― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 23 January 2003 16:23 (twenty-three years ago)
― Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Thursday, 23 January 2003 16:28 (twenty-three years ago)
― dave225 (Dave225), Thursday, 23 January 2003 16:32 (twenty-three years ago)
It's rather incongruous seeing the Ramones in that context - far more jarring than the placing of da bruddas' logo on La Twain's body, when such devices are seen any day on fashion catwalks.
― Jerry (Jerry), Thursday, 23 January 2003 17:26 (twenty-three years ago)
― Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Thursday, 23 January 2003 17:28 (twenty-three years ago)
― Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Thursday, 23 January 2003 21:19 (twenty-three years ago)
― Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Thursday, 23 January 2003 21:32 (twenty-three years ago)
Dude, don't worry. Just one more of those beers and I probably would have posted "Sean = sexy ass" instead.
― Kim (Kim), Friday, 24 January 2003 01:29 (twenty-three years ago)
― earlnash, Friday, 24 January 2003 02:50 (twenty-three years ago)
― Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Saturday, 25 January 2003 15:48 (twenty-three years ago)
― Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Saturday, 25 January 2003 15:57 (twenty-three years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Saturday, 25 January 2003 16:52 (twenty-three years ago)
― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Saturday, 25 January 2003 18:06 (twenty-three years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Saturday, 25 January 2003 18:47 (twenty-three years ago)
― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Saturday, 25 January 2003 19:13 (twenty-three years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Saturday, 25 January 2003 19:24 (twenty-three years ago)
― Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Saturday, 25 January 2003 19:30 (twenty-three years ago)
― Kim (Kim), Saturday, 25 January 2003 19:35 (twenty-three years ago)
― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Saturday, 25 January 2003 20:06 (twenty-three years ago)
― Kim (Kim), Saturday, 25 January 2003 20:09 (twenty-three years ago)
― Cozen (Cozen), Saturday, 25 January 2003 20:36 (twenty-three years ago)
― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Saturday, 25 January 2003 20:42 (twenty-three years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 25 January 2003 21:14 (twenty-three years ago)
― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Saturday, 25 January 2003 21:44 (twenty-three years ago)
― Kim (Kim), Saturday, 25 January 2003 22:43 (twenty-three years ago)
― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Saturday, 25 January 2003 23:12 (twenty-three years ago)
Me and a friend discussed my ass in depth tonight. Apparently my clean living has given me back my booty! It's very exciting. Also, the donut I ate today might've helped. I hadn't eaten a donut in like 2 years. BAVARIAN CREME IS DELICIOUS!
― Ally (mlescaut), Sunday, 26 January 2003 09:06 (twenty-three years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Sunday, 26 January 2003 16:28 (twenty-three years ago)
― HASTUR THE UNSPEAKABLE! (Lord Custos Epsilon), Sunday, 26 January 2003 18:13 (twenty-three years ago)
http://www.an-irrational-domain.net/images/jaz/best86-3.jpg
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Sunday, 26 January 2003 20:09 (twenty-three years ago)
― HASTUR THE UNSPEAKABLE (Lord Custos Epsilon), Sunday, 26 January 2003 20:16 (twenty-three years ago)
― HASTUR THE UNSPEAKABLE (Lord Custos Epsilon), Sunday, 26 January 2003 20:18 (twenty-three years ago)
http://www.an-irrational-domain.net/images/snakes_left.gif http://www.an-irrational-domain.net/images/mickeycoleman.GIF http://www.an-irrational-domain.net/images/snakes_right.gif
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Sunday, 26 January 2003 20:20 (twenty-three years ago)
― HASTUR THE UNSPEAKABLE (Lord Custos Epsilon), Sunday, 26 January 2003 20:23 (twenty-three years ago)
http://killing-joke.com/bomb.gif
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Sunday, 26 January 2003 20:26 (twenty-three years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Sunday, 26 January 2003 20:33 (twenty-three years ago)
― Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Sunday, 26 January 2003 20:34 (twenty-three years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Sunday, 26 January 2003 20:36 (twenty-three years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Sunday, 26 January 2003 20:39 (twenty-three years ago)
― Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Sunday, 26 January 2003 20:42 (twenty-three years ago)
― Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Monday, 27 January 2003 15:06 (twenty-three years ago)
Alex, who loves you baby, but dave225, nabisco, mark s and Tom are on the money. The more you all complain about this, the more the Ramones t-shirt is doing what it's supposed to be doing, which is to get you talking about Shania. This just in: music is a business.
"Ramones" is just a logo. More proof that Baudrillard was right when he postulated that in the future the strength of a signifier, rather than its qualitative meaning, will ultimately be the value that people seek in using them.
At "least" she's not selling Ramones T-shirts like at the boring rock-chick-by-the-numbers fashion in the Anna Sui boutique.
Would anyone like to talk about the album? I like "Up!" and "In My Car (I'll be the Driver). They sound like gasoline commericals written by Def Leppard. The blue disc isn't all that.
Oh no! The NYCILXCHIXoRs listened to the ILX comp, "No More Heroes" AND "Up!" yesterday when we were driving around Upstate NY. Oh No! (Well, I made them listen to Up! but it was my Strangelers comp, too!
― felicity (felicity), Monday, 3 February 2003 15:23 (twenty-three years ago)
Maybe to you.
"At 'least' she's not selling Ramones T-shirts like at the boring rock-chick-by-the-numbers fashion in the Anna Sui boutique."
Anna Sui herself is, at least, a fan of the band/scene/genre.
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 3 February 2003 15:40 (twenty-three years ago)
― Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Monday, 3 February 2003 16:06 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 3 February 2003 16:14 (twenty-three years ago)
Alex, that's fine that as far as the T-shirt goes it's just a logo to me but the word "The Ramones" obviously means more than that, including a band that I have seen and records that I own.
Even assuming you know for a fact that one is a fan and the other is not, are you saying Anna Sui can sell $70 Ramones T-shirts and Shania Twain can't wear one? It's the exact same shirt -- what is the difference in effect? I mean, isn't it a good test -- would true Ramones fans be fooled? Where exactly are the boundaries of the band/scene/genre set such that that you can say a particular fashion designer is a fan and a particular pop singer isn't?
I'm not disagreeing with your position, just trying to understand it. I would expect you to be equally upset with Anna Sui for trading off Ramones logos but now I'm confused. I ahave always been curious about these what-is-okay-to-wear threads, I mean, wouldn't it be strange if I continually harped on the designer clothes a lot of musicians wear -- I mean, Mayn*rd K*enan in his Prada shoes, who does he think he is, Eurotrash? J.J. Burnel in a stripey boatneck -- what, is he a merchant sailor?
― felicity (felicity), Monday, 3 February 2003 21:15 (twenty-three years ago)
― Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Monday, 3 February 2003 21:21 (twenty-three years ago)
― Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 3 February 2003 21:23 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 3 February 2003 21:25 (twenty-three years ago)