yeah plus my copy is on the computer so i haven't looked at the disc insert in an eternity
― aka best bum of the o_O's (Noodle Vague), Monday, 13 June 2011 10:07 (fifteen years ago)
the pictures were pretty bad at capturing the track iirc. it was just a wind up wasn't it?
― jed_, Monday, 13 June 2011 10:19 (fifteen years ago)
everything's just a wind up isn't it?
i dunno, i like the puzzle of the pictures' relationship to the tracks, even if the secret answer is "there isn't one". the pictures are there, and we can make of them what we will, and they add to the whole subterranean blur for me
― aka best bum of the o_O's (Noodle Vague), Monday, 13 June 2011 10:24 (fifteen years ago)
Hate the way that every time Mr D.James does something opaque, it's automatically assumed to be "a wind up." His sense of humour is pretty distinctive but I sometimes suspect that because he's often so oblique, people often assume that if they don't immediately get it, it must be a "wind up" rather than him creating something they don't understand. He seems to be about links and puzzles and interrelationships rather than direct correlations, so that's how I understand the picture-song interlink.
(or perhaps I'm just defensive on his behalf.)
― Karen D. Tregaskin, Monday, 13 June 2011 10:59 (fifteen years ago)
I think as long as you don't see something that's a joke and something that has artistic merit as being two mutually exclusive things then there's less of a problem.
― Actual LOL Tolhurst (Doran), Monday, 13 June 2011 11:02 (fifteen years ago)
how are the pictures-to-songs a wind-up anyway? The whole thing makes sense if you look at it. Wasn't it Designers Republic who made the inlay anyway?
― Bus to Yoker (dog latin), Monday, 13 June 2011 11:05 (fifteen years ago)
this album
― caek, Monday, 13 June 2011 11:10 (fifteen years ago)
They're not mututally exclusive at all. And with Mr D.James I think the line is often very close - in fact, he's expressed being mystified at how people take things that he intends entirely as a joke, completely seriously. (Come To Daddy being the prime example.)
It's more that kind of kneejerk anti-abstraction, anti-intellectual (you see the same thing with abstract or conceptual art "what, 1 million quid for a pile of bricks?" type thinking) that if something is not immediately apparent, it must be a wind-up (and, to me, that concept of wind-up has a slightly malicious overtone) that he's always somehow fucking with his fanbase rather than just doing something he thinks is cool or interesting or just needs to be done.
Don't see this attitude so much on ILX but on tWATMM it's completely rampant. Every time RDJ or Rephlex or whoever do something a bit sideways, they howl "he's taking the piss, they're winding us up!" rather than realising they're doing something amusing for their own benefit.
But I guess if I judged artists by their fanbases I'd never listen to Aphex Twin. :-/
DL - the photographs are his, he's actually done quite a lot of his own photography for his albums.
― Karen D. Tregaskin, Monday, 13 June 2011 11:12 (fifteen years ago)
I had no idea they were his photographs :-)
― Bus to Yoker (dog latin), Monday, 13 June 2011 11:20 (fifteen years ago)
i haven't actually sat down and listened to anything aphex-related in a very long time...i do like a lot of his stuff, but it's so tied to a particular time and place in my life, for me.
i was at a party in new york a few months ago and the DJ put on the afx remix of 808 state's 'flow coma', and i kept wishing that they'd play the original 808 state version instead. the original bangs so much harder than his distorted-to-hell remix
― geeta, Monday, 13 June 2011 11:56 (fifteen years ago)
Twin mixes tend to be a bit hit and miss. Can't say I ever really got into his 23 Mixes For Cash album, but by that point my obsession was admittedly starting to wane a little.
I do like this though:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J55uy2b_x_Q
― Bus to Yoker (dog latin), Monday, 13 June 2011 12:02 (fifteen years ago)
KDT if you think my response was anti-abstraction or anti-intellectual you obv don't know much about me (why would you? etc) it's just that in this case i think he probably was on one, nothing wrong with that, he's a wind up merchant a lot of the time.
― jed_, Monday, 13 June 2011 12:06 (fifteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8SP_OE3qrbk
rah
― http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:WhiteAmericanFolks.jpg (nakhchivan), Monday, 13 June 2011 12:09 (fifteen years ago)
He's not a wind-up merchant. Sometimes he jokes, sometimes he doesn't. Sometimes he does both at the same time. But that doesn't mean that every single thing he does is somehow a wind-up.
I dunno. Older Aphex (everything pre-Drukqs, which was where I originally got off the bus, but particularly the SAWs) is also so much a time and place for me, but it was a time and place where I was particularly happy so I get the pleasant twinge of being reminded of happier times as well as the enjoyment of listening to the music.
― Karen D. Tregaskin, Monday, 13 June 2011 12:19 (fifteen years ago)
I love that Flow Coma remix. I use it a lot when I'm DJing between bands. It has an immediately energising effect on people when it's on a good system. It's usually either that or Logan Rock Witch when I'm playing records.
― Actual LOL Tolhurst (Doran), Monday, 13 June 2011 12:21 (fifteen years ago)
Or that hardcore track off Smojphace...
― Actual LOL Tolhurst (Doran), Monday, 13 June 2011 12:23 (fifteen years ago)
But that doesn't mean that every single thing he does is somehow a wind-up.
I don't think so either. The photos thing may not be a wind up but the tracks are (on the whole) good or very good and the photos are rubbish. it looks like he spent about 20 minutes on the whole thing.
― jed_, Monday, 13 June 2011 12:26 (fifteen years ago)
the pictures also remind me of those Ask the Family "familiar object from an unfamiliar angle" questions where the camera wd slowly pan back until the identity of the object was blindingly obvious
― aka best bum of the o_O's (Noodle Vague), Monday, 13 June 2011 13:09 (fifteen years ago)
the sound of SAWII is often like lying on the ground in a quiet spot staring at something mundane until you don't recognise it any more
― aka best bum of the o_O's (Noodle Vague), Monday, 13 June 2011 13:10 (fifteen years ago)
I don't get it, Jed. It's like... Mr D.James makes set of ambient tracks which are fuzzy, indistinct, distorted, blurred and that makes him a genius expressing a deliberate aesthetic. Mr D.James makes set of photographs which are fuzzy, indistinct, distorted and blurred with which to express the ambience of said tracks without the use of words - and that makes them rubbish he spent maybe 20 minutes on?
― Karen D. Tregaskin, Monday, 13 June 2011 14:17 (fifteen years ago)
I've taken some great pics that took me all of 20 mins to take, total!
― Mark G, Monday, 13 June 2011 14:22 (fifteen years ago)
He may well have spent 20 minutes on them TBF, doesn't make them a wind-up. And yes, some of the things RDJ has got up to could well be considered a wind-up (thinking things like the Jesus Jones remix etc). But it's his prankster reputation that lends him a lot of ears. No one's saying he's not a great musician without a considerable amount of ideas, but he is also a jester who will wilfully take the piss to a degree. The difference is, he's one of the few artists I can think of for whom it never feels like the listener is being duped necessarily. Like, he could if he wanted to, release a single consisting of three particularly fruity fart noises and know that it would sell. But he's never done that. Even at his most irreverant, RDJ's music manages to be worthy in some fashion.
― Bus to Yoker (dog latin), Monday, 13 June 2011 14:24 (fifteen years ago)
'worthy' is an awful word, but yeah.
― Mark G, Monday, 13 June 2011 14:28 (fifteen years ago)
SAW Vol. 2 is actually the only Aphex record I actively love, and I'd always wished he'd done more like it. The Biosphere recommendation above is a great call... I also forgot to mention Roedelius as a precursor to this stuff, but the more lo-fi records like Selbstportraits I and II.
― Clarke B., Monday, 13 June 2011 14:33 (fifteen years ago)
See, this is one reason I like not knowing everything about music: There are still worlds undiscovered that I can explore when I get ennui about the stuff I own.
Thing is, I've just bought 'myself' (with some birthday funds from both sets of parents, mine and my wife's), a Technics 1220Mk2 turntable, and have since discovered that those records I thought I'd worn out bass frequencies on, tuen out to be 'not the case', maybe this different stylus is touching new parts of the groove.
So, am rediscovering all sorts of vinyl from within!
Although, our alice asks "can you play some Beatles?" at which pont I went, oh OK.. and stuck on Revolver as I nipped around the shops.
Anyhow, she wants to take the "School's Out" album to school to show her teacher, and the 'cool' way it folds out into a desk...
Anyway, back to the ambient masterwork...
― Mark G, Monday, 13 June 2011 14:47 (fifteen years ago)
― Karen D. Tregaskin, Monday, 13 June 2011 14:17 (1 hour ago) Bookmark
eh this isn't what i'm saying. this is what you think i'm saying.
― jed_, Monday, 13 June 2011 15:49 (fifteen years ago)
there's clearly a qualitative difference between these photos and these tracks. i don't think they express the tracks well. i like the concept i just think the execution is poor. you're perfectly entitled to think they're great.
― jed_, Monday, 13 June 2011 15:55 (fifteen years ago)
i agree that they're not exactly amazing photographs, especially not compare dto the music, no. Certainly not what I think of when I hear these songs. But the concept is good - I like the way each picture is a different size according to length of track.
― Bus to Yoker (dog latin), Monday, 13 June 2011 16:02 (fifteen years ago)
match sticks
― tanuki, Friday, 6 April 2012 13:14 (fourteen years ago)
Tredanva-wyns.
― Popcorn Supergay Receiver (Masonic Boom), Friday, 6 April 2012 13:25 (fourteen years ago)
wind farm? I could see that — one 500 years from now in a posthuman world
― tanuki, Friday, 6 April 2012 13:51 (fourteen years ago)
Tredanvayow-wyns a wra gul tros hevelep ilow dhe Afeks Twyn. Pur deg yw!
― Popcorn Supergay Receiver (Masonic Boom), Friday, 6 April 2012 14:14 (fourteen years ago)
(I have no idea what "ambient" is yn Kernewek, will have to ask my teacher. I'm guessing "ambyennek" or something like that?)
― Popcorn Supergay Receiver (Masonic Boom), Friday, 6 April 2012 14:15 (fourteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=goDd02TTxBA
― piano toilet (am0n), Friday, 6 April 2012 14:55 (fourteen years ago)
OMG why am i just finding out now that there is finally a 3LP repress out?!??
― zappi, Thursday, 24 May 2012 16:07 (fourteen years ago)
"stone in focus" not included though -.-
http://www.discogs.com/Aphex-Twin-Selected-Ambient-Works-Volume-II/release/3577040
― ☆, Monday, 4 June 2012 18:59 (fourteen years ago)
shit pressing unfortunately ):
― diamonddave85, Monday, 4 June 2012 19:36 (fourteen years ago)
... both of which i found out to my cost this week. smh :(
― zappi, Monday, 4 June 2012 20:19 (fourteen years ago)
What exactly constitutes a shit pressing of a record full of ambient noises and drones?
― Naive Teen Idol, Monday, 4 June 2012 21:36 (fourteen years ago)
loud scratches and distortion
― diamonddave85, Monday, 4 June 2012 21:39 (fourteen years ago)
the original pressing was shit as well.
― jed_, Monday, 4 June 2012 21:43 (fourteen years ago)
Why would anyone even want a vinyl version of an ambient album?
― Tuomas, Monday, 4 June 2012 21:48 (fourteen years ago)
i read this thread & full of nostalgia popped this out of filing for a listen & i found it hugely insubstantial. like a bad roedelius album. thomas köner's first few were contemporaneous w/ this & infinitely preferable to my ears. don't get me wrong, I love SAW1, & that fusiony new tuss stuff - i think he's a good but imperfect composer. lionising this heap of shit (SAW2)is simple hero-worship, wish fulfilment, & nostalgic longing, IMO
― iglu ferrignu, Tuesday, 5 June 2012 05:52 (fourteen years ago)
lionising this heap of shit (SAW2)is simple hero-worship, wish fulfilment, & nostalgic longing, IMO
― iglu ferrignu, Tuesday, June 5, 2012 1:52 AM (6 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink
Ouch! What about those of us who don't love that much of Aphex's stuff outside of this particular record? Early Koner is on a very different wavelength too, I think.
― Clarke B., Tuesday, 5 June 2012 12:19 (fourteen years ago)
fuck you.
― crüt, Tuesday, 5 June 2012 13:27 (fourteen years ago)
1) I heard to SAWII for the first time in like 2003; it's not "nostalgic longing"2) I don't give a shit about the rest of RDJ's career; it's not "hero-worship"3) SAW2 is one of the most intricate, moving albums of all time; it's not a "heap of shit"4) fuck you
― crüt, Tuesday, 5 June 2012 13:30 (fourteen years ago)
anyone with a dissenting opinion on Aphex Twin get the FUCK off ILM
― frogbs, Tuesday, 5 June 2012 13:35 (fourteen years ago)
it's not that; it's just that I'm going to give anyone who shits on my favorite album & its fans a hearty "fuck off."
― crüt, Tuesday, 5 June 2012 13:42 (fourteen years ago)
crüt otm
― Trey Imaginary Songz (WmC), Tuesday, 5 June 2012 14:07 (fourteen years ago)
haha. you fanboys !
― iglu ferrignu, Tuesday, 5 June 2012 14:38 (fourteen years ago)