This might be my fave Jamie XX bit yet
http://soundcloud.com/ramprecordings/faltydl-hip-love-jamie-xx-remix
The original is even better mind but its all cool
http://soundcloud.com/ramprecordings/faltydl-hip-love
Looking forward to hearing what else The xx have in store too, wasn't really feeling that Romy Creep track unfortunatly.
― jimitheexploder, Thursday, 27 January 2011 19:36 (fifteen years ago)
that faltydl remix is gorgeous, actually prefer to original
― Dominique, Thursday, 27 January 2011 19:55 (fifteen years ago)
that faltydl remix
too long on ILx - I read that as shorthand for "fat do you look like"
― onimo, Thursday, 27 January 2011 20:46 (fifteen years ago)
lol :')
I asked him how he got his name once and he just said he couldn't spell and it stuck or something...
― jimitheexploder, Thursday, 27 January 2011 20:54 (fifteen years ago)
the syncopation/style of the steel drums or w/e on the adele remix are really similar to the closing chords of caribou - odessa
― dayo, Wednesday, 2 February 2011 14:44 (fifteen years ago)
so that jamie xx single is nearing release
― Neu! romancer (dayo), Tuesday, 1 March 2011 01:04 (fifteen years ago)
http://blackdownsoundboy.blogspot.com/2011/02/lost-sleevenotes-gil-scott-heron-v.html
the sleevenotes meant for we're new here. far too po faced/earnest for me, esp for what is just a not bad/semi interesting but ultimately undeservingly overhyped remix album, but im sure plenty of people like that sort of thing. jamie xx needs to spend a bit more time honing his producing skills i think. cos right now he just sounds like a tinkerer, or a dabbler.
― titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Tuesday, 8 March 2011 09:46 (fifteen years ago)
So when they came to combine, on “We’re New Here”, perhaps Jamie XX and Gil Scott Heron were not truly strangers, instead linked by musical heritagerecord label
― lex pretend, Tuesday, 8 March 2011 09:57 (fifteen years ago)
i probably agree w/titchy - i don't think jamie xx is making particularly bad music but it's not particularly good either - even that adele remix gets by on the strength of her song more than what he does (and it never feels totally satisfactory to me, it doesn't have that DROP moment that would push it over the top)
― lex pretend, Tuesday, 8 March 2011 09:58 (fifteen years ago)
they should have just done an 'XL artists remix Gil Scott Heron!' album. you could have had adele doing power duets with gsh's vocals, jack white doing a blues version, vampire weekend making gsh sound preppy, dizzee rascal making gil grimey....
― titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Tuesday, 8 March 2011 10:04 (fifteen years ago)
haha, actually a "jamie xx remixes the xl roster" compilation would have been preferable to making him take on the entire GSH album and pretending it's some sort of huge ~artistic enterprise~ rather than yr common-or-garden record label cash-in (or cred-in, here, but similar reasoning) - i think he's def up to doing interesting things to individual tracks atm
― lex pretend, Tuesday, 8 March 2011 10:07 (fifteen years ago)
thats fair. gil just deserves better i think.
― titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Tuesday, 8 March 2011 10:10 (fifteen years ago)
Except albums like this are never as good as the sum of their parts.
I quite like the one-remixer-one-artist approach actually, I'm enjoying this album quite a lot as well. Jamie XX has a very Duplo building-block approach to production (beats especially) but it works for him.
I like what he did to the Adele song but after a couple of months I'm not sure I actually like the original song itself enough to keep going back to the remix.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 8 March 2011 10:14 (fifteen years ago)
Gil Scott-Heron vs Vampire Weekend - Whitey on the Campus
― Pop is superior to all other genres (DL), Tuesday, 8 March 2011 10:20 (fifteen years ago)
whitey on the campus is something i would genuinely like to hear.
― titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Tuesday, 8 March 2011 10:24 (fifteen years ago)
or cred-in, here, but similar reasoning
Not sure either act needs more cred than they already have but if it does both artists a favour commercially then who cares? Not like they don't deserve it.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 8 March 2011 10:36 (fifteen years ago)
i lolled twice
― Tim F, Tuesday, 8 March 2011 10:37 (fifteen years ago)
i do still think the florence and the machine remix is genuinely good and smart
― plax (ico), Tuesday, 8 March 2011 10:38 (fifteen years ago)
for truth though this is a pretty clever match-up from a marketing perspective, I feel like the fans of each are the kind of people who would feel favourably disposed to the idea of the other artist (or even just the idea of liking the other artist) once they're forced to form an opinion.
― Tim F, Tuesday, 8 March 2011 10:39 (fifteen years ago)
Six Degrees of Jamie XX (xpost)
yes considering i previously didnt mind the xx and found their quiveringly delicate indie schmindie quite nicely melancholy if also irritatingly tentative, i now quite dislike mr xx.
― titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Tuesday, 8 March 2011 10:41 (fifteen years ago)
Oh yeah totally, it works as a way of selling the same (or similar) album to a different-but-complementary audience. Given the trend for bet-hedging across the industry right now (Guetta rnb I'm looking at you) I'd be interested to see if anyone else cottons onto this approach. Basically what I'm getting at is I want to see Ill Blu remix an entire Roll Deep album.
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 8 March 2011 10:43 (fifteen years ago)
nice idea but it would never happen (though it should - id be happy just with more ill blu remixes of grime mcs)
― titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Tuesday, 8 March 2011 10:47 (fifteen years ago)
Basically what I'm getting at is I want to see Ill Blu remix an entire Roll Deep album.
Man can you imagine, it would be like the second coming of The Real McCoy in the best possible way.
― Tim F, Tuesday, 8 March 2011 10:48 (fifteen years ago)
i like this album a lot. thoughts here. anyway, i don't get the impression jamie is "pretending it's some sort of huge ~artistic enterprise~" -- nor does this sound like a "common-or-garden record label cash-in" -- basically just sounds like jamie remixing a record he really likes while bored on the xx tour bus (not a bad thing at all). also iirc he's come across as v humble about the whole thing in the couple interviews i've seen
― Damn this thread seems so....different without ilxor (ilxor), Tuesday, 8 March 2011 15:15 (fifteen years ago)
actually, i quite like the remix of home. he keeps it quite simple. though its warmer than anything hes done, it sort of makes me wonder what tricky (back in the late 90s) would have done with remixing this album. richard xl's production on the original gsh album strikes me as a very 90s sounding thing anyway.
― titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Tuesday, 8 March 2011 15:44 (fifteen years ago)
http://www.jetsetrecords.net/en/XX-SHELTER-NIGHT-TIME/product/213004042722
i hope this becomes more available than just in Japan.
― du mein bestie (micarl), Tuesday, 8 March 2011 19:52 (fifteen years ago)
huh
this GSH/Jamie XX album is almost good, but I can't pin down what it is that is keeping me from embracing it
― ancient, but very sexy (DJP), Friday, 11 March 2011 15:01 (fifteen years ago)
I agree. Even I'll Take Care of You, which is my favourite track, doesn't quite achieve greatness.
― Number None, Friday, 11 March 2011 15:05 (fifteen years ago)
a small portion of it is a lingering sentiment of "I expect to hear this only over the PA in The Gap", which is semi-surprising to me because I usually don't care about that type of thing
― ancient, but very sexy (DJP), Friday, 11 March 2011 15:07 (fifteen years ago)
"Running" has started to work for me now.
― ancient, but very sexy (DJP), Friday, 18 March 2011 19:19 (fifteen years ago)
the quietus review of this is way too emo.
― titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Friday, 18 March 2011 21:19 (fifteen years ago)
of were new here i mean.
― titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Friday, 18 March 2011 21:20 (fifteen years ago)
damn, 2009 -- this is what i'm listening to @ 2:25 am est in september 2011
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=REAuQt3HctQ
― markers, Friday, 2 September 2011 06:26 (fourteen years ago)
this album is still the shit
― J0rdan S., Friday, 2 September 2011 06:32 (fourteen years ago)
it is!
― flopson, Friday, 2 September 2011 06:41 (fourteen years ago)
this album will never not remind me of 2009
― markers, Friday, 2 September 2011 06:44 (fourteen years ago)
2009 is the best year for music since at least 2009
― flopson, Friday, 2 September 2011 06:47 (fourteen years ago)
i listen to this album just two days ago, loved it immensely.
― Bee OK, Friday, 2 September 2011 07:16 (fourteen years ago)
listened
― Bee OK, Friday, 2 September 2011 07:17 (fourteen years ago)
btw, i'm not really getting those highs from music anymore = sad. especially after all these years...
― Bee OK, Friday, 2 September 2011 07:26 (fourteen years ago)
yeah i have mixed feelings abt music atm i guess
― markers, Friday, 2 September 2011 07:32 (fourteen years ago)
idk
maybe
lots of great stuff this year
― J0rdan S., Friday, 2 September 2011 07:45 (fourteen years ago)
like every year imo
i doubt it's the music
― markers, Friday, 2 September 2011 07:50 (fourteen years ago)
lol i don't even know what that means
― J0rdan S., Friday, 2 September 2011 07:51 (fourteen years ago)
btw, i'm not really getting those highs from music anymore = sad. especially after all these years...― Bee OK, Friday, September 2, 2011 3:26 AMyeah i have mixed feelings abt music atm i guess― markers, Friday, September 2, 2011 3:32 AM
― Bee OK, Friday, September 2, 2011 3:26 AM
― markers, Friday, September 2, 2011 3:32 AM
there probably is "lots of great stuff this year," and if i'm not super into any of it "i doubt it's the music," it's probably me
― markers, Friday, 2 September 2011 07:56 (fourteen years ago)
oh
― J0rdan S., Friday, 2 September 2011 07:59 (fourteen years ago)
It's time for a new album, you xx people.
― Mark G, Friday, 2 September 2011 09:21 (fourteen years ago)