Shania Twain's Ramones T-shirt: C/D?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (381 of them)
(Doesn't the most flatly-stated reason people are pissed off = they don't like to see rock t-shirts become fashion items disassociated from the actual music they represent? This is a perfectly legitimate stance so far as I can tell, but it unfortunately requires an such a paranoid vigilant monitoring of who might possibly actually enjoy what that I'm not sure it's worth it.)

nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 23:21 (twenty-three years ago)

How is that a legitimate stance, Nabisco? Rock t-shirts already ARE fashion items, regardless of whether they retain their association to the musicians on them or not. Furthermore, the associations made with them often have very little to do with the actual bands and more with whatever the prevalent stereotypes of fans associated with those bands happen to be. (In other words, only people like us who are already predisposed to looking at everything in terms of DA MUSIC are going to look at concert/band t-shirts and associate any type of iconic music-related status to them; everyone else has a sociological reaction that ranges from stereotyping the band's fans to stereotyping the fans of the genre associated with that band, and that's assuming that they get the stereotypes and genre right.)

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 23:31 (twenty-three years ago)

(Wow, that was a lot of words to say, "No one besides us even CARES!" Which may be the point of the anti-shirt folks, now that I think about it.)

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 23:33 (twenty-three years ago)

"and an essentially religious impulse (mine, Alex's though I'm guessing he would/will resent that)"


You'd be correct.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 23:35 (twenty-three years ago)

Honor the shirt size?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 23:36 (twenty-three years ago)

Tom, I think you're right about the diehard fans (like Alex), but the waverers and the casual buyers to whom 'cool' is a vital sellling point will be put off.

Cool' can be devalued by overexposure, and knowing the kind of people who like the Ramones or that type of band (and I don't mean Alex), one of it's 'selling points' is it exclusiveness. If every Tom, Dick or Shania likes it then it's stock will fall.

As for Shania Twain fan's being open to conversion. I suspect the numbers who will now investigate the Ramones will be miniscule, and they will be the diehard fans who would hang on her very word. Just have to get her in a Merzbow t-shirt next time.

Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 23:39 (twenty-three years ago)

Nabisco sed: "Doesn't the most flatly-stated reason people are pissed off = [that] they don't like to see rock t-shirts become fashion items disassociated from the actual music they represent?"

Sums it up for me, Nabisco!

"This is a perfectly legitimate stance so far as I can tell,"

Glad we agree.

"...but it unfortunately requires such a paranoid vigilant monitoring of who might possibly actually enjoy what that I'm not sure it's worth it."

I wouldn't consider guessing that Shania's *NOT* a Ramones fan a "paranoid vigilant monitoring", but rather a logical assumption based on a wealth of evidence.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 23:40 (twenty-three years ago)

"Rock t-shirts already ARE fashion items"

They've *BECOME* fashion items, you mean.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 23:40 (twenty-three years ago)

No, I mean they are fashion items, they've always been fashion items and they'll always be fashion items. All clothing is fashion.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 23:44 (twenty-three years ago)

"All clothing is fashion."

Well, yeah...true, but there's a difference between fashion and Fashion (notice the capital letter).

Meaning: there's a difference between things people happen to wear and things that you're likely to spot people like Naomi Campbell and, well, Shania Twain in.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 23:48 (twenty-three years ago)

Not really. Everything just plays into the image that the person wearing the clothes wants to convey.

It seems to me that the problem then isn't that Shania is wearing a Ramones shirt, it's that the "outsider" signifiers don't signify the outside anymore (which, if you'd looked at a television or magazine at any time during the 90s, shouldn't be that big a shock to you).

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 23:51 (twenty-three years ago)

At any rate, on an objective "stands the test of time" scale, the relative importance of The Ramones to Shania Twain is completely dwarfed by the relative importance of either to Bach, Beethoven, Handel, Mozart, Brahms, Vivaldi, Dvorak, Mahler, Puccini, Verdi, etc, etc. You can't logically push forward your argument without also pushing that one.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 23:57 (twenty-three years ago)

Hard to imagine anyone not knowing who the Ramones were anymore (i.e. negating their status as 'outsiders'). But, the Ramones certainly made their name via being outsiders to begin with. The fact that they couldn't break the mainstream *MADE* them outsiders; and herewith the irony of a mainstream prototype asserting her implied (though invariably false) affinity for them.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Wednesday, 22 January 2003 23:59 (twenty-three years ago)

To quote (and agree) with Captain Sensible of the Damned (as quoted on the rear flap of Evertt True's new bio of the Ramones):

"This is classical music for future generations. People will be listening to [the Ramones] in 100 years time and talking about it in the same breath as Beethoven."

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 23 January 2003 00:01 (twenty-three years ago)

Out rockisting the rockists!

Ironically, I'm not fussed about Shania wearing the Ramones t-shirt, because, well, the Ramones were just as much a knowing confection of poses and assumed attitudes as any band there's ever been! You can't have your cake and eat it!

On the other hand, I DO get kind of annoyed at the kind of post-Harmony Korine fashonista appropriation of eg metal t-shirts, mullets, monsta truks etc as some emblem of how, like, suburban white trash culture is just, like, the most *authentic* and *persistent* and *kinda charming* voice in the whole sanitized and tastefully niche-marketed datasphere. And I guess the difference is that this attitude strikes me as condescending, whereas, if anything, Shania - or her stylist - is honoring and valorising the Ramones by trying to be associated with them.

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Thursday, 23 January 2003 00:07 (twenty-three years ago)

How much of an outsider band can you be if you star in a feature film reminiscent of the Beatles/Monkees movies?

As for that quote, conjecture is not proof. "Serious" musicians and "serious" music lovers know, appreciate and respect Beethoven, NOT The Ramones. In fact, to "serious" music lovers, The Ramones are no-talent hacks who played the same simple song over and over ad nauseum.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 23 January 2003 00:08 (twenty-three years ago)

People will be listening to [the Ramones] in 100 years
FIRE THE CANON!
oh no wait that's not it...

mitch lastnamewithheld (mitchlnw), Thursday, 23 January 2003 00:09 (twenty-three years ago)

Dan, you're likely right in that only select groups of people care about the shirt's connection to the band-as-musicians, but I think that's precisely why such a fizz goes off over it being the Ramones, in this case: there are still these narrow tribes in which certain band affiliations are still assumed to tell us something about the affiliator, however vague or usually wrong; basically the complaint here is that a symbol is being removed from that caste's vocabulary, or anyway deprived of whatever last ounce of meaning they could still place on it. In other words, the horror is "well before I could assume that anyone wearing a Ramones shirt was at least pretending to be punk!" So I say it's a legitimate complaint insofar as, well, yes, the shirt-based "vocabulary" of such people does in fact suddenly have less of the meaning they want it to, and I suppose they have every right to bitch about that.

Alex I think your "wealth of evidence" is exactly the kind of overwrought monitoring I'm talking about: first off, the fact that you see enjoyment of the Ramones and making Shania Twain's music as incompatible doesn't necessarily make it so (any more than her husband's early career is so incompatible with his current one). Second if you're so down on Shania Twain it saddens me that you'd have to go around collecting a "wealth of evidence" about her just to decide whether her shirt's worth criticizing -- I suppose what I'm saying here is that none of us should be wasting our time prying inside people's heads and lives to pass judgment on whether they are or are not "qualified" or "allowed" to wear a given shirt, and no matter how sure you are in this Shania case you're setting yourself up to conduct the same inquisition with everyone, everywhere, to the point of ridiculousness.

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 23 January 2003 00:14 (twenty-three years ago)

"it saddens me that you'd have to go around collecting a "wealth of evidence" about her just to decide whether her shirt's worth criticizing"

Don't be sad, Nabisco. Given her overexposure, the wealth would collect itself without much effort.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 23 January 2003 00:18 (twenty-three years ago)

can people be ironically not fussed?

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 23 January 2003 00:46 (twenty-three years ago)

j0hn: "I only like my favorite band so long as no people I don't like like them" -- nuts to that, sez I.

aka "If you think the Ramones are cheapened coz Shania wears them, then they were never yours to begin with.

Nabisco: "In other words, the horror is "well before I could assume that anyone wearing a Ramones shirt was at least pretending to be punk!" So I say it's a legitimate complaint insofar as, well, yes, the shirt-based "vocabulary" of such people does in fact suddenly have less of the meaning they want it to, and I suppose they have every right to bitch about that."

aka "Actually if you think Shania can cheapen The Ramones then they're ALL YOURS."

taking sides!

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Thursday, 23 January 2003 06:16 (twenty-three years ago)

Sean = sexist ass ;)

I = drunk on a wednesday

blah blah blah

Kim (Kim), Thursday, 23 January 2003 06:37 (twenty-three years ago)

There was a similar controversy in the 80s when Kip Winger wore a Hugo Largo (!) t-shirt in a video, leading to much consternation and re-evaluation of Winger by indie kids ("Well, their drummer was in the Dixie Dregs, and they were kind prog..."). Winger was asked about his fondness for the band in an interview. "They're a band? I just picked it out of a box the wardrobe girl had."

Colin Meeder (Mert), Thursday, 23 January 2003 11:01 (twenty-three years ago)

Let's not forget what's important. She looks hot in that t-shirt and I would not have seen the picture had it not been controversial.
http://www.shaniaforums.com/attachment.php?s=a8f4ac689c4410591c84ec1adc23355d&postid=206468

dave225 (Dave225), Thursday, 23 January 2003 12:56 (twenty-three years ago)

Hard to imagine anyone not knowing who the Ramones were anymore
Heyyyyy...was she ever wearing any Ramones shirts before the deaths of Joey and Dee Dee made the Ramones profile much more public?

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Thursday, 23 January 2003 13:41 (twenty-three years ago)

Sean = sexist ass ;)
Madam, you have distilled my very essence!

Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Thursday, 23 January 2003 14:32 (twenty-three years ago)

I beg to differ yet again, but she doesn't even look hot in that picture. Yes, she's an attractive woman and yes she's managed to look great in a variety of photographs (including the one where's she's dishonoring AC/DC's fire), but she just looks bad in that pic in the Ramones shirt. Look at it! It just looks so forced! She's a poser!!!!

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 23 January 2003 14:33 (twenty-three years ago)

c'mon, man.. girl next door... givin' ya li'l tease... wearing her fathers, I mean boyfriend's, t-shirt.

dave225 (Dave225), Thursday, 23 January 2003 16:22 (twenty-three years ago)

She looks airbrushed and carved out of plastic. Yech.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 23 January 2003 16:23 (twenty-three years ago)

c'mon, man.. girl next door... givin' ya li'l tease... wearing her fathers, I mean boyfriend's, t-shirt.
Careful, dave, Kim might call YOU a sexist ass, too.

Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Thursday, 23 January 2003 16:28 (twenty-three years ago)

what's wrong with being sexy?

dave225 (Dave225), Thursday, 23 January 2003 16:32 (twenty-three years ago)

(credit to Nigel Tuffnel, by the way.)

dave225 (Dave225), Thursday, 23 January 2003 16:32 (twenty-three years ago)

D'ya reckon the background to that photo is fake? Who asked Shania to don a Ramones T-shirt and then stand in front of some friggin' mountains and shrubbery?

It's rather incongruous seeing the Ramones in that context - far more jarring than the placing of da bruddas' logo on La Twain's body, when such devices are seen any day on fashion catwalks.

Jerry (Jerry), Thursday, 23 January 2003 17:26 (twenty-three years ago)

I just assumed that those mountains were part of her backyard, now that she lives in 'em.

Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Thursday, 23 January 2003 17:28 (twenty-three years ago)

Are you saying Shania's mountians are fake Sean?
Your not helping the sexist rumour here.

Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Thursday, 23 January 2003 21:19 (twenty-three years ago)

Do women in Switzerland need plastic surgery? There's some Shakira tie-in here but damned if I can find the words for it.

Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Thursday, 23 January 2003 21:32 (twenty-three years ago)

Careful, dave, Kim might call YOU a sexist ass, too.

Dude, don't worry. Just one more of those beers and I probably would have posted "Sean = sexy ass" instead.

Kim (Kim), Friday, 24 January 2003 01:29 (twenty-three years ago)

I have a friend that is a minor league comedian that bought a "Pigface" t-shirt only because the word is usually worth a few laughs. He has never as far as I known ever even heard any of their music, he just thinks the word "pigface" is funny as shit.

earlnash, Friday, 24 January 2003 02:50 (twenty-three years ago)

I think it's depressing that one mention of my ass killed this thread. Maybe we should mention Ally's ass or Julian Casablancas' ass to get this thread going again?

Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Saturday, 25 January 2003 15:48 (twenty-three years ago)

b-b-but Julian Casablancas ass is all pasty and hairy. We don't want to talk about that.

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Saturday, 25 January 2003 15:57 (twenty-three years ago)

mmmm pasty

mark s (mark s), Saturday, 25 January 2003 16:52 (twenty-three years ago)

TS: pasty, hairy asses vs. me going out and getting some donuts

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Saturday, 25 January 2003 18:06 (twenty-three years ago)

John, THAT IS NOT A CONTEST!

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Saturday, 25 January 2003 18:47 (twenty-three years ago)

I am now in possession of the donuts and I must say that I am utterly persuaded that I made the right decision

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Saturday, 25 January 2003 19:13 (twenty-three years ago)

John, YOU HAVE MADE THE WRONG CHOICE!

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Saturday, 25 January 2003 19:24 (twenty-three years ago)

Were they honey glazed, chocolate frosted, jelly filled or powdered sugar covered?

Lord Custos Epsilon (Lord Custos Epsilon), Saturday, 25 January 2003 19:30 (twenty-three years ago)

It's brilliant how this thread is suddenly about ass and donuts.


Kim (Kim), Saturday, 25 January 2003 19:35 (twenty-three years ago)

As is, ahem, widely known, my ass is always suger-covered but seldom honey-glazed. As for the donuts I got a dozen of 'em and enjoyed one jelly-filled and half of a chocolate-chip one. There are more in the kitchen, where the hell are all you guys, we could have donuts & coffee & make mashups of "Still the One" and "Beat on the Brat"

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Saturday, 25 January 2003 20:06 (twenty-three years ago)

John, your ass may be sugar coated, but is it punk rock?

Kim (Kim), Saturday, 25 January 2003 20:09 (twenty-three years ago)

I think by putting sugar-coating on John's ass, he has devalued it. Sugar-coating is more powerful than his ass.

Cozen (Cozen), Saturday, 25 January 2003 20:36 (twenty-three years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.