― chris andrews (fraew), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 01:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 18 January 2005 01:07 (twenty-one years ago)
― chris andrews (fraew), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 01:25 (twenty-one years ago)
Post punk
2. Overall, would you say that the Beatles or the Rolling Stones are (or were) more popular?
Beatles
3. Which of the two bands do you prefer?
4. What is your favorite album by one of these bands? (just looking for one answer here - for example, if you like Let It Bleed the best by the Stones and the White Album the best by the Beatles, just go with Let It Bleed).
White Album
5. Which band do you think has had a stronger lasting impact on music?
― buck van smack (Buck Van Smack), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 01:35 (twenty-one years ago)
Authentic Jamaican roots reggae.
Overall, yes.
I've never heard of two bands.
Which bands? I like The Freewheelin Bob Dylan' by the Bob Dylan Band.
Stronger than what? I think Kraftwerk had a lasting impact on music. I don't know very much about them, though.
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 01:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― I Am Curious (George) (Rock Hardy), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 01:48 (twenty-one years ago)
2. Beatles
3. Beatles
4. Magical Mystery Tour. If that doesn't count as an album then White Album.
5. Beatles
― dog latin (dog latin), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 01:52 (twenty-one years ago)
We have a winner!
― Broken Hipster (Broken Hipster), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 01:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― Broken Hipster (Broken Hipster), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 01:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― Bruce S. Urquhart (BanjoMania), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 02:14 (twenty-one years ago)
2. I think the Beatles were probably more popular overall (talking globally).
3. The Beatles.
4. Revolver.
5. The Beatles.
― RS £aRue (rockist_scientist), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 02:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 02:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 02:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― RS £aRue (rockist_scientist), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 02:42 (twenty-one years ago)
2. Overall, would you say that the Beatles or the Rolling Stones are (or were) more popular?Unfortunately, the Beatles are more popular than the Stones. Note I didn't say they were better, just more popular.
3. Which of the two bands do you prefer?If a gun was held to my nutsack, I'd say the Stones.
4. What is your favorite album by one of these bands? (just looking for one answer here - for example, if you like Let It Bleed the best by the Stones and the White Album the best by the Beatles, just go with Let It Bleed).Beatles - 1Stones - Fourty Licks
5. Which band do you think has had a stronger lasting impact on music?Again, I'd have to concede that the Beatles have had way more impact. Most of it for the worse.
― Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 03:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 03:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― jole, Tuesday, 18 January 2005 03:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― Bryan Moore (Bryan Moore), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 06:38 (twenty-one years ago)
2. The Beatles
3. The Rolling Stones
4. Let It Bleed
5. The Beatles
― Nic de Teardrop (Nicholas), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 06:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― Shmool McShmool (shmuel), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 06:59 (twenty-one years ago)
― Tip Mikkleson, Tuesday, 18 January 2005 07:07 (twenty-one years ago)
post-punk rock
the beatles
the rolling stones
aftermath -- an evil pop masterpiece.
the stones (as perverse as that may sound).
― Eisbär (llamasfur), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 07:12 (twenty-one years ago)
2. Depends on where we're talking about. I wonder if the Stones aren't more popular in the U.S. I'm going with the Stones for the hell of it.
3. Beatles, by as Fiendish said "a country mile"
4. For me it's a choice between childhood and adulthood: Sgt. Pepper vs. Abbey Road. I'm going with Abbey Road.
5. The Beatles. God was born when the Beatles formed, haven't you heard?
― Bimble... (Bimble...), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 07:21 (twenty-one years ago)
in the spirit of the above:
1. pop (but i honestly think classical is more complex)2. beatles (but i honestly think the stones slept with more women)3. beatles (but i honestly think chris robinson prefers the stones)4. rubber soul (but i honestly thing revolver came later)5. beatles (but i honestly think mick jagger is a better dresser)
― fact checking cuz (fcc), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 07:41 (twenty-one years ago)
― Jez (Jez), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 07:59 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 10:06 (twenty-one years ago)
Jazz
Beatles (probably a simple fact not an opinion?
Beatles (but I love The Rolling Stones also)
4. What is your favorite album by one of these bands?
Abbey Road
Difficult. Far more bands used The Stones template but someone would probably have come up with a similar mix of Chicago blues, Chuck Berry, Dylan, Country, yadda yadda even if the Stones hadn't existed. The Beatles were much more of a one-off and probably changed the landscape more, even though they had fewer direct imitators.
― frankiemachine, Tuesday, 18 January 2005 10:40 (twenty-one years ago)
can i cheat and say beatles "complete bbc sessions" and rolling stones"jumpback"the stones can be easily copied but the beatles had wider taste in music.the beatles knew when to stop(thanks Yoko).
you'll get 100 replies here.
― revolverville, Tuesday, 18 January 2005 10:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 18 January 2005 11:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― Neil Kulkarni, Tuesday, 18 January 2005 11:43 (twenty-one years ago)
― mms (mms), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 12:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― Acme 2, Tuesday, 18 January 2005 14:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― Stevem On X (blueski), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 14:34 (twenty-one years ago)
― mcd (mcd), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 14:45 (twenty-one years ago)
Progressive Rock
the Beatles
I don't like either of them much, really.
I don't own a single album by either band. Best tracks, as an alternative
beatles - Tomorrow Never Knowsstones - 2000 light years from home
Stones, probably, for useless "look at me i'm a badass motherfucker 'mojo'"
OK, now you've got yr info/survey, what are you going to target market at us? ;)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 14:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 14:47 (twenty-one years ago)
― mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 14:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― Stevem On X (blueski), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 14:49 (twenty-one years ago)
3. Rolling Stones
4. White Album / Exile On Main Street
5. Beatles (unfortuntately)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 14:50 (twenty-one years ago)
1. What is your favorite genre of music?
A: Robbie Williams
A: They're not as popular as Robbie Williams!
A: ROBBIE WILLIAMS!
A: ROBBIE WILLIAMS GREATEST HITS
A: ROBBIE WILLIAMS
― Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 18 January 2005 14:52 (twenty-one years ago)
4. Beatles, Revolver
5. The Beatles had far more of an impact, I think; the Stones executed well but didn't transform how musicians approached songcraft.
― Joseph McCombs (Joseph McCombs), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 14:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 14:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― peter smith (plsmith), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 15:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― o. nate (onate), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 15:45 (twenty-one years ago)
2. Overall, would you say that the Beatles or the Rolling Stones are (or were) more popular? Beatles.
3. Which of the two bands do you prefer? Stones.
4. What is your favorite album by one of these bands? (just looking for one answer here - for example, if you like Let It Bleed the best by the Stones and the White Album the best by the Beatles, just go with Let It Bleed). Beatles--Beatles for Sale. Stones--Exile on Main St.
5. Which band do you think has had a stronger lasting impact on music? The Beatles by a nose.
― eddie hurt (ddduncan), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 15:53 (twenty-one years ago)
3. The Beatles
4. Between The Buttons
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 15:58 (twenty-one years ago)
― Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 16:52 (twenty-one years ago)
3. The Beatles. I'd like to be able to say Rolling Stones but I'm afraid I can't.
4. Either Rubber Soul or Revolver.
You're welcome.
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 17:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― ppp, Tuesday, 18 January 2005 17:12 (twenty-one years ago)
It seems to me that Muddy Waters, Howlin Wolf, Little Walter, Hank Williams, and Johnny Cash basically had accomplished all of these things before the Stones, at least up through the part about the first critique - though I'm not sure I get the second meta-critique or the eraser part, so maybe that's where the Stones' contribution lies.
― o. nate (onate), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 17:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 17:33 (twenty-one years ago)
Okay, so...
Um... I think if I have to use the widely accepted "genres" I'll probably fall in the punk/indie camp. A substantial chunk of my favorites are technically postpunk and another good sized one would likely be called bubblegum, but punk/indie probably covers the majority.
The Beatles are more popular precisely for the reasons Stones fans tend to dislike them in these comparisons. Alex has probably already said it best... Just about everyone can find Beatles stuff to like, which isn't true for the Stones by and large.
The other reason they were more popular is their image. It stands to reason that a band marketed as "good guys" is going to be more accepted by everyone than a band with a "bad boy" image, right?
The Beatles
Without context for this question it's difficult to answer, because it is dangerously easy to answer this question with the same answer as #2 but without different reasons. (i.e. They had a stronger impact because they were more popular.)
I am going to say the Beatles though, because I don't think the Stones changed the face of music in quite the same way. There's no doubt of the Stones' influence on tons of bands, but the Beatles "changed what was possible" in more ways. (Off the top of my head I'm thinking of use of harmony, for one.)
― martin m. (mushrush), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 18:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― Geir Hongro, Monday, 2 April 2007 11:54 (nineteen years ago)
― Mark G, Monday, 2 April 2007 11:56 (nineteen years ago)
― Geir Hongro, Monday, 2 April 2007 12:36 (nineteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4nG_nKn7vZA
http://dangerousminds.net/comments/never-before-seen_footage_the_rolling_stones_play_the_beatles_1965
― Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 18 October 2012 23:54 (thirteen years ago)
And did the Beatles ever do the Stones? No. They did a Who track once though. "A quick one while he's away"
― Mark G, Friday, 19 October 2012 00:01 (thirteen years ago)
The Stones' second single was, for all intents and purposes, written for them by Lennon/McCartney ("I Wanna Be Your Man").
And the Beatles didn't really cover "A Quick One" so much as goof on the "We'll soon be home" part during a lull in/the lull that was the Let It Be filming.
― 5-Hour Enmity (Tarfumes The Escape Goat), Friday, 19 October 2012 00:07 (thirteen years ago)
You'd think there would be 10 seconds of Satisfaction or something during the Get Back sessions, but it doesn't look like it...
― Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 19 October 2012 00:12 (thirteen years ago)
xpost I know, it just amuses me that the (only?) contemporaneous cover they ever had a go at was that one.
Not counting "Hello Dolly" that they did for the banned Xmas single
― Mark G, Friday, 19 October 2012 00:25 (thirteen years ago)
Good point re: only contemporaneous cover. My guess is that John started it off, having just played on the bill with the Who at the RnR Circus.
― 5-Hour Enmity (Tarfumes The Escape Goat), Friday, 19 October 2012 02:22 (thirteen years ago)
Well they covered a ton of current R&B stuff in the early years. But yeah nothing really past '65.
― Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 19 October 2012 02:35 (thirteen years ago)