― jonathan - stl (jonathan - stl), Thursday, 2 November 2006 19:58 (nineteen years ago)
― zippezappy (doomed), Wednesday, 8 November 2006 19:23 (nineteen years ago)
― Owen Pallett (Owen Pallett), Wednesday, 8 November 2006 20:23 (nineteen years ago)
xp
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 8 November 2006 20:32 (nineteen years ago)
I still find this an admirable, ambitious record, but also a flawed and problematic one. I doubt anyone else is going to nail how I feel about this one closer than the Stylus review. Which gives it a good grade, but reads as similarly conflicted w/r/t to my own feelings about Ys, even if they don't quite stretch to "enchantment".
― new new wave of new wave new rave (fandango), Wednesday, 8 November 2006 20:39 (nineteen years ago)
― max (maxreax), Wednesday, 8 November 2006 21:16 (nineteen years ago)
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Wednesday, 8 November 2006 21:24 (nineteen years ago)
― max (maxreax), Wednesday, 8 November 2006 21:36 (nineteen years ago)
― Mark (MarkR), Wednesday, 8 November 2006 21:38 (nineteen years ago)
I've only listened to it once so far, but it did sort of remind me of the Phil Ochs song 'Crucifixion' in places. Obviously that's the Van Dyke Parks link in full effect.
― NickB (NickB), Wednesday, 8 November 2006 21:46 (nineteen years ago)
― mike powell (mike powell), Wednesday, 8 November 2006 21:55 (nineteen years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 8 November 2006 22:03 (nineteen years ago)
― mike powell (mike powell), Wednesday, 8 November 2006 22:13 (nineteen years ago)
― zippezappy (doomed), Wednesday, 8 November 2006 23:10 (nineteen years ago)
― badg (badg), Wednesday, 8 November 2006 23:20 (nineteen years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 8 November 2006 23:22 (nineteen years ago)
― J (Jay), Thursday, 9 November 2006 00:25 (nineteen years ago)
― Marmot (marmotwolof), Thursday, 9 November 2006 00:32 (nineteen years ago)
and on the "bad thing" remark, yesterday i had someone add the 'e' and try to insult her by saying she sounds like lisa simpson--yeah, why IS that bad?
― mox twelve (Mox twleve), Thursday, 9 November 2006 04:46 (nineteen years ago)
― Raw Patrick (Raw Patrick), Thursday, 9 November 2006 09:43 (nineteen years ago)
ts for misspellings designed to infuriate sub-editors: joanna newsome v missy elliot
(the missy misspelling is far out in front because it has been going on for a DECADE now and shows no sign of slowing down EVEN THOUGH SHE SPELLS HER NAME CORRECTLY ON ALL HER SLEEVES)
i really really want to hear ys but i am not convinced that i'll like it and so am unwilling to spend money on it
― The Lex (The Lex), Thursday, 9 November 2006 10:35 (nineteen years ago)
― Nedpoleon (NedBeauman), Thursday, 9 November 2006 11:22 (nineteen years ago)
No one who's heard it here has spent any money on it, it's not out yet!
― Marmot (marmotwolof), Thursday, 9 November 2006 16:09 (nineteen years ago)
― The Lex (The Lex), Thursday, 9 November 2006 16:10 (nineteen years ago)
― NickB (NickB), Thursday, 9 November 2006 16:30 (nineteen years ago)
― Marmot (marmotwolof), Thursday, 9 November 2006 16:51 (nineteen years ago)
Dude, what kind of stick is stuck in your ass? Of COURSE people are qualified to critique her music without spelling her name correctly! What the hell does the spelling of her name have to do with her music? Moreover, my critique offered NO OPINION WHATSOEVER about whether her music was good or bad--I just said she sounded like Miss Kitty. And she does. That is all.
Touchy-ass fanboys. Sheesh.
― J (Jay), Thursday, 9 November 2006 18:43 (nineteen years ago)
― the pinefox (the pinefox), Thursday, 9 November 2006 19:05 (nineteen years ago)
― the pinefox (the pinefox), Thursday, 9 November 2006 19:07 (nineteen years ago)
― mike powell (mike powell), Thursday, 9 November 2006 19:16 (nineteen years ago)
― mike powell (mike powell), Thursday, 9 November 2006 19:18 (nineteen years ago)
Oh, I had no idea about that. I've totally been reading it as 'wise' - thought it might have been some sort of concept album about Ernie.
― NickB (NickB), Thursday, 9 November 2006 20:43 (nineteen years ago)
― Marmot (marmotwolof), Thursday, 9 November 2006 20:45 (nineteen years ago)
― bb (bbrz), Thursday, 9 November 2006 20:50 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 9 November 2006 20:57 (nineteen years ago)
― Marmot (marmotwolof), Thursday, 9 November 2006 21:01 (nineteen years ago)
yep
― bb (bbrz), Thursday, 9 November 2006 21:09 (nineteen years ago)
― Marmot (marmotwolof), Thursday, 9 November 2006 21:14 (nineteen years ago)
― Marmot (marmotwolof), Thursday, 9 November 2006 21:15 (nineteen years ago)
beep. I hit the wrong button.
(>>>>"not a defensive remark")
My apologies, son.
Of COURSE people are qualified to critique her music without spelling her name correctly! What the hell does the spelling of her name have to do with her music?
Wellll--and this observation is far removed your own neutral remark--there does seem to be an arguable correlation between the banal critiques of her vocal doses and that spare e.
― mox twelve (Mox twleve), Thursday, 9 November 2006 21:16 (nineteen years ago)
Well...searching through the thread, it looks like Edward said something about that:"The elegant sweep of movements in "Only Skin" are flattened into sequential morasses of sound. To give a specific instance, the cascasding runs during the "rolling along, among the reeds among the rushes" segment have less of an impact because of the accompanying orchestral surge."
The 16 minutes is something nice to hear when you're idle, but I would much rather repeat the live piano version because it dives right into that wonderful rhythm.
― mox twelve (Mox twleve), Thursday, 9 November 2006 21:33 (nineteen years ago)
― Space Is the Place (Space Is the Place), Friday, 10 November 2006 03:13 (nineteen years ago)
Haven't found the leaked version (HOW THE HELL aka yr torrent networks is garbage, son), so I'm just gonna pony the fuck up and buy it next week.
― Hoosteen (Hoosteen), Friday, 10 November 2006 03:21 (nineteen years ago)
― max (maxreax), Friday, 10 November 2006 05:24 (nineteen years ago)
― pisces (piscesx), Friday, 10 November 2006 12:45 (nineteen years ago)
― zippezappy (doomed), Friday, 10 November 2006 18:05 (nineteen years ago)
i agree with mark
― zippezappy (doomed), Friday, 10 November 2006 20:55 (nineteen years ago)
fantastic though isn't it? i mean head-fuckingly fantastic.
― pisces (piscesx), Monday, 13 November 2006 12:27 (nineteen years ago)
― hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 13 November 2006 15:34 (nineteen years ago)
It's not that I don't get it, I GET ITI just don't think it's very good
― zippezappy (doomed), Monday, 13 November 2006 15:35 (nineteen years ago)