is this really what people want?
Why else spend hours on blogs, messageboards, and music publications trying to convince others that what you're listening to is worthwhile? Why bother voting in a year-end poll?
She probably makes it out to be more black/white than it actually is, but I do think we're all ultimately competing to have our likes be more prevalent and our dislikes to disappear.
― Indexed, Tuesday, 14 December 2010 23:24 (fifteen years ago)
we're all ultimately competing to have our likes be more prevalent and our dislikes to disappear
What, all the time until the end of our days? Sounds horrifying.
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 14 December 2010 23:25 (fifteen years ago)
you're glad Loveless is only this board's favourite album ever then? :]
― modrić in paradise (blueski), Tuesday, 14 December 2010 23:40 (fifteen years ago)
It's nice that it is, wouldn't care if it wasn't. (As it stands I had completely forgotten about those polls until you mentioned it.)
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 14 December 2010 23:51 (fifteen years ago)
More truthfully: we're competing for validation of our own aesthetic preferences by
(a) having others agree with us; and
(b) having been seen to be a cause of (or contributor to) any emergent critical position w/r/t X piece of music.
Hence all the passive-aggressive (and i'm not immune) "yes, it's great that X has belatedly endorsed this, note that I loved it way back when" stuff.
― Tim F, Tuesday, 14 December 2010 23:59 (fifteen years ago)
i was making that argument in like 2004, btw
― skrrr boi (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 15 December 2010 00:04 (fifteen years ago)
:P
i write about music and do the pazz & jop poll because its fun, and because i like (possibly) turning people on to stuff that i think is good (and that they may have overlooked or never heard of), and because i like the idea of documenting stuff that might very well go undocumented or under-documented unless i write about it. but i'm not really looking for consensus or validation. i don't think.
― scott seward, Wednesday, 15 December 2010 00:09 (fifteen years ago)
did you used to? i figure it's something you get over.
― modrić in paradise (blueski), Wednesday, 15 December 2010 00:12 (fifteen years ago)
but i don't think i'm normal! and the idea that people want to embrace stuff that everyone is embracing is completely understandable and i love pop music so i get the whole social/we are the world THING, but, yeah, i guess that doesn't even begin to describe why i listen to music. just the idea that there is something unsatisfying in listening to music alone and not sharing it with a larger group...well, i've always hated larger groups, so i guess that's my problem right there.
― scott seward, Wednesday, 15 December 2010 00:13 (fifteen years ago)
because i like (possibly) turning people on to stuff that i think is good (and that they may have overlooked or never heard of)
this is my main motivation
we're all ultimately competing [for]... our dislikes to disappear
this too
― lex diamonds (lex pretend), Wednesday, 15 December 2010 00:14 (fifteen years ago)
"did you used to? i figure it's something you get over."
it was nice in high school when me and my friends would all fall for the same thing. we all bonded over madonna. and other stuff. i mean i like the one on one of friendship and shared likes.
― scott seward, Wednesday, 15 December 2010 00:15 (fifteen years ago)
i am definitely not seeking "validation" of my tastes lol. as for being seen to be FIRST!!! or whatever - i don't think it's a motivation, i'm pretty bad at even guessing what's likely to cross over (critically or commercially) and frankly don't get why it happens 90% of the time. but it's really nice when it does happen! (first british journalist to write about nicki minaj, never gonna stop bragging about that.)
― lex diamonds (lex pretend), Wednesday, 15 December 2010 00:16 (fifteen years ago)
i couldn't talk to ANYONE about TONS of stuff that i liked for years until i became friends with chuck! so, that was kinda cathartic, i guess. i do like talking about music with people. and i do it every day. so i'm not a shut-in or whatever.
― scott seward, Wednesday, 15 December 2010 00:19 (fifteen years ago)
and because i like (possibly) turning people on to stuff that i think is good (and that they may have overlooked or never heard of)
surely we all like doing this, but i'm pretty sure that that's down to the taste validation thing tim mentioned. NOT because we're worried people think we have bad taste tho (we aren't and we don't - how dare you etc.), just in the sense that we want other people to recognise that our taste and insight is as good as we think it is. without that why care at all what people (especially on the internet) like/dislike?
― modrić in paradise (blueski), Wednesday, 15 December 2010 00:35 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah i think that it would be disingenuous to claim that there are absolutely no egotistical motives in being a critic, basically if you think that your taste is worth imposing on the wider world that's a bit of a d*ck move, and the task of good music crit is basically to justify that by being a good enough writer/thinker/tastemaker that you're ultimately on the plus side of the register.
Not trying to diss people: basically existing on the planet is a d*ck move that requires justification.
And obv there's more and less egotistical forms of writing IMO.
― Tim F, Wednesday, 15 December 2010 00:41 (fifteen years ago)
for me the problem is how she moves from "music is such a social phenomenon" into we all want "a sort of mythical community where everyone agrees with us" because that community would be inherently anti-social and movements towards that community have resulted in the fragmentation/individualization of taste that has occurred over the last howevermany years
― /\/K/\/\, Wednesday, 15 December 2010 00:49 (fifteen years ago)
and i would suggest that arguing over music is precisely what makes it social goes against any desire for a mythical community where everyone agrees with you
― /\/K/\/\, Wednesday, 15 December 2010 00:51 (fifteen years ago)
"what makes it social and contradicts any desire" is how that should read
― /\/K/\/\, Wednesday, 15 December 2010 00:52 (fifteen years ago)
basically existing on the planet is a d*ck move that requires justification.
uh what?
― lex diamonds (lex pretend), Wednesday, 15 December 2010 00:58 (fifteen years ago)
"Yeah i think that it would be disingenuous to claim that there are absolutely no egotistical motives in being a critic, basically if you think that your taste is worth imposing on the wider world that's a bit of a d*ck move, and the task of good music crit is basically to justify that by being a good enough writer/thinker/tastemaker that you're ultimately on the plus side of the register."
oh yeah i thought this was understood. i definitely think i'm really cool. and i have awesome taste. and when i say it's fun to write and be a part of the pazz & jop poll that just means its fun to blab about stuff that i think is great! which is totally egotistical. but i honestly don't feel as though i'm imposing anything on anybody. i make a case and let people judge for themselves. which is why i'm generally anti-poll. but pazz & jop is a good chance to vote for stuff that nobody would ever vote for that i love. and someone might read my ballot and be curious.
― scott seward, Wednesday, 15 December 2010 01:01 (fifteen years ago)
a+ attitude
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_QqvfSFxx5rI/SiXGBw115EI/AAAAAAAANZg/eUq9WqzAPFk/s320/Image58ilikeyourstyle.jpg
― modrić in paradise (blueski), Wednesday, 15 December 2010 01:13 (fifteen years ago)
It's very A+ -- also more generous than where I think I am these days as a writer, then again I feel I simply *listen* far differently than I used to, and that act of listening influencing how/where I choose to spend my time in terms of both listening and talking/writing about it. It's not willful isolation per se, but I do often feel quite contentedly disengaged from a lot of the macrolevel battles and discussion going on -- this verges a bit more into the piece I wrote as Pazz/Jop commentary, though, so I might say more then whenever I run the full thing on my blog.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 15 December 2010 01:27 (fifteen years ago)
it is strange that, with the thousands of albums released every year and freely-available via the internet, that there's anything approaching a concensus about the best albums of the year. i'd more likely expect that, of a hypothetical 1K critics, there'd be maybe 700 -- 850 different no. 1 album picks.
― Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 15 December 2010 01:30 (fifteen years ago)
The albums that show up most often make a top ten list.
― Gus Van Sotosyn (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 15 December 2010 01:39 (fifteen years ago)
yeah, sure. but that's a bit beside the point.
― Daniel, Esq., Wednesday, 15 December 2010 01:40 (fifteen years ago)
Listening to High Violet now, and god is it as awful as expected, admittedly a predictable response on my part.
― _Rudipherous_, Wednesday, 15 December 2010 01:41 (fifteen years ago)
respect to anyone listeing to hundreds of albums over the course of a year as ever - critics or not. even with spotify i'm only gonna manage about 100 and that's well above my norm.
― modrić in paradise (blueski), Wednesday, 15 December 2010 01:42 (fifteen years ago)
word. i tried to listen to a lot of music this year & it sucked so i gave up
― flopson, Wednesday, 15 December 2010 01:44 (fifteen years ago)
people who make enormous, 50+ album lists though, how many of those albums do they actually "connect" with or deeply love/would not rather just listen to their favourite couple songs off of
― flopson, Wednesday, 15 December 2010 01:46 (fifteen years ago)
i only really deeply loved like, two or three albums this year. i think that's a good amount
― flopson, Wednesday, 15 December 2010 01:47 (fifteen years ago)
i've "connected" with about 20 albums this year, i'd say? obv to varying degrees, but they're pretty much all keepers. then about another 20 that i'd say are definitely worth hearing. i lost track of how many albums i've heard this year a while back but i'd guess it's about 150.
that's about the same number of albums i usually "connect" with, definitely the year in which i've heard the most albums tho.
― lex diamonds (lex pretend), Wednesday, 15 December 2010 01:53 (fifteen years ago)
20 is unthinkable to me but it is your job i guess. beginning to feel it's such a rare feat when an album is consistently engaging throughout, or is really deeply engaging for at least many songs, & it removes from the pleasure of listening to music (especially new) to be constantly searching for that
― flopson, Wednesday, 15 December 2010 02:03 (fifteen years ago)
i do a top 20 albums every year so am gonna say....
20
― modrić in paradise (blueski), Wednesday, 15 December 2010 02:15 (fifteen years ago)
(but real answer is 10, and i still hate albums)
― modrić in paradise (blueski), Wednesday, 15 December 2010 02:16 (fifteen years ago)
someone find me some good asian year-end lists. feel bad that half the world is excluded from this thread.
― scott seward, Wednesday, 15 December 2010 02:24 (fifteen years ago)
man, i love albums. i'm sick that way. i listen to thousands every year. never gets old.
Hot Tub
man, i love albums. i'm sick that way. i listen to thousands every year. never gets old. --scott seward
Otm
― skrrr boi (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 15 December 2010 02:30 (fifteen years ago)
Lol at aborted hot tub time machine joke still making an appearance in that post
― skrrr boi (Whiney G. Weingarten), Wednesday, 15 December 2010 02:31 (fifteen years ago)
it is strange that, with the thousands of albums released every year and freely-available via the internet, that there's anything approaching a concensus about the best albums of the year.
Too much choice = people retreat to old favorites. That's not a value judgment, either; I do it, everyone does it to some degree. But I don't think it's a coincidence that the more music there the less that gets covered.
― slow a cat sample down 800 percent (Matos W.K.), Wednesday, 15 December 2010 03:29 (fifteen years ago)
"more music there IS"
― slow a cat sample down 800 percent (Matos W.K.), Wednesday, 15 December 2010 03:30 (fifteen years ago)
For Scott, Top 100 Korean pop songs from Nov. '09 to Nov. '10: http://cassipeasworld.blogspot.com/2010/11/bugs-top-100-songs-for-2010.html
― slow a cat sample down 800 percent (Matos W.K.), Wednesday, 15 December 2010 03:32 (fifteen years ago)
Also, Top 10 Anime Songs: http://www.lw-concepts.com/lw/?p=6422
Very interesting end-year chart (with sound illustration) at Pontone.
Here's the first part (50-34): http://pontone.pl/tones-of-the-year-2010-best-50-albums-vol-1-50-34/
the next one should be out today
― Patataj, Wednesday, 15 December 2010 05:27 (fifteen years ago)
Pitchfork's Honorable Album Mentions:
Actress - SplazshBaths - Ceruleanceo - White MagicCurren$y - Pilot Talk / Pilot Talk IIDOM - Sun Bronzed Greek Gods EPDum Dum Girls - I Will Be Charlotte Gainsbourg - IRMGlasser - RingGold Panda - Lucky ShinerGrinderman - Grinderman 2Guido - AnideaLiars - SisterworldMale Bonding - Nothing HurtsMount Kimbie - Crooks & LoversPantha du Prince - Black NoisePerfume Genius - LearningSam Amidon - I See the SignSurfer Blood - Astro CoastSwans - My Father Will Guide Me Up a Rope to the SkyToro y Moi - Causers of This
― prolego, Wednesday, 15 December 2010 07:33 (fifteen years ago)
ceo, pilot talk 1, charlotte gainsbourg, gold panda, liars, male bonding, pantha du prince, and surfer blood were all best new music, so a little surprising to see that none of them made the actual list
― kaygee, Wednesday, 15 December 2010 07:37 (fifteen years ago)
Based on the list of albums she then pimps I think it's more a case of her not knowing that non-indie exists.― Tim Fif i wanted to read the "this is my personal top 10" list from someone who clearly has little understanding/interest of anything besides the most loudly trumpeted indie rock and the occassional Wire favorite, I could visit ANYONE'S BLOG ON EARTH. The fact that this appears on Dusted instead of somerandombullshit.blogspot.com doesn't change anything― skrrr boi (Whiney G. Weingarten)
if i wanted to read the "this is my personal top 10" list from someone who clearly has little understanding/interest of anything besides the most loudly trumpeted indie rock and the occassional Wire favorite, I could visit ANYONE'S BLOG ON EARTH. The fact that this appears on Dusted instead of somerandombullshit.blogspot.com doesn't change anything― skrrr boi (Whiney G. Weingarten)
Of all the boring personal top tens, why does this particular one draw such contempt? I don't know if she writes much outside of Dusted, but skimming through her stuff (http://dustedmagazine.com/writers/kelly), Kelly is no ignorant hack. She just has a preference for indie, psych and post-punk. Her list is hardly random -- she pretty clearly stated that they're her favorites. Since when is specializing a crime? Should we start bludgeoning the hip-hop and r&b crits who neglect country? Or call the metal writers ignorant fucks because they clearly have little understanding/interest of dance-pop? If one wanted an update on Brazilian albums here, you're all useless.
The whole indie backlash thing is kind of funny, but ultimately comes off as peevish and pointless. The way I see it, anyone who bothers to dismiss an entire genre of music most likely couldn't be bothered to listen to much of it and is in a weak-ass position to judge. Hearing and hating the Arcade Fire and the National is understandable, but ridiculing a writer for a top 20 that you probably hadn't heard more than a third of? Now that's some bullshit.
The Soft Pack certainly has no pretentions of being 'important' but it does have 7 excellent songs on it, which is more than one can say about many of the others topping this year's lists.
― Fastnbulbous, Wednesday, 15 December 2010 07:40 (fifteen years ago)
the most loudly trumpeted indie rock and the occassional Wire favorite
Within the realm of trumpeted indie rock in 2010, her list is reasonably atypical. If anyone finds it completely humdrum content-wise (I'm talking about the specific albums chosen, not whether or not you personally find them any good), it's because you've probably heard as many or more records this year than she has. 8 of her 10 records aren't exactly commonplace in the blogspot circles.
― Lightning Is For Babies (Johnny Fever), Wednesday, 15 December 2010 07:47 (fifteen years ago)
My issue was with her preamble not her content. Why ask "where is this year's merriweather post pavilion to unite us all" if you're not even interested in anything that falls outside of a pretty narrow sphere. It's the implied borders around "what matters", rather than what she actually likes, which gives off a blinkered indie rock critic vibe.
― Tim F, Wednesday, 15 December 2010 08:35 (fifteen years ago)
Resident Advisor: Top 20 albums of 2010http://www.residentadvisor.net/feature.aspx?1264
20. Prins Thomas - Prins Thomas [Full Pupp]19. The Black Dog - Music for Real Airports [Soma]18. Lindstrom & Christabelle - Real Life Is No Cool [Smalltown Supersound]17. Peter Van Hoesen - Entropic City [Time To Express]16. ASC - Nothing Is Certain [NonPlus+]15. Darkstar - North [Hyperdub]14. Bonobo - Black Sands [Ninja Tune]13. Oneohtrix Point Never - Returnal [Mego]12. Virgo - Virgo [Rush Hour]11. LCD Soundsystem - This is Happening [DFA]10. Matthew Dear - Black City [Ghostly International]09. Mount Kimbie - Crooks & Lovers [Hotflush]08. Scuba - Triangulation [Hotflush]07. Four Tet - There Is Love In You [Domino]06. Pantha Du Prince - Black Noise [Rough Trade]05. John Roberts - Glass Eights [Dial]04. Actress - Splazsh [Honest Jons]03. Shed - The Traveller [Ostgut Ton]02.Flying Lotus - Cosmogramma [Warp]01. Caribou - Swim [City Slang]
― O Permaban (NickB), Wednesday, 15 December 2010 08:37 (fifteen years ago)