― ethan, Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Yes this is why indie people (in the general not the specific sense) got the broad-brush slags in the first place Phil! They claimed "mainstream" or "Top 40" as a genre = they got the same treatment back.
Nitsuh has misunderstood my point I think. I consciously said that I find people who listen to lots of things more interesting than people who listen to one thing, without specifying what that one thing might be. eg I think the Jay-Z/Nas thread is funny and entertaining but I also don't actually read it much.
(I'm also not saying that it's very difficult or effortful to listen to lots of things - my cousin Leila listens to lots of things - hip- hop, nu-metal, guitar pop, teen-pop, trance, big ballads, ragga - every time she puts on the NOW records I buy her.)
― Tom, Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― jess, Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Though the crossover of Naughty By Nature's f'in' brilliant and f'in' hard-ass debut remains a mystery to this day
― John Darnielle, Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― cuba libre (nathalie), Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
it might have something to do with hooks.
Er, I already figured that one out, Tom...:-) My point was that, by offering the same treatment back -- rather than by positing an inclusive, uniting "third way" in which the virtues of good pop and good indie are appreciated -- you're basically "sinking to their level" = acknowledging that you have nothing more interesting to say (than what they're saying) = acknowledging that their behavior was completely legitimate, since you're engaging in it too.
― Phil, Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
(haha, contrary to this thread, i can actually produce coherent thoughts.)
except for that bit about my ace of base cover being my best work
kidding kidding
For fairness' sake - so people on ILM can get an idea of what the "new" people on this thread usually talk about.
― 34523, Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
NB yes I know BDP are too "conscious" to count as black according to most anglo interpreters of hiphop roolz
― 234523525, Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― 6433, Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
let's have another g + t shall we
― 667, Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
(which is a bit like being the tallest midget, yes, but still...)
― Melissa W, Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― electric sound of jim, Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Mr Noodles, Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Ron, Wednesday, 29 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Is this an 'indie' attitude rather than a 'pop' attitude? Let me explain...
I don't think of 'indie' or 'pop' as types of music, but as attitudes to music and listening to music. Listening to something because it's 'good' = indie; listening to something because you like it = pop; having to think about whether you like something or not, or what kind of music it is, etc. = definitely indie (ie the whole point of ILM). But because I'm not sure there is such a thing as a pure unmediated reaction to music (pure instinctive liking) that would mean that there is no 'true' pop fan (especially not the infamous critical model eg. 14 yr old girls): everyone is 'indie' to some extent.
Which certainly makes *me* indie, however much I like pop music, and the same probably goes for the rest of ILM, and anyone who can even be bothered to argue about this.
There's a separate issue about the insularity of particular scenes, which is I think a misleading way of thinking about the problem. Scenes or particular groups of fans do not exist as such -- they are posited, either as the subject of a proposition ('we true fans of X') or as its object ('those bastard fans of Y'), and thus are only constituted polemically: 'which side are you on boys?'
― alext, Thursday, 30 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Sterling said this and it is my favourite piece of this thread so far!
― mark s, Thursday, 30 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Yes there is
1) Kids under 9.
2)The vast majority of the general non-music obsessed public who just hear stuff on the radio and buy <5 CDs a year. They'll instinctively like/dislike a record without knowing if they're supposed to like it or whether listening to it will be 'good for them'. Even if people have heard that a record is meant to be good (here : good = sells a lot) they feel under pressure to like it if they don't.
― Dr. C, Thursday, 30 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Dom Passantino, Thursday, 30 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
Not a big blues fan, then? ;) (Or soul for that matter)
― Tom, Thursday, 30 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)
― Nate Patrin, Thursday, 30 May 2002 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)