Radiohead - The King of Limbs

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1877 of them)

^^^ OTM. Nothing new here. And it's quite a dull album actually. And that's coming from someone who likes hearing it, or at least doesn't mind hearing it. It seems like a certain amount of reviews used the "It's a grower"-argument, while what they actually mean is "It's not a grower - but hey it's Radiohead, it sounds half decent, we can't just slag it off, so it must be a grower!".

This isn't a grower at all. It won't advance from what it is now to something sublime in the coming time, there's no deeper layer waiting to be unveiled. More than anything, this just is what it is.

La descente infernale (Le Bateau Ivre), Sunday, 27 February 2011 22:14 (fifteen years ago)

xp to Cpt. Lorax

La descente infernale (Le Bateau Ivre), Sunday, 27 February 2011 22:14 (fifteen years ago)

The only song on here I really, really value and enjoy is 'Separator'. It is the only composition that seems daring, seems a leap forward. The rest of the songs could've been b-sides to songs of the last three albums. If only they put Seperator up front and took it from there. It's the Can-like drums, the 'Tourist'-like breeziness and lush sounds, kosmische almost, that I really wished they would've elaborated on.

La descente infernale (Le Bateau Ivre), Sunday, 27 February 2011 22:18 (fifteen years ago)

Lotus Flower still wins it for me, a really seductive melody. Morning Mr Magpie is growing on me as well.

Inevitable stupid dubstep mix (chap), Sunday, 27 February 2011 22:20 (fifteen years ago)

any interviews worth reading about the album? i can't possibly think the band is very proud of it. not at least compared to albums in which they clearly had the right to be (kid a, mostly... i guess they kind of had that same vibe of self-importance w/ amnesiac/ httt tho)

kelpolaris, Sunday, 27 February 2011 22:25 (fifteen years ago)

Liam Gallagher weighs in (link):

I heard that fucking Radiohead record and I just go, 'What?!' I like to think that what we do, we do fucking well. Them writing a song about a fucking tree? Give me a fucking break! A thousand year old tree? Go fuck yourself! You’d have thought he’d have written a song about a modern tree or one that was planted last week. You know what I mean?

Damn this thread seems so....different without ilxor (ilxor), Wednesday, 2 March 2011 16:21 (fifteen years ago)

have they given any interviews about this album yet? i feel like if any of them talked to any reporter at length i would've heard about it by now.

Rovi Wade (some dude), Wednesday, 2 March 2011 16:23 (fifteen years ago)

does Liam read ILE?

But it couldn’t have gone on the front of the head, could it? I’d rather go grey than fucking bald and I’m not going to be dyeing it if it does go grey.

corey, Wednesday, 2 March 2011 16:30 (fifteen years ago)

this album is good "work music"

gr8080 sings the blues (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Wednesday, 2 March 2011 16:30 (fifteen years ago)

ha, that sesame street jam is great.

i can't possibly think the band is very proud of it. not at least compared to albums in which they clearly had the right to be

oh come on

bows don't kill people, arrows do (Jordan), Wednesday, 2 March 2011 16:31 (fifteen years ago)

i think non-musicians tend to have a really warped and strange view of how 'proud' musicians are or should be of their own music and whether that has any actual reflection on the music

Rovi Wade (some dude), Wednesday, 2 March 2011 16:33 (fifteen years ago)

I think a band with as much quality control as Radiohead would break up before they released an album they "weren't proud of"

corey, Wednesday, 2 March 2011 16:34 (fifteen years ago)

Relistened yesterday, still think it's great. Very easy album to love. (All their albums are easy to love, I find. I know I've gone on about it this elsewhere but I think the number one judgment about Radiohead I've never been able to get to grips with is that they make 'cold' music. It always feels very enveloping.)

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 2 March 2011 16:35 (fifteen years ago)

not to like put myself on the level of a "real musician" or artist or whatevs

but i have recorded and released 4 albums w/2 different bands, and basically i can hardly ever listen to any of them, all i hear is flaws, etc

you get to a stage sometime during mixing where you're like god this is GREAT omg, then by time it comes out you've already got regret creeping in and it seems like it doesn't sound like how you imagined it sounds...then you blame whoever mastered it and move on w/yr life

gr8080 sings the blues (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Wednesday, 2 March 2011 16:35 (fifteen years ago)

maybe you have a lower core temperature than other people (xpost)

Rovi Wade (some dude), Wednesday, 2 March 2011 16:36 (fifteen years ago)

haha that is pretty OTM, M@tt

goth barbershop quartet (DJP), Wednesday, 2 March 2011 16:36 (fifteen years ago)

xpost -- Well I do try and be relaxed.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 2 March 2011 16:36 (fifteen years ago)

yeah lots of musicians can't stand their own stuff but i don't think that's a universal standard... i tend to actually enjoy the stuff i make when i do make music, but that's more out of me trying really hard to make stuff i'd enjoy than being totally impressed with myself or blind to its flaws or anything.

Rovi Wade (some dude), Wednesday, 2 March 2011 16:38 (fifteen years ago)

it's more that they have so much control over the critical mass that I think they'd like to experiment with themselves and see the result. radiohead is definitely a band that has receieved, no matter how drastically it changers it sounds, resounding applause.

cant believe i'm calling the whole album an experiment but for something so short it doesn't seem like they were very enthused/passionate about doing the thing really either. growing weary of your own work surely doesn't speak much.

kelpolaris, Wednesday, 2 March 2011 16:38 (fifteen years ago)

xpost

yeah i guess stuff that's REALLY old now can kinda surprise me, like i listened to this thing from 99 that i did that i liked, because now i couldn't even play any of the parts anymore or remember the process, so it's almost this weird feeling of "who DID this?" like it seems like another person

gr8080 sings the blues (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Wednesday, 2 March 2011 16:46 (fifteen years ago)

one thing i've noticed talking to a lot of musicians is that no one really likes to stay attached to their old work, even if it's what they're best known for. for one thing, it's a pretty sad life if you don't believe that your new stuff is better than your old stuff. also being a lot more experienced, comfortable with your craft, and having worked on your weak points can translate to a "i didn't know shit back then compared to now, so it couldn't have been that great" mentality.

bows don't kill people, arrows do (Jordan), Wednesday, 2 March 2011 16:54 (fifteen years ago)

for me it's simply an inability to get past Yorke's voice, which is unpleasant as sound effect and conveyor of meaning.

Rich Lolwry (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 2 March 2011 16:56 (fifteen years ago)

I'd think any artist would feel similarly. Whenever I get compliments on past work I'm flattered but...it already happened. In some cases a hell of a long time back. And I'm just not there any more. (Matt's 'thing from 99' comment just makes me think of the 136 list I did.)

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 2 March 2011 16:57 (fifteen years ago)

yeah I think a lot of the disconnect between how artists view their own work and how fans do starts with the fact that by the time they put a record out, it's in the artist's past but it kind of stays in the perpetual present for the listener. if they don't keep playing a song live regularly, it probably stops even existing in their head at some point.

sometimes I wonder if it's easier to be have a kind of internal sense of satisfaction as a musician that hasn't 'made it' than one that has because you can believe your best days are ahead of you or that what you're working on at any given moment is the most exciting thing you've done, because there's not a huge fanbase or critical community constantly talking about how your best work was 5 or 10 years ago and they don't like the direction you've been going in the last couple albums.

Rovi Wade (some dude), Wednesday, 2 March 2011 17:11 (fifteen years ago)

you get to a stage sometime during mixing where you're like god this is GREAT omg, then by time it comes out you've already got regret creeping in and it seems like it doesn't sound like how you imagined it sounds...then you blame whoever mastered it and move on w/yr life

this is exactly how i feel about almost everything i write except without the mastering excuse, so i believe you.

difficult listening hour, Wednesday, 2 March 2011 17:14 (fifteen years ago)

reminds me this dfw quote from the lipsky interview book, talking about being a grad student looking at writers who have "made it":

You suffer from a delusion that, for all the pain of your envy, there's this inverse, satisfied feeling...there's no keen, exquisite pleasure that corresponds with the keen exquisite pain of envying somebody older. Who's written something, or won some tournament, that you particularly admire.

adult music person (Jordan), Wednesday, 2 March 2011 17:23 (fifteen years ago)

ha yeah there's a bunch of stuff in IJ about that, about the lower-ranked tennis players assuming that the higher-ranked tennis players are as happy as the lower-ranked ones are unhappy.

difficult listening hour, Wednesday, 2 March 2011 17:24 (fifteen years ago)

Favorite lotus mashup so far:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m0VPPJscIL4&feature=player_embedded

Moka, Friday, 4 March 2011 19:18 (fifteen years ago)

OMG fuckin' a

Damn this thread seems so....different without ilxor (ilxor), Friday, 4 March 2011 20:08 (fifteen years ago)

bullet proof (he wishes he was)

Damn this thread seems so....different without ilxor (ilxor), Friday, 4 March 2011 20:08 (fifteen years ago)

lol I'm stealing that one

Moka, Friday, 4 March 2011 20:15 (fifteen years ago)

baw someone already used it on youtube

Moka, Friday, 4 March 2011 20:19 (fifteen years ago)

yup, i stole it myself !

Damn this thread seems so....different without ilxor (ilxor), Friday, 4 March 2011 20:26 (fifteen years ago)

in gif form

http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lhbagzv4zO1qa9wbfo1_500.gif

Roz, Saturday, 5 March 2011 12:48 (fifteen years ago)

omg he's shooting justin bieber!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

fuck wit my dinner with andre day (m bison), Saturday, 5 March 2011 13:48 (fifteen years ago)

god the future is great.

got electrolytes (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Saturday, 5 March 2011 17:00 (fifteen years ago)

Okay, excuse my format-illiteracy, but I was born in the post-tape/pre-CD era.... how much _____ does a 10" vinyl contain? Kinda overlooked the fact that there'll be two of them w/ the newspaper album.

Congratulations, you've just won a Nintendo iPod. (kelpolaris), Saturday, 5 March 2011 18:50 (fifteen years ago)

It will probably be similar to Kid A... 2 to 3 songs per side... a waste of vinyl but looks sweet:

http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcS74iB6cP4pPCguhu9qc8TlGPqryJRgPHlqubFCn3ccBhRK-DO2&t=1

Moka, Saturday, 5 March 2011 20:04 (fifteen years ago)

Thanks. So with all these rumors regarding Separator's last line ("It's not over yet" or something like that) (and it's obvious implication via song title).... maybe the idea of a continuation of the album doesn't have a whole lot of ground?

Congratulations, you've just won a Nintendo iPod. (kelpolaris), Saturday, 5 March 2011 20:10 (fifteen years ago)

iono, i'm just hearing lots elsewhere that lotta peepz are hopeful considering the album as we have it now is so short

Congratulations, you've just won a Nintendo iPod. (kelpolaris), Saturday, 5 March 2011 20:11 (fifteen years ago)

There's apparently a hidden cover on the digital version of tkol that nulls the theory that there's more than 8 tracks on the physical release:
http://radioheadthekingoflimbs.com/hidden-tkol-cd-cover/

In a recent interview Johnny said they were still recording so I'm not sure anymore that they have a definitive upcoming release anytime soon.

Moka, Saturday, 5 March 2011 20:20 (fifteen years ago)

^they seem to avoid using the word "album" tho, and instead "CD version". I'm slightly, slightly hopeful; but it's not something that'll keep me up at night.

If it hasn't been posted already, somebody digitized the album artwork into.... a song (I'm kinda O_o as well)
http://soundcloud.com/zersto/radiohead-the-king-of-limbs-1/s-FQ8Os

Congratulations, you've just won a Nintendo iPod. (kelpolaris), Saturday, 5 March 2011 20:46 (fifteen years ago)

and there's just this website's existence in general:
http://www.thekingoflimbspart2.com/

Congratulations, you've just won a Nintendo iPod. (kelpolaris), Saturday, 5 March 2011 20:47 (fifteen years ago)

Woah. I think the Jacob is the Smoke Monster and the island is all in Hurley's imagination.

scott pgwp (pgwp), Saturday, 5 March 2011 20:58 (fifteen years ago)

lol @ radiohead fans getting to the end of the album and going "that's it? that's all? van damme!" and convincing themselves there's another record in the pipeline

Rovi Wade (some dude), Saturday, 5 March 2011 21:08 (fifteen years ago)

Here's another clue for you all: the walrus was Paul.

scott pgwp (pgwp), Saturday, 5 March 2011 21:44 (fifteen years ago)

Suggest Ban Permalink

lol @ radiohead fans getting to the end of the album and going "that's it? that's all? van damme!" and convincing themselves there's another record in the pipeline

― Rovi Wade (some dude), Saturday, March 5, 2011 2:08 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark

I WANT TO BELIEVE

Congratulations, you've just won a Nintendo iPod. (kelpolaris), Saturday, 5 March 2011 22:35 (fifteen years ago)

& this partially supports the aforementioned theory
http://www.nme.com/news/radiohead/55292

Congratulations, you've just won a Nintendo iPod. (kelpolaris), Sunday, 6 March 2011 05:33 (fifteen years ago)

I'm not sure if that statement says anything other than "I'm a musician and I'm in a band and we make music"

Z S, Sunday, 6 March 2011 05:37 (fifteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.