or actual interest in talking about music or criticism
― five gone cats from Boston (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Monday, 2 May 2011 21:49 (fifteen years ago)
deej's shaky reading comprehension (or refusal to respond to anything anyone says in anything but the most reductive point he can disagree with) is definitely the elephant in the room here
― some dude, Monday, 2 May 2011 21:50 (fifteen years ago)
wow
― geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, 2 May 2011 21:54 (fifteen years ago)
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_ZIAraI6ixdo/TOo25Zw4mmI/AAAAAAAAAK8/G5A8BrtyYzo/s1600/stunned%2Bcat.gif
― bananas foster wallace (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 2 May 2011 21:56 (fifteen years ago)
speaking of reading comprehension --
sorry for being troll-y when quoting aero -- the point was that he wasnt actually partaking of witty repartee but was engaging in a serious argument that you cosigned -- which contradicted your assertion that u were simply busting my balls.
― geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, 2 May 2011 21:57 (fifteen years ago)
man whiney you are incredibly annoying
sorry for ruining this great thread
― bananas foster wallace (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 2 May 2011 21:59 (fifteen years ago)
like, i get aero's point wasnt per se about me in this instance, but why were we even discussing it? what did it have to do w/ the matter at hand if you were just joking around? it was brought up because you were criticizing something id written -- pretend it was in jest if you want but that makes no sense. we were, in fact, discussing the writing -- so, was i overreacting to 'jokes' or not? cuz i thought we were having a serious discussion
― geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, 2 May 2011 22:00 (fifteen years ago)
some dude i get a total 'have your cake and eat it too' vibe from this whole thing -- you get to be critical, but can back away when i take offense because you're just joking. i mean, you can claim its a 'persecution complex' but that doesnt explain why it doesnt bother me when flopson or j0rdan say it, but when u do it comes across like criticism.
― geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, 2 May 2011 22:01 (fifteen years ago)
aero's post had a friendly and familial air that, obviously, left the building soon after. your manner is can be extremely severe, especially when other people are trying to keep the mood light or contribute some levity or just say anything other than "deej otm" without you taking offense.
― some dude, Monday, 2 May 2011 22:03 (fifteen years ago)
like, you may notice that when you call me a dick or whatever i don't spend my next 10 posts explaining why i'm not and never have been a dick and you started it. me being less squeamish than you about being the bad guy or just being wrong or overstepping a line doesn't actually mean that you by default are right.
― some dude, Monday, 2 May 2011 22:05 (fifteen years ago)
yes & i apologize for characterizing his post the way i did because it confused my primary pt which was that this wasnt just a series of jibes but had crossed into a 'serious' discussion.
whatever. i guess i just need to learn to ignore your posts like that -- obv im taking them 'too seriously'.
― geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, 2 May 2011 22:06 (fifteen years ago)
xp
hey ignore me or don't, it's all good, obviously you should be able to defend yourself if you think someone's being unfair, even jokingly. i'm just saying the earnest 700 word response to a one-liner kind of inherently raises things beyond "jokes bruv" in a way that i find kind of impossible to take seriously.
― some dude, Monday, 2 May 2011 22:11 (fifteen years ago)
c'mon guys you are all nice ppl why are you fighting?
― coo coo khal (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Monday, 2 May 2011 23:08 (fifteen years ago)
i believe the term is not fighting but 'lol sparring'
― some dude, Tuesday, 3 May 2011 00:16 (fifteen years ago)
lolsparrer is one of best oi bands
― coo coo khal (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 3 May 2011 00:30 (fifteen years ago)
its not 'a one liner' its a series of passive aggressive zings directed my way that are kind of your stock in trade
― geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Tuesday, 3 May 2011 00:43 (fifteen years ago)
& whiney id appreciate if you kept shit like calling me 'paranoid' to the board and not twitter, thnx
― geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Tuesday, 3 May 2011 00:44 (fifteen years ago)
its not v professional imo
how much more clearly do i have to express myself to stop being sneaky and 'passive aggressive'? i really feel like i've laid all my cards on the table.
― some dude, Tuesday, 3 May 2011 00:47 (fifteen years ago)
i didnt have to write 700 words to make that argument, i did because its ilx & its just off the top of the dome shit, conversational or whatever.
heres a short version.
'yeah i figured you guys would get a kick out of that but i did it anyway cuz i think there is a connection between the artists -- i can go into detail if you like but it wasn't just a cataloging of the artists i like'
now you wouldnt be able to make jokes about how much i wrote, as if that was an indicator of something. would this convo have turned out differently? would i be overreacting? am i taking a 'joke' too seriously bcuz i take issue w/ you saying that i did that 'out of nowhere'? am i not allowed to take issue w/ that? are all zings hands-off because they're just jokes, even when its sorta implied that you mean some of the shit behind it?
― geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Tuesday, 3 May 2011 00:55 (fifteen years ago)
my main takeaway from this convo is that you'd be totally fine with someone disagreeing with or making fun of something you said IF you said something wrong and/or unintentionally funny, which in your opinion has never happened and probably never will.
― some dude, Tuesday, 3 May 2011 01:04 (fifteen years ago)
well, then read better
― geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Tuesday, 3 May 2011 01:05 (fifteen years ago)
like literally everything you've said just amounts to a haughty "how dare you!"
― some dude, Tuesday, 3 May 2011 01:05 (fifteen years ago)
you felt obligated to explain that you dont even love sheek louch like that in this thread -- how is that any different
― geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Tuesday, 3 May 2011 01:06 (fifteen years ago)
cause i said it once briefly and moved on?
― some dude, Tuesday, 3 May 2011 01:06 (fifteen years ago)
because i didnt then continue to argue with you about it because im sure you're right, as i dont happen to be in your head, like you were when you determined i was listing my favorite artists instead of making some wider point
― geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Tuesday, 3 May 2011 01:07 (fifteen years ago)
there is no relationship between jacka & max b, none, and if deej says there is, ill argue with him or troll him for the next 200 posts
― geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Tuesday, 3 May 2011 01:08 (fifteen years ago)
i'm not saying you deliberately listed favorite artists and are denying it, i'm saying you're so far inside the deej canon that you're not even aware of how much you lean on it in your writing. maybe you were aware and were comfortable with your choice, it just felt very hilariously reflexive, like "paragraph 3 = time to address where Gucci fits in here"
― some dude, Tuesday, 3 May 2011 01:11 (fifteen years ago)
i'm saying you're so far inside the deej canon that you're not even aware of how much you lean on it in your writing
oh see i thought it was just 'joeks bruv'
― geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Tuesday, 3 May 2011 01:13 (fifteen years ago)
at least youre admitting it now
like, do you see how phrasing it that way, instead of how flopson or jordan did, feels more like you want to, like, actually talk about the writing rather than standard 'ha, deej section' -- like, you are jumping inside my head & ascertaining that im lost in my world of rap ppl, or whatever
― geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Tuesday, 3 May 2011 01:14 (fifteen years ago)
which, if you want to discuss that, fine, but dont front like its just jokes when i come back at it like, well, i actually had a reason to compare them here! and accuse me of overreacting
― geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Tuesday, 3 May 2011 01:15 (fifteen years ago)
so if you joke about someone in a way that references actual sincere opinions or observations about that person it's no longer a joke? i can only joke about deej in ways that make no sense like "hey that guy has really long toenails!"?
― some dude, Tuesday, 3 May 2011 01:16 (fifteen years ago)
gross deej get a pedicure
― coo coo khal (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 3 May 2011 01:17 (fifteen years ago)
i didnt see where flopson made fun of my toenails
― geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Tuesday, 3 May 2011 01:18 (fifteen years ago)
i mean people here joke about how i obsess over drum sounds or whatever and i might protest a little but ultimately all i can say is 'touche' because i know they're just noticing patterns in things i post, not formulating malicious personal attacks on me
― some dude, Tuesday, 3 May 2011 01:19 (fifteen years ago)
yeah but ... you do obsess over drum sounds. & yeah, i obsess on some artists that I think are underrated, but i could also say SOME DUDE'S WORLDVIEW IS DISTORTED BY HIS OBSESSION WITH DRUM SOUNDS, and you could say DEEJ IS LOST IN HIS MYOPIC RAP WORLD, and they are both gonna be interpreted differently! in my case it felt like you were selling my actual analysis short but not in a way that comes across as 'thats our deej' but like, 'deej has lost perspective'
― geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Tuesday, 3 May 2011 01:23 (fifteen years ago)
'but its a joke i can sell it short' well this time, i didnt take it as a joke, and i dont think that its entirely on me to put up with any jokes anyone says about me ever? that i can be like, hey, i think that this is a bit unfair / misinterprets what i was doing here.
― geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Tuesday, 3 May 2011 01:25 (fifteen years ago)
btw some dude off topic but you are into drum sounds and that's why i always boggle at how you can like so much mainstreamy major label rock, worst drum sounds ever yikes, that's p much why i can't engage w/any of it
― coo coo khal (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 3 May 2011 01:26 (fifteen years ago)
hate them drum soundshate them hate then drum sounds
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 3 May 2011 01:27 (fifteen years ago)
that's a big can of worms, m@tt, i don't even know where to begin.
― some dude, Tuesday, 3 May 2011 01:29 (fifteen years ago)
― geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, May 2, 2011 9:25 PM (3 minutes ago) Bookmark
are you asserting this is the first time anyone on ilx has accused you of not being able to take a joke or have a sense of humor about yourself?
― some dude, Tuesday, 3 May 2011 01:30 (fifteen years ago)
i guess what im saying is, im careful not to 'lose perspective' or draw connections where i dont think there are any, so when you were clowning like id failed to do that it felt like you were dissing my writing & legitimacy rather than the fact that im a fan of whatever rappers.
― geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Tuesday, 3 May 2011 01:30 (fifteen years ago)
it is true that hardly anybody has any idea how to record drums any more - take a record with well-recorded drums to any decent mastering engineer & you'll see the guy's eyes get wide & he'll be like "WHERE'D YOU HAVE THIS DONE, WHO DID THIS" and you'll hear the horror stories of the garbage that gets brought into mastering facilities with instructions to "clean it up"
― five gone cats from Boston (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Tuesday, 3 May 2011 01:31 (fifteen years ago)
yeah esp because like it's most what you DON'T do, like all records used to have p good drum sounds until the 80s
― coo coo khal (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 3 May 2011 01:32 (fifteen years ago)
im going to rewrite that
im careful when it comes to approaching my writing to keep as much perspective as i can so the audience can trust what im saying, to avoid drawing connections that dont exist, or being anything other than 100% honest (as much as that is possible) when writing about this stuff, so when you were clowning the writing it felt like you were mocking my writing rather than my interest in the aforementioned rappers. which i will put up with from anonymous ppl on message boards, but i take the writing itself seriously, and if you make some joke about it that feels like youre arguing with how ive written something, i'll probably respond seriously. people are defensive about their writing!
― geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Tuesday, 3 May 2011 01:34 (fifteen years ago)
xpwhat's yr method for lovely drum recordings? it has always seemed hard from my v limited home studio type experiences.
― ogmor, Tuesday, 3 May 2011 01:34 (fifteen years ago)
i mean i guess i dont understand why that would surprise you or that id take it seriously -- its not the joke about me liking jacka that pissed me off (sorry not trying to keep you guys from this actually-interesting tangent)
― geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Tuesday, 3 May 2011 01:35 (fifteen years ago)