Tim F is wrong about the Pony one.
THIS is the best version of the meme there has been or ever will be.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vnjOUKXqm9Q
― Johnny Fever, Saturday, 19 February 2011 06:12 (fifteen years ago)
Anyone else notice that in the fine print for the 'Newspaper' edition that it takes 25 days from dispatch to be delivered? So it will more than likely be June before we get 'em over here.
― rendezvous then i'm through with HOOS (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Saturday, 19 February 2011 06:15 (fifteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rYq1oqtQ7k0
― egregious fannydangling (Autumn Almanac), Saturday, 19 February 2011 06:24 (fifteen years ago)
I really am glad about this video, because the meme is way more entertaining than the album.
― Johnny Fever, Saturday, 19 February 2011 06:25 (fifteen years ago)
new thom dancing meme is also way more entertaining than more reactions, so i'll chop chop -
1st listen - what are ppl complaining about, the production is typically gorgeous and musicianship is A+2nd - 4th listens - eh, there's no Reckoner on here, or anything I can remember or hum later. Radiohead - tunes = wtf?5th listen (several hours later) - still can't really hum anything but the sound is more addictive. Great I have a new tuneless drug.
― Cosmo Vitelli, Saturday, 19 February 2011 08:22 (fifteen years ago)
First thoughts - http://sickmouthy.wordpress.com/2011/02/19/radiohead-the-king-of-limbs/
― Ukranian crocodile that swallowed a mobile phone (Scik Mouthy), Saturday, 19 February 2011 08:35 (fifteen years ago)
after some more listening i think 'codex' is a worthy successor to 'pyramid song' and 'sail to the moon', really lovely tune
― ciderpress, Saturday, 19 February 2011 08:38 (fifteen years ago)
I like them at their most krauty so this is as up my street as they ever get, by and large.
― Ukranian crocodile that swallowed a mobile phone (Scik Mouthy), Saturday, 19 February 2011 08:44 (fifteen years ago)
As I alluded to above, this is their first album which is absolutely fine - just fine - while it's on, but truly pales in comparison to their previous output. It's nowhere even near "The Eraser." Should have been a free-EP teaser for a forthcoming album that has songs on it.
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 19 February 2011 13:55 (fifteen years ago)
(Lack of songs on this album being hyperbole, but nothing here jumps out as a particularly strong song, or even a strong composition.)
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 19 February 2011 13:56 (fifteen years ago)
Speaking of hyperbole, LOL at this NYTimes take: "Most of the new album is so vertiginously layered that it’s plausible the band spent nearly four years in the studio making it." Four years? Come on.
― Josh in Chicago, Saturday, 19 February 2011 14:00 (fifteen years ago)
Benny Hill meme doesn't work because there is no need to speed up what is already ridiculous and fast.
― if there is a King Moaty, apparently he is huge into slapstick. (a hoy hoy), Saturday, 19 February 2011 14:12 (fifteen years ago)
i dig this record so far.
not as immediate or warm-sounding as in rainbows. but for as much as i loved that album, after i'd digested the hooks, i felt little need to return to it. i think this king of limbs disc will be the reverse: it will take a long time for it to sink in, but in the meantime and beyond, i'll want to keep listening to it (kind of the way i felt about OKC and Kid A, actually).
― Daniel, Esq., Saturday, 19 February 2011 14:14 (fifteen years ago)
Listening to Radiohead - 'Vegetable' youtube. It's like they took verse chorus verse and perfected it (radiohead style). Dropping memorable chorus sounds is a plus in this case.
― if you can't forgive forget (CaptainLorax), Saturday, 19 February 2011 14:29 (fifteen years ago)
You know what keeps coming to mind with the mutual release date excitement discussion? "Well I learnt what 10:17 release times meant in GMT ages ago." But then I guess that is a reference only like rev and j0rdan and a few other goons will get and p4k don't write articles about
― if there is a King Moaty, apparently he is huge into slapstick. (a hoy hoy), Saturday, 19 February 2011 14:40 (fifteen years ago)
Of all the previous Radioheads, I think the one I miss the Radiohead who would never record a guitar unless they could make it sound like something other than a guitar - a synth, a creepy alien noise, a shimmer, a screaming chainsaw noise, anything. They've moved away from this since HTTT. A lot of the guitar sounds are kind of dull on this record and it would really benefit from a bit more sonic colour.
― Matt DC, Saturday, 19 February 2011 15:07 (fifteen years ago)
the wife loves it
― charlie h, Saturday, 19 February 2011 15:15 (fifteen years ago)
http://i.imgur.com/N4xno.gif
― Moka, Saturday, 19 February 2011 15:27 (fifteen years ago)
a bunch of weird radiohead tweets certainly makes it sound like more is coming.
― akm, Saturday, 19 February 2011 15:32 (fifteen years ago)
1st listen: not bad, but boring
giving it another try w/breakfast
― ullr saves (gbx), Saturday, 19 February 2011 15:39 (fifteen years ago)
listening... 3 tracks in - there needs to be a hook. nice stream of consciousness but the stream digs into itself and nothing else. sort of similar to 'In Raibows' in that aspect
― dead flies on a chain (CaptainLorax), Saturday, 19 February 2011 15:45 (fifteen years ago)
― Daniel, Esq.,
if you got to digest the hooks they aren't really there, you know what I'm saying?
― dead flies on a chain (CaptainLorax), Saturday, 19 February 2011 15:47 (fifteen years ago)
naw. some stuff's buried at first and then clear as a bell later. all sorts of things. like on oar.
― your LiveJournal experience (schlump), Saturday, 19 February 2011 15:50 (fifteen years ago)
what is oar?
― dead flies on a chain (CaptainLorax), Saturday, 19 February 2011 16:08 (fifteen years ago)
the greatest jamband that Rockville, MD ever produced, that's who
― OH YEAAAAH! (Z S), Saturday, 19 February 2011 16:09 (fifteen years ago)
xp It is used to propel a canoe
― van smack, Saturday, 19 February 2011 16:10 (fifteen years ago)
After three listens I'm more than happy with this -- another excellent album. Honestly the only album of theirs I don't think much of is the debut, and that's just patchy rather than bad.
― Ned Raggett, Saturday, 19 February 2011 16:16 (fifteen years ago)
http://caughtbytheriver.net/cms/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/skip-spence-oar.jpg
sorry, think this rec has some fans on ILX so was using as shorthandbut, with anything, really; like i'd imagine a lotta new stuff, the panda bear/AC recs, etc, is a totally different first listen in terms of what sticks out and keeps you goin.
― your LiveJournal experience (schlump), Saturday, 19 February 2011 16:35 (fifteen years ago)
paddles propel canoes fyi
― gtfopocalypse (dan m), Saturday, 19 February 2011 16:36 (fifteen years ago)
shuttaup you oar
― if there is a King Moaty, apparently he is huge into slapstick. (a hoy hoy), Saturday, 19 February 2011 16:37 (fifteen years ago)
Odult Ariented Rock?
― StanM, Saturday, 19 February 2011 16:40 (fifteen years ago)
http://kingofrims.com/
― richard melville hell (crüt), Saturday, 19 February 2011 16:49 (fifteen years ago)
This is enjoyable, but not amazing. (3x listens)
― old man yells at poop first thing in the morning (pixel farmer), Saturday, 19 February 2011 16:55 (fifteen years ago)
http://kingofrimjobs.com
― OH YEAAAAH! (Z S), Saturday, 19 February 2011 16:56 (fifteen years ago)
that was supposed to point to http://thephilter.com/oldimages/Tony_Danza.gif
hahaha
― richard melville hell (crüt), Saturday, 19 February 2011 16:58 (fifteen years ago)
I like the album but it is certainly one of their most despairing in tone.
― akm, Saturday, 19 February 2011 17:16 (fifteen years ago)
i didn't say it would take a long time for the hooks to sink in, just a long time for the album to sink in. i like a lot of albums that don't have many hooks.
― Daniel, Esq., Saturday, 19 February 2011 17:20 (fifteen years ago)
I didn't mean to single you out with that reply
― dead flies on a chain (CaptainLorax), Saturday, 19 February 2011 17:29 (fifteen years ago)
understood.
― Daniel, Esq., Saturday, 19 February 2011 17:31 (fifteen years ago)
one of their most despairing in tone.
I don't think this is true at all! I think it's their most contented-sounding - no freakouts of any kind, and the ballad moments don't feel too sullen.
― Simon H., Saturday, 19 February 2011 17:43 (fifteen years ago)
oar is better than any radiohead record by a mile
― he do the waka lyfe (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Saturday, 19 February 2011 18:22 (fifteen years ago)
Other than "Lotus Flower" and maybe "Little By Little," a snooze.
― Rich Lolwry (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 19 February 2011 18:31 (fifteen years ago)
Actually finding that I'm spending less time listening to this and more time for Amnesiac, which really is not a bad album if you just sort of ignore Kid A's existence. Hail..Thief still sux.
― The previous message has been brought to you by (kelpolaris), Saturday, 19 February 2011 18:42 (fifteen years ago)
those are def the two i'm enjoying most so far.
xpost
― got electrolytes (The Cursed Return of the Dastardly Thermo Thinwall), Saturday, 19 February 2011 18:43 (fifteen years ago)
first half songs are some bedroom bangers
― fuck wit my dinner with andre day (m bison), Saturday, 19 February 2011 19:23 (fifteen years ago)
my favorite thing theyve done in 10 years 4 real
― fuck wit my dinner with andre day (m bison), Saturday, 19 February 2011 19:29 (fifteen years ago)
four tet is a good comparison pt i think, 'little by little' reminds me of caribou's 'andorra' too
― fuck wit my dinner with andre day (m bison), Saturday, 19 February 2011 19:31 (fifteen years ago)
lol @ any radiohead album being 'the most despairing in tone'
― iatee, Saturday, 19 February 2011 19:31 (fifteen years ago)
tho I guess in rainbows is pretty clearly the least and that's why it's their best
― iatee, Saturday, 19 February 2011 19:34 (fifteen years ago)