hmm re Growl - you mean you have the notifications set to always remain on screen?
― licorice oratorio (baaderonixx), Sunday, 7 August 2011 13:34 (fourteen years ago)
i thought that you were meant to be able to redownload stuff you'd already purchased from itunes without being charged again?
it lets me do it with some songs but not others :(
― first period don't give a fuck, second period gon get cut (lex pretend), Saturday, 4 February 2012 10:04 (fourteen years ago)
Is it possible you bought the others under a different Apple ID?
― Your Favorite Album in the Cutout Bin, Monday, 6 February 2012 21:45 (fourteen years ago)
Mastered for iTunes
haven't heard any of it yet, kinda interested
― unlistenable in philly (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Sunday, 26 February 2012 14:47 (fourteen years ago)
well iTunes 11 is out and it's pretty much the slowest application of all time
― frogbs, Tuesday, 4 December 2012 06:09 (thirteen years ago)
I have 906GB in my iTunes library and I never get a pinwheel. Switching views is fast, editing metadata is painless. The never version is working great for me. How much RAM do you have?
― brotherlovesdub, Tuesday, 4 December 2012 06:26 (thirteen years ago)
I've heard conflicting reports, but if slowness is a ram issue I'm not that worried. I'll upgrade sooner or later.
― Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 4 December 2012 06:27 (thirteen years ago)
6 GB ram, 300 GB library. I don't get the pinwheel, just click any view and it takes a good 5-6 seconds to switch over.
― frogbs, Tuesday, 4 December 2012 06:33 (thirteen years ago)
i don't have nearly that big a library, but it feels like the new one is a bit faster than 10, tbh
― Nhex, Tuesday, 4 December 2012 07:07 (thirteen years ago)
It's running considerably faster for me. Used to be super buggy but I haven't had any issues. I am a little peeved at how some view options were unnecessarily cut but oh well.
― Andrew W, Tuesday, 4 December 2012 07:21 (thirteen years ago)
Interesting. I've just clicked around and everything loads fine except for Artists. I do pinwheel there every time I select it but Songs, Playlists, Albums etc all load quickly. I use Song view almost exclusively though.
― brotherlovesdub, Tuesday, 4 December 2012 07:29 (thirteen years ago)
345GB Library and cranks right along. Big performance improvement over v10
― Elvis Telecom, Tuesday, 4 December 2012 07:43 (thirteen years ago)
http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/technology/2012/11/itunes_11_it_s_time_for_apple_s_horrible_bloated_program_to_die.html
― abanana, Tuesday, 4 December 2012 07:46 (thirteen years ago)
Maybe I need to do a reboot or restart the program. For me switching views seems to lock things up briefly. The search bar is also very slow, I type in "R" and it brings up a zillion things which seems to really drain CPU power. v10 was pretty slow for me too but not to this level.
― frogbs, Tuesday, 4 December 2012 14:43 (thirteen years ago)
that said looking around in it this morning there do appear to be some neat new features and they seemed to have gotten rid of some of the real useless stuff (like iTunes DJ, what the hell was that)
― frogbs, Tuesday, 4 December 2012 14:47 (thirteen years ago)
They've made it more clunky to drag music from Windows explorer to ipod = me even more annoyed Amazon lost my order for an SD card so I never have to use this piece of shit application again
― Just noise and screaming and no musical value at all. (Colonel Poo), Tuesday, 4 December 2012 15:00 (thirteen years ago)
I actually used iTunes DJ! Though to be honest, I'm not sure how it was better than just doing a random shuffle on your Song list.. but it WAS better... somehow.
― Nhex, Tuesday, 4 December 2012 15:31 (thirteen years ago)
I played around with that "give me 5 recently played songs and 20 others" or whatever and it never seemed to work at all. It really did just seem like random shuffle though maybe it interacted with something I didn't have ?
― frogbs, Tuesday, 4 December 2012 15:44 (thirteen years ago)
What view options did they cut?
― my other pug is a stillsuit (Jon Lewis), Tuesday, 4 December 2012 16:22 (thirteen years ago)
So which is it- is 11 faster or slower than 10? That's the deciding factor for me. 10 is painfully slow on my Mac mini.
― FunkyTonk, Tuesday, 4 December 2012 18:09 (thirteen years ago)
from a quick glance between this and the other apple thread, i think it's faster for most
― Nhex, Tuesday, 4 December 2012 18:46 (thirteen years ago)
iTunes dj was great
― licorice oratorio (baaderonixx), Tuesday, 4 December 2012 19:17 (thirteen years ago)
yeah I guess I'm the only one saying it's slower
― frogbs, Tuesday, 4 December 2012 19:52 (thirteen years ago)
I never update to a new itunes until it's been out at least half a year.
― my other pug is a stillsuit (Jon Lewis), Tuesday, 4 December 2012 19:55 (thirteen years ago)
They've made it more clunky to drag music from Windows explorer to ipod
Won't be downloading that then. Am I just getting old, or is software in a decline-of-the-Roman-empire phase where there's a 50% chance that any one app update will be worse than what came before? Although I listen to most of my music on Winamp, so it's probably the first one.
― B-Boy Bualadh Bos (ecuador_with_a_c), Tuesday, 4 December 2012 20:00 (thirteen years ago)
I don't think anything recent has been as bad as the update that introduced gapless playback and havoc it wreaked upon hapless ipods (updating gapless playback information...updating gapless playback information...updating gapless playback information...updating gapless playback information...updating gapless playback information...updating gapless playback information...)
― my other pug is a stillsuit (Jon Lewis), Tuesday, 4 December 2012 20:03 (thirteen years ago)
I downloaded it. Definitely seems faster for me. No major downsides, although I'm not so into the look of it.
By the way, anyone out there using BitPerfect or other higher-audio-quality players/plugins/whatever? I've tested a bunch out and am loving BitPerfect. Cheapest of the bunch, easy, great sound.
― FunkyTonk, Wednesday, 5 December 2012 00:07 (thirteen years ago)
Uh why aren't all the artists showing up in my artist list on my iPhone any more? I hate iTunes so much
― make like a steak and beef (dog latin), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 00:10 (thirteen years ago)
p amazed at how ugly it is for an apple product actually, looks like a homebrew shonky "itunes" skin you'd get for mediamonkey or whatever
faster for me although i dont really ever use it so
also no artwork in the bottom corner SUXXX, why are people gonna bother making it for singles at all now
― r|t|c, Wednesday, 5 December 2012 00:12 (thirteen years ago)
I hate it. I used to type in the artist and all the songs would appear quickly. Now all the separate albums show up with the artwork, none of which is important to me. Editing and browsing takes forever.
― Jazzbo, Wednesday, 5 December 2012 01:30 (thirteen years ago)
You can change your view back to the way it was. Not in front of it now but it's possible with menu selections.
― brotherlovesdub, Wednesday, 5 December 2012 02:10 (thirteen years ago)
I've changed most of it back, but I haven't yet figured out how to get that big album artwork option again instead of the teeny, tiny icon in the status window.
― HAPPY BDAY TOOTS (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 02:51 (thirteen years ago)
189.73 gigs, 2GB RAM, slow as hell but less horrible than iTunes 10 was. I already used a grid view instead of a list (even though that was a major factor in the slowdown), so I'm not too torn up about it being the default now, but I really hate how quickly typing an artist name to skip to them will auto-open the first result.
― muus lääv? :D muus dut :( (Telephone thing), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 03:56 (thirteen years ago)
Very clunky interface now. Annoying to use. And it sounds like they've given the eq a weird boost around in the lower midrange/upper bass. More "body." Sounds fuller, but also sometimes more sluggish, than before.
― Michael Train, Wednesday, 5 December 2012 04:02 (thirteen years ago)
How do I get the cover flow back?
― WARS OF ARMAGEDDON (Karaoke Version) (Sparkle Motion), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 04:23 (thirteen years ago)
yeah right now the program itself isn't so bad but the search is still kinda dumb...say I wanted to hear anything Scott Walker/Walker Brothers and I type in "walker", I don't get the list of anything, just a bunch of suggestions that take it into views I don't want. also I type in "w" and everything just freezes. but ymmv
― frogbs, Wednesday, 5 December 2012 04:48 (thirteen years ago)
Also making the miniplayer only accessible from a dropdown menu where it then gives you 2 players is dumb.
― WARS OF ARMAGEDDON (Karaoke Version) (Sparkle Motion), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 05:35 (thirteen years ago)
no volume control on miniplayer either. alot of weird choices.
― WARS OF ARMAGEDDON (Karaoke Version) (Sparkle Motion), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 05:38 (thirteen years ago)
OTM. This is my main gripe. And yes, it's a lot slower for me.
― Jazzbo, Wednesday, 5 December 2012 14:24 (thirteen years ago)
yeah right now the program itself isn't so bad but the search is still kinda dumb...say I wanted to hear anything Scott Walker/Walker Brothers and I type in "walker", I don't get the list of anything, just a bunch of suggestions that take it into views I don't want.
That SUCKS.
― my other pug is a stillsuit (Jon Lewis), Wednesday, 5 December 2012 16:51 (thirteen years ago)
well I can deal with that but when you type in "walker" you get to look at the artists/songs/albums for "w", wait five seconds, then "wa", wait five seconds then "wal"...that's the part that's annoying
― frogbs, Wednesday, 5 December 2012 16:54 (thirteen years ago)
switch the search back to the old way by changing the parameter from "Search entire library" to "all". works just fine.
― EZ Snappin, Wednesday, 5 December 2012 17:05 (thirteen years ago)
That's it! Thank you, thank you, EZ.
― Jazzbo, Thursday, 6 December 2012 18:23 (thirteen years ago)
That did it. Thanks!!
― frogbs, Thursday, 6 December 2012 23:56 (thirteen years ago)
What is the consensus in tagging multi-disc albums these days? It used be preferred to note it in the album name (i.e. The Beatles (disc one)) but has that switched to using the ID3 tags instead?
― Your Favorite Album in the Cutout Bin, Friday, 7 December 2012 16:47 (thirteen years ago)
there was consensus?
― I loves you, PORGI (DJP), Friday, 7 December 2012 16:48 (thirteen years ago)
If it's a 2cd album like The Beatles or 666 I never name the discs separately. ID3 indeed.
― my other pug is a stillsuit (Jon Lewis), Friday, 7 December 2012 16:51 (thirteen years ago)
yeah just use the Disc # fields
― Nhex, Friday, 7 December 2012 17:20 (thirteen years ago)
What about boxed sets?
― Your Favorite Album in the Cutout Bin, Friday, 7 December 2012 18:17 (thirteen years ago)
If a box set is particularly well-sequenced (like the 2CD Ryko Soft Boys comp or the Richard Thompson Watching The Dark) where each disc is a nice listen, then I do file them as separate discs.
― Tomb Of Spatula (Jon Lewis), Friday, 7 December 2012 18:23 (thirteen years ago)