★ The Weeknd ★ What You Need ★

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (2502 of them)

^ why does this point get missed. lex it seems like you still feel that they're going for a certain mood + failing but i dont think thats it

just sayin, Thursday, 24 March 2011 12:39 (fifteen years ago)

Lex's point seems to be "how dare critics value this mood over all the others" but I still think that's an unfair caricature especially of the people in this thread.

Matt DC, Thursday, 24 March 2011 12:40 (fifteen years ago)

that's a shifting-the-goalposts argument though, it could be applied to p much anything, ever. "oh they're not TRYING to do that!"

what i'm reacting to: they get write-ups, across the board, that tie them to r&b, and in many cases are held up as an example of where r&b as a genre should be going. so yeah i think it's fair to assess them on what r&b's genre values are. but also taking into account that they're not trad r&b, it's also fair to compare them to other non-r&b acts recontextualising the genre.

lex pretend, Thursday, 24 March 2011 12:43 (fifteen years ago)

ANYWAY i am actually going to do an article about this now :)

lex pretend, Thursday, 24 March 2011 12:43 (fifteen years ago)

ok this part - 'held up as an example of where r&b as a genre should be going'

i havent seen these writeups?

just sayin, Thursday, 24 March 2011 12:44 (fifteen years ago)

me neither, they are gen being received as chillwave appropriating rnb and i think the rnb side of their side is in gen being played way down.

ico, Thursday, 24 March 2011 12:47 (fifteen years ago)

of their sound

ico, Thursday, 24 March 2011 12:48 (fifteen years ago)

the terrible sean fennessey piece linked upthread

lex pretend, Thursday, 24 March 2011 12:48 (fifteen years ago)

also i've been criticising this for being unremarkable by CHILLWAVE standards as well as r&b

lex pretend, Thursday, 24 March 2011 12:49 (fifteen years ago)

Yeah you're more of a Neon Indian man.

Matt DC, Thursday, 24 March 2011 12:50 (fifteen years ago)

yes you are clearly a massive chillwave fan

ico, Thursday, 24 March 2011 13:00 (fifteen years ago)

i don't have any investment in chillwave as a thing but people have kept saying that a lot of the UK bass music i like is chillwavey - i don't mind if it is or isn't

lex pretend, Thursday, 24 March 2011 13:04 (fifteen years ago)

That stuff is chillwavey in the way that Kompakt is chillwavey, ie people are just talking nonsense based on vague sonic signifiers rather than function, scene or anything else.

Matt DC, Thursday, 24 March 2011 13:07 (fifteen years ago)

so what you're saying is that you like chillwave from the vantage point of other critical discourses?

ico, Thursday, 24 March 2011 13:09 (fifteen years ago)

he likes chillwave that is actually what people in other genres are making, those people being people who would make chillwave if they weren't in other genres.

Tim F, Thursday, 24 March 2011 13:20 (fifteen years ago)

Souljazz's 'Rapegaze 2: The Dallas - London Connection' has a decent explanation in the liner notes.

Tim F, Thursday, 24 March 2011 13:21 (fifteen years ago)

the weather is very nice

LocalGarda, Thursday, 24 March 2011 13:22 (fifteen years ago)

What I was getting at is that "OMG this is chillwave" is the sort of sub-Whiney line people take when they have no idea about the genre in question but a stupid compulsion to have an opinion about it nonetheless.

Matt DC, Thursday, 24 March 2011 13:23 (fifteen years ago)

Might get an ice-cream at lunchtime though.

Matt DC, Thursday, 24 March 2011 13:23 (fifteen years ago)

I dunno, where does chillwave end anyway? Are Forest Swords chillwave? Creep?

Tim F, Thursday, 24 March 2011 13:25 (fifteen years ago)

I don't think "Days" is particularly R&B-ish? When I'm comparing it to The Weeknd songs I'm listening to, I'm thinking more about sound palette than execution; the singer for The Weeknd sounds too much in the Chris Brown/Ne-Yo/Raphael Saddiq being lazy vein to totally dismiss R&B influence upon their sound so I don't really get some of Lex's objections.

Also maybe I am granting more credit than is due because of how disappointing I found that Jamie XX/GSH album, which is currently my Event Zero for "music that is too sloppy to pull off what I think it's trying to do".

ancient, but very sexy (DJP), Thursday, 24 March 2011 13:28 (fifteen years ago)

I dunno, where does chillwave end anyway? Are Forest Swords chillwave? Creep?

CHILLWAVE CONTINUUM

Matt DC, Thursday, 24 March 2011 13:31 (fifteen years ago)

the ch'uum, as it is referred to at conferences all over england.

Tim F, Thursday, 24 March 2011 13:40 (fifteen years ago)

jeremih is a way better comp than trey songz

― ico, Thursday, March 24, 2011 12:13 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

have u heard 'anticipation'? i think its iciness is a lot closer to what this is aiming for

so fly zone (D-40), Thursday, 24 March 2011 14:28 (fifteen years ago)

itt deej and lex get mad at tastemakers

― dayo, Thursday, March 24, 2011 11:03 AM (3 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

who's mad?

so fly zone (D-40), Thursday, 24 March 2011 14:28 (fifteen years ago)

im scoffing disdainfully @ them

so fly zone (D-40), Thursday, 24 March 2011 14:35 (fifteen years ago)

I've listened to this now and much of it sonically is real 1998 arse-end of trip-hop stuff. Has he sung over the Sneaker Pimps yet?

Matt DC, Thursday, 24 March 2011 14:56 (fifteen years ago)

i too was thinking along those lines Matt, especially Curvatia by SpaceK.

[granted i haven't heard that album in years and need to dig it out to see if there is a connection .. ]

mark e, Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:06 (fifteen years ago)

still tho weeknd are p obv going for a mood that is p distinct from all these other artists you are mentioning itt so

― ico, Thursday, March 24, 2011 8:35 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

^ why does this point get missed. lex it seems like you still feel that they're going for a certain mood + failing but i dont think thats it

― just sayin, Thursday, March 24, 2011 8:39 PM (2 hours ago) Bookmark

haha yeah I love how lex is all sputtering "b-b-b-but you should listen to marsha ambrosius!!!' when marsha ambrosius sounds nothing like this

dayo, Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:26 (fifteen years ago)

anyway I just relistened to the second jeremih album and it's like a really good version of this album except it came out first

also you should skip the track with 50 on it

dayo, Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:27 (fifteen years ago)

i never heard the second jeremih....to spotify i go.

Ask Nult What Your Country Can Do For You (Local Garda), Thursday, 24 March 2011 15:41 (fifteen years ago)

it's great!

goole, Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:47 (fifteen years ago)

some good points here: http://blatantineptitude.blogspot.com/2011/03/jj-abrams-ication-of-music-on-web.html

some dude, Thursday, 24 March 2011 16:56 (fifteen years ago)

version of "The Morning" doesnt have the slo-mo vocal effect abused by salem
i liked the old version but i like this version too
― gr8080, Monday, March 21, 2011 8:48 PM (3 days ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

lolling that salem is ref point, not dj screw

jaxon, Thursday, 24 March 2011 18:18 (fifteen years ago)

the beats remind me of this the-dream/santogold track which i love and still listen to a lot

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KtWT_6ftriU

johnny crunch, Thursday, 24 March 2011 18:24 (fifteen years ago)

so many posts since last night, it's almost too hard to respond to everything. i know this post is gonna come off a bit defensive but glad people aren't ganging up on me. i don't nec wanna be the strawman for 'indie' 'blog reader' who only listens to something if it's weird. but i might as well accept parts of it even though i dislike indie rock and i don't read blogs. i've always liked 'the exception to the rule' music. it's almost a joke now. i'm feeling this bette midler house track. but i'm so deep in the beardy/balearic/cosmic record collecting scene where i'm always on the lookout for a funky track by a generally non-funky musician. throw a synth on it™ and i'm in heaven. disco track by a rock musician. boom. popstar records in africa or african musician records in france. oh yeah. i'm also sorta ADD in my music tastes. i get so into some genre until i feel i've squeezed the life out of them then i'm onto the next one. so it's not that i'm like this outsider to r'n'b. i've been listening to it on and off since elementary school. and it's not like i have an aversion to radio pop. it's not the major label feeling that i didn't like about trey songz. that gloss has nothing to do with being on a major label. i love tons of major label stuff. there are tons of HUGE acts that can do interesting things. beyonce, rihanna, wayne (sorry guys). they can have a song on the radio a billion times and it still sounds interesting. even some BEP. i don't hate on those guys. but there really was a feeling on the TS album that he was reading from a script of cliched phrases of what an r'n'b loverman would say to his lady. i've since listened to the How To Dress Well & The Dream albums, trying to do a lil catch up on 'real' and 'not real' r'n'b. HTDW was my least favorite out of all this. i said i liked sloppy, but this was taking it too far. i liked the parts of it that were the least "soulful" i guess, but when he started singing over new jack loops w/noise on top. meh. the dream album was fantastic. everything about it, from the drum programming to the synths and his singing voice and production. there was dirt and noise in stuff. (i coulda done w/o that florida university song though, and wish cee lo didn't cover it). anyways, glad a thread like this has come along for me to spend some time w/different music. next up is frank ocean (not looking forward to it tbh) and jerimih's second album.

jaxon, Thursday, 24 March 2011 19:24 (fifteen years ago)

i can't rate the dream highly enough...i have listened to love king more than any other lp of the last few years.

Ask Nult What Your Country Can Do For You (Local Garda), Thursday, 24 March 2011 19:27 (fifteen years ago)

curious to hear what you think of the frank ocean record, jaxon.

adult music person (Jordan), Thursday, 24 March 2011 19:40 (fifteen years ago)

me too

frogbsclovetofu (cozen), Thursday, 24 March 2011 20:18 (fifteen years ago)

the unspoken message i get out of conversations like this is kind of like "I really like R&B or the IDEA of R&B, but I'm only going to sit down with an album of it if it's something outside the major label system that gets blog hype as being especially weird or creative"

― some dude, Wednesday, March 23, 2011 5:01 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark

and really, i was overly dismissive of lex considering i more or less agree w/ his overarching point, which is that this group is not particularly great or important but they're quirky, which means a lot to critics right now in general

its something ive been wrestling w/ in other areas of music as well -- it seems like theres a disproportionate amount of media attention for 'certain kinds' of acts that is based on some fantastical notion of perceived significance that seems heavily inflated relative to musical accomplishments, but that ends up becoming 'true' through sheer force of will on behalf of influential people

imo

― so fly zone (D-40), Wednesday, March 23, 2011 5:16 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark

not to give the impression that i don't value music crit or pay attention to trends in crit circles, but i think not being a critic myself and just being a guy who likes music and occasionally gets paid to DJ gives me the luxury to not give a shit about this stuff?

also, this was touched on upthread wrt 'pageantry and theatricality', but pop music has always been about more than faceless recorded music. image and quirk and mythos arent't unfortunate byproducts of pop music, they're part of its makeup. there's absolutely nothing wrong with liking the weeknd because of a quirky aesthetic.

btw it should go w/o saying i'm pretty much in the same boat as jaxon taste-wise.

gr8080, Thursday, 24 March 2011 21:13 (fifteen years ago)

the thing abt 'quirkiness' is only really addressed at other critics / journalists writing about how 'important' this is. its not addressed at people who just like the music, man. obviously my taste heavily overlaps w/ yours & jaxon's when it comes to this kind of stuff, but there is a commonality to all the stuff the three of us have ever talked about, which is that we all think the songs are good, right? like, you want to listen to them over & over? i know you like these, but for me these just arent good songs on the level of, like, former porn stars singing about 'flying like an eagle' or eartha kitt's disco record -- both of which are campy, but not, like, constructed sloppily as an affect. they both function to me the way great songs are supposed to function. that they are weird/interesting is a bonus.

anyway this is where it comes to an issue of taste -- i just wanted to be clear where my lines are w/ this

so fly zone (D-40), Thursday, 24 March 2011 21:20 (fifteen years ago)

grady just listen to R&B

― D-40, Tuesday, March 22, 2011 9:32 AM (2 days ago) Bookmark

gr8080, Thursday, 24 March 2011 21:35 (fifteen years ago)

also, this was touched on upthread wrt 'pageantry and theatricality', but pop music has always been about more than faceless recorded music. image and quirk and mythos arent't unfortunate byproducts of pop music, they're part of its makeup. there's absolutely nothing wrong with liking the weeknd because of a quirky aesthetic.

i can't tell if you're flipping my argument on me on purpose or what but i was saying that 'anonymous' anti-image stuff like The Weeknd, while certainly shrewdly mythology-building in its own right, is kind of a way of hooking people who are turned off by more star/persona-driven R&B that's more overtly about dramatic videos and big melismatic vocal performances.

some dude, Thursday, 24 March 2011 21:39 (fifteen years ago)

i dont know if i was flipping it on you or not but i was saying that image is part of it no matter what, and some ppl like the jj-abrams-ication image

gr8080, Thursday, 24 March 2011 21:44 (fifteen years ago)

you cant be "anti-image" i guess is what i was saying, there's no such thing

gr8080, Thursday, 24 March 2011 21:44 (fifteen years ago)

haven't listened to them, but on a scale of 1 - 10, how #based is this band?

Bleeqwot the Chef (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, 24 March 2011 21:45 (fifteen years ago)

the unspoken message i get out of conversations like this is kind of like "I really like R&B or the IDEA of R&B, but I'm only going to sit down with an album of it if it's something outside the major label system that gets blog hype as being especially weird or creative"
― some dude, Wednesday, March 23, 2011 5:01 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark

i just wrote something a little unsatisfying about this, but ... there's always the impulse to discuss this stuff on the level of media, perceived coolness, and what's "okay to like" -- what seems much harder for people to talk about is, like, what specific difference makes this intriguing to certain listeners in a way mainstream r&b is not? I'm not discounting the effect of media, or the air of cool, or tribal affiliation, but that feels minor: this record does concrete things differently than mainstream r&b I like just as much or better, and that sticks out pretty clearly if i, say listen to it during commercials on 106&park. production sensibility, emotional effect, sense of persona -- I don't even know that they're pointedly "weird" so much as just a slightly different thing. ("weird" depends where you're coming from, I guess; like many people, I enjoy r&b and beach house both, so this doesn't exactly jar!) it might be hard to articulate, but it seems easy to hear concrete choices here that will be inviting to one audience rather than another.

it actually seems to me that it would be productive if, instead of worrying much about audience-crossing and such, we considered it a GOOD thing for acts to stake out weird middle stances between styles and methods we're used to, just to open out the field and see what develops!

oɔsıqɐu (nabisco), Thursday, 24 March 2011 21:47 (fifteen years ago)

grady just listen to R&B

― D-40, Tuesday, March 22, 2011 9:32 AM (2 days ago) Bookmark

― gr8080, Thursday, 24 March 2011 21:35 (10 minutes ago) Permalink

tbf this was in response to you saying that this music made u think of sex & weed & dismissing sade as old woman music

so fly zone (D-40), Thursday, 24 March 2011 21:47 (fifteen years ago)

man grady you really think sade is old woman music

max, Thursday, 24 March 2011 21:47 (fifteen years ago)

hey nitsuh i guess what intrigues me about it would be, is this middle-ground artist actually appealing to both audiences, or are they just one audience's artist in the end, and if they end up appealing to both audiences, is it in the same way jay-z hates rap but loves coldplay cliche of ilx yore

so fly zone (D-40), Thursday, 24 March 2011 21:50 (fifteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.