to shitholes in Flyoverland, they aren't struggling with their muses. They're just airing their ladybits and talking shit about Scarlett Johannson. Hell, even I could do that, if I had ladybits.

2. What was more popular, dance-pop Lohan or emo Lohan, is my point.

3. Check the record, yo. Just neglecting your children doesn't make you Courtney Love.

Haikunym (Haikunym), Friday, 26 January 2007 04:49 (nineteen years ago)

Teenpop != Rock Star? Or can they both exist simultaneously?

Mordechai Shinefield (Mordy), Friday, 26 January 2007 05:02 (nineteen years ago)

rockstars: David Cassidy, Young Michael Jackson, Avril Lavigne.

Haikunym (Haikunym), Friday, 26 January 2007 05:04 (nineteen years ago)

Also - what does it mean if Lohan has a 'Rock Star' persona or not. This might be way New Critical of me - but shouldn't the album *also* have to stand on its own? You can ask if the pose is on the songs, I guess.

Mordechai Shinefield (Mordy), Friday, 26 January 2007 05:05 (nineteen years ago)

I think what I might also be asking is: What does 'rock star' mean, and what's its value for understanding the music?

Mordechai Shinefield (Mordy), Friday, 26 January 2007 05:06 (nineteen years ago)

1. Point taken.

2. So if she's not popular when acting rock-y, she's not actually acting rock-y? Also, if you close your eyes, people can't see you. It's true!

3. Yeah, but neglecting your kids and getting lots of plastic surgery does. Dropping a baby is TOTALLY rock-n-roll, dude!

Nia (girlboymusic), Friday, 26 January 2007 05:16 (nineteen years ago)

Meng are endangered species in pop

Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Friday, 26 January 2007 06:24 (nineteen years ago)

Nia I think you are on the verge of making some good points but you are not reading me very carefully on point #2 so I am giving up.

Haikunym (Haikunym), Friday, 26 January 2007 12:04 (nineteen years ago)

Previous reports were false: the new Hilary Duff album will be called...DIGNITY.

nameom (nameom), Friday, 26 January 2007 18:11 (nineteen years ago)

Razzies noms:

Vying with Stone for Worst Actress will be repeat offender Jessica Simpson (nominated this year for EMPLOYEE OF THE MONTH), teen-idol (and terrible role model) Lindsay Lohan in JUST MY LUCK, newcomer Kristanna Loken in BLOODRAYNE and spelling-challenged risible siblings Hilary and Haylie Duff in MATERIALS GIRLS.

nameom (nameom), Friday, 26 January 2007 18:15 (nineteen years ago)

Has anyone heard Youtube girl Mia Rose?

What I heard, I liked. Though I'm not sure what makes her special -- didn't we also make the Arctic Monkeys famous? Or is Youtube more special than Myspace?

Mordechai Shinefield (Mordy), Friday, 26 January 2007 19:15 (nineteen years ago)

Ouch. I botched that link.


http://www.rollingstone.com/rockdaily/index.php/2007/01/25/youtube-phenom-mia-rose-has-her-thorns/

Mordechai Shinefield (Mordy), Friday, 26 January 2007 19:15 (nineteen years ago)

Mandy Barry, a talent whom Dave Bedbug found on MySpace: best tracks are the third ("bonus snippet) and the fourth, "No More," which she lets you download. Pinkish voice, an r&b bruise in it, she'll sometimes use rock instrumentation but always keeps the vocals rhythm & bruise. Unnecessarily tangles herself up in fire metaphors: "I've been put through the fire/To the point that I'm tired" (which seems an odd use of the metaphor, finding fire tiring)(unless you're a professional firefighter); she's been burned; and the love is ashes, no more flames (but didn't we establish that the flames were exhausting anyway?). But that's little matter (she can always hire a lyricist). The fuzz guitars and bruised voices push back and forth at each other, an insistent rhythm of weariness and defiance.

Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Saturday, 27 January 2007 00:45 (nineteen years ago)

Mia Rose's persona is cheery and giggly (I go more for Ava Gardner in Mogambo, the wisecracking sharpie with a lot going on inside), but cheery and giggly can be art, and is a reasonable choice. I mean, it takes all types, and I don't find her offensive. As for the music, the soft voice at the end is the best part; she's too bright-voiced earlier, but she can work on that. Or maybe she wants to be bright-voiced. If I were an investor I wouldn't sink money into her, because I don't think she's good enough, but what do I know? (Rest of the online discussion, which I got bored with and only skimmed, was about whether her name's a fake, whether YouTube viewing figures were being manipulated, if they are, whether this undercuts YouTube and the Net [why would it?], whether she's real, etc.)

The Stone writeup on Mia Rose is coyer and more irritating than she is, but in a dull journalistic way that tries to hide its tracks. "In the last few weeks, vlogs from Mia Rose, a disturbingly well-packaged 18-year-old singer-songwriter, have become some of the most-viewed videos on YouTube. Rose is a well-scrubbed but coy girl-next-door with decent guitar skills, a welcome-to-Hollywood worthy voice and a knack for bearing her midriff without seeming trashy (harder than it looks)." "Obviously this girl is manipulating the YouTube system for her own gain, but is there anything wrong with that?" Well, Elizabeth, I don't know, you're the one who called her "disturbingly well-packaged." Why don't you tell us why you think there's something wrong with it, rather than suggesting that there is and then covering your ass by rhetorically implying there isn't, and not giving a single reason one way or another? "And what do you think of the tunes?" Well, Elizabeth, what do you think of them? Pretend social analysis, pretending to rise above the slime sell while being a dull little slime sell all its own. Journalism seems full of this.

Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Saturday, 27 January 2007 01:29 (nineteen years ago)

Linda Sundblad's excellent "Lose You" has jumped to number two in Sweden. Linda was formerly in unheard-by-me Lambretta. In her previous single, "Oh Father," she asks God if the fact that she touches herself means she won't get to heaven. In this one, she's found a guy who is heaven, makes everything steamy and nice; from this she knows she'll lose him. I also recommend "Cheat," which seems to endorse the right to be murdered for infidelity.

(Writers of "Lose You" are Linda Sundblad, Tobias Karlsson, Alexander Kronlund, Klas Åhlund, the last of whom is in Teddybears STHLM and produced a lot of the most recent Robyn album. Producer of "Lose You" is Tobias Karlsson.)

Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Saturday, 27 January 2007 23:09 (nineteen years ago)

Thanks, Frank. That was definitely my reaction to the RS piece too. "Disturbingly well-packaged..." What exactly makes being well-packaged disturbing?

Anyway, I enjoyed a couple of the songs that were posted, and didn't like a few others. I think there is definitely something charismatic about the girl - very sincere. And part of why her music is interesting is because of that personality. And I think that her circumventing of the traditional artist/audience divide (which isn't unique, but nonetheless) is very charming. Though I think the question of "is she for real?" is important, just not for the reasons that RS states. I think it's important because a lot of her appeal is her authenticity - not because it's undermining expectations if she's not. (And if it turns out she's not 'real,' whatever that means, she'll be interesting for that reason instead.)

Mordechai Shinefield (Mordy), Sunday, 28 January 2007 00:13 (nineteen years ago)

We're the rebels, causing trouble
Beat us up, we don't care
We're the babies, born in the '80s
Put your hands in the air

Posing pirates, pink perky riots
Big D.P. bottles about to pop
Flamboyant peacocks, straight out of detox
And total chaos, it never stops... right?

--Linda Sundblad "Pretty Rebels"

Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Sunday, 28 January 2007 01:00 (nineteen years ago)

Songwriters of "Pretty Rebels": Linda Sundblad, Tobias Karlsson, Alexander Kronlund, Max Martin. Producer: Tobias Karlsson. (Excellent echo effects, which make her sound like a gang in conversation with itself.)

Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Sunday, 28 January 2007 01:06 (nineteen years ago)

Oh yeah, the question "is she real?" is important (I'm not one of the people who thinks "Oh, ho hum, it's time to get over thinking about authenticity), but not the question whether Mia Rose's name is the one on her birth certificate, which is what some of the commenters were going on about. There's also a question as to whether she might be an actress playing Mia Rose (as opposed to a girl who's taking on the performing persona Mia Rose, as Bob Zimmerman took on the performing persona Bob Dylan; though actress playing a role and person taking on a persona, not to mention person presenting herself to others in the normal course of life, aren't different orders of being from one another, and one can bleed into the other). As for the question of "realness," when people ask it they don't seem to know what they're asking, or why they're asking it, though the Hero Story I've alluded to on my livejournal has little to do one way or another with whether someone makes calculations and adopts poses, but rather whether one takes risks and courts opposition.

Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Sunday, 28 January 2007 01:24 (nineteen years ago)

Isn't that the issue with asking "is she real" though Frank? The fact that people use it to ask the wrong (or, rather, muddled) questions, while the right questions can be asked using different words?

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Sunday, 28 January 2007 01:49 (nineteen years ago)

Tim, in the context of the question, it's obvious what they're asking. RS is clearly asking: Is this a corporate employed woman or authentically a DIY normal YouTube user? If someone was saying the same thing about Hillary Duff, they might mean a different kind of 'real' (ie: is she responsible for her own image?). About Paris Hilton, you might have a variation on that - or merely the question: Is this serious art? ('real' becoming synonymous with 'serious' - the quotations on serious indicated that's once again according to the asker of the question.)

If RS asked the first question outright, would you still consider it muddled?

Mordechai Shinefield (Mordy), Sunday, 28 January 2007 04:09 (nineteen years ago)

Wait a minute, though, the concerns about Mia Rose are very specific -- an outside source is creating dummy accounts on Youtube to inflate her "subscriptions." Anyone could technically do this, so in that sense it doesn't "undercut" anything, but it still understandably rubs Youtube users the wrong way.

If it is a marketing plan by a major label (or something) it was pretty poorly thought out since Youtube tracks the number of videos you watch, making inflation transparent to anyone patient enough to compile a montage of it happening (that's a link from Idolator, less nasty write-up than the RS one). So I can't say that the "anti-manufactured" tone is justified, but it is justifiable to say that whoever's aiding her popularity is doing it by creating the false appearance of grassroots democratic consensus. I'll bet it offends people as vote-tampering as much as it might as a "just another coporate manufactured pop star" story.

nameom (nameom), Sunday, 28 January 2007 07:13 (nineteen years ago)

The Youtube commenters to the video I linked are more to the point:

kokokokoii (12 hours ago)
no matter what was really going out there, these are what possible to happen in the future:

1)She is a cheater, and will never release any album.
2)Her is talent and has a attractive voice. There will be a company to contact her soon.

The reason for one to subscribe is because of her singing not the numbers or ratings. Why you wasted you time doing this?

nameom (nameom), Sunday, 28 January 2007 07:17 (nineteen years ago)

Well -- I understand why she cheated. Even if she's got a beautiful voice (I think it's pretty) and good songwriting chops (I find them enjoyable) -- it's hard to get heard. Obviously it's easier than ever, but I imagine with the thousands of myspace babies, it's still harder to get recognized than you think. If this isn't corporate, it's a good way to get buzz (and from what I understand, music companies are in contact with her). If it's corporate done - it's odd. Why not just go the normal route? The dummy accounts aren't /actual/ people buying albums.

Mordechai Shinefield (Mordy), Sunday, 28 January 2007 07:46 (nineteen years ago)

I think the Rolling Stone woman, Elizabeth Goodman, had some potentially good questions to ask, but she was too busy trying to convey attitude via code words - "a knack for [baring] her midriff without seeming trashy (harder than it looks)" (by which Elizabeth is suggesting something, but not being clear what it is) - rather than genuinely saying what she was trying to say and figuring out what she wanted to ask. What's wrong with Elizabeth Goodman that she feels that she has to do this, perhaps doesn't even know that she's doing it, it's so standard in journalism?

It was the commenters, not Elizabeth, who brought up the dummy sites and the inflated subscriptions (unless Elizabeth was using her code words to try to suggest those, as well). I think that the - good - question she's trying to ask isn't "Is Mia diy or is she corporate?" but rather "No matter whether Mia is an actress playing a part, a singer coached on how to present herself, or someone who's in charge of her own presentation - or is even guilelessly being 'herself' - what's wrong with her trying to appeal to an audience?" This is a good question because sometimes there is something wrong, and also there's a deep culture-wide uneasiness with anything being straight-up appealing, as if pleasing an audience contaminates you.

As to the first point (whether there's sometimes something wrong), I think there's something wrong with the way Elizabeth Goodman is trying to appeal to her readers, so I'm not averse in principle to claims that there's something wrong with how Mia Rose is trying to appeal to viewers. As to the second point (a culture-wide uneasiness, that I share), that's what a good deal of my book is about, and so I hope that if you find my posts appealing you'll go out and buy my book (I get a dollar for every copy sold, and I need the money).

Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Sunday, 28 January 2007 21:38 (nineteen years ago)

Tim, "real" and "fake" are fine words that I use all the time. "Pretend social analysis, pretending to rise above the slime sell while being a dull little slime sell all its own."
If I'm willing to say this, then I must also think that there's real social analysis that's worth doing and worth distinguishing from the fake, and that slime sells can at least sometimes be bad things. If Elizabeth Goodman is for real, she'll make her way to real social analysis. (Haven't read another word of hers, so for all I know, she's gotten there, though I wouldn't bet on it.) Tim, what words would you have me use?

There's no inherent problem with the question "Is she real?" The problems arise because the reasons given to justify the answer "No" raise a whole bunch of questions themselves, and most people are intellectually lazy and don't ask the follow-up questions. But the problem isn't with the original question.

Another good question is why the question "Is she real?" keeps popping up throughout pop culture. If you dislike the question "Is she real?" you nonetheless will want to ask why the question is so persistent. Why are people asking it?

If someone claims that the Monkees are phonies because "they don't write their own songs" [incredibly, people still say this], the obvious follow-up question would be, "well, if I consider the Monkees fake for not writing their own songs, why don't I think the Animals and Aretha Franklin - who've hit with songs by the very same songwriters the Monkees used - are also fake?" (I've never in my life heard someone argue that the Animals and Aretha Franklin were fake for not writing "It's My Life" and "We Gotta Get Out Of This Place" and "Don't Bring Me Down" and "Natural Woman.") In the mid-Sixties an answer to the follow-up question might have been, "Aretha's real because she's black and sings the music soul; the Animals are real because they come on like hoods" - these responses, in their time, would not have been dumb at all, but are so problematic that they'd have inevitably provoked further thought.

Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Sunday, 28 January 2007 22:22 (nineteen years ago)

"...sings the music with soul"

Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Sunday, 28 January 2007 22:24 (nineteen years ago)

Lloyd's song "You" f. Lil Wayne - also seen it called "Want You" - has been kicking around since late summer but is still rising on the charts: number two with a bullet on the hip-hop/r&b stations, number two with a bullet on the urban stations, number forty-three with a bullet on the Top 40 stations, number seventeen with a bullet on the Billboard Hot 100. Don't know how much further it'll spread; hasn't made the jump to adult contemporary, damned if I know why not. Lloyd's young enough - 21 - for it to go Disney, if anyone there wants it, though RD might find Wayne's rapping too much of a problem. But the song sure deserves its airplay: it's far more luscious and gorgeous than the Spandau Ballet track it samples, Wayne is clever ("I ain't talkin' fast/it's just you listenin' slow"), and Lloyd is impassioned. My friend Elizabeth Shaw, in San Francisco, would tell me that kissy male r&b like this is a Great Lie that she'd once believed: that men would have these gorgeous high feelings of pain and devotion towards a woman.

Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Sunday, 28 January 2007 22:50 (nineteen years ago)

Radio Disney's tendencies towards aesthetic and moral bankruptcy are exemplified by the following brutal fact:

THEY NEVER PLAY WEBSTAR F. YOUNG B'S "CHICKEN NOODLE SOUP."

Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Monday, 29 January 2007 03:26 (nineteen years ago)

Rolling RD 1-29-07: Top 30 So exciting! Oh wait, it's like exactly the same. "Say OK" debuts at #19, should go top ten in a week or so. Still no sign of Webstar/Young B (or Hilary, whose "With Love" is technically eligible for voting but as of yet hasn't received any promotion at all). Mailbag Kyle Massey's theme song to his Disney Channel comedy spin-off "Cory in the House" (that's the White House) not sure if it was picked or kicked (probably picked, don't care enough to wait to find out). Kinda dull round these parts lately, might be time to go once every two weeks.

nameom (nameom), Monday, 29 January 2007 04:27 (nineteen years ago)

I like "Say OK" a lot, but maybe constant RD airplay will make me tire of it. May make my year end top 50. Of the 2007 singles I've heard so far this year, only Sophie Ellis Bextor's "Catch You" do I like better (I still haven't heard Linda Sunbladt). Ugh, new Kyle Massey theme song is really bad. Or not really bad, but really mediocre.

No promotion at all for "Play With Fire" and now none for "With Love" either. I'm hoping, and choosing to believe, that they are waiting until it is closer to the release of the album before they start to push the songs hard. Maybe the sound of it is just so anti-American pop that they are just going to punt it in America.

Greg Fanoe (JustFanoe), Monday, 29 January 2007 15:31 (nineteen years ago)

Amy Winehouse - You Know I'm No Good

I know.

Mordechai Shinefield (Mordy), Monday, 29 January 2007 19:21 (nineteen years ago)

Actually, come to think of it, "With Love" is my favorite single of the year so far. Surely Kelly Clarkson's singles will put it to shame though!

Greg Fanoe (JustFanoe), Monday, 29 January 2007 21:01 (nineteen years ago)

the concerns about Mia Rose are very specific -- an outside source is creating dummy accounts on Youtube to inflate her "subscriptions." Anyone could technically do this, so in that sense it doesn't "undercut" anything, but it still understandably rubs Youtube users the wrong way.

other things wannabe pop stars and record companies can and do in fact do do: write their own reviews of their first records and send them to fanzines under pesudonyms (monster magnet did this, and i salute them for it; then again, monster magnet probably flunk every "authenticity" test you could come up with) ... "leak" their own records to the internet (pretty much every record company does this to one degree or another) ... request their own records on radio or anywhere else requests are taken (again, the whole industry can stand up and plead guilty to that one) ... acquire lots of "friends" in myspace who aren't really your "friends" and may not even have a clue who you are ... and so on and so forth. if mia rose is better at playing this game than other wannabe pop stars, then more power to her. in the end, either she's got it or she doesn't (i haven't heard a note yet), but what do a few thousand dummy accounts on youtube have to do with anything?

fact checking cuz (fcc), Monday, 29 January 2007 21:19 (nineteen years ago)

(that was a lot of do's in my first sentence!)

fact checking cuz (fcc), Monday, 29 January 2007 21:20 (nineteen years ago)

I basically agree with you, and I don't really care about Youtube inflation (just like I don't really care about payola or anything you mentioned). I care more about why and how certain artists implicated in certain questionable institutional schemes/scams are called out (and why/how others aren't), which is where Elizabeth Goodman and Rolling Stone comes in (and which is where I'm chickening out in this conversation because I don't think Mia Rose is worth it!). But all of the things you mentioned could understandably raise eyebrows -- it goes against the hero story of the triumph of democratic consumer choices (or something).

One thing that's interesting about Radio Disney is that, despite the fact that they could completely ignore their audience and plug whatever they feel like -- and I guess I have no proof they don't until I can figure out what they could possibly gain from keeping Hampton or Cha Cha or Crazy Frog in the countdown without popular support (maybe Disney owns the rights or something?) -- they do seem to actually count the votes. But they transparently stack the deck in just about every other way they possibly can.

nameom (nameom), Monday, 29 January 2007 22:38 (nineteen years ago)

I just realized that nobody's yet posted the full video for "With Love", by Hilary Duff. So here it is. I'm loving it.

Greg Fanoe (JustFanoe), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 00:24 (nineteen years ago)

Lily Allen's Alright, Still being streamed this week on the AOL Listening Party. There are a couple of tracks I've never heard a studio version of.

Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 06:40 (nineteen years ago)

If the US release of the album means we get to do Lily Allen over, I'd like to revise my order of favorite songs from Smile - LDN - Friday Night to Friday Night - LDN - Smile. For all intent, LDN beat Smile, and then Friday Night was a come from behind take-all winner. And for some reason, talking about Lily Allen's songs in terms of some kind of contest to be the best makes perfect sense to me. (Actually, talking about Lily Allen only makes sense to me as an active conversation - something is always *happening* in Lily's songs. Even in LDN, where she's observing, she's walking around to do so.)

Mordechai Shinefield (Mordy), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 08:21 (nineteen years ago)

Also, cause American Idol is tomorrow - here are some contestants I've loved so far that I think fit into the scope of this thread:
Jory Steinberg: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGdcX5JQgM0 (Tina Arena: "Chains")
Sarah Burgess: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Uz1BbMpgJo
Porcelana Patino: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a6P_z_1RpgI

Actually, one really interesting thing going on - particularly contrasting Burgess + Porcelana. Burgess lays it all out in the audition - her narrative is really out there. She's the hard luck girl, whose family isn't standing behind her. Porcelana keeps a little more back - because you know she's gotten here also against the odds, but it's not laid out there. Something is held back. You can hear it in Porcelana's voice, too. It sounds wearied - like it's been wrestling with life. That's why I'm rooting for Porcelana as my number one pick so far (but it'll definitely be an underdog rooting).

So yeah -- you might notice that all these people are from NY. That's cause... hometown pride. Heh. Actually, it's mostly because of Porcelana - who I've been searching for her name and only found tonight. So if you don't watch any of the others, watch hers. It's really great.

Mordechai Shinefield (Mordy), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 08:37 (nineteen years ago)

Album from Katharine McPhee, last year's American Idol runner-up, is one of the other albs being streamed at the AOL Listening Party. I'm on the fourth track, and I've enjoyed what I've heard, including the ballad, "Home"! "Up-tempo, sultry r&b" says AOL. Strong voice, so she/they are going for punch à la Kelly, Whitney, though she's not pushing the melisma as hard as people like her often do.

I'm on track five, which is the first one that makes me shrug, though it's not a bad dance track. In fact, as it's fading out, I'm feeling it more, a warm after-image. But now track six is really making me shrug. Slow jam. Doesn't have anything insinuatingly catchy, like, say, Ciara's "Promise" does. McPhee does seem anonymous, which isn't necessarily a criticism. Track seven, "Dangerous," is passionate, and I'm picking up. Chords of the verse initially reminded me of "Happy Together"/"Wild World"/"It's A Sin"/"Come Into My Arms," but they don't hold onto the pattern, unfortunately. Or maybe it wasn't there in the first place. Uh oh, Track eight starts off with sensitive piano. Her voice is warm, however. Something slightly Scottish sounding in the chorus. Or maybe that's in my imagination. Haven't heard a great song yet. Um, track nine, she's suddenly trying to be Kelis. A club banger. Also a shrugger. Her anonymity is going to hurt sales. Enjoying this overall, somewhat, but haven't come close to caring. Constant play of a hit could change that. Track ten, "Better Off Alone," warmth: early '90s mainstream r&bish slow pop may be her strength.

Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 16:02 (nineteen years ago)

omg i am going to watch that porcelana patino video as soon as i get home just because of her name! PORCELANA PATINO!!!!

lex pretend (lex pretend), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 16:04 (nineteen years ago)

(McPhee ends up overall as only a bit above a shrug, though as I said a hit could turn me around, as could a further listen, though I doubt I'll give it one during the rest of its week on the board. There's Travis Tritt to explore.)

(Both the Natalie Cole and the Clint Black albums are entitled Love Songs. Unless AOL made a goof.)

Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 16:28 (nineteen years ago)

clint's is called THE love songs. but they're both valentine-themed compilations, so why not?

fact checking cuz (fcc), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 17:36 (nineteen years ago)

other things wannabe pop stars and record companies can and do in fact do do: write their own reviews of their first records and send them to fanzines under pesudonyms (monster magnet did this, and i salute them for it; then again, monster magnet probably flunk every "authenticity" test you could come up with) ... "leak" their own records to the internet (pretty much every record company does this to one degree or another) ... request their own records on radio or anywhere else requests are taken (again, the whole industry can stand up and plead guilty to that one) ... acquire lots of "friends" in myspace who aren't really your "friends" and may not even have a clue who you are ... and so on and so forth. if mia rose is better at playing this game than other wannabe pop stars, then more power to her.

on the other hand, advertising a concert as an evening of music by the jam and then standing by silently as your own fans trade tickets for hundreds if not thousands of dollars, and then playing exactly 10 jam songs as part of a 27-song set -- i'm talking to you, ex-teen-popper paul weller -- that is wrong and evil and i hope he woke up this morning feeling like the dick that he is. i didn't go because i hate that kind of nostalgia as much as weller told the fans at last night's show that he hates nostalgia. but i'm not the one going around trying to drum up interest in my shitty little u.s. tour by lying about what i'm going to play. may he never sell out a show again.

fact checking cuz (fcc), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 18:21 (nineteen years ago)

From a comment on a RS submission:
http://www.rollingstone.com/imfromrollingstone/index.php/2007/01/26/assignment-three-finalist-lauren-glucksman-on-amy-winehouse-new-york-city/

"Anyone from the first hearing of Amy belt out a lyric with such rich soulful intensity knows that this woman is not from this era. She is effortless in her delivery and I love your comment about “confident without any obnoxiousness.” It is this quality that makes her work hauntingly genuine. Good article Lauren. Be very grateful for this opportunity to review genius like Amy. She as well as you are being watched very closely by this fan. Take care."

The comment was written by someone named Valton Morgan.

"Every step you take... every move you make..."

Mordechai Shinefield (Mordy), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 18:36 (nineteen years ago)

I liked Katharine McPhee a lot on American Idol, and she had plenty of personality on the show. Both in the speaking segments and in her singing voice. But I agree that her recorded voice lacks personality and distinction. A bit of a letdown from this album. I like the Jojo ripoff first single though.

I love American Idol but just can't stomach the auditions. For fun, here are my favorite contestants by season. This is based entirely on what they did on the show, not what they did afterwards:

1 - Kelly
2 - Didn't really care for anybody
3 - JPL
4 - Jessica Sierra (boo, America!), Carrie Underwood
5 - McPhee

Greg Fanoe (JustFanoe), Tuesday, 30 January 2007 19:51 (nineteen years ago)

Oh, forgot about this but Julianne Shepard did a column on Amy the other week. She (Amy) digs the Shangri-Las.

Winehouse loves the dramatics and borderline creepiness of 1960s girl groups, of which "He Hit Me " is an extreme example. It's an influence you can hear in the tambourines and innocent snaps of her new album, Back to Black. "My favorite band of all time is probably the Shangri-La's," says Winehouse. "I love them because they were kids, and it's so emotional. Loads of sound effects, loads of lyrics like, 'My boyfriend's so fine and I'm gonna kill myself for him' and ‘I'm gonna die' and oh, I love it, I love it."

The Shangri-La's sound oppressed by love, bound by expectations, suicidal in their devotion. It's the difficult parts about them that informed Frank.

nameom (nameom), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 02:43 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, apparently the Shangri-Las have influenced her hairdos or something (see also: B-52s and Gore Gore Girls, both of whom are about a million times more fun than Amy is.) The musical comparison that's rung the most true to me, though (even more than Lauryn Hill) was Amy Linden mentioning Fiona Apple in her Voice review of Winehouse's New York shows a couple weeks ago. (For what it's worth, I've never remotely understood the appeal of Fiona, either. The Shangri-Las' appeal I've never had a problem with.)

xhuxk (xhuck), Wednesday, 31 January 2007 12:52 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.