the audio quality is far better than standard MP3 audio files and equivalent to the remastered CDs released last year. =
not if it's 256 surely?
― piscesx, Wednesday, 17 November 2010 18:30 (fifteen years ago)
Can't wait for the SACD release in 2013.
― 14d. South African cleric (2,2) (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 17 November 2010 20:47 (fifteen years ago)
Can't wait for the Mono SACD release in 2014.
― my opinionation (Hamildan), Thursday, 18 November 2010 12:30 (fifteen years ago)
are they ever gonna put out the vinyl remasters?
Well, so far they have put out one vinyl remaster: The Paperback Writer/Rain single, in stereo. OK, so the audio may be remastered, but the cutting of the vinyl has it without 'groove spacing' so it's all within 50% of the available space, which is ironic as the original (mono) single was the first to ensure the bass frequencies were maxxed.
(and I'm no audiobuff at all)
― Mark G, Thursday, 18 November 2010 12:36 (fifteen years ago)
No Rock N Roll Fun's jaded, cynical but interesting take on it all: http://xrrf.blogspot.com/2010/11/beatles-very-slight-tremor-few-injured.html
― piscesx, Thursday, 18 November 2010 13:07 (fifteen years ago)
i just compared early u.s. stereo capitol pressing of MMT and early u.s. apple pressing - um, cuz that's the kind of thing i like to do at 8:30 in the morning - and the capitol blows the apple away. apple probably only came out a couple years later, but its like night and day really. apple folks probably pretty stoned at the time...
― scott seward, Thursday, 18 November 2010 13:53 (fifteen years ago)
i don't know if i've ever actually heard a beatles album on cd! i am curious about the new shiny ones. if i see any for a buck at the thrift store i'll pick them up.
― scott seward, Thursday, 18 November 2010 13:56 (fifteen years ago)
listening to a clean mfsl white album pressing now. the sound is so clean too. lots of great detail. very crisp. maybe not as loud as early apple pressings. i'd have to check. great copy to own for ringo fans. drums sound amazing.
― scott seward, Thursday, 18 November 2010 14:06 (fifteen years ago)
what's mfsl?
― piscesx, Thursday, 18 November 2010 14:24 (fifteen years ago)
mobile fidelity sound laboratory, as I remember. They did amazing quality 12" vinyl pressings of a bunch of albums in the pre-CD days.
― Pashmina, Thursday, 18 November 2010 14:29 (fifteen years ago)
the bass on piggies is so fat! very cool. i'm gonna bring this copy to the local record show in december. someone will be happy. it won't go to japan this time.
― scott seward, Thursday, 18 November 2010 14:36 (fifteen years ago)
um, nothing against japan. much love for them and the tons of money they have given me for obscure boogie twelve inches. but i'm trying to be more of a locavore in deed and spirit.
― scott seward, Thursday, 18 November 2010 14:38 (fifteen years ago)
Wasn't he the singer in Dr Hook?
― Mark G, Thursday, 18 November 2010 14:38 (fifteen years ago)
today i am sending records to...let's see here...germany (rare brazil cozmik disco), japan (more rare disco), germany (rare private press glam metal), connecticut! (more rare disco), and actually sending something up the road near me! (prog record) heck, i should have just told them to come to the store and given them their postage back.
― scott seward, Thursday, 18 November 2010 14:43 (fifteen years ago)
This is a good spot as any to recommend everyone pick up the "Wonderwall" soundtrack if they can find it. Unfortunately it hasnt been remastered, but it was recorded by George in India pre-White Album, and it is really a great instrumental record. Lots of genre hopping, with some nice psych baroque/eastern influence running through it all. Harpsichords and sitars kind of stuff. Eric Clapton shreds on one song that is pretty much a 2 second loop over and over again.
― Telephoneface (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 18 November 2010 15:03 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah, it took me yonks to find one, an old US copy, bit worn...
― Mark G, Thursday, 18 November 2010 15:05 (fifteen years ago)
i need a copy of that. i don't have one. mono copies sell for a bunch.
― scott seward, Thursday, 18 November 2010 15:06 (fifteen years ago)
i'm gonna play george's dark horse album today. i've never heard it!
― scott seward, Thursday, 18 November 2010 15:07 (fifteen years ago)
Is "Wonderwall" on iTunes? Because if not, I'm waiting.
― Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 18 November 2010 15:08 (fifteen years ago)
okay, listening now. all i know is for such a krishnahead george sure was fond of christmas music.
― scott seward, Thursday, 18 November 2010 15:12 (fifteen years ago)
my first thought listening to dark horse is i wanna tell george to lay off the cigs. r.i.p. (i really gotta quit too...)
― scott seward, Thursday, 18 November 2010 15:16 (fifteen years ago)
George had emphysema during the recording of that album. not his best (altho there's like three songs on it that I think are great)
― you can sub out "bipartisan solutions" for "some of my dick" (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 18 November 2010 16:19 (fifteen years ago)
more like Dark Hoarse amirite
― you can sub out "bipartisan solutions" for "some of my dick" (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 18 November 2010 16:30 (fifteen years ago)
lolz
― scott seward, Thursday, 18 November 2010 16:42 (fifteen years ago)
yeah its okay. some of the longer groove tracks sound good. don't think i need a copy though.
― scott seward, Thursday, 18 November 2010 16:43 (fifteen years ago)
Wonderwall is a terrible movie btw
― you can sub out "bipartisan solutions" for "some of my dick" (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 18 November 2010 16:47 (fifteen years ago)
btw, song w vocal recorded for Wonderwall sdtk but initially 'lost' and not released until 1999
― you can sub out "bipartisan solutions" for "some of my dick" (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 18 November 2010 16:51 (fifteen years ago)
The movie's not so bad.
― Mark G, Thursday, 18 November 2010 16:56 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah that amazing song is on the DVD release. Plus the movie has The Fool in it, that Dutch art collective that painted the side of the Apple building and Eric Clapton's guitar and did some album covers (including ISB) had a cool freak folk record of their own as well:
http://img.maniadb.com/images/album/287/287713_1_f.jpg
― Telephoneface (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 18 November 2010 17:32 (fifteen years ago)
Woah!
"The Fool's best known artworks are those they created for The Beatles in 1966–67. They include:the original (rejected) cover and the inner sleeve for Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band;"
elsewhere...
"Originally a Dutch group called the Fool made a design for the center fold of the album.
Miles: "Simon and Marijke painted a dream landscape of stylised mountain peaks and wonderful birds, like an LSD-influenced Chinese willow-pattern design. The sky was rainbow-ed with two oval panels for text, one of which was filled with stars and comets. A further empty panel had a flower border with a peacock draping its tail over the side. Tiny figures of the Beatles peeped out from among the flora. The style was Euro-psychedelic, owing much to Mucha, Beardsley, art nouveau and nineteenth-century children’s book illustrations. Unfortunately they got the dimensions wrong, but even with a border added, the work looked somehow second-rate. The Beatles, however, loved it."
But Fraser saw it differently. He felt it would be judged by posterity as simply another piece of sixties acid art. Robert suggested a series of portrait shots instead. For this picture the Beatles all looked in the camera and tried to express a feeling of love to their fans. "And that’s what that is," declares Paul "if you look at it you’ll see the big effort from the eyes".
Here's an interview by Dutch Beatlesexpert Azing with Simon Posthuma (The Fool), made in March 2, 1996.
Azing: Can you describe the design? We have no idea what it looked like. Simon: It was very colorful. It was a gatefold (three-part) cover with a square filled with dancing people and many rainbow colors. Very lovely - like everything in those days. Flower power, you know?Azing: What happened to the original design?Simon: John took it and hang in on the wall at his house. I think it's still on the wall at Yoko's."
― Telephoneface (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 18 November 2010 17:39 (fifteen years ago)
http://i162.photobucket.com/albums/t263/frequentflyer909/FoolSgtPepper.jpg
― Telephoneface (Adam Bruneau), Thursday, 18 November 2010 17:43 (fifteen years ago)
huh never seen that before
it is kind of dopey tho. they made the right choice
― you can sub out "bipartisan solutions" for "some of my dick" (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 18 November 2010 18:02 (fifteen years ago)
didn't derek taylor have the Fool cover pulled? it says in Macca's book which i don't have to hand. they did the Apple painting which i always quite likedhttp://theselvedgeyard.files.wordpress.com/2009/11/apple_boutique_01.jpg
― piscesx, Thursday, 18 November 2010 18:08 (fifteen years ago)
love the "classic" sign next door too lol
― you can sub out "bipartisan solutions" for "some of my dick" (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 18 November 2010 18:27 (fifteen years ago)
(That 'Classic' is a cinema and there's still a cinema there these days - 'Screen on Baker Street)
For this picture the Beatles all looked in the camera and tried to express a feeling of love to their fans. "And that’s what that is," declares Paul "if you look at it you’ll see the big effort from the eyes".
According to John, two of the Beatles were 'flying' (presume he means tripping) on the Sgt Pepper cover, unknown to the others. One has to be John, but not sure who the other was was. According to John, George was 'very heavy on acid' - and Paul was known to be wary - so I'd guess it was George.
― Bob Six, Friday, 19 November 2010 00:37 (fifteen years ago)
Macca had taken it already a few times by the time of the Pepper sleeve mind.
― piscesx, Friday, 19 November 2010 00:48 (fifteen years ago)
and he does look pretty out of it in that session:
http://29.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lbv0oe5BXn1qb2mtno1_500.jpg
― Bob Six, Friday, 19 November 2010 00:53 (fifteen years ago)
haha yeah.
― piscesx, Friday, 19 November 2010 04:34 (fifteen years ago)
They all look pretty out in that particular photo though.
― You're Twistin' My Melody Man! (Geir Hongro), Saturday, 20 November 2010 10:17 (fifteen years ago)
the voice of experience
― i'm assuming that it's tity boi, host of the mixtape (sic), Saturday, 20 November 2010 12:23 (fifteen years ago)
i thought that when the announcement was that the washington coliseum concert was available "streaming from itunes" it meant it was actually available in itunes like a movie preview, but I guess it's just on a webpage? lame-o.
― akm, Saturday, 20 November 2010 15:01 (fifteen years ago)
40 W Beatles Hey Jude
― Mark G, Monday, 22 November 2010 12:26 (fifteen years ago)
Least popular track is What Goes On apparently - 14 downloads. Revolution 9 downloaded 48 times!
― nate woolls, Monday, 22 November 2010 12:36 (fifteen years ago)
Poor ol' rings. (where is this list?)
― Mark G, Monday, 22 November 2010 12:38 (fifteen years ago)
Those figures were tweeted by Music Week News earlier.
― nate woolls, Monday, 22 November 2010 12:40 (fifteen years ago)
http://twitter.com/MusicWeekNews
― my sex drew back into itself tight and dry (abanana), Monday, 22 November 2010 12:53 (fifteen years ago)
ha:
EMI Publishing has secured deals with two of the hottest new bands, putting pen to paper with Mona and Brother.
Will hear nothing futher from these bands...
― Mark G, Monday, 22 November 2010 13:01 (fifteen years ago)
UK Top 40 singles has 'Hey Jude' at number 40. That's it.
― James Mitchell, Monday, 22 November 2010 13:14 (fifteen years ago)
Yep.
― Mark G, Monday, 22 November 2010 14:28 (fifteen years ago)
I have had it up to here hearing about The Beatle's catalogue being available on iTunes.
― Captain Ostensible (Scik Mouthy), Tuesday, 23 November 2010 05:57 (fifteen years ago)