The Beatles vs. The Rolling Stones - A Survey

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (89 of them)
1. avant-pop-indie-post-punk
2. beatles
3. beatles
4. sticky fingers
5. beatles

chris andrews (fraew), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 01:06 (twenty-one years ago)

I can't believe we've gotten this far without any smartass answers.

Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 18 January 2005 01:07 (twenty-one years ago)

now you've done it

chris andrews (fraew), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 01:25 (twenty-one years ago)

1. What is your favorite genre of music?

Post punk

2. Overall, would you say that the Beatles or the Rolling Stones are (or were) more popular?

Beatles

3. Which of the two bands do you prefer?

Beatles

4. What is your favorite album by one of these bands? (just looking for one answer here - for example, if you like Let It Bleed the best by the Stones and the White Album the best by the Beatles, just go with Let It Bleed).

White Album

5. Which band do you think has had a stronger lasting impact on music?

Beatles

buck van smack (Buck Van Smack), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 01:35 (twenty-one years ago)

1. What is your favorite genre of music?

Authentic Jamaican roots reggae.

2. Overall, would you say that the Beatles or the Rolling Stones are (or were) more popular?

Overall, yes.

3. Which of the two bands do you prefer?

I've never heard of two bands.

4. What is your favorite album by one of these bands? (just looking for one answer here - for example, if you like Let It Bleed the best by the Stones and the White Album the best by the Beatles, just go with Let It Bleed).

Which bands? I like The Freewheelin Bob Dylan' by the Bob Dylan Band.

5. Which band do you think has had a stronger lasting impact on music?

Stronger than what? I think Kraftwerk had a lasting impact on music. I don't know very much about them, though.

gabbneb (gabbneb), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 01:36 (twenty-one years ago)

1. Jazz/Free Jazz/Free Improv
2. Beatles
3. Beatles
4. Exile on Main Street
5. Beatles

I Am Curious (George) (Rock Hardy), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 01:48 (twenty-one years ago)

1. Do I have to choose? Weird/Alternative Pop then

2. Beatles

3. Beatles

4. Magical Mystery Tour. If that doesn't count as an album then White Album.

5. Beatles

dog latin (dog latin), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 01:52 (twenty-one years ago)

I can't believe we've gotten this far without any smartass answers.

We have a winner!

Broken Hipster (Broken Hipster), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 01:53 (twenty-one years ago)

I meant gabbneb, not you dog latin.

Broken Hipster (Broken Hipster), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 01:54 (twenty-one years ago)

1. I'm not quite sure. Depends on my mood.
2. The Beatles were much more popular. I don't recall reading about Rolling Stonesmania.
3. Most days I prefer The Beatles.
4. Rubber Soul (gets the nod for In My Life)
5. The Beatles (over the Rolling Stones)

Bruce S. Urquhart (BanjoMania), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 02:14 (twenty-one years ago)

1. I'm going to say salsa. I can't think of any other genre that I like such a high percentage of (although certain areas of Arabic music would maybe win if I could put a name on them--but let's stick to salsa).

2. I think the Beatles were probably more popular overall (talking globally).

3. The Beatles.

4. Revolver.

5. The Beatles.

RS £aRue (rockist_scientist), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 02:21 (twenty-one years ago)

1. bubblegum
2. the beatles
3. the rolling stones up to around some girls, but the beatles kind of have an advantage here by breaking up when they were still really good so you don't have to think about later less-inspired stuff
4. tough one, but I'd say just for the sake of argument that hot rocks and more hot rocks are better double album greatest hits packages than the red and blue beatles comps... for your survey you can put rs - "out of our heads", if that's easier
5. "stronger lasting influence" is pretty hard to quantify, but i guess i'd say the beatles but only reluctantly

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 02:27 (twenty-one years ago)

1. N/A
2. Beatles
3. Beatles
4. Something New, probably
5. not a carefully considered answer, but the Stones

gabbneb (gabbneb), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 02:29 (twenty-one years ago)

gabbneb, please explain the flaws in this survey's methodology.

RS £aRue (rockist_scientist), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 02:42 (twenty-one years ago)

1. What is your favorite genre of music?
Um...Rock/Pop?

2. Overall, would you say that the Beatles or the Rolling Stones are (or were) more popular?
Unfortunately, the Beatles are more popular than the Stones. Note I didn't say they were better, just more popular.

3. Which of the two bands do you prefer?
If a gun was held to my nutsack, I'd say the Stones.

4. What is your favorite album by one of these bands? (just looking for one answer here - for example, if you like Let It Bleed the best by the Stones and the White Album the best by the Beatles, just go with Let It Bleed).
Beatles - 1
Stones - Fourty Licks

5. Which band do you think has had a stronger lasting impact on music?
Again, I'd have to concede that the Beatles have had way more impact. Most of it for the worse.

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 03:04 (twenty-one years ago)

too many mentalists (xpost - see?)

gabbneb (gabbneb), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 03:05 (twenty-one years ago)

1. Pop
2. Beatles
3. Beatles
4. Abbey Road
5. Beatles

jole, Tuesday, 18 January 2005 03:15 (twenty-one years ago)

1. Rock
2. Beatles for popularity, but I honestly think the Stones are better musicians.
3. Rolling Stones
4. Exile on Main Street is the greatest piece of artwork of any medium, EVER.
5. Beatles, hesitantly...

Bryan Moore (Bryan Moore), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 06:38 (twenty-one years ago)

1. Post-Punk

2. The Beatles

3. The Rolling Stones

4. Let It Bleed

5. The Beatles

Nic de Teardrop (Nicholas), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 06:54 (twenty-one years ago)

rap
beatles
beatles
abbey road
beatles

Shmool McShmool (shmuel), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 06:59 (twenty-one years ago)

The Beatles make a happy, cocky, belligerently resourceless brand of harmonic primitivism. In the Liverpudlian repertoire, the indulgent amateurishness of the musical material, though closely rivalled by the indifference of the performing style, is actually surpassed only by the ineptitude of the studio production method.
Strawberry Fields suggests a chance encounter at a mountain wedding between Claudio Monteverdi and a jug band.

Tip Mikkleson, Tuesday, 18 January 2005 07:07 (twenty-one years ago)

1. What is your favorite genre of music?

post-punk rock

2. Overall, would you say that the Beatles or the Rolling Stones are (or were) more popular?

the beatles

3. Which of the two bands do you prefer?

the rolling stones

4. What is your favorite album by one of these bands? (just looking for one answer here - for example, if you like Let It Bleed the best by the Stones and the White Album the best by the Beatles, just go with Let It Bleed).

aftermath -- an evil pop masterpiece.

5. Which band do you think has had a stronger lasting impact on music?

the stones (as perverse as that may sound).

Eisbär (llamasfur), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 07:12 (twenty-one years ago)

1. genres...hm..okay I'll take post-punk

2. Depends on where we're talking about. I wonder if the Stones aren't more popular in the U.S. I'm going with the Stones for the hell of it.

3. Beatles, by as Fiendish said "a country mile"

4. For me it's a choice between childhood and adulthood: Sgt. Pepper vs. Abbey Road. I'm going with Abbey Road.

5. The Beatles. God was born when the Beatles formed, haven't you heard?

Bimble... (Bimble...), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 07:21 (twenty-one years ago)

2. Beatles for popularity, but I honestly think the Stones are better musicians.

in the spirit of the above:

1. pop (but i honestly think classical is more complex)
2. beatles (but i honestly think the stones slept with more women)
3. beatles (but i honestly think chris robinson prefers the stones)
4. rubber soul (but i honestly thing revolver came later)
5. beatles (but i honestly think mick jagger is a better dresser)

fact checking cuz (fcc), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 07:41 (twenty-one years ago)

1. Pop with a dash of pysch/jazz
2. Beatles
3. Beatles
4. All of them ... I'll say The White Album
5. Beatles

Jez (Jez), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 07:59 (twenty-one years ago)

1. I guess the guitar bands are back as OK for me.
2. The Beatles, undoubtably
3. I grew up wid the Beatles albums.
4. One answer? Umm, probably Revolver.
5. Thesedays, more bands want to be the Stones than the Beatles, which is good.

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 10:06 (twenty-one years ago)

1. What is your favorite genre of music?

Jazz

2. Overall, would you say that the Beatles or the Rolling Stones are (or were) more popular?

Beatles (probably a simple fact not an opinion?

3. Which of the two bands do you prefer?

Beatles (but I love The Rolling Stones also)

4. What is your favorite album by one of these bands?

Abbey Road

5. Which band do you think has had a stronger lasting impact on music?

Difficult. Far more bands used The Stones template but someone would probably have come up with a similar mix of Chicago blues, Chuck Berry, Dylan, Country, yadda yadda even if the Stones hadn't existed. The Beatles were much more of a one-off and probably changed the landscape more, even though they had fewer direct imitators.

frankiemachine, Tuesday, 18 January 2005 10:40 (twenty-one years ago)

the beatles are a albums band , the stones ( i like them) are a singles band.
i'd pick beatles "revolver"(their first four had 8 originals and 6 covers and the white album should be a brilliant single album.
i haven't got any stones lps anymore but "steel wheels" is good.

can i cheat and say beatles "complete bbc sessions" and rolling stones"jumpback"
the stones can be easily copied but the beatles had wider taste in music.the beatles knew when to stop(thanks Yoko).

you'll get 100 replies here.

revolverville, Tuesday, 18 January 2005 10:44 (twenty-one years ago)

1. Not applicable
2. I would say neither is currently as popular as Elvis Presley
3. I have no strong feelings either way about either band
4. Their Satanic Majesties Request
5. The Beach Boys

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 18 January 2005 11:13 (twenty-one years ago)

1. Pop
2.The Beatles
3. The Rolling Stones
4. Between The Buttons
5. Unfortunately, the Beatles

Neil Kulkarni, Tuesday, 18 January 2005 11:43 (twenty-one years ago)

1. Pop/Rock
2. The Beatles
3. The Beatles
4. Revolver
5. The Beatles

mms (mms), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 12:26 (twenty-one years ago)

1. Jazz? Today, it's jazz.
2. The Beatles.
3. ? Maybe The Beatles ?
4. Revolver
5. ? Maybe The Beatles ?

Acme 2, Tuesday, 18 January 2005 14:25 (twenty-one years ago)

1. Techno pop
2. clearly the Beatles
3. the Stones by a whisker
4. Let It Bleed
5. i can't see the worth of attempting to determine the answer to a question such as this

Stevem On X (blueski), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 14:34 (twenty-one years ago)

1. jazz/post-punk
2. Beatles
3. Rolling Stones
4. Exile on Main Street
5. Beatles

mcd (mcd), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 14:45 (twenty-one years ago)

1. What is your favorite genre of music?

Progressive Rock

2. Overall, would you say that the Beatles or the Rolling Stones are (or were) more popular?

the Beatles

3. Which of the two bands do you prefer?

I don't like either of them much, really.

4. What is your favorite album by one of these bands? (just looking for one answer here - for example, if you like Let It Bleed the best by the Stones and the White Album the best by the Beatles, just go with Let It Bleed).

I don't own a single album by either band. Best tracks, as an alternative

beatles - Tomorrow Never Knows
stones - 2000 light years from home

5. Which band do you think has had a stronger lasting impact on music?

Stones, probably, for useless "look at me i'm a badass motherfucker 'mojo'"

OK, now you've got yr info/survey, what are you going to target market at us? ;)

Pashmina (Pashmina), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 14:46 (twenty-one years ago)

Stones, probably, for useless "look at me i'm a badass motherfucker" 'mojo' that shd read, argh.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 14:47 (twenty-one years ago)

Jet.

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 14:48 (twenty-one years ago)

woo-ooo-ooh wooo-ooo-oooh wooo-ooo-oooh

Stevem On X (blueski), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 14:49 (twenty-one years ago)

1. Don't have one

2. Beatles

3. Rolling Stones

4. White Album / Exile On Main Street

5. Beatles (unfortuntately)

Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 14:50 (twenty-one years ago)

just in, this from a poll conducted among the viewers of channel 4:

1. What is your favorite genre of music?

A: Robbie Williams

2. Overall, would you say that the Beatles or the Rolling Stones are (or were) more popular?

A: They're not as popular as Robbie Williams!

3. Which of the two bands do you prefer?

A: ROBBIE WILLIAMS!

4. What is your favorite album by one of these bands? (just looking for one answer here - for example, if you like Let It Bleed the best by the Stones and the White Album the best by the Beatles, just go with Let It Bleed).

A: ROBBIE WILLIAMS GREATEST HITS

5. Which band do you think has had a stronger lasting impact on music?

A: ROBBIE WILLIAMS

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 18 January 2005 14:52 (twenty-one years ago)

1. Pop/Rock

2. Beatles

3. Beatles

4. Beatles, Revolver

5. The Beatles had far more of an impact, I think; the Stones executed well but didn't transform how musicians approached songcraft.

Joseph McCombs (Joseph McCombs), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 14:53 (twenty-one years ago)

... but I wouldn't like to give you the impression that I actually own anything by the Beatles... no hold on, I've got the "Yellow Submarine" soundtrack

Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 14:53 (twenty-one years ago)

1. experimental rock/psych, but also pop-rock
2. beatles
3. beatles, but the gap is closing really fast.
4. rubber soul
5. beatles

peter smith (plsmith), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 15:25 (twenty-one years ago)

1. hard to say
2. beatles
3. beatles
4. sticky fingers
5. beatles

o. nate (onate), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 15:45 (twenty-one years ago)

1. What is your favorite genre of music? Soul music.

2. Overall, would you say that the Beatles or the Rolling Stones are (or were) more popular? Beatles.

3. Which of the two bands do you prefer? Stones.

4. What is your favorite album by one of these bands? (just looking for one answer here - for example, if you like Let It Bleed the best by the Stones and the White Album the best by the Beatles, just go with Let It Bleed). Beatles--Beatles for Sale. Stones--Exile on Main St.

5. Which band do you think has had a stronger lasting impact on music? The Beatles by a nose.

eddie hurt (ddduncan), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 15:53 (twenty-one years ago)

1. Psychpostpunksoulreggaebleeps

2. The Beatles

3. The Beatles

4. Between The Buttons

5. Beatles

Dr. C (Dr. C), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 15:58 (twenty-one years ago)

1. Hard rock (I had to think about this, given that for the last 25 years I way prefer disco and hip-hop; but in my heart I keep wanting disco and hip-hop to do what the Dolls did)
2. The Beatles
3. The Rolling Stones
4. Big Hits (High Tide and Green Grass (U.S. version)(and for what it's worth, Let It Bleed is my least favorite '60s Stones album ("Can't Always Get What You Want" reducing "Heart of Stone" to platitudes and dragging on interminably), and The White Album and Revolver are among my least favorite Beatles' albums; my favorite Beatles album is The Beatles Second Album, which was their third album and didn't exist in Britain, and reminds me of the Stones)
5. The Rolling Stones (and among rock bands the Yardbirds would be number two in impact, though this question is difficult to answer since "impact" can pertain to so many different things: But sonically and emotionally, anywhere in music that "hard" is an issue - hard beats, hardcore - you're haunted by the Stones, like it or not, and what you're haunted by isn't just the impulse to be hard and bad, which long preceded the Stones, but the Stones' twisting this impulse into impossibility and sadness, running a critique of it at the same time they were doing it, and running a critique of a critique, eventually turning the pencil around and writing with an eraser)

Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 16:52 (twenty-one years ago)

1. Avant-Garde Psychedelic Proto-Post-Punk R&B Jazz In Dub. Or just about any category that you could get both Captain Beefheart and The Slits into, to be honest. Plus whatever The Doc said, obviously.

2. The Beatles

3. The Beatles. I'd like to be able to say Rolling Stones but I'm afraid I can't.

4. Either Rubber Soul or Revolver.

5. The Beatles.

You're welcome.

Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 17:04 (twenty-one years ago)

1. dont have one.
2. beatles.
3. beatles.
4. rubber soul/revolver. i think the stones are monstrously overrated and dont love any one of their albums more than their others. i think theyre more of a singles band personally.
5. beatles.

ppp, Tuesday, 18 January 2005 17:12 (twenty-one years ago)

what you're haunted by isn't just the impulse to be hard and bad, which long preceded the Stones, but the Stones' twisting this impulse into impossibility and sadness, running a critique of it at the same time they were doing it, and running a critique of a critique, eventually turning the pencil around and writing with an eraser

It seems to me that Muddy Waters, Howlin Wolf, Little Walter, Hank Williams, and Johnny Cash basically had accomplished all of these things before the Stones, at least up through the part about the first critique - though I'm not sure I get the second meta-critique or the eraser part, so maybe that's where the Stones' contribution lies.

o. nate (onate), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 17:20 (twenty-one years ago)

the beatles

RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 17:33 (twenty-one years ago)

Okay, first I just want to say that this made me laugh:
i haven't got any stones lps anymore but "steel wheels" is good.

Okay, so...

1. What is your favorite genre of music?

Um... I think if I have to use the widely accepted "genres" I'll probably fall in the punk/indie camp. A substantial chunk of my favorites are technically postpunk and another good sized one would likely be called bubblegum, but punk/indie probably covers the majority.

2. Overall, would you say that the Beatles or the Rolling Stones are (or were) more popular?

The Beatles are more popular precisely for the reasons Stones fans tend to dislike them in these comparisons. Alex has probably already said it best... Just about everyone can find Beatles stuff to like, which isn't true for the Stones by and large.

The other reason they were more popular is their image. It stands to reason that a band marketed as "good guys" is going to be more accepted by everyone than a band with a "bad boy" image, right?

3. Which of the two bands do you prefer?

The Beatles

4. What is your favorite album by one of these bands? (just looking for one answer here - for example, if you like Let It Bleed the best by the Stones and the White Album the best by the Beatles, just go with Let It Bleed).

Abbey Road

5. Which band do you think has had a stronger lasting impact on music?

Without context for this question it's difficult to answer, because it is dangerously easy to answer this question with the same answer as #2 but without different reasons. (i.e. They had a stronger impact because they were more popular.)

I am going to say the Beatles though, because I don't think the Stones changed the face of music in quite the same way. There's no doubt of the Stones' influence on tons of bands, but the Beatles "changed what was possible" in more ways. (Off the top of my head I'm thinking of use of harmony, for one.)

martin m. (mushrush), Tuesday, 18 January 2005 18:06 (twenty-one years ago)

two years pass...
1. What is your favorite genre of music?

Classic pop (as in The Beatles ;) )

2. Overall, would you say that the Beatles or the Rolling Stones are (or were) more popular?

Fairly obvious, from chart performance, The Beatles.

3. Which of the two bands do you prefer?

The Beatles

4. What is your favorite album by one of these bands? (just looking for one answer here - for example, if you like Let It Bleed the best by the Stones and the White Album the best by the Beatles, just go with Let It Bleed).

That would be "Sgt. Pepper" then.

5. Which band do you think has had a stronger lasting impact on music?

Again, rather obviously The Beatles even though their legacy was more totally dominant before punk.

Geir Hongro, Monday, 2 April 2007 11:54 (nineteen years ago)

Geir, why you searching for Beatles threads today?

Mark G, Monday, 2 April 2007 11:56 (nineteen years ago)

This was linked from another post.

Geir Hongro, Monday, 2 April 2007 12:36 (nineteen years ago)

five years pass...

And did the Beatles ever do the Stones? No. They did a Who track once though. "A quick one while he's away"

Mark G, Friday, 19 October 2012 00:01 (thirteen years ago)

The Stones' second single was, for all intents and purposes, written for them by Lennon/McCartney ("I Wanna Be Your Man").

And the Beatles didn't really cover "A Quick One" so much as goof on the "We'll soon be home" part during a lull in/the lull that was the Let It Be filming.

5-Hour Enmity (Tarfumes The Escape Goat), Friday, 19 October 2012 00:07 (thirteen years ago)

You'd think there would be 10 seconds of Satisfaction or something during the Get Back sessions, but it doesn't look like it...

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 19 October 2012 00:12 (thirteen years ago)

xpost I know, it just amuses me that the (only?) contemporaneous cover they ever had a go at was that one.

Not counting "Hello Dolly" that they did for the banned Xmas single

Mark G, Friday, 19 October 2012 00:25 (thirteen years ago)

Good point re: only contemporaneous cover. My guess is that John started it off, having just played on the bill with the Who at the RnR Circus.

5-Hour Enmity (Tarfumes The Escape Goat), Friday, 19 October 2012 02:22 (thirteen years ago)

Well they covered a ton of current R&B stuff in the early years. But yeah nothing really past '65.

Emperor Cos Dashit (Adam Bruneau), Friday, 19 October 2012 02:35 (thirteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.