Is it someone here who coined the phrase, "a Breihanian level of misunderstanding"? Because that's all I can think about when I read his stuff now.
― Parenthetical Grillz, Tuesday, 15 March 2011 20:35 (thirteen years ago) link
only took tom two paragraphs to drop an "asthmatic rasp," which is right in line with his world record time
― J0rdan S., Tuesday, 15 March 2011 20:36 (thirteen years ago) link
Have you ever forgotten to remove one or a few, leaving some GREATs throughout?
― Wacky Way Lounge (Evan), Tuesday, 15 March 2011 21:06 (thirteen years ago) link
all-caps great wouldn't stick out that much in some of the things lex has written tbh
― some dude, Tuesday, 15 March 2011 21:07 (thirteen years ago) link
"The idea of watching someone perform a DJ set may not be the most enticing proposition""The idea of watching someone perform a DJ set may not be the most enticing proposition""The idea of watching someone perform a DJ set may not be the most enticing proposition""The idea of watching someone perform a DJ set may not be the most enticing proposition""The idea of watching someone perform a DJ set may not be the most enticing proposition""The idea of watching someone perform a DJ set may not be the most enticing proposition""The idea of watching someone perform a DJ set may not be the most enticing proposition"
― lex pretend, Friday, 18 March 2011 14:28 (thirteen years ago) link
hold up what!??!
― ilxor you've listened to one odd future album once (ilxor), Friday, 18 March 2011 14:31 (thirteen years ago) link
thats otm though for the most part. nb i dont know the context. u dance to dj sets you dont watch them
― D-40, Friday, 18 March 2011 14:31 (thirteen years ago) link
Well... no one actually goes to a DJ set to watch the DJ, right? Unless they also happen to be DJs?
xp: yeah D-40 OTM
― ancient, but very sexy (DJP), Friday, 18 March 2011 14:32 (thirteen years ago) link
the sentence contains with it the assumption that people go to dj sets to watch them! which makes it doubly clueless.
― lex pretend, Friday, 18 March 2011 14:35 (thirteen years ago) link
*within it
"The idea of watching someone perform a DJ set may not be the most enticing proposition"
it's not the idea that's the proposition... it's the watching. try this:
Watching someone perform a DJ set may not be the most enticing proposition
boom, three words saved.
could even cut 'someone perform a'.
― suggest and ban is my favourite combination (history mayne), Friday, 18 March 2011 14:37 (thirteen years ago) link
maybe it's from a review of a concert DVD where the camera is pointed at the DJ the entire time
― some dude, Friday, 18 March 2011 14:38 (thirteen years ago) link
It's from the Thom Yorke thing, no?
― yeah (kelpolaris), Friday, 18 March 2011 14:39 (thirteen years ago) link
maybe they're reviewing Creep's live show
― ancient, but very sexy (DJP), Friday, 18 March 2011 14:39 (thirteen years ago) link
The reason Deadmau5 is successful is because people like watching him perform a dj set
― hey jelixy (Whiney G. Weingarten), Friday, 18 March 2011 14:54 (thirteen years ago) link
This IS fun to watch...!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcq7NTFHgOk
― Wacky Way Lounge (Evan), Friday, 18 March 2011 15:09 (thirteen years ago) link
Honestly almost every cut to the crowd is golden.
― Wacky Way Lounge (Evan), Friday, 18 March 2011 15:11 (thirteen years ago) link
― suggest and ban is my favourite combination (history mayne), Friday, 18 March 2011 14:37 (38 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
it might just be me but the verb 'perform' wrt a DJ set seems really odd and clunky to me, so yeah... other than that I don't see the issue w/ the serntiment given that it's talking about watching a film of a DJ set?
― I only use this style of type when I choose it (DJ Mencap), Friday, 18 March 2011 15:20 (thirteen years ago) link
I realize that video isn't really a DJ set by the way.
― Wacky Way Lounge (Evan), Friday, 18 March 2011 15:23 (thirteen years ago) link
DJ sets would be much funner to watch if you were actually able to see what it is they were doing... from the standpoint of most shows, it looks like a lot of unskillful knob-turning and intermittent fist-pumping being all you need to be the next big thing.
dunno how this would be accomplished, tho, aside from video camera
― yeah (kelpolaris), Friday, 18 March 2011 15:23 (thirteen years ago) link
er well you could go and see a bunch of DJs somewhere small w/ no barrier and have a peek maybe
then get told to leave the club when you spill a drink in their record bag
― I only use this style of type when I choose it (DJ Mencap), Friday, 18 March 2011 15:26 (thirteen years ago) link
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NFhxr8Muz5A
granted this was a long time ago, but this was not boring
― in my world of suggest bans (Shakey Mo Collier), Friday, 18 March 2011 15:35 (thirteen years ago) link
Deadmaufive is not a DJ
― lol kudso (sic), Friday, 18 March 2011 23:31 (thirteen years ago) link
?
― hey jelixy (Whiney G. Weingarten), Saturday, 19 March 2011 06:34 (thirteen years ago) link
I was hilariously mispelling Deadmau5
― lol kudso (sic), Saturday, 19 March 2011 07:59 (thirteen years ago) link
Is that the Hensel twins at :06 in the Deadmau5 vid?
― Dare, Saturday, 19 March 2011 09:48 (thirteen years ago) link
i lol'd
― loser beam (electricsound), Saturday, 19 March 2011 23:55 (thirteen years ago) link
http://pitchfork.com/features/articles/7947-you-were-there-the-complete-lcd-soundsystem/
― thistle supporter (mcoll), Monday, 28 March 2011 06:08 (thirteen years ago) link
why say the pre-album singles are "from" an album that came out years later and no longer even includes a bonus disc compiling them?
why list remixes and session versions for Daft Punk Is but not for Tribulations (or any of the other non-in-house remixes) (or session versions) (or live versions)?
why say 45:33 was originally a 2007 double LP when a) it first came out as a file the year before and b) the LP doesn't even play the entire song in full but the CD does?
did Throw not come out somewhere else years before the Planet E single? sessions comp maybe? pitchfork is dumb
looking forward to reading this in a day or two
― kris menace isn't even french (sic), Monday, 28 March 2011 09:45 (thirteen years ago) link
is lcd soundsystem the band that played wolf?
― patrice wil$on is my favorite rapper (history mayne), Monday, 28 March 2011 09:48 (thirteen years ago) link
I'm a huge fan of LCD Soundsystem so it kind of pains me to say that I don't know if I can even get through this
Murphy's first out-and-out ode to New York City aims to revive seedier times. "Yr city's a sucker, my city's a creep," he taunts, with the perfect combination of fuck-you and what-the-fuck-do-I-care that may have been born on the downtown F line somewhere around 1976. LCD's fascination with its hometown would peak with Sound of Silver's gloriously ambiguous "New York, I Love You But You're Bringing Me Down", but "Sucker" is more of a cocksure strut. They city isn't bringing Murphy down just yet.
**vomits on keyboard, publishes it on Pitchfork**
― frogbs, Monday, 28 March 2011 15:08 (thirteen years ago) link
trying really hard w/ a band 99% of their readers already know/like
― bnw, Monday, 28 March 2011 15:12 (thirteen years ago) link
this thing is a lot of words!
― ★ INXS ★ What You Need ★ (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 28 March 2011 15:14 (thirteen years ago) link
John Cage's "4:33" is all about a void of composition and performance creating space for random, ambient sounds. James Murphy's "45:33" is the exact opposite: a micro-managed, dense, building-size mural of music that leaves nothing to chance.
Pitchfork writers get paid by the word : CONFIRMED
― frogbs, Monday, 28 March 2011 15:14 (thirteen years ago) link
This thing like one thing, but this other thing that has not connection to it whatsoever is shockingly not like it at all
― ★ INXS ★ What You Need ★ (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 28 March 2011 15:18 (thirteen years ago) link
Like I love LCD Soundsystem and love a lot of these writers. But couldn't imagine reading any of this for any reason. Am I alone in that?
― ★ INXS ★ What You Need ★ (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 28 March 2011 15:19 (thirteen years ago) link
how dare you not have time for a sprawling retrospective overview of an epic THREE ALBUM CAREER
― corkslovetoscrew (some dude), Monday, 28 March 2011 15:21 (thirteen years ago) link
yeah i'm kind of on yr side there, i mean lcd soundsystem are one of those bands that have never been short of rock crit love, so they've had a loooot of stuff written abt them already
― just sayin, Monday, 28 March 2011 15:22 (thirteen years ago) link
LOL U GUYS READ PITCHFORK
― H3LP, Monday, 28 March 2011 15:23 (thirteen years ago) link
I mean, no offense to LCD and no offense to writers who's stuff is genuinely and consistently good, but I really can't muster any reason to tackle any of this.
― ★ INXS ★ What You Need ★ (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 28 March 2011 15:23 (thirteen years ago) link
I'm trawling through it and barf
it's no surprise that "Us v. Them" became a live staple for the group (it's their tenth most-played song according to setlist.fm)
They only have 3 albums with 9 songs each
― frogbs, Monday, 28 March 2011 15:24 (thirteen years ago) link
oh man wtf. i aint even gonna open that LCD piece from the sound of it. at least grays0n curr1n's mtn g0ats review is good, i guess? read this one instead plz
http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/15259-all-eternals-deck
― ilxor you've listened to one odd future album once (ilxor), Monday, 28 March 2011 15:24 (thirteen years ago) link
(it's their tenth most-played song according to setlist.fm)
~headdesk~
― ilxor you've listened to one odd future album once (ilxor), Monday, 28 March 2011 15:25 (thirteen years ago) link
Maybe Nathan Rabin will take this as a challenge and we 'll have some Pet Sounds/Sgt. Pepper's action in the TL;DR genre
― da croupier, Monday, 28 March 2011 15:31 (thirteen years ago) link
but I really can't muster any reason to tackle any of this.
i like reading james murphy on about his own (or any) music, and this at least collects a lot of good quotes
― adult music person (Jordan), Monday, 28 March 2011 15:31 (thirteen years ago) link
tbf you could argue that Pitchfork would not have the cachet they have if they hadn't come up along with LCD Soundsystem, so it kind of makes sense in terms of acknowledging a debt
not that that makes me want to read it
― 'lol u stuck with me now watch this ass expand, joeks on u' (DJP), Monday, 28 March 2011 15:59 (thirteen years ago) link
if they hadn't insisted on making this an exhaustive song-by-song examination and actually edited it down, it could have been good or at least readable. i'm not a pile on pitchfork kinda guy but i skimmed this whole thing and it's really redundant and long and boring.
― congratulations (n/a), Monday, 28 March 2011 16:01 (thirteen years ago) link
i just skimmed for "s
― adult music person (Jordan), Monday, 28 March 2011 16:05 (thirteen years ago) link
lol okay I just looked at this and clearly the point is to cherrypick the songs you really care about and just read those sections
reading the whole thing is madness
― 'lol u stuck with me now watch this ass expand, joeks on u' (DJP), Monday, 28 March 2011 16:06 (thirteen years ago) link
― 'lol u stuck with me now watch this ass expand, joeks on u' (DJP), Monday, March 28, 2011 11:59 AM (7 minutes ago) Bookmark
wait what
― corkslovetoscrew (some dude), Monday, 28 March 2011 16:07 (thirteen years ago) link