★ The Weeknd ★ What You Need ★

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (2502 of them)

its pretty lol that you complain abt how little ppl write abt r&b and you've never heard abt this guy

just sayin, Friday, 25 March 2011 19:36 (fifteen years ago)

The article in the Guardian references Toop's Sugar & Poison. The journalist needs to reevaluate this. The mood on that compilation is no where near Weeknd are aiming for. S&P is an exercise in indulgent, bitter-sweet, melancholic soul. Weeknd quite obviously play for a seedy, sexual but vulnerable mood. In my opinion there is a lot of rubbish being written about Weeknd. Who judges the music the like on the same scales? I've really enjoyed Weeknd's mixtape this week but they've(he's) yet to create something truly worthy.

mmmm, Friday, 25 March 2011 22:49 (fifteen years ago)

trying to form a slightly more coherent take on this qn - at this moment in history when music is so readily accesible to anyone w/ an internet connection its worth thinking abt music as much fitting into 'emotional' or 'functional' constellations as traditional sonic/cultural ones. & so instead of always using genre as a starting (& end) point in these discussions its worth acknowledging the emotional content of the music & how big a part that plays in how its received

I think we all do this, including all the writers you complain about in this thread lamp. The only difference is that when people aren't into something much they tend to downplay the "emotional" content as they don't consider it very effective or compelling.

At any rate what I've been trying to say is that "emotional content" is cultural, and no more genre-neutral than sonic content. Just as people get primed to connect with certain kinds of sonic tricks (both by listening to music and reading about it / discussing it) they get primed to connect with certain emotional tricks as well.

Personally I haven't really had a position on Weeknd in this thread, or even the media's treatment of R&B really, I'm just a bit suspicious of any arguments premised on some vague dichotomy between thinking and feeling.

Tim F, Friday, 25 March 2011 23:17 (fifteen years ago)

please tell me you've at least listened to them

gr8080, Saturday, 26 March 2011 00:13 (fifteen years ago)

question for you guys re: avenues to discovering the weeknd:

a friend of mine said she found out about the weeknd when it came up on a pandora station she had programmed to play artists like:

  • radio dept
  • kings of leon
  • erykah badu
  • adele
  • phoenix
first of all: lol. second of all: i was under the impression artists needed some sort of a proper release to get played on pandora? is this the norm now?

gr8080, Saturday, 26 March 2011 00:17 (fifteen years ago)

payolandora?

NO BLOGS WERE INVOLVED. (some dude), Saturday, 26 March 2011 00:49 (fifteen years ago)

best bit on the thread so far is lex not knowing who my beautiful dark twisted fennessey is

who is john nult? (dayo), Saturday, 26 March 2011 01:24 (fifteen years ago)

thats "hurricane" fennessey to you

max, Saturday, 26 March 2011 01:41 (fifteen years ago)

One time I used pandora to find some good 70s new age. It kept playing blaring droney crap that I 86'd until it basically went "fuck it" and started playing Jaheim and teedra Moses. turned out that was what I was looking for all along.

blank, Saturday, 26 March 2011 01:46 (fifteen years ago)

tim, i meant to note earlier that i definitely know what you're getting at on this thread. the only thing i feel a need to note is that the "priming" you're talking about is surely, for most people, an INCREDIBLY complicated interaction between stuff in the world (narratives about genre, media, social taste, etc.) and a lot MORE stuff about themselves (self-image, emotional desires, etc.) i worry when conversations seem to be overemphasizing the first part. but maybe that's not what's happening here.

oɔsıqɐu (nabisco), Saturday, 26 March 2011 02:20 (fifteen years ago)

I like this and don't feel conflicted about that.

Popture, Saturday, 26 March 2011 02:46 (fifteen years ago)

wicked games one is pretty cool. that's the only youtube i could get to work.

scott seward, Saturday, 26 March 2011 02:51 (fifteen years ago)

"does this make me corny indie fuxor btw?"

dude, you are rarely corny. and you have better taste than most people. that's why i first clicked on this thread. not for no controversy! no lexoversy!

i dig some of the discussion though. and you are all lucky because i have very little to add.

i knew i smelled somthing burning in here. you guys were thinking and stuff! god bless you.

scott seward, Saturday, 26 March 2011 03:17 (fifteen years ago)

The background vocal sample on The Party and The After Party... where's that from? It's killing me.

Popture, Saturday, 26 March 2011 03:38 (fifteen years ago)

it's Beach House.

hi scott seward you're my favorite kind of music critic

gr8080, Saturday, 26 March 2011 03:51 (fifteen years ago)

u mad

so fly zone (D-40), Saturday, 26 March 2011 04:06 (fifteen years ago)

The background vocal sample on The Party and The After Party... where's that from? It's killing me.

― Popture, Friday, March 25, 2011 11:38 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

it's Beach House.

― gr8080, Friday, March 25, 2011 11:51 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

bet i'm gonna love this record huh

★ INXS ★ What You Need ★ (Whiney G. Weingarten), Saturday, 26 March 2011 04:09 (fifteen years ago)

tim, i meant to note earlier that i definitely know what you're getting at on this thread. the only thing i feel a need to note is that the "priming" you're talking about is surely, for most people, an INCREDIBLY complicated interaction between stuff in the world (narratives about genre, media, social taste, etc.) and a lot MORE stuff about themselves (self-image, emotional desires, etc.) i worry when conversations seem to be overemphasizing the first part. but maybe that's not what's happening here.

yeah absolutely. I guess when we're talking about stuff in general it's easier to focus on the "stuff in the world" than the "stuff about [the listeners]" because (a) people's discussions about why they like things tend to emphasise the former anyway even if the latter is more important to them (for ease of communication as much as for any other reason) and because (b) the areas of overlap and are likely to be greater with the former.

Like, as much as saying "Weeknd-fans have this idea about R&B" is an unfair generalisation, I would have thought "Weeknd fans identify with this notion of the hollowness at the heart of hypersexualised modernity" (or insert other similar prevailing explanation for the emotional appeal of this music) to be far more of a generalisation.

Which is not to say that critics shouldn't indulge in this kind of thing, but I notice that people only have an issue with it when they're getting all defensive "these are not my thoughts get out of my brane!"

Tim F, Saturday, 26 March 2011 04:13 (fifteen years ago)

Tim what do you think about this album

gr8080, Saturday, 26 March 2011 04:23 (fifteen years ago)

dude, you are rarely corny >:-0

jaxon, Saturday, 26 March 2011 05:12 (fifteen years ago)

The background vocal sample on The Party and The After Party... where's that from? It's killing me.

― Popture, Friday, March 25, 2011 11:38 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

it's Beach House.

― gr8080, Saturday, March 26, 2011 1:51 PM (5 hours ago)

Oh thanks, It was thinking it sounded a bit like B BEAT GIRLS "FOR THE SAME MAN" Classic Version 1983 ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8rJp80ozJ4c) , but it's just that sounds a little like Beach House.

Popture, Saturday, 26 March 2011 09:04 (fifteen years ago)

btw did anybody notice in one of the songs he goes "fun fun fun fun fun"

who is john nult? (dayo), Sunday, 27 March 2011 01:07 (fifteen years ago)

now I understand why everybody's lookin' forward to The Weeknd

corkslovetoscrew (some dude), Sunday, 27 March 2011 01:25 (fifteen years ago)

weeknd warriors

so fly zone (D-40), Sunday, 27 March 2011 01:39 (fifteen years ago)

I'm listening to anticipation right now, it's nice but I don't think it's directly comparable to the weeknd, yeah the production is stripped down and bare on some tracks, but the vocal arrangements are still very lush compared to the weeknd

who is john nult? (dayo), Sunday, 27 March 2011 02:07 (fifteen years ago)

Given most people who would be boosting Trey over the Weeknd probably would say that the latter's vocals are its weakest link, that ought not be so surprising.

Tim F, Sunday, 27 March 2011 02:12 (fifteen years ago)

I don't dislike Weeknd's vocals except for particular moments actually; I agree he sounds more like Jeremih than Trey.

Tim F, Sunday, 27 March 2011 02:13 (fifteen years ago)

I'm kinda loving that hollowed out, empty-eyed feeling of the opening bars on the morning

who is john nult? (dayo), Sunday, 27 March 2011 02:15 (fifteen years ago)

I briefly flirted w/ trey songz after cb broke my heart/rihannas face but i was put off by his luvvverman thing and it felt like it was for 30smthg professionals and that you should listen to it w/ a glass of wine and watch the city through your floor-ceiling windows. weeknd sound like you're watching the end of a party through smoke.

plax (ico), Sunday, 27 March 2011 02:16 (fifteen years ago)

I'm kinda diggin lamp's appraisal of different emotional spaces upthread, and yeah emotional responses are enculturated, guess it appeals to my culture

who is john nult? (dayo), Sunday, 27 March 2011 02:16 (fifteen years ago)

you could dub a weeknd track of this vid and it'd be ~just right~

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DnvFOaBoieE

who is john nult? (dayo), Sunday, 27 March 2011 02:18 (fifteen years ago)

*over this vid

who is john nult? (dayo), Sunday, 27 March 2011 02:18 (fifteen years ago)

The Weeknd actually remind me a lot of my own obsession with a hidden history of isolationist/intergalactic R&B future-slow-jams, so I can't object to this dude too much because it's the kind of thing I might try to do if I was a musician. Anyway if I was gonna make an R&B-for-Weeknd-fans mixtape it'd be stuff like:

The-Dream - Abyss
Jeremih - The 5 Senses
Ashanti - Voodoo
Tweet - Drunk - ACTUALLY GRADY, MAX, PLAX ET AL LISTEN TO THIS!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BwpeFUrPsLY

Tim F, Sunday, 27 March 2011 02:26 (fifteen years ago)

fwiw the dude's voice wasn't what i had a particular problem w/ it was the songwriting & i guess vocal arrangements, sure -- to me those sound underwritten -- partly improvised but in a way that signifies to me anyway carelessness rather than craft

so fly zone (D-40), Sunday, 27 March 2011 02:29 (fifteen years ago)

I dunno, the dude is going for a very specific feel w/ the arrangements in say, house of ballons/glass table girls - I don't think it bespeaks carelessness at all

who is john nult? (dayo), Sunday, 27 March 2011 02:30 (fifteen years ago)

that tweet track is amazing btw

who is john nult? (dayo), Sunday, 27 March 2011 02:30 (fifteen years ago)

that would be where I hear what lex & andy were talking about w/r/t it sounding 'forced' like this guy waltzes into a studio & thinks he can diy his way into a classic R&B record that gets a pass bcuz people will say like grady was that oh its not R&B at all -- it gets to be bad at these things because its made for burial fans

so fly zone (D-40), Sunday, 27 March 2011 02:30 (fifteen years ago)

like most of the haters itt have been "trey songz did the same style but did it BETTER" but so far nobody's really offered up what metrics or continuum they are putting trey songz ahead of the weeknd on

who is john nult? (dayo), Sunday, 27 March 2011 02:31 (fifteen years ago)

real rnb

plax (ico), Sunday, 27 March 2011 02:32 (fifteen years ago)

like most of the haters itt have been "trey songz did the same style but did it BETTER" but so far nobody's really offered up what metrics or continuum they are putting trey songz ahead of the weeknd on

― who is john nult? (dayo), Sunday, March 27, 2011 2:31 AM (1 minute ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

i havent??

so fly zone (D-40), Sunday, 27 March 2011 02:32 (fifteen years ago)

multiple xxxxpost I think this is always an issue with "outsider" takes on genre: in most cases people who follow the genre closely can actually point to a myriad of examples where the genre itself previously has produced stuff in the same vein, so they're more likely to see the point of difference as ~60% market positioning.

Of course no-one (except arguably Drake, and then fitfully) has made the above sound their raison d'etre, so it's also about giving that sound a certain conceptual unity, about stating that it's the goal rather than just something done on the way to doing a number of other things.

I imagine lots of hip hop listeners would have felt similarly about the critical rise of trip hop at the time: like, we do this kind of thing anyway, you're just not listening hard enough.

Tim F, Sunday, 27 March 2011 02:33 (fifteen years ago)

do you see your name in that post deej?

who is john nult? (dayo), Sunday, 27 March 2011 02:33 (fifteen years ago)

I think "Unfortunate" is more genuinely impressive surround-sound (the variety of vocal approaches are important) and also more moving, but it's a matter of degree for me rather than "this is great that is awful".

Tim F, Sunday, 27 March 2011 02:34 (fifteen years ago)

Maybe we should talk about "Shades" here also.

Tim F, Sunday, 27 March 2011 02:35 (fifteen years ago)

i might not be the best representative for the anti-side in this case though as my issue is more with the execution than the overall attempt. Like, im into that one jamie woon song, and i dug the way ariel pink did this kind of thing sometimes. its not an overall anti-indie bias, i was fairly surprised that i didnt like it when i first listened

so fly zone (D-40), Sunday, 27 March 2011 02:35 (fifteen years ago)

'this kind of thing' being genre mixing generally, pink sounds nothing like this obv

so fly zone (D-40), Sunday, 27 March 2011 02:35 (fifteen years ago)

Of course no-one (except arguably Drake, and then fitfully) has made the above sound their raison d'etre, so it's also about giving that sound a certain conceptual unity, about stating that it's the goal rather than just something done on the way to doing a number of other things.

― Tim F, Sunday, March 27, 2011 2:33 AM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

yeah i remember talking w/ noz about that song 'dominoes' by big pink that was year ended last year, and about how it was like a nas/jay-z hot line/hot song but with gucci instead. There's a bias here in that, theres a density of these kinds of ideas in a genre, and then someone focuses on one of them to give it 'conceptual unity' & its taken more seriously (still unclear on why Big Pink's groupie misogyny barely raised an eyebrow)

so fly zone (D-40), Sunday, 27 March 2011 02:38 (fifteen years ago)

year ended at pfork

so fly zone (D-40), Sunday, 27 March 2011 02:38 (fifteen years ago)

so what about the execution don't you like, deej

who is john nult? (dayo), Sunday, 27 March 2011 02:38 (fifteen years ago)

do you see your name in that post deej?

― who is john nult? (dayo), Sunday, March 27, 2011 2:33 AM (5 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

whenever i see 'haters' i assume my name is in it lol

so fly zone (D-40), Sunday, 27 March 2011 02:39 (fifteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.