btw, song w vocal recorded for Wonderwall sdtk but initially 'lost' and not released until 1999
― you can sub out "bipartisan solutions" for "some of my dick" (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 18 November 2010 16:51 (fifteen years ago)
The movie's not so bad.
― Mark G, Thursday, 18 November 2010 16:56 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah that amazing song is on the DVD release. Plus the movie has The Fool in it, that Dutch art collective that painted the side of the Apple building and Eric Clapton's guitar and did some album covers (including ISB) had a cool freak folk record of their own as well:
http://img.maniadb.com/images/album/287/287713_1_f.jpg
― Telephoneface (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 18 November 2010 17:32 (fifteen years ago)
Woah!
"The Fool's best known artworks are those they created for The Beatles in 1966–67. They include:the original (rejected) cover and the inner sleeve for Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band;"
elsewhere...
"Originally a Dutch group called the Fool made a design for the center fold of the album.
Miles: "Simon and Marijke painted a dream landscape of stylised mountain peaks and wonderful birds, like an LSD-influenced Chinese willow-pattern design. The sky was rainbow-ed with two oval panels for text, one of which was filled with stars and comets. A further empty panel had a flower border with a peacock draping its tail over the side. Tiny figures of the Beatles peeped out from among the flora. The style was Euro-psychedelic, owing much to Mucha, Beardsley, art nouveau and nineteenth-century children’s book illustrations. Unfortunately they got the dimensions wrong, but even with a border added, the work looked somehow second-rate. The Beatles, however, loved it."
But Fraser saw it differently. He felt it would be judged by posterity as simply another piece of sixties acid art. Robert suggested a series of portrait shots instead. For this picture the Beatles all looked in the camera and tried to express a feeling of love to their fans. "And that’s what that is," declares Paul "if you look at it you’ll see the big effort from the eyes".
Here's an interview by Dutch Beatlesexpert Azing with Simon Posthuma (The Fool), made in March 2, 1996.
Azing: Can you describe the design? We have no idea what it looked like. Simon: It was very colorful. It was a gatefold (three-part) cover with a square filled with dancing people and many rainbow colors. Very lovely - like everything in those days. Flower power, you know?Azing: What happened to the original design?Simon: John took it and hang in on the wall at his house. I think it's still on the wall at Yoko's."
― Telephoneface (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 18 November 2010 17:39 (fifteen years ago)
http://i162.photobucket.com/albums/t263/frequentflyer909/FoolSgtPepper.jpg
― Telephoneface (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 18 November 2010 17:43 (fifteen years ago)
huh never seen that before
it is kind of dopey tho. they made the right choice
― you can sub out "bipartisan solutions" for "some of my dick" (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 18 November 2010 18:02 (fifteen years ago)
didn't derek taylor have the Fool cover pulled? it says in Macca's book which i don't have to hand. they did the Apple painting which i always quite likedhttp://theselvedgeyard.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/apple_boutique_01.jpg
― piscesx, Thursday, 18 November 2010 18:08 (fifteen years ago)
love the "classic" sign next door too lol
― you can sub out "bipartisan solutions" for "some of my dick" (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 18 November 2010 18:27 (fifteen years ago)
(That 'Classic' is a cinema and there's still a cinema there these days - 'Screen on Baker Street)
For this picture the Beatles all looked in the camera and tried to express a feeling of love to their fans. "And that’s what that is," declares Paul "if you look at it you’ll see the big effort from the eyes".
According to John, two of the Beatles were 'flying' (presume he means tripping) on the Sgt Pepper cover, unknown to the others. One has to be John, but not sure who the other was was. According to John, George was 'very heavy on acid' - and Paul was known to be wary - so I'd guess it was George.
― Bob Six, Friday, 19 November 2010 00:37 (fifteen years ago)
Macca had taken it already a few times by the time of the Pepper sleeve mind.
― piscesx, Friday, 19 November 2010 00:48 (fifteen years ago)
and he does look pretty out of it in that session:
http://29.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lbv0oe5BXn1qb2mtno1_500.jpg
― Bob Six, Friday, 19 November 2010 00:53 (fifteen years ago)
haha yeah.
― piscesx, Friday, 19 November 2010 04:34 (fifteen years ago)
They all look pretty out in that particular photo though.
― You're Twistin' My Melody Man! (Geir Hongro), Saturday, 20 November 2010 10:17 (fifteen years ago)
the voice of experience
― i'm assuming that it's tity boi, host of the mixtape (sic), Saturday, 20 November 2010 12:23 (fifteen years ago)
i thought that when the announcement was that the washington coliseum concert was available "streaming from itunes" it meant it was actually available in itunes like a movie preview, but I guess it's just on a webpage? lame-o.
― akm, Saturday, 20 November 2010 15:01 (fifteen years ago)
40 W Beatles Hey Jude
― Mark G, Monday, 22 November 2010 12:26 (fifteen years ago)
Least popular track is What Goes On apparently - 14 downloads. Revolution 9 downloaded 48 times!
― nate woolls, Monday, 22 November 2010 12:36 (fifteen years ago)
Poor ol' rings. (where is this list?)
― Mark G, Monday, 22 November 2010 12:38 (fifteen years ago)
Those figures were tweeted by Music Week News earlier.
― nate woolls, Monday, 22 November 2010 12:40 (fifteen years ago)
http://twitter.com/MusicWeekNews
― my sex drew back into itself tight and dry (abanana), Monday, 22 November 2010 12:53 (fifteen years ago)
ha:
EMI Publishing has secured deals with two of the hottest new bands, putting pen to paper with Mona and Brother.
Will hear nothing futher from these bands...
― Mark G, Monday, 22 November 2010 13:01 (fifteen years ago)
UK Top 40 singles has 'Hey Jude' at number 40. That's it.
― James Mitchell, Monday, 22 November 2010 13:14 (fifteen years ago)
Yep.
― Mark G, Monday, 22 November 2010 14:28 (fifteen years ago)
I have had it up to here hearing about The Beatle's catalogue being available on iTunes.
― Captain Ostensible (Scik Mouthy), Tuesday, 23 November 2010 05:57 (fifteen years ago)
I feel like we all need to go back and geek out about the re-releases again. The Itunes thing feels very much like a non-starter.
― That is the stench of tyranny (VegemiteGrrrl), Tuesday, 23 November 2010 06:00 (fifteen years ago)
happily..
lets talk about unsurpassed promos and when it will be available?
really looking forward to it.
― my opinionation (Hamildan), Tuesday, 23 November 2010 12:52 (fifteen years ago)
The new DVD project is a 4 disc set under the title "Unsurpassed Promos" collecting not only all the Beatles' official promotional music videos from 1962-1970, but a version of every song they mimed to on tv, songs from their films and something like 350 still photos from the shootings of the promo films. Each video will be presented in the best quality available and every effort has been made to avoid videos that have station logos. The set will also include the last 30 minutes of "Let It Be" in stereo. The promos have been synched to the mono CD's, but whenever a promo features an alternate mono mix, that mix will be included as an audio option. Some of the videos have had to be pieced together from various sources in order to get the best quality. The fan behind the project is the same guy who gave us the "Unsurpassed Broadcasts" collection, as well as the "Empire Strikes Back" DVD and CD. Naturally, because of his reputation, when he announced his plans for this set, he was contacted by people who sat on superior material they offered for inclusion.When "1" was released back in 2000, then head of Apple Corps Neil Aspinall was asked what the next step was, perhaps a collection of The Beatles' music videos? His answer was that "No, that would be too obvious". As you can see by the titles I have mentioned and linked to in this post, that statement made for a bootlegger's paradise, as does the absense of an official "Let It Be" DVD.The "Unsurpassed Promos" project is made by fans, for fans, and for free. The 4-disc set will be leaked to internet download sites and traded among fans. Undoubtedly, bootleggers will rip the set and offer it for money somewhere along the line, but that's not something that can ever be avoided, neither with official nor unofficial products.http://wogew.blogspot.com/2010/10/unsurpassed-promos.html
When "1" was released back in 2000, then head of Apple Corps Neil Aspinall was asked what the next step was, perhaps a collection of The Beatles' music videos? His answer was that "No, that would be too obvious". As you can see by the titles I have mentioned and linked to in this post, that statement made for a bootlegger's paradise, as does the absense of an official "Let It Be" DVD.
The "Unsurpassed Promos" project is made by fans, for fans, and for free. The 4-disc set will be leaked to internet download sites and traded among fans. Undoubtedly, bootleggers will rip the set and offer it for money somewhere along the line, but that's not something that can ever be avoided, neither with official nor unofficial products.
http://wogew.blogspot.com/2010/10/unsurpassed-promos.html
Sounds great. Frankly, tho, im swimming in Beatles boot DVDs, so i sure hope the quality on this is thoroughly stunning.
― Telephoneface (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 23 November 2010 16:44 (fifteen years ago)
Oh yeah, looks like its up on the green demon right now...
― Telephoneface (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 23 November 2010 16:47 (fifteen years ago)
The first 2 discs at least....
― Telephoneface (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 23 November 2010 16:49 (fifteen years ago)
little bit off topic, but i'm kinda curious about the Modern Jazz Quartet records that Apple put out (they've just now been reissued on CD, along with the other Apple Records). Had no idea they were on Apple! Weird pairing. Anyone heard them?
― tylerw, Tuesday, 23 November 2010 17:02 (fifteen years ago)
Oh, that old thing..
Actually, I remember telling Alice about the version of "I feel fine" I'd read about, where they recorded a video that basically consisted of them sitting round and having their dinner of Fish and chips out of newspaper, while miming slightly. Not thinking that I'd ever see this (it was sent off to the far east, or something)..
But no, it got compiled and there it is.
― Mark G, Tuesday, 23 November 2010 17:29 (fifteen years ago)
i'm trying to be more of a locavore in deed and spirit.
Wasn't he the singer in Dr Hook?
― Mark G, Thursday, November 18, 2010 2:38 PM (5 days ago)
^^^ I just got this (really obscure) reference! LOL!
― The animal magnetism of Tim Pawlenty (Dan Peterson), Tuesday, 23 November 2010 17:47 (fifteen years ago)
About to check out the Washington show, which is an interesting 'new release' incentive because i probably first saw it on a grey-market VHS 15 years ago or something. I remember this is the show where you can see Ringo relentlessly pounding the shit out of the bass drum.
― Telephoneface (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 23 November 2010 18:09 (fifteen years ago)
Wow that 'Unsurpassed Broadcasts' is *twelve* discs? Did they really do that much BBC session stuff? I had no idea. Never liked 'At The BBC' much mind.
― piscesx, Tuesday, 23 November 2010 18:15 (fifteen years ago)
the washington one is with the revolving stage, right? saw that at a beatles convention in the 70's. so, um, its been a while.
― scott seward, Tuesday, 23 November 2010 18:16 (fifteen years ago)
Ok, what's Green Demon?
― nate woolls, Tuesday, 23 November 2010 18:21 (fifteen years ago)
Is the Washington one the same one that was in the Maysles doc?
― That is the stench of tyranny (VegemiteGrrrl), Tuesday, 23 November 2010 18:22 (fifteen years ago)
That alternative I Feel Fine clip that Mark G mentions upthreadhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3zhQ7nCoRp4
I've never seen it either until now! Seen many stills from it over the years.
― piscesx, Tuesday, 23 November 2010 18:31 (fifteen years ago)
Also, their version of "A midsummer night's dream"..
It wasn't until I saw a full production of the play, that I realised it's supposed to be as raucous as their version is. (It's the play from within the main body of the play, at the end..)
― Mark G, Tuesday, 23 November 2010 18:36 (fifteen years ago)
― nate woolls, Tuesday, November 23, 2010 1:21 PM (51 minutes ago) Bookmark
The last word in your question + this creature you're supposed to avoid
http://30.media.tumblr.com/yYVS2ZIYLkftsh0kydBiMQHQo1_400.gif
― Telephoneface (Adam Bruneau), Tuesday, 23 November 2010 19:14 (fifteen years ago)
ah! the pizza devil!
― scott seward, Tuesday, 23 November 2010 19:15 (fifteen years ago)
It's taken me about half an hour to figure out who the hell that is, and now I need an invite. Sorry to be that guy but can anyone help me out?
― nate woolls, Tuesday, 23 November 2010 20:43 (fifteen years ago)
Nate, check ur email.
― I'm being a smartass here, but in a fun way (NotEnough), Tuesday, 23 November 2010 21:22 (fifteen years ago)
That's brilliant. Thanks a lot.
― nate woolls, Tuesday, 23 November 2010 21:30 (fifteen years ago)
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/music_blog/2010/11/beatles-itunes-first-week.html
Apple announced Tuesday that 450,000 Beatles albums and 2 million individual tracks were downloaded during the first week they went up online. That translates to well more than $8 million spent on Beatles downloads out of the gate, using the single album download price of $12.99 and $1.29 per song. It doesn’t take into account several double albums priced at $19.99 or the digital Beatles box set that iTunes offers for $149.
At the same time the Beatles finally joined the digital world, Amazon began discounting the remastered physical CDs that were released last year, with individual albums now selling for $7.99, double sets for $11.99 and $12.99 and the 16-CD stereo box set priced at $129.99, making the tangible versions cheaper than the virtual ones. Consequently, six Beatles titles are in the Top 100 of Amazon’s ranking of its bestselling music titles as of Tuesday.
― World Series champion San Francisco Giants (Bee OK), Wednesday, 24 November 2010 04:30 (fifteen years ago)
weird
― tylerw, Wednesday, 24 November 2010 04:34 (fifteen years ago)
Amazing to me that someone would rather pay almost twice as much for an iTunes download than a physical CD. Guess Steve Jobs really is a genius.
― Mark, Wednesday, 24 November 2010 05:06 (fifteen years ago)
amazon is discounting them, not apple.
― my sex drew back into itself tight and dry (abanana), Wednesday, 24 November 2010 05:39 (fifteen years ago)
Right - I mean that you'd pay $12.99 for an iTunes download vs. $7.99 for a new CD from Amazon, like these 450k people did.
― Mark, Wednesday, 24 November 2010 06:06 (fifteen years ago)
blah
― my sex drew back into itself tight and dry (abanana), Wednesday, 24 November 2010 06:25 (fifteen years ago)