Not at all, anyone who's paid the slightest attention to what I post knows I'm no indie stan at all. Some of my favourites of theirs don't have any guitars at all (Everything in Right Place, Backdrifts, Pyramid Song). This is a different point.
― Inevitable stupid dubstep mix (chap), Tuesday, 22 February 2011 19:55 (fifteen years ago)
Bloom actually kind of reminds me of Everything in its Right Place...I don't understand in what way that song is "well-written" and Bloom is not...
― if music be the fuiud of love then piss off (Drugs A. Money), Tuesday, 22 February 2011 20:03 (fifteen years ago)
i don't think it's a slight to say that 'everything in its right place' is catchier, if only because the main keyboard riff is very precise and gets repeated throughout pretty much the whole song.
― bows don't kill people, arrows do (Jordan), Tuesday, 22 February 2011 20:14 (fifteen years ago)
I think I know why it was hyped for pre-order.
― egregious fannydangling (Autumn Almanac), Tuesday, 22 February 2011 21:48 (fifteen years ago)
Because they are a pretty well known band? Because the last one was too?
― rendezvous then i'm through with HOOS (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Tuesday, 22 February 2011 21:52 (fifteen years ago)
n1ts\/h article was rad
― ofwgktaxlrmde (cozen), Tuesday, 22 February 2011 21:56 (fifteen years ago)
I've only listened to this once, but my initial impression was that everything sounded disappointingly familiar.
― Darin, Tuesday, 22 February 2011 23:10 (fifteen years ago)
Hasn't everything post-Amnesiac?
― Ukranian crocodile that swallowed a mobile phone (Scik Mouthy), Wednesday, 23 February 2011 08:54 (fifteen years ago)
Where's Nitsuh's article?
http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2011/02/radioheads_king_of_limbs_revie.html
― just sayin, Wednesday, 23 February 2011 08:57 (fifteen years ago)
That's a typically great piece.
― Ukranian crocodile that swallowed a mobile phone (Scik Mouthy), Wednesday, 23 February 2011 09:39 (fifteen years ago)
I see all that and raise you the fact that I now think their arranging / production skills are almost on a par with their influences / electronic peers
Bloom aside, I still think the exact opposite of this.
― Matt DC, Wednesday, 23 February 2011 10:26 (fifteen years ago)
I'm not saying they sound 'new', in fact far from it. But I think there's a litheness and flexibility that was missing before from their more overtly electronic / rhythm based stuff.
― Ukranian crocodile that swallowed a mobile phone (Scik Mouthy), Wednesday, 23 February 2011 12:29 (fifteen years ago)
I'd agree with that.
More on the production: The marvellously detailed sounds and arrangements they've assembled here are a treat, but every time I'm drawn into the record, I feel let down by the flat, immutable percussion on some songs. Interesting rhythms, but nothing grooves (wrong word, perhaps) like their supposed influences do. I'm curious what drove that particular stylistic choice.
― Millsner, Wednesday, 23 February 2011 12:55 (fifteen years ago)
but nothing grooves (wrong word, perhaps) like their supposed influences do
Apart from Lotus Flower, you're right.
― Inevitable stupid dubstep mix (chap), Wednesday, 23 February 2011 12:58 (fifteen years ago)
Is that partly just Radiohead's perpetually hermetically sealed, disinfected aesthetic? Their sexlessness?
― Ukranian crocodile that swallowed a mobile phone (Scik Mouthy), Wednesday, 23 February 2011 13:02 (fifteen years ago)
i think popmatters called this album "sexy" fwiw
― Damn this thread seems so....different without ilxor (ilxor), Wednesday, 23 February 2011 15:16 (fifteen years ago)
maybe sensuous. sex has climaxes, this has none. at all.
― The previous message has been brought to you by (kelpolaris), Wednesday, 23 February 2011 16:37 (fifteen years ago)
so, they're saying that pop doesn't matter all that much, then?
― StanM, Wednesday, 23 February 2011 16:37 (fifteen years ago)
It's like a Caribou album minus the banger that gets played on the radio.
― Under Me Smang Tang (Doran), Wednesday, 23 February 2011 20:42 (fifteen years ago)
This album is an instant classic. I love every second of it. It is way WAY out there.
― Mr. Snrub, Wednesday, 23 February 2011 21:42 (fifteen years ago)
really startling how many musicians have come out to explicitly mention how much they love/are enthralled by this, as opposed to radiohead fans. certainly seems to work on one level at least.
― matt h, Wednesday, 23 February 2011 23:38 (fifteen years ago)
who is?
― The previous message has been brought to you by (kelpolaris), Thursday, 24 February 2011 00:58 (fifteen years ago)
flying lotus, for one
― phantompenguin, Thursday, 24 February 2011 02:01 (fifteen years ago)
he works with thom yorke directly. on music.
not saying that lots of musicians love it, just saying. i mean, haven't checked, but assuming bjork/pj harvey/unkle/neil finn love it too
― Z S, Thursday, 24 February 2011 02:06 (fifteen years ago)
i think other songs have grooves in them... flying lotus is the most obv. but i think the first half of the record has some pretty subtle ones. i thought this album was pretty flat until i started listening to it on my headphones. all of a sudden i was like "oh there you are, colin." for most of the record they're this tightly wound, frenetic group, up until about give up the ghost and separator, where everything kind of comes apart. so i would call that a sort of climax. i also see feral as a great centrepiece because it's just so tense. like when you have something on the tip of your tongue but can quite express it.
― borntohula, Thursday, 24 February 2011 02:27 (fifteen years ago)
whoops, and by flying lotus i meant lotus flower.
― borntohula, Thursday, 24 February 2011 03:32 (fifteen years ago)
I like this album but it's nothing huge to me...I think Codex slows the album down way too much for its own good and it never really recovers...Codex is probably a good song, but in context it just takes me out of the album entirely--the album up to this point is a bit too frail to be able to handle a drastic change of pace--and as a result I kind of don't have real opinions about the last two tracks...
― hapshash jar tempo (Drugs A. Money), Friday, 25 February 2011 00:46 (fifteen years ago)
people are really concerned about phil selway huh
― congratulations (n/a), Friday, 25 February 2011 00:46 (fifteen years ago)
he's a helluva guy
― hapshash jar tempo (Drugs A. Money), Friday, 25 February 2011 00:50 (fifteen years ago)
nabisco rilly nails it in that piece
― Roberto Spiralli, Friday, 25 February 2011 02:44 (fifteen years ago)
Colin is totally the hero of this record. Whenever the bass enters the mix it is exquisite.
― Brad Nelson (BradNelson), Friday, 25 February 2011 03:20 (fifteen years ago)
♥https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lQfP2b8ZB9I
― Arghn, Friday, 25 February 2011 20:13 (fifteen years ago)
Okay, officially sick of the meme, good job internet.
― rendezvous then i'm through with HOOS (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Friday, 25 February 2011 20:14 (fifteen years ago)
not star wars enuff huh
― r.i.p. hamilton (am0n), Friday, 25 February 2011 20:15 (fifteen years ago)
no just way too many of them
― rendezvous then i'm through with HOOS (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Friday, 25 February 2011 20:20 (fifteen years ago)
wasn't a great meme, but this one i did literally lol at, mostly b/c the guy actually took a bother to edit it https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MsS4PQ2wHmc
― mamma mia pizzeroni (kelpolaris), Friday, 25 February 2011 21:39 (fifteen years ago)
but they're never funny enough to listen to from beginning to end
― mamma mia pizzeroni (kelpolaris), Friday, 25 February 2011 21:41 (fifteen years ago)
i listened to this once throughthought some songs had cool things going oni'll probably never listen to itthanksk bye
― Aerosol, Friday, 25 February 2011 21:52 (fifteen years ago)
i'll probably never listen to it again
― Aerosol, Friday, 25 February 2011 21:53 (fifteen years ago)
best one~~~
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fzYERyX7XIA
― Damn this thread seems so....different without ilxor (ilxor), Friday, 25 February 2011 22:52 (fifteen years ago)
the yackety sax one is the only one that's made me actually lol: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vnjOUKXqm9Q
― bows don't kill people, arrows do (Jordan), Friday, 25 February 2011 22:56 (fifteen years ago)
rly starting to like king of limbs
― nakhchivan, Saturday, 26 February 2011 02:30 (fifteen years ago)
It's growing on me, but I keep falling asleep after the first 3 songs, so the latter half is still a mystery to me.
― Moodles, Saturday, 26 February 2011 09:11 (fifteen years ago)
Separator is well worth listening to in isolation.
― lol sickmouthy (Scik Mouthy), Saturday, 26 February 2011 09:48 (fifteen years ago)
^ yeah. I like "Separator" at a very high volume. There's a lot of little things going on in that song.
― van smack, Saturday, 26 February 2011 15:17 (fifteen years ago)
The funniest thing about the Thom Yorke dancing meme is that I can't imagine the band/Yorke made that video without realizing how silly it was, and yet I can completely imagine they never considered it would be repurposed, let alone so quickly. One of those forest for the trees situations.
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 26 February 2011 15:29 (fifteen years ago)
can't imagine someone hadn't envisaged it really
i mean it's barely even repurposed
― nakhchivan, Saturday, 26 February 2011 15:33 (fifteen years ago)
Exactly. It's so obvious that I can imagine it totally slipping their mind! I mean, do you really think they made it and then thought, ha, can't wait to see if someone dubs in "Yakety Sax?"
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 26 February 2011 15:36 (fifteen years ago)
# of dancing thom yorke meme videos i have watched: 20-25
# of times i have played the radiohead album: 0
this will change at some point (CD release?) but i'm in no great rush to hear this
― Damn this thread seems so....different without ilxor (ilxor), Saturday, 26 February 2011 16:00 (fifteen years ago)