no it doesn't, pretty much the only connection between those 3 artists is "these are people that the author of this review loves and has to bring up at every opportunity"
― hong does your geirden gro (some dude), Sunday, May 1, 2011 10:57 AM (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
this sounds likea point-blank 'what you wrote here was incorrect' criticism, not a 'lol, deej mentioned artist he talks about a lot' ribbing. youre backpedaling into 'just zings bruv' which is fine but when u first posted it read to me as some kind of disagreement w/ its relevence to the piece rather than lighthearted lols
― geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, 2 May 2011 16:16 (fifteen years ago)
remember when i made almost the exact same kind of crack about Whiney's Quik review like a week ago and it didn't become a federal case? good times.
― some dude, Monday, 2 May 2011 16:19 (fifteen years ago)
yeah but that was correct
― geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, 2 May 2011 16:25 (fifteen years ago)
like, comparing the beastie boys to quik makes far less sense than max b & the jacka, for the reasons i outlined upthread
― geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, 2 May 2011 16:27 (fifteen years ago)
so you think whiney just quietly realized his error and isn't also just way more laid back and able to take a jab than you are?
― some dude, Monday, 2 May 2011 16:30 (fifteen years ago)
did you think maybe there is no 'error' and that your entire 'i am the only rational viewpoint on ilx' schtick is often wrong?
― geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, 2 May 2011 16:31 (fifteen years ago)
like, my entire point is that i thought this through in advance & think there are lots of parallels between the artists & there is no 'error' here; its an easy zing but i made the point for a reason
― geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, 2 May 2011 16:34 (fifteen years ago)
― geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, May 2, 2011 12:31 PM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark
um, which one of us is famous for saying "i have been otm on this thread"?
― some dude, Monday, 2 May 2011 16:40 (fifteen years ago)
I don't know any of these guys' music & I know D-40 will think this is just me takin a shot which it isn't it's just me talking about something I've been thinking about since I was a kid which comes up in this thread but FWIW probably nothing but other SoCal grampas will be able to attest to the following: the LA Times for years had a writer named Robert Hilburn for whom absolutely everything had to be framed in the context of the artists he liked best. He would have framed that differently: he would have said "these are the artists who are important and who frame the current pop dialogue" or something like that. Nevertheless, absolutely 100% of his readers lol'd at him twice a week because he was completely incapable of reviewing anything at all without referring at least once to Springsteen or Elvis Costello or X, and for a while there to Big Country and the Alarm. Once every review, it'd be like, "INXS are good, but, in lacking the vibrant optimism of Bruce Springsteen or the cutting worldly-wise wit of Elvis Costello, they come up short" and it got to be very, very lol. Growing up with this, back when I had designs on being a critic, I took this from it: no matter how certain you are that the artists you feel are most important in the current dialogue are, and no matter how certain you are that comparisons are fitting and apt, if you have some artists whose names you seem to mention in pretty much everything you write, people are going to clown you, either to your face or behind your back. If there are artists you namecheck regularly, people's radar will be up about it and they will clown even when you'd be likely to say "look I know I'm always talking about Springsteen but these guys really sound like Springsteen. D-40, I take from the way you talk about it that your writing is important to you, so I thought I would share this idea, if it's unwelcome, no harm intended, the end.
― five gone cats from Boston (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Monday, 2 May 2011 16:50 (fifteen years ago)
totally.
― some dude, Monday, 2 May 2011 16:52 (fifteen years ago)
fwiw, I think it's OK to compare a track that samples "Paul Revere" to the Beastie Boys
― bananas foster wallace (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 2 May 2011 16:59 (fifteen years ago)
i dont fucking do that though! my entire argument here is that these two particular artists, max b & the jacka, are actually very very similar and make total sense as reference points for each other! i dont refer to jacka in my other reviews! flopson agreed with me in this thread that it made sense to compare them!
― geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, 2 May 2011 17:00 (fifteen years ago)
yeah that admittedly got lumped in w/ the other 2 refs a little unfairly, sorry whiney (xpost)
― some dude, Monday, 2 May 2011 17:00 (fifteen years ago)
Like sorry, I didn't load my 75 word review with comparisons to Compton's Most Wanted and WC or whatever, guys; but like the point I was making was "this is Quik's iconic sound with some cool detours that might appeal to alt types" and so I 100% stand by the way I wrote it.
― bananas foster wallace (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 2 May 2011 17:01 (fifteen years ago)
fwiw my problem w/ whiney's review is, i see the reason he made those comparisons, but for me that kind of writing is pandering, that an artist shouldnt have to be justified on alt-rapper approved grounds to be worth hearing & can stand on his own two. its a different comparison than what i was doing, which was connecting lines between three seemingly unrelated artists who actually approach the form very similarly.
― geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, 2 May 2011 17:04 (fifteen years ago)
okay man it just sounded like 2 people were kinda clowning you for being a dude who brings up gucci mane whenever possible which seemed like a thing from a couple years back, I'll return to smoking a corncob pipe in this rocking chair, like I say just sorta bringin my own unwelcome & uninformed perspective to things as per usual no big
― five gone cats from Boston (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Monday, 2 May 2011 17:04 (fifteen years ago)
deej, there's a huge difference between "pandering" and "writing for your audience" which is coincidentally why no one gives two shakes of a dead dog's dick about a pitchfork review of a Max B record
― bananas foster wallace (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 2 May 2011 17:06 (fifteen years ago)
― five gone cats from Boston (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Monday, May 2, 2011 5:04 PM (38 seconds ago) Bookmark
imo there's a diff between 'bringing it up a lot on this board' whichis like conversation for me, vs. 'bringing it up in my writing,' where i do only try to make those connections if they make real sense to do so
― geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, 2 May 2011 17:06 (fifteen years ago)
― bananas foster wallace (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, May 2, 2011 5:06 PM (37 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
you're right i should have compared him to 'chillwave'
sorry swooshwave
― geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, 2 May 2011 17:07 (fifteen years ago)
i get that YOU see the connection and were making a case for it. but like aero said, you should also see why those connections seem a) totally random and arbitrary and, in the jacka's case kind of uselessly obscure, to non-goon thread regulars and b) hilariously in character to us.
― some dude, Monday, 2 May 2011 17:07 (fifteen years ago)
i do see why its lol & in character! what objected to was the post where u asserted i had no basis to compare them
― geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, 2 May 2011 17:08 (fifteen years ago)
well, i get why you like Max B and why you're eager to place him in a context that isn't strictly east coast/Dipset. but paralleling him with one or a couple southern/west coast/midwest acts would imo get that point across -- bringing up Gucci AND the Jacka AND Bone Thugs in the same review just felt like you were unloading a full barrel of "stuff deej people like"
― some dude, Monday, 2 May 2011 17:11 (fifteen years ago)
to answer whiney more seriously re: knowing my audience, i do write to an audience but i want to do so w/out losing rap readers who will roll their eyes at a madvillian ref in a quik review. i think you can make the case for the record w/out that
― geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, 2 May 2011 17:11 (fifteen years ago)
deej, If you don't think that song sounds like a Quik version of contemporary Dam-Funk/VHS/blown-out weirdness that's pervading a lot of hip-hop since "Sensual Seduction" than you don't have ears that work. Just because the shorthand I used was a little HRO doesn't mean it's inaccurate. I don't think rap records have to be treated differently than any other records.
― bananas foster wallace (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 2 May 2011 17:11 (fifteen years ago)
but like the point I was making was "this is Quik's iconic sound with some cool detours that might appeal to alt types" and so I 100% stand by the way I wrote it.
― bananas foster wallace (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, May 2, 2011 1:01 PM (10 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
Also, being 31, i don;'t have some hilarious baggage about "OH NO WHAT WILL REAL HEADS think of me", like the ghost of ethan lurking over your shoulder all day while you file a review that will get the #5 slot underneath the new East River Pipe and AIDS Wolf
― bananas foster wallace (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 2 May 2011 17:14 (fifteen years ago)
i want to do so w/out losing rap readers who will roll their eyes at a madvillian ref in a quik review.
like seriously, get the fuck over yourself, dude.
― bananas foster wallace (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 2 May 2011 17:15 (fifteen years ago)
lol @ your only touchpoint for 'real heads' being ethan
― geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, 2 May 2011 17:15 (fifteen years ago)
the point was that YOUR only touchpoint for 'real heads' is ethan
― bananas foster wallace (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 2 May 2011 17:16 (fifteen years ago)
― some dude, Monday, May 2, 2011 5:11 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark
bone thugs & gucci at this pt are all artists that like everyone knows. how do they even remotely qualify as 'artists deej likes' before 'references anyone familiar with hip hop will identify'
― geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, 2 May 2011 17:16 (fifteen years ago)
i'd like to apologize to whiney and everyone else for throwing up the whineysignal itt. let's all just slowly back away and watch this thing go up in flames, shall we?
― some dude, Monday, 2 May 2011 17:17 (fifteen years ago)
― bananas foster wallace (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, May 2, 2011 5:16 PM (26 seconds ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
and apparently yours is people whose knowledge begins & ends with adult swim rap
― geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, 2 May 2011 17:17 (fifteen years ago)
what, you?
― bananas foster wallace (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 2 May 2011 17:18 (fifteen years ago)
read aero's post again dude -- Elvis Costello and Springsteen are artists Hilburn's readers were familiar with too
― some dude, Monday, 2 May 2011 17:18 (fifteen years ago)
Adult Swim rap and THE JACKA THE JACKA THE JACKA THE JACKA THE JACKA THE JACKA THE JACKA THE JACKA THE JACKA THE JACKA THE JACKA THE JACKA THE JACKA TUNNEL TUNNEL JACKA GUCCI BRRR
― bananas foster wallace (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 2 May 2011 17:19 (fifteen years ago)
do i compare stuff to bone thugs in every review i write?
― geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, 2 May 2011 17:19 (fifteen years ago)
whiney is pulling a burt_stanton
― some dude, Monday, May 2, 2011 5:18 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
i mean you're basically arguing that i cant ever refer to musicians i happen to like in reviews any more?
― geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, 2 May 2011 17:21 (fifteen years ago)
ive never made a reference to an artist in my writing where it was relevant to do so. point blank period. im sorry if you think im overloading people with artists i happen to like but i think thats bullshit.
― geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, 2 May 2011 17:22 (fifteen years ago)
ha, typo. where it wasnt relevant to do so
― geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, 2 May 2011 17:23 (fifteen years ago)
that's a good question, but oh hey look at the beautiful weather outside, i'm gonna take my son to the park instead of spending another second talking about this right now, hope that's cool w/ you.
― some dude, Monday, 2 May 2011 17:25 (fifteen years ago)
no but if I sweeten the deal with a quarter for every bone thugs reference could we make this a reality?
xp fuckin lol @ relevancy typo.
― five gone cats from Boston (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Monday, 2 May 2011 17:33 (fifteen years ago)
but tbrr you compared synths on a j stalin record to wendy carlos where goblin or john carpenter soundtracks would have been way more apt so relevant yes but I'm ringin u up with a great big comparison-aptness check so like deal w/that
― five gone cats from Boston (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Monday, 2 May 2011 17:37 (fifteen years ago)
i dunno man that shit sounds like some clockwork orange outtakes to me
― geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, 2 May 2011 17:42 (fifteen years ago)
fwiw because im tired of this 'deej is obsessed w/ [x]' coming up everytime we talk about any of an entire series of artists ive talked a lot about on ilx, im going to set this out there:
1) some artists are talked about a lot by critics / on ilx, some are not
2) if an artist i like is not talked about a lot by critics, i will spend more time here talking about it
3) if an artist - say dj quik or e-40 or gucci, for examples of artists i used to talk about a lot MORE on ilx - gets picked up by wider discussions here, i tend to talk about them less, because theres no need to get a ball rolling
4) if an artist is not, i tend to spend more time talking about that artist, because what he's accomplishing artistically feels undervalued to me, so i try to convince others of his/her value
5) none of these things are particularly related to my reference to the jacka in a max b review, which was more about identifying different approaches to the art of rapping between two similarly-minded artists.
can we be done now?
― geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, 2 May 2011 17:46 (fifteen years ago)
lol 2 & 4 are basically the same thing but im typing this on my clocked-out half-hour lunch break so i did it kind of hurridly
― geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, 2 May 2011 17:47 (fifteen years ago)
mainly I just like to bitch about the j stalin review because I copped that record on the strength of the review and I thought the record sucked balls so I will be angry abt it until I die
― five gone cats from Boston (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Monday, 2 May 2011 17:47 (fifteen years ago)
sad u felt that way boo. i def dont think it sucks balls tho i did feel i overrated it slightly after the fact, if only bcuz in retrospect i realized 'gas nation' is a more fully-realized project
did you like 'red & blue lights' at least?
― geeks, dweebs, nerds & lames (D-40), Monday, 2 May 2011 17:48 (fifteen years ago)
man, max b is in the slammer and this is his ilx thread, what a raw deal
― don't judge a book by its jpg (Edward III), Monday, 2 May 2011 17:55 (fifteen years ago)
yeah it was a decent track!
― five gone cats from Boston (underrated aerosmith bootlegs I have owned), Monday, 2 May 2011 17:55 (fifteen years ago)