TS: Aphex Twin: Selected ambient works 85-92 VS SAW Volume 2

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (173 of them)
I think it is a great record, but I found it to be very derivative of Eno's ambient work. I am not saying that just from a production standpoint or because it is "ambient", I am saying it because it seems like a lot of the musical ideas in SAWII were pulled from Eno's early ambient albums.

I cannot say what was ripped off from what off the top of my head, but I have had SAWII for years and have only recently been getting a lot of Eno's ambient material. There have been more than a couple times where I will listen to Eno and recognize something from SAWII.

SAWII and SAWI are vastly different records and I do not think it is fair to judge them against each other. I quite like them both, but for very different reasons. I do find that it is very difficult to play SAWII at a party, but SAWI goes over quite well. Then again, most of my friends hate drifty ambient music with a passion. ;)

If I hate to take sides, I would go with SAWII. If only for Blue Calx and Disc 1 track 3.

Mike Taylor (mjt), Tuesday, 21 January 2003 23:22 (twenty-three years ago)

Ageispolis and Heliosphan are both tons better than Xtal. The second side of Vol1 is gay.

dog latin (dog latin), Tuesday, 21 January 2003 23:52 (twenty-three years ago)

i read this as Aphex vs StockAitkinWaterman and was delighted by Marcello's championing of the trios second greatest hits comp.

gaz (gaz), Tuesday, 21 January 2003 23:56 (twenty-three years ago)

Has it got the hilarously bad "Band Aid 2" single on it? The one with Sonia and Bros and stuff?

Lynskey (Lynskey), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 00:14 (twenty-three years ago)

"if it really is me" on the polygon window album is one of my rdj faves. never really bothered too much with aphex twin which i'm not sure i regret or not. something seems to tell me that a belated exploration wouldn't be worthwhile but i am curious to hear some more of his stuff. i do like girl/boy song, windowlicker, on and some other bits i've heard.

michael wells (michael w.), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 14:49 (twenty-three years ago)

get the richard d james album, i care because you do and maybe hangable auto bulb

gareth (gareth), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 15:41 (twenty-three years ago)

start with the come to daddy mini album and then work backwards. Don't bother with Druqks - it's only got about 4 REALLY decent tunes and the rest is poor to piddling.

dog latin (dog latin), Thursday, 23 January 2003 01:10 (twenty-three years ago)

...and have only recently been getting a lot of Eno's ambient material.

When will someone point out that mt is late to the party?

Andy K (Andy K), Thursday, 23 January 2003 02:04 (twenty-three years ago)

In order of greatness

1. I Care Because You Do
2. Come to Daddy
3. Surfing on Sine Waves
4. SAW2
5. SAW1
6. Caustic Window Comp
7. Windowlicker

Richard D. James album/Drukqs - consigned to crap bin. The 'V/VM Help Aphex Twin' pair of mini-CDs are better than either by a long shot.

Millar (Millar), Thursday, 23 January 2003 02:07 (twenty-three years ago)

i dug out surfing on sinewaves the other day and it's better than i remember. i really quite like the Mike and Rich "Expert Knob Twiddlers" album. at first it sounds like a fucking joke but it can get quite trippy at points.

dog latin (dog latin), Thursday, 23 January 2003 02:16 (twenty-three years ago)

In order of greatness
1. I Care Because You Do
2. Come to Daddy
3. Surfing on Sine Waves
4. SAW2
5. SAW1
6. Caustic Window Comp
7. Windowlicker

No Classics?

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Thursday, 23 January 2003 03:30 (twenty-three years ago)

I've heard of people playing both discs of SA2 simultaneously, a la Zaireeka. Has anyone tried this? If so, what were the results?

Ian Johnson, Thursday, 23 January 2003 04:10 (twenty-three years ago)

Sorry...

1. I Care Because You Do
2. Come to Daddy
3. Surfing on Sine Waves
4. SAW2
5. SAW1
6. Caustic Window Comp
7. Classics
8. Windowlicker

Eh. 'Classics' no great shakes for me, probably why I forgot it.

Millar (Millar), Thursday, 23 January 2003 04:12 (twenty-three years ago)

Disagree as vociferously as I can muster, Richard D James is a fantastic record, especially when listened to in conjunction with the "Girl/Boy EP" ("Boy/Girl"? I forget).

Seconded re: Expert Knob Twiddlers as well, esp for the fab Francois Hardy sample.

Charlie (Charlie), Thursday, 23 January 2003 04:16 (twenty-three years ago)

five months pass...
Vol. 2 affects me like no other record I've ever heard. Each track is its own distinct sound universe, not so much composed as seemingly unearthed or discovered. The album is basically egoless, by which I mean you are never aware of the presence of the composer. The beauty of the tracks is not so much in the underlying musical ideas (in a "wow, how did he ever think to do that!" way) as in their sheer near-physical presence. They give the uncanny and very disturbing impression that they are emanating from within your own mind. I realize that my description makes it sound not so different from other zone-out drone type stuff, but SAWII lacks that sensed underlying intention of being created in order to lull you to sleep or trance you out. The melodies are actually quite beguiling; they rarely if ever tense up and resolve, which gives the impression that they could go on forever -- and further reinforces the sense the listener gets of having uncovered them, of aurally witnessing some natural phenomena rather than being subjected to the ego-driven expression of a fellow human. More later; I could talk for hours about this record.

Clarke B. (stolenbus), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 18:52 (twenty-two years ago)

I've heard of people playing both discs of SA2 simultaneously, a la Zaireeka. Has anyone tried this? If so, what were the results?

I've tried it before but the results are debatable. It appears to sync up for the first 10 mins and then not really. Worth a try though if you're bored.

dog latin (dog latin), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 19:21 (twenty-two years ago)

"I've heard of people playing both discs of SA2 simultaneously, a la Zaireeka. Has anyone tried this? If so, what were the results? "

i remember doing this a while ago,it was a bit of a laugh but i can't remember whether it was actually better or just a novelty
the reason i did it was because i read that it was designed to work well like that
haha crosspost

robin (robin), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 19:25 (twenty-two years ago)

I can't actually believe that some people thought this was a joke or a novelty when it came out? What was the thinking behind that conclusion?

Clarke B. (stolenbus), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 19:41 (twenty-two years ago)

who thought it was a novelty?

robin (robin), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 19:49 (twenty-two years ago)

I was under the impression that some thought this was a middle-finger-up album in the same vein (albeit much more subdued) as Metal Machine Music. As in, "No beats, what's gotten INto this guy?!"

Clarke B. (stolenbus), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 19:56 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah, that's correct. it was expected that he would just go on in the beat-type template but he turned around and gave warp a dbl CD rec of ambient music. wonder what they thought...but of course, unlike MMM, it was no contract breaker or anything.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 20:05 (twenty-two years ago)

The first album he put out was ambient. No shocker that the second one was too, as I recall.

Such controversy as there was revolved around the lack of titles and the symbols/images he used to identify each track instead.

My basic theory with Aphex Twin is that everything without beats rules, and everything with beats sucks.

Ben Williams, Wednesday, 16 July 2003 20:30 (twenty-two years ago)

well i can imagine some spa putting on sawII and dismissing it instantly,but i have always thought it was one of his more well regarded albums

robin (robin), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 20:34 (twenty-two years ago)

but wasn't some of his early stuff (singles) beats oriented. some was ambient but at that point he was being talked abt etc and he was a new-ish signing to the warp label (as i recall, SAW II was his first big release on there).

I don't think everything that has beats sucks at all but he has never managed to make an out and out grebt record by using beats.

SAWII is the best thing i've heard from him.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 20:37 (twenty-two years ago)

i just sold vol ii because as much as i respect it i never, ever listen to it.

amateurist (amateurist), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 20:37 (twenty-two years ago)

My basic theory with Aphex Twin is that everything without beats rules, and everything with beats sucks.

While I think this is balderdash, I do hold the "piano" pieces on Druqks in very high regard, despite the general spottiness of that album. If I had a CD burner, I'd make myself a special EP of just those tracks. The very last track, in particular, is so beautiful it hurts.

Sam J. (samjeff), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 20:38 (twenty-two years ago)

No dude, SAW I was his first big release on Warp! I comes before II, you see...

The first track he was known for was Didgeridoo, which was pretty pounding. But the next was Analogue Bubblebath, which was classically fluffy.

His beats are crap! They really are.

Ben Williams, Wednesday, 16 July 2003 20:40 (twenty-two years ago)

(Did anyone hear the with-added-beats version of one of the SAW II tracks on that "Remixes for Cash" thing? I thought the track was... way diminished in that form. I read a review somewhere speculating that all the SAW II tracks may have originally had beats that were then removed, but I don't know where they got that from.)

Sam J. (samjeff), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 20:42 (twenty-two years ago)

are you saying he gets ''beats'' out of a piano? (haven't heard druqks yet).

''No dude, SAW I was his first big release on Warp! I comes before II, you see...''

ok thought it was on that label from belgium, my memory fails me again at this late hour.


Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 20:44 (twenty-two years ago)

The first 12 inches were on R&S, but not the album.

Ben Williams, Wednesday, 16 July 2003 20:45 (twenty-two years ago)

I read a review somewhere speculating that all the SAW II tracks may have originally had beats that were then removed, but I don't know where they got that from.

Possibly because the track is called the "Original Mix"?

SAW 85-92 and SAWII are both gorgeous and brilliant. I couldn't possibly choose.

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Wednesday, 16 July 2003 21:21 (twenty-two years ago)

Possibly because the track is called the "Original Mix"?

Oh, okay, whoops.

It would be quite something if all the tracks on that album really had started out like that, and then had the beats removed on a whim.

Sam J. (samjeff), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 21:32 (twenty-two years ago)

Vol. 2 affects me like no other record I've ever heard. Each track is its own distinct sound universe, not so much composed as seemingly unearthed or discovered. The album is basically egoless, by which I mean you are never aware of the presence of the composer. The beauty of the tracks is not so much in the underlying musical ideas (in a "wow, how did he ever think to do that!" way) as in their sheer near-physical presence. They give the uncanny and very disturbing impression that they are emanating from within your own mind. I realize that my description makes it sound not so different from other zone-out drone type stuff, but SAWII lacks that sensed underlying intention of being created in order to lull you to sleep or trance you out. The melodies are actually quite beguiling; they rarely if ever tense up and resolve, which gives the impression that they could go on forever -- and further reinforces the sense the listener gets of having uncovered them, of aurally witnessing some natural phenomena rather than being subjected to the ego-driven expression of a fellow human. More later; I could talk for hours about this record.

Just read this and I agree with everything Clarke B said. I like the long silences in the middle - they get very interesting in the wee hours, especially if you're half awake because it's the silences that make you wake up!

Um, Ben Williams is very VERY wrong btw. SAW1 was on R&S, not Warp. Polygon Window was RDJ's first album on Warp. And the Twin's beats rule. Obviously people are forgetting "I Care Because You Do", probably the most consistent (and best) beat-driven Aphex album. The RDJ Album and Come To Daddy are great as well.

dog latin (dog latin), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 23:19 (twenty-two years ago)

Ageispolis and Heliosphan are both tons better than Xtal.

...and Green Calx is better than all three of them.

I don't have SAWII, so I'm going to hold off on rating it until I get a copy.

Christine 'Green Leafy Dragon' Indigo (cindigo), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 23:37 (twenty-two years ago)

I like the long silences in the middle - they get very interesting in the wee hours, especially if you're half awake because it's the silences that make you wake up!

don't you just hate posting something you already said months ago on the same thread?

dog latin (dog latin), Wednesday, 16 July 2003 23:45 (twenty-two years ago)

i read this as Aphex vs StockAitkinWaterman and was delighted by Marcello's championing of the trios second greatest hits comp.
-- gaz (gary.lo...), January 21st, 2003.

Me too Gaz. What a disappointment.

colin s barrow (colin s barrow), Thursday, 17 July 2003 00:14 (twenty-two years ago)

bull vs. shit.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Thursday, 17 July 2003 00:47 (twenty-two years ago)

One of the coolest moments I've experienced while listening to this album is having my dad come in my room to say good-night right at the beginning of disc 1 track 3 and asking "what is *this*?" He proceeded to lay on my floor and listen to the entire track, and at the end summed up the emotional tone of the piece perfectly: "That's one of the loneliest things I've ever heard."

Clarke B., Thursday, 17 July 2003 02:54 (twenty-two years ago)

are you saying he gets ''beats'' out of a piano?

er, piano is a percussion instrument?

gabbneb (gabbneb), Thursday, 17 July 2003 03:12 (twenty-two years ago)

Yes, it is. You strike it. Actually, all sound is percussive. Also, all tones have beats. Plus, I'm a wanker.

colin s barrow (colin s barrow), Thursday, 17 July 2003 03:20 (twenty-two years ago)

but we love you anyway

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Thursday, 17 July 2003 03:22 (twenty-two years ago)

"you should read the customer reviews on amazon
1/3 of them never really got into it
1/3 of them find it the most peaceful,relaxing music ever
1/3 of them find that it terrifies them to the very core of their being"

Okay, does anyone here actually find nothing at all remotely disturbing about these tracks? Yes the record is in some sense quite beautiful, but god how some of those sound worlds get under my skin! Maybe it's good I've never done acid...

Clarke B., Thursday, 17 July 2003 03:32 (twenty-two years ago)

Okay, does anyone here actually find nothing at all remotely disturbing about these tracks?

Yes. I listened to SAWII while shrooming one time. Everyone went to some godawful bar to celebrate someone's birthday so I was all alone. I eventually had to turn it off because it was 'giving me bad vibes, maaan.'
I do wish there were more hauntingly beautiful tracks on there, such as the one Clarke just mentioned (Disc 1, Track 3--which to me isn't lonesome, but instead evokes the feeling of lying in bed in the arms of a lover)(but it does have that 'all is right w/the world, too bad I'll eventually die' mood too)

oops (Oops), Thursday, 17 July 2003 03:46 (twenty-two years ago)

sigh... I feel like I'm missing something, but I've given SAWII a chance, and RDJ's ambient stuff does absolutely nothing for me. All of those two discs sound like individual parts of Brian Eno or Robert Rich outtakes. (Basically, I'm feel the opposite of Ben)

donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 17 July 2003 04:22 (twenty-two years ago)

Donut Bitch has ears of cloth and hates music. Oh wait.

Clarke B's story about his dad and Disc 1, Track 3, aka One Of the Most Beautiful Songs Ever = genius.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 17 July 2003 04:41 (twenty-two years ago)

from discogs.com:

"Selected Ambient Works 85-92, 2x12" (R&S)
Selected Ambient Works 85-92, CD (Distance)
Selected Ambient Works 85-92, CD (Apollo)
Selected Ambient Works 85-92, CD (Apollo)"

i dont remember it ever being on warp either.
the warp site shows the 'on' ep to be the first aphex record out on warp, 15.11.93

ambrose (ambrose), Thursday, 17 July 2003 09:46 (twenty-two years ago)

haha was that fucking thing on warp or not (yes i don't remmeber being on warp either).

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 17 July 2003 10:20 (twenty-two years ago)

Since the copy I have seems to be R&S, I guess I lose the SAW I trainspotting battle.

Call me old-fashioned, but I like my beats to have at least a minimal sense of rhythm.

Ben Williams, Thursday, 17 July 2003 12:38 (twenty-two years ago)

But pretty much all the tracks on SAW II are repeated sequencer riffs, just without old-school Warp beats thundering over top of them.

Clarke B., Thursday, 17 July 2003 16:35 (twenty-two years ago)

But 85-92 is all about the heavenly analog love-fests, whilst SAWII is all about digital dragons being abducted by UFOs (case in point: disc 2 track 4)

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Thursday, 17 July 2003 18:30 (twenty-two years ago)

It's still one of his most overrated tracks. 'Flim' is brilliant, though - Top 10 Aphex track for me.

The Roger Waters Experience (Turrican), Friday, 31 March 2017 16:33 (nine years ago)

I'm not dismissing it as parody, but that was the starting point, no? Don't get me wrong the track rules but its such a clear one-off.

but I do see what you're saying DL, there was definitely a sense of each track being its own thing back then. that whole stretch from ICBYD to Windowlicker rules because you don't know what you're going to hear, the way he mixes acoustic and real-world sounds with drill n' bass hell was always fascinating to me. it's hard to imagine him doing something like "Logon Rock Witch" or "4" anymore.

frogbs, Friday, 31 March 2017 19:34 (nine years ago)

Film is overrated there I said it

a but (brimstead), Friday, 31 March 2017 20:29 (nine years ago)

yeah. I mean don't get me wrong I like Flim plenty but I don't get why it gets singled out so much.

example (crüt), Friday, 31 March 2017 20:34 (nine years ago)

windowlicker is great track

-_- (jim in vancouver), Friday, 31 March 2017 20:37 (nine years ago)

fu if disagree

-_- (jim in vancouver), Friday, 31 March 2017 20:37 (nine years ago)

I have literally never seen so many dog latin otms in the entire time dog latin has been on ilx.

Bill Teeters (Tom D.), Friday, 31 March 2017 23:03 (nine years ago)

Sure, if the O stands for "off", which he certainly is regarding Druqks.

The Roger Waters Experience (Turrican), Friday, 31 March 2017 23:37 (nine years ago)

COME ON YOU CUNTS, LET'S HAVE SOME APHEX ACID!

The Roger Waters Experience (Turrican), Friday, 31 March 2017 23:42 (nine years ago)

^^^ for real. Drukqs was my proper intro to Aphex, i had heard only Stone in Focus (on Astralwerks comp.) and SAW vol. II in a car, previously. to this day, i've heard nothing that touches the depth and feel of tracks like 54 Cymru Beats, Vordhosbn, Meltphace 6, Ziggomatic 17, Omgyjya-Switch7, Cock/ver10, Mt Saint Michel + Saint Michaels Mount, and Taking Control (all fucking epics)--in this vein of aggressive, super-detailed "drill + bass" music. Except for maybe Death Fuck Mental Beats, on Rushup Edge. my attitude/approach wasn't colored by anything - i had no expectations, nothing to gauge it by. i loved the piano tracks at first, and was nearly repelled by the aggro 'drill' tracks.. it took a couple years to grow on me. the miscellaneous ambient bits and piano tracks provide a welcome relief to the more intense tracks, as well as added atmosphere and a sense of a journey/exploration. the overall sequence is great, wouldn't have it any other way. one of my favorite albums

braunld (Lowell N. Behold'n), Saturday, 1 April 2017 00:53 (nine years ago)

drukqs pwns

just another (diamonddave85), Saturday, 1 April 2017 01:54 (nine years ago)

saw II sounds lush on my stereo setup, it's really enveloping.. like somebody stated upthread, it's as if it's emanating from something other than the stereo speakers. hard to compare it to 85-92, the music is markedly different - the terrain and spaced out qualities of it aren't really present on 85-92. Stone in Focus is timeless and beautiful. it does sort of evoke the feelings of late night/early morning acid comedown, like a warm cave/gentle brain balm. Love Tha, too

Syro is spotty, for sure. Papat4 (Pineal Mix) + S950tx16wasr10 (Earth Portal Mix) are both fantastic, along with the front end of the album (Minipops + XMASEVET10). 4 Bit 9d Api+e+6 is another banger, even my mom dug it. the Circlont tracks are chunky-sounding, they don't have that effortless feel/flow that characterizes some of the "drill" tracks on Drukqs.

Fredugolon 6 (on Rushup Edge) is another underrated track.

braunld (Lowell N. Behold'n), Saturday, 1 April 2017 19:49 (nine years ago)

my mistake, Fredugolon 6 is on the Confederation Trough ep. The CD version has this little gem: https://youtu.be/_wTl-wYL0-k

braunld (Lowell N. Behold'n), Saturday, 1 April 2017 21:36 (nine years ago)

^ This guy gets it!

The Roger Waters Experience (Turrican), Saturday, 1 April 2017 23:10 (nine years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1YMO1DZJMc

There's nothing as refined or fleshed out as this, on the RDJ album. 54 Cymru Beats is a modest example, check out Taking Control or Ziggomatic 17.. these tracks set a high-water mark that hasn't been touched since.

braunld (Lowell N. Behold'n), Sunday, 2 April 2017 01:23 (nine years ago)

designer of saw II artwork/logo:

https://www.facebook.com/residentadvisor/videos/10154686276379480/

dollar general (am0n), Thursday, 6 April 2017 17:24 (nine years ago)

that was nice

Raul Chamgerlain (Noodle Vague), Thursday, 6 April 2017 19:59 (nine years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vDSFMxLQBsk

dollar general (am0n), Thursday, 6 April 2017 23:31 (nine years ago)

https://www.instagram.com/p/BR594wqhkiL/

having the logo mutate over time to unrecognizability would have been brilliant

0 / 0 (lukas), Friday, 7 April 2017 05:13 (nine years ago)

hold on though are frogs and dogs up there really acting like Windowlicker isn't a banger on a big system

― 0 / 0 (lukas), Friday, March 31, 2017 5:23 PM (one week ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

I really really like Windowlicker FWIW. It's clever in more ways than one.

but I do see what you're saying DL, there was definitely a sense of each track being its own thing back then. that whole stretch from ICBYD to Windowlicker rules because you don't know what you're going to hear, the way he mixes acoustic and real-world sounds with drill n' bass hell was always fascinating to me. it's hard to imagine him doing something like "Logon Rock Witch" or "4" anymore.

― frogbs, Friday, March 31, 2017 8:34 PM (one week ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

And this is OTM

Lennon, Elvis, Hendrix etc (dog latin), Friday, 7 April 2017 12:18 (nine years ago)

Yeah there was a Disco Nihilist post that I think about a lot, talking about how Aphex releases used to be like shocking brand-new worlds. Hard to imagine that happening again.

0 / 0 (lukas), Friday, 7 April 2017 18:48 (nine years ago)

there have been many posts saying exactly that...

clouds, Friday, 7 April 2017 18:52 (nine years ago)

At this point I find the most exciting thing Aphex Twin does is occasionally bring out tracks that include his signifiers, like on "Cheetah" there's a couple synth pads that sound like his classic ambient work.

Carlotta's Portrait (Ross), Friday, 7 April 2017 18:57 (nine years ago)

all his tracks have his signifiers though?

clouds, Friday, 7 April 2017 19:14 (nine years ago)

Yeah, I guess so..perhaps some just resonate with me more

Carlotta's Portrait (Ross), Friday, 7 April 2017 19:19 (nine years ago)

he comes up with some gnarly bass lines, like those in 4 bit, papat4, and Xmas_Evet10 on Syro. hell, even the circlont14 (Shrymoming mix) 20-step bass breakdown is good for a calboti (an internal chuckle). the textures are surely popping, or maybe they're just remarkable. papat4 is elating, the bass is burgeoning.. but it's short-lived. oh, Aphex *sigh*

braunld (Lowell N. Behold'n), Saturday, 8 April 2017 13:56 (nine years ago)

https://youtu.be/_1Pk2bKF3xs

this Aleksi Perälä character uses tonalities (Colundi Sequences?) that vaguely recall saw II.. giant catalog of his stuff on Bandcamp

braunld (Lowell N. Behold'n), Saturday, 8 April 2017 14:08 (nine years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FB_ClJ9nikY

dollar general (am0n), Monday, 10 April 2017 20:11 (nine years ago)

Thanks for sharing that am0n. Getting serious tingles.

Fetchboy, Wednesday, 19 April 2017 05:28 (nine years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.