ODD FUTURE WOLF GANG KILL THEM ALL

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (7499 of them)

dude seriously, come on. strangling kittens and pushing prams off cliffs ARE absurd, because they don't happen every day. rape happens every day. and the culture we live in (US at least) is fucking broken when it comes to dealing with it. lyrics advocating rape don't make me go "oh my god that's so shocking and transgressive, who would promote rape!"

understand the objection, but aaargh's "moral absurdity" argument rings true. i don't get the sense that anyone in OF is "promoting rape." it's pure nihilism, promoting nothing but its own voice. and i'm used to this. i came of age courting exactly this sort of moral vertigo, listening to the misfits, following the adventures of the mighty ranxerox and watching herschell gordon lewis movies. it's hard for me to see a real difference in kind here.

contenderizer, Tuesday, 17 May 2011 02:29 (fifteen years ago)

tyler is trolling like a motherfucker and it's working out pretty well for him

Frankly shocked that no critic hasn't jumped at the chance to put Goblin and a few other OFWGKA releases under a Trollcore umbrella.

CompuPost, Tuesday, 17 May 2011 02:49 (fifteen years ago)

http://www.coloncancerresource.com/image-files/colon-cancer-thoughtful-man-in-glasses.jpg

what great discussions touching on class, race, and gender did i miss today?

its realy sad he was a drowner (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 17 May 2011 02:51 (fifteen years ago)

colon-cancer-thoughtful-man-in-glasses.jpg

markers, Tuesday, 17 May 2011 02:52 (fifteen years ago)

we all got colonoscopies, you should've been here

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 17 May 2011 02:55 (fifteen years ago)

feel so refreshed

w of in the attic (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Tuesday, 17 May 2011 02:56 (fifteen years ago)

understand the objection, but aaargh's "moral absurdity" argument rings true. i don't get the sense that anyone in OF is "promoting rape." it's pure nihilism, promoting nothing but its own voice. and i'm used to this. i came of age courting exactly this sort of moral vertigo, listening to the misfits, following the adventures of the mighty ranxerox and watching herschell gordon lewis movies. it's hard for me to see a real difference in kind here.

i'm just saying that one person's "this is an expression of pure nihilism and I don't believe it is meant seriously" is another person's "this is triggery shit that contributes to an overall feeling that culture doesn't take rape seriously." i don't think we have to hammer it into just one of those categories, it can exist in both. anyway i realize i'm getting pretty earnest for this thread, but after seeing these "i listened to terrible stuff for its nihilist viewpoint" posts, i wanted to point out that sometimes the ability to stay detached is a privilege.

THIS ILLUMINATI RITUAL (reddening), Tuesday, 17 May 2011 03:07 (fifteen years ago)

ooooooh, "trollcore"! Now there's a wheel I could get behind and drive off a cliff.

it is sad but their is so much beauty (forksclovetofu), Tuesday, 17 May 2011 03:18 (fifteen years ago)

one person's "this is an expression of pure nihilism and I don't believe it is meant seriously" is another person's "this is triggery shit that contributes to an overall feeling that culture doesn't take rape seriously." i don't think we have to hammer it into just one of those categories, it can exist in both. anyway i realize i'm getting pretty earnest for this thread, but after seeing these "i listened to terrible stuff for its nihilist viewpoint" posts, i wanted to point out that sometimes the ability to stay detached is a privilege.

that seems more than fair. i mean, i certainly can't fault anyone for approaching this discussion in earnest.

contenderizer, Tuesday, 17 May 2011 03:24 (fifteen years ago)

yeah pretty dead on

i mean both positions you describe are 100% true in my mind

brio, Tuesday, 17 May 2011 03:30 (fifteen years ago)

reddening otm. I think mark r drew a good distinction between the kind of violent lyrics typical to rap and odd future in his piece I linked to

D-40, Tuesday, 17 May 2011 13:03 (fifteen years ago)

tyler is the same age as prodigy and havoc were when the infamous was released

i'm a fucking walking pair of Docs (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 17 May 2011 14:55 (fifteen years ago)

ORLY?
http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_ljva876ZnP1qdudjxo1_500.jpg

Number None, Tuesday, 17 May 2011 15:00 (fifteen years ago)

hmmm wiki said he was born in 74...looks like we're gonna have to see the kenyan birth certificate.

i'm a fucking walking pair of Docs (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 17 May 2011 15:04 (fifteen years ago)

I just remembered that Noz had posted this on his tumblr a few weeks back but with a proviso that it was probably a typo

Number None, Tuesday, 17 May 2011 15:05 (fifteen years ago)

trying to remember the year that poetical prophets unsigned hype column in the source was printed, they looked super young in that...i can remember the pic pretty well

found it but doesn't say what month:

http://dl.thesource.com/content/7744_k1hdggaxklhlt_pl.jpg

i'm a fucking walking pair of Docs (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 17 May 2011 15:06 (fifteen years ago)

lol they sound so young here

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M7OzX-w794I

i'm a fucking walking pair of Docs (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 17 May 2011 15:07 (fifteen years ago)

reddening otm. I think mark r drew a good distinction between the kind of violent lyrics typical to rap and odd future in his piece I linked to

― D-40, Tuesday, 17 May 2011 13:03 (2 hours ago)

did you actually link to it or was yr phone giving w of again

the first rule of debate club (Edward III), Tuesday, 17 May 2011 15:19 (fifteen years ago)

is that a joke?

D-40, Tuesday, 17 May 2011 15:29 (fifteen years ago)

no, the last time you ref'd it I didn't see the link, maybe I just missed it

the first rule of debate club (Edward III), Tuesday, 17 May 2011 15:33 (fifteen years ago)

ten years from now tyler will be the star of csi:saskatoon or whatever and be beloved by millions. he just needs a good movie deal. nobody cares what you rapped about once you are a movie star. kelly ripa was just telling regis how much she loved her eminem step class the other day. eminem used to be controversial i think? foulmouthed anti-woman defiler of youth. now he's america's adorable lil' grumpy gus.

scott seward, Tuesday, 17 May 2011 15:37 (fifteen years ago)

xpost -

did anyone read this
http://pitchfork.com/features/resonant-frequency/7971-resonant-frequency-79/

― D-40, Tuesday, 17 May 2011 01:05 (15 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

just sayin, Tuesday, 17 May 2011 15:39 (fifteen years ago)

I was just thinking about that in relation to reviewing Snoop tonight. Snoop, Ice-T, Ice Cube, Eminem - all former scourges, now national treasures.

xpost Aw bless, the Poetical Prophets.

We need to talk about Bevan (DL), Tuesday, 17 May 2011 15:39 (fifteen years ago)

reddening otm

scott otm, too. the other night jon stewart showed a clip of some fox commentator pillorying common quickly followed by a clip of him palling around with ice-t.

once upon a time vernon reid was on a CMJ panel to debate amerikkka's most wanted when it was released, somebody said it was a very clever album and he was like "yeah, hitler was a clever motherfucker too"

the first rule of debate club (Edward III), Tuesday, 17 May 2011 15:57 (fifteen years ago)

vernon reid can shred like a motherfucker

i'm a fucking walking pair of Docs (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 17 May 2011 16:04 (fifteen years ago)

so if the tyler album or the earl album had more prosaic backing tracks, same lyrics, and was released on, i dunno, rap-a-lot, this thread wouldn't exist, right? or not in its present form anyway. might get a little interest from ilx rap dudes and then it would go away. gaining a white audience is obviously filled with the promise of riches, but also fraught with the perilous scrutiny of the media elite. nobody cares if you stay in the hood but not in my backyard fella!

scott seward, Tuesday, 17 May 2011 16:31 (fifteen years ago)

there's probably a trenchant tumblr post about that already. i can't read everything! sorry nabisco!

scott seward, Tuesday, 17 May 2011 16:32 (fifteen years ago)

yes, scott - when something is more popular, more people hear it & have opinions on it

w of in the attic (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Tuesday, 17 May 2011 16:34 (fifteen years ago)

if it were an album by the meatmen it also wouldn't be getting a whole lotta play

w of in the attic (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Tuesday, 17 May 2011 16:35 (fifteen years ago)

it's not really a given that a similar album released on Rap-A-Lot would sell significantly less than this is selling

some dude, Tuesday, 17 May 2011 16:40 (fifteen years ago)

so if the tyler album or the earl album had more prosaic backing tracks, same lyrics, and was released on, i dunno, rap-a-lot, this thread wouldn't exist, right? or not in its present form anyway. might get a little interest from ilx rap dudes and then it would go away. gaining a white audience is obviously filled with the promise of riches, but also fraught with the perilous scrutiny of the media elite. nobody cares if you stay in the hood but not in my backyard fella!

all of this. plus, you know, the hype machine reached a tipping point: major rap stars weighed in, pitchfork weighed in, major journalists weighed in, etc. etc., and suddenly everyone had to have an opinion.

solitary posts that effortlessly summarize the spirit of ilxor (ilxor), Tuesday, 17 May 2011 16:41 (fifteen years ago)

including myself, i bought it and it's among the lesser albums i've heard this year (though several tracks are stellar, in isolation)

solitary posts that effortlessly summarize the spirit of ilxor (ilxor), Tuesday, 17 May 2011 16:41 (fifteen years ago)

i'm not exactly sure what scott's point is. that if the music was different than ppl would be reacting differently? couldn't you say that about practically every artist ever

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 17 May 2011 16:45 (fifteen years ago)

no, maybe even if the music were the same. different audiences breed different reactions and different scrutiny.

scott seward, Tuesday, 17 May 2011 16:47 (fifteen years ago)

but yeah this is kinda obvious.

scott seward, Tuesday, 17 May 2011 16:49 (fifteen years ago)

you can call me mr.obvious.

scott seward, Tuesday, 17 May 2011 16:49 (fifteen years ago)

if it were an album by the meatmen it also wouldn't be getting a whole lotta play

BURN

the first rule of debate club (Edward III), Tuesday, 17 May 2011 16:50 (fifteen years ago)

i can imagine totally different reactions if the album was on an underground hip-hop label, instead of XL catering to indie kids along with their roster of Radiohead, White Stripes, Adele, Beck, Vampire Weekend, M.I.A., Sigur Rós, Basement Jaxx, Thom Yorke, Titus Andronicus, The Horrors, Gil Scott-Heron, The xx

solitary posts that effortlessly summarize the spirit of ilxor (ilxor), Tuesday, 17 May 2011 16:51 (fifteen years ago)

I'm happy to report tesco vee is staying current tho

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-fJXvgUyE1Y

the first rule of debate club (Edward III), Tuesday, 17 May 2011 16:52 (fifteen years ago)

xp: I can imagine totally different reactions if the album was exactly the same but all of the promo material had Gwen Stefani's harajuku backup dancers cast as the people doing the rapping/production; being able to imagine something doesn't automatically make it a scenario worth exploring.

I HAVE ISSUES (DJP), Tuesday, 17 May 2011 16:53 (fifteen years ago)

ilxor you're basically just creating a fantasy world at that point -- if tyler everything involving odd future had played out exactly how it had except for the one difference of 'goblin' being released on anticon instead of xl, i really doubt that there would've been a discernible difference in its sales/acceptance

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 17 May 2011 16:53 (fifteen years ago)

lol i should've just let dan's post stand

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 17 May 2011 16:53 (fifteen years ago)

uh i think this particular boulder got pushed down the mountain a long time before tyler signed to xl

call all destroyer, Tuesday, 17 May 2011 16:54 (fifteen years ago)

i can imagine totally different reactions if the album was on an underground hip-hop label, instead of XL catering to indie kids along with their roster of Radiohead, White Stripes, Adele, Beck, Vampire Weekend, M.I.A., Sigur Rós, Basement Jaxx, Thom Yorke, Titus Andronicus, The Horrors, Gil Scott-Heron, The xx

― solitary posts that effortlessly summarize the spirit of ilxor (ilxor), Tuesday, May 17, 2011 12:51 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

well, he signed with XL well after they'd begun to share a fanbase with those kinds of artists

some dude, Tuesday, 17 May 2011 16:54 (fifteen years ago)

four posts in a row calling your point completely idiotic = the ilx version of a grand slam. congrats, ilxor

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 17 May 2011 16:55 (fifteen years ago)

lol i shoulda just stayed out of the odd future thread huh

solitary posts that effortlessly summarize the spirit of ilxor (ilxor), Tuesday, 17 May 2011 16:57 (fifteen years ago)

http://stayout.ytmnd.com/

the first rule of debate club (Edward III), Tuesday, 17 May 2011 16:59 (fifteen years ago)

in fairness, so should I

I HAVE ISSUES (DJP), Tuesday, 17 May 2011 17:00 (fifteen years ago)

so should all of us

underrated earl sweatshirt fans i have boned (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 17 May 2011 17:02 (fifteen years ago)

*camera pans to the horizon; strings swell*

FIN

I HAVE ISSUES (DJP), Tuesday, 17 May 2011 17:02 (fifteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.