I do believe that a lot of the kinderlach seem to know Diamonds And Pearls period on wards and forget about the pre purple rain stuff...Ok let's say almost 25 years then but no matter your protestations and I know there are great things post 88 but you can't tell me 'Chaos And Disorder' is very good...I'll listen to it tonight just to make sure...
― The Pastiche Liberation Front (sonnyboy), Wednesday, 3 August 2011 18:31 (fourteen years ago)
I don't expect classic Prince albums anymore, I guess...? It's not a big deal. No one could continue his rate of excellence. "Very good" is enough.
― livin in my own private Biden hole (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 3 August 2011 18:33 (fourteen years ago)
no one is forgetting prince anytime soon, you can rest easy
― J0rdan S., Wednesday, 3 August 2011 18:33 (fourteen years ago)
he murdered the super bowl halftime show to universal acclaim like three years ago or something
― J0rdan S., Wednesday, 3 August 2011 18:34 (fourteen years ago)
I think I always knew, but wasn't conscious of until just now, when someone called "When You Were Mine" an "indie" choice, that the chords and guitar riff were lifted for the Replacements' "Kiss Me on the Bus."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yDH6W-bU8wo
― Pete Scholtes, Wednesday, 3 August 2011 19:16 (fourteen years ago)
I don't like Chaos and Disorder all that much either, but I wouldn't say it was worse than "actually decent"
― CLUB PISCOPO (DJP), Wednesday, 3 August 2011 19:17 (fourteen years ago)
wow i sure would
― I dream of vodka sandwich (jjjusten), Wednesday, 3 August 2011 19:20 (fourteen years ago)
and yay i am an idiot and totally missed voting in this
tbf i would have just been stupidly voting for gold album and first NPG album shit that had no chance of placing so
― I dream of vodka sandwich (jjjusten), Wednesday, 3 August 2011 19:21 (fourteen years ago)
I like "Dinner With Dolores" and "Dig U Better Dead" too much to write off the album entirely.
― CLUB PISCOPO (DJP), Wednesday, 3 August 2011 19:24 (fourteen years ago)
actually shit i always forget that dig u better dead is on there! that song is ok!
i think i was just so awash w/ prince new stuff at the time and knew the whole supposed ok you want another album here is all the crap i dont give a shit about rumors that it might have tainted my opinions
my #1 would have probably been "count the days"/"return of the bump squad"/"horny toad". or "billie jack bitch" maybe.
― I dream of vodka sandwich (jjjusten), Wednesday, 3 August 2011 19:32 (fourteen years ago)
when u were mine is fucking indestructible. the cyndi lauper cover is (of course) quite beautiful as well, maybe even more beautiful.
― by another name (amateurist), Wednesday, 3 August 2011 20:26 (fourteen years ago)
IIRC
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hbzxA-5OfWc
― by another name (amateurist), Wednesday, 3 August 2011 20:27 (fourteen years ago)
i thought chaos and disorder actually WAS a "leftovers" album while come was actually a "real" album that prince advertised as a "leftovers" album to spite warner bros.
or maybe i'm thinking of old friends 4 sale (=worst prince album?)
― by another name (amateurist), Wednesday, 3 August 2011 20:28 (fourteen years ago)
correct! chaos is the record that completed his contract with warner bros. and is basically stuff from the vault
prince made come and gold experience at the same time (they contain basically every song in glam slam ulysses between the two of them) and wanted them released simultaneously but warner bros. wasn't having that
― preschoolin' life (BradNelson), Wednesday, 3 August 2011 20:30 (fourteen years ago)
damn i fuck with that lauper cover heavy
― J0rdan S., Wednesday, 3 August 2011 20:30 (fourteen years ago)
cannot parse that sentence
― by another name (amateurist), Wednesday, 3 August 2011 20:32 (fourteen years ago)
see what the song is doing to him?
― livin in my own private Biden hole (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 3 August 2011 20:33 (fourteen years ago)
you can hardly blame warners, really -- i think there sense that a glut of prince albums would bring his stock down was basically correct.
prince in not having best commercial instincts shocker.
― by another name (amateurist), Wednesday, 3 August 2011 20:33 (fourteen years ago)
there = their
I don't blame Warners much at all!
― livin in my own private Biden hole (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 3 August 2011 20:34 (fourteen years ago)
well, I do for this: did the record company really expect to recoup their advance even knowing that no album released after PR sold more than a couple million copies?
― livin in my own private Biden hole (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 3 August 2011 20:35 (fourteen years ago)
Diamonds and Pearls is the only big hit.
how much was the advance? when was the deal made?
― by another name (amateurist), Wednesday, 3 August 2011 20:38 (fourteen years ago)
late 80s/early 90s rife with ridiculous deals ... didn't motley crue have some crazy multi-album deal worth millions? even though their stock was clearly plunging?
music industry flush w/ cash around that time. couldn't spend it fast enough.
― by another name (amateurist), Wednesday, 3 August 2011 20:39 (fourteen years ago)
/nostalgia
Can't remember if I said this earlier, but thanks for the work on this one, Jamie!
― L.P. Hovercraft (WmC), Thursday, 4 August 2011 15:43 (fourteen years ago)
When You Were Mine is a great song. Probably in my top 30 or so. Not my favourite on that album though.
I still can't really work out the commercial drop off from PR onwards up to about Batman, esp. in the US. 14 million (now 20 and counting) for PR, to what, 2 or 3 million for ATWIAD and Parade (as of 2011) and what, a couple mil for SOTT and about 1 million for Lovesexy in the US? He was having top 10 hits, a massive iconic 'name', part of the 'big three' etc etc. Just too much material in too short a time? Moving on when the last album was gaining momentum? If there were no records between PR and SOTT, would the latter have sold at least 10 million? People say that the hugeness of PR was in fact the anomaly, but why? It's Prince for goodness sake. Everyone knew him.
― Master of Treacle, Thursday, 4 August 2011 16:10 (fourteen years ago)
Fleetwood Mac, Michael Jackson, Madonna, and Springsteen never surpassed the success of their single disc diamond-certified albums either!
― livin in my own private Biden hole (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 4 August 2011 16:15 (fourteen years ago)
I was one of I'm sure millions of teenage Purple Rain fans who listened to a friend's copy of ATWIAD and was disappointed: That kind of break in momentum is hard to come back from. And you can't underestimate the shifts in taste toward hip hop that left Prince looking out of touch even as he was making brilliant music: Steve Perry broke down the racial and sexual politics of it well at the time, but it was more than that--Prince was just not at the center of musical innovation by '88, though I remember buying The Black Album and Nation of Millions at the same time.
― Pete Scholtes, Thursday, 4 August 2011 16:51 (fourteen years ago)
Batman and Around the World in a Day both went double platinum, by the way. What's strange to me is that Sign 'O' the Times "only" went platinum, despite spawning three top 10 hits and having massive critical approval. Probably just a case of too much product in a relatively short period of time, or maybe a higher price tag as it was a double album. From ATWIAD through what I'll call Love Symbol in 1992, though, his only real flops were Lovesexy and Graffiti Bridge, though each spawned a top 10 single. I don't think the real dropoff occurred until the mid-90s - Prince sold a lot of records after Purple Rain, but those sales were spread out over a bunch of minor hit albums rather than a small handful of blockbusters.
― Melle Mel and the Coconuts (thewufs), Thursday, 4 August 2011 17:05 (fourteen years ago)
+ it's a double album, so it's sort of like it didn't even go platinum at all
― third-generation stripper (Eric H.), Thursday, 4 August 2011 17:25 (fourteen years ago)
Pretty sure it was certified before the RIAA started counting double albums twice. So it sold (or shipped) at least a million copies. Just checked the RIAA website, actually - yup, it actually went platinum a few months after it was released in 1987.
― Melle Mel and the Coconuts (thewufs), Thursday, 4 August 2011 17:40 (fourteen years ago)
Sales often measure buyers' reactions to the previous album: I can't imagine Lovesexy being released as a single track on CD endeared him to anyone.
― Pete Scholtes, Thursday, 4 August 2011 17:48 (fourteen years ago)
Actually, Lovesexy came after SOTT, in 1988. The follow-up to Lovesexy was Batman, his biggest seller in years.
― Melle Mel and the Coconuts (thewufs), Thursday, 4 August 2011 17:55 (fourteen years ago)
Not sure how many actually bought Lovesexy on CD, as opposed to vinyl c. '88.
― third-generation stripper (Eric H.), Thursday, 4 August 2011 17:57 (fourteen years ago)
I know SOTT didn't follow Lovesexy, and I'm theorizing off the cuff more generally about sales--I guess Batman might prove that idea wrong, but it's a cumulative thing, inevitably not very provable. Either way, Batman never struck me as a Prince revival.
― Pete Scholtes, Thursday, 4 August 2011 18:06 (fourteen years ago)
And you're right about the CD thing, to me it just registered as one more pointless barrier to Prince love.
― Pete Scholtes, Thursday, 4 August 2011 18:08 (fourteen years ago)
Batman and Around the World in a Day both went double platinum, by the way. What's strange to me is that Sign 'O' the Times "only" went platinum, despite spawning three top 10 hits and having massive critical approval
I read in a Billboard published late '87 or early '88 which praised SOTT for being a "sleeper hit" because it remained on the charts longer than ATWIAD and Parade and boasted three top ten singles. I thought, "Wow! How things have changed since 1984."
― livin in my own private Biden hole (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 4 August 2011 18:28 (fourteen years ago)
I get the sense that, in comparison to Madonna or Michael or Bruce, Prince was just too eccentric for a lot of people, and that might be a big part of the reason he's sold fewer records than his superstar peers (of course Michael was eccentric, but in a distinctly pop, pan-humanist sort of way). Since I was born in late '82 and barely aware of his importance until about 1994, I can't really verify this firsthand - but I know that as a kid Madonna and MJ were on my cultural radar long before Prince, and I would be surprised if my experience was entirely atypical.
― Melle Mel and the Coconuts (thewufs), Thursday, 4 August 2011 18:42 (fourteen years ago)
What's more, Prince cultivates the rarefied air of a vanguard artist, whereas Michael and Madonna (almost) always shot for the pop universal, even when they courted controversy/scorn/ridicule. Prince has certainly continued to make something out of his own mystique, but after Purple Rain he never made such a conscious effort to build or maintain his celebrity, excepting the Musicology comeback in 2004.
― Melle Mel and the Coconuts (thewufs), Thursday, 4 August 2011 18:59 (fourteen years ago)
after Purple Rain he never made such a conscious effort to build or maintain his celebrity
what about D&P?
― livin in my own private Biden hole (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 4 August 2011 19:59 (fourteen years ago)
That was an obvious pop move, but was it accompanied by a media blitz approaching those for, say, Like a Prayer or Dangerous? That's not a rhetorical question, by the way - my only exposure to Prince at the time was Batman, whereas Madonna and Michael were already pretty familiar by 1991.
― Melle Mel and the Coconuts (thewufs), Thursday, 4 August 2011 20:14 (fourteen years ago)
i dont think we are likely to ever see a media blitz that approaches purple rain, but thats because it was a self-contained one. i mean dangerous and like a prayer didnt have $80 million grossing films promoting them so
― I dream of vodka sandwich (jjjusten), Thursday, 4 August 2011 20:38 (fourteen years ago)
LAP did boast a Pepsi commercial tie-in which was one of the canniest moves of her career.
― livin in my own private Biden hole (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Thursday, 4 August 2011 20:38 (fourteen years ago)
and yeah obv other film soundtracks have done exceedingly well but they arent as completely tied to the product as purple rain (eh i mean maybe the bodyguard but not in the same way) xpost
― I dream of vodka sandwich (jjjusten), Thursday, 4 August 2011 20:40 (fourteen years ago)
i don't think we can think about batman as just another album in the arc of prince's career -- it was an integral part of a massive marketing juggernaut. i bought it because it was a "batman" album, not because it was a prince album -- and i imagine many others did the same. so the sales of that album are sort of anomalous in terms of prince's post-PR career.
to change the subject somewhat, one thing i find really weird and kind of sad is that because of the unusual distribution prince arranges for his new records these days (he makes/packages an album, then contracts with a major to distribute it, making no long-term deals) and because of paisley park's general flakiness, some of prince's most popular recent albums are already out of print. that doesn't mean you can't buy them for $0.50 on amazon or whatever, but they aren't going to be in the targets and best buys of this world. more than ever i guess prince--even more than most artists--seems to view albums as teasers for his renumerative tours.
― by another name (amateurist), Thursday, 4 August 2011 22:12 (fourteen years ago)
Groan.
― third-generation stripper (Eric H.), Thursday, 4 August 2011 22:51 (fourteen years ago)
Aside from (very) current major releases and proven catalogue sellers (which for Prince includes only Purple Rain, maybe 1999, and a couple best-ofs), the Targets and Best Buys of this world don't stock a lot of CDs by anybody, so the fact that Prince's new releases are disappearing from their shelves is really no great loss. Anybody who cares already knows what to do.
― Melle Mel and the Coconuts (thewufs), Friday, 5 August 2011 00:58 (fourteen years ago)