deej's pitchfork review is really, really good y'all
http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/14771-flockaveli/
― jrue (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 28 October 2010 05:48 (fifteen years ago)
Great review.
― The Reverend, Thursday, 28 October 2010 09:34 (fifteen years ago)
great album and great review.
― Tim F, Thursday, 28 October 2010 11:53 (fifteen years ago)
great review deej, though one line I'd disagree with:
There are no attempts to integrate nuance or complexities, gray-scale morality, or introspection.
I think there are moments of nuance and introspection here (besides the obvious "Fuck This Industry," also "Karma," and even "For My Dogs" ). Obviously that isn't Waka's forte nor is it the appeal of the album, but there are moments that point to more than his usual "yes I'm 'gon rob you, and then I might kill you" steez.
Still, great review!
― humping and bouncing (The Brainwasher), Thursday, 28 October 2010 12:19 (fifteen years ago)
I'm gonna say "great review" instead of being a deej and focusing on the one or two lines i didn't agree with 100%
― O Let's Group Doueh (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 28 October 2010 12:55 (fifteen years ago)
nice job deej--you really make the case for the album to someone who might be unfamiliar or unconvinced
― call all destroyer, Thursday, 28 October 2010 13:32 (fifteen years ago)
― humping and bouncing (The Brainwasher), Thursday, October 28, 2010 7:19 AM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
this is right, but i felt like drawing attention to that wd just give fodder to ppl arguing we're building up something that doesnt really exist -- it does exist, but its not the 'point,' u know
― j. sargent & lil k3v (deej), Thursday, 28 October 2010 13:37 (fifteen years ago)
probably should have just used slightly less absolute language there
whiney feel free to point out where u disagree dude
― j. sargent & lil k3v (deej), Thursday, 28 October 2010 13:38 (fifteen years ago)
nah it's all nitpicky shit
― like reindeer bitch we blitzen (Whiney G. Weingarten), Thursday, 28 October 2010 13:41 (fifteen years ago)
i saw this review and i was like imma twitter that
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bJLgwJxKHzo
― surfboard dudes get wiped out, totally, Thursday, 28 October 2010 13:55 (fifteen years ago)
facebook pfork page has some excellent responses to the review
― j. sargent & lil k3v (deej), Thursday, 28 October 2010 17:21 (fifteen years ago)
"brainless filth like Waka Flocka Flame"
smh
― markers, Thursday, 28 October 2010 17:23 (fifteen years ago)
so glad P4k doesn't have a commenting system on the site
― markers, Thursday, 28 October 2010 17:28 (fifteen years ago)
why did i go + read those comments
― just sayin, Thursday, 28 October 2010 17:30 (fifteen years ago)
i would love to see the same people's responses to reviews of metal records.
― j., Thursday, 28 October 2010 17:33 (fifteen years ago)
loved the review dude
― i feed these skreets (tpp), Thursday, 28 October 2010 17:43 (fifteen years ago)
great review deej
― catalina whiney ilxor (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, 28 October 2010 17:49 (fifteen years ago)
That is a well-written review that I disagree almost 100% with.
― lol tea partiers and their fat fingers (HI DERE), Thursday, 28 October 2010 17:58 (fifteen years ago)
just connected review with ilx poster. this (a) isn't my favorite style of music at all and (b) i had no previous interest in (and only a dim awareness of) the act, but fwiw, the review's made me want to at least hear the album and give it a chance.
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 28 October 2010 18:00 (fifteen years ago)
yeah honestly deej that review is better than the album
― catalina whiney ilxor (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, 28 October 2010 18:09 (fifteen years ago)
that review goes hard in the paint
― i feed these skreets (tpp), Thursday, 28 October 2010 18:10 (fifteen years ago)
deej killed pfork
Der3k St0ne Today is the day I leave Pitchfork as a reader... it's been a good run guys, but this is too much.
― sour posse (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 28 October 2010 18:30 (fifteen years ago)
wtg deej, proud of u buddy
― call all destroyer, Thursday, 28 October 2010 18:31 (fifteen years ago)
R0bbie D'Amic0 This is why pitchfork is usually pretentious hipster ruhtards! half the time... they review things based on one person and what they like and blacklist other bands...complete shat! you want to review a hip-hop album review Cyhi da Prynce mixtape royal flush...
― sour posse (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 28 October 2010 18:32 (fifteen years ago)
nail on the head imo
Ky1e W1ll1ams-McP4ak pitchfork tries so hard not to be racist that they actually end up being racist - they're afraid to call out bad music made by popular african american artists in an attempt to look contemporary, less snobbish, and to try to make up for the fact that 90% of the music they review is made by white people. but really this just proves that pitchfork prioritizes "look at us! see? we're not racist!" posturing over actually reviewing new, great hip hop
― sour posse (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 28 October 2010 18:33 (fifteen years ago)
who are der3k st0ne and r0bbie d'amic0 and ky1e w1ll1ams and why are they so mean?
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 28 October 2010 18:34 (fifteen years ago)
MattMcEwing I respect Pitchfork and all, but what's with giving Waka Flocka Flame's new album an 8.0? Forfuckinreal? #gimmeabreak
― sour posse (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 28 October 2010 18:34 (fifteen years ago)
evankaloudis LOL Pitchfork is really trolling with this Waka Flocka Flame review. It's pretty funny that people are getting upset over it.
holdmycoat New Waka Flocka got an 8.0 on @pitchforkmedia, YOU. SUCK. PITCHFORK. STOP TRYING TO BE HIPSTER AND IRONIC. http://bit.ly/bXG4Zc
― sour posse (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 28 October 2010 18:35 (fifteen years ago)
Cyhi da Prynce is kind of coming across to me as a competent version of Drake...?
― lol tea partiers and their fat fingers (HI DERE), Thursday, 28 October 2010 18:35 (fifteen years ago)
lol where the hell are these from? non to get tuomas but i did not see where comments are.
xp ohh is this twitter
― goole, Thursday, 28 October 2010 18:35 (fifteen years ago)
ahhday I'm beginning to think Pitchfork reviewers are mentally retarded rodents. An 8.0 rating for Waka Flocka Flame? Are you f*$king serious?!
first few are from facebook, now i'm doing twitter
cyhi da prynce is post-drake but he doesn't have the ear for pop so he's not really worth much
― sour posse (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 28 October 2010 18:36 (fifteen years ago)
jordanmunson Waka Flacka Flame's album got an 8.0 from Pitchfork. In other news, Pitchfork is on some straight bullshit. (via @noyokono)1 hour ago Favorite Retweet Reply
this one is up for discussion
WlLLYUM So Pitchfork gave Waka Flocka's album an 8 but gave Eminem's a 2. This is supposed to be the most credible music site?
― sour posse (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 28 October 2010 18:37 (fifteen years ago)
lol ok. two more web interfaces i've never really liked/gotten/figured out.
g/j, please post more!
xps
― goole, Thursday, 28 October 2010 18:38 (fifteen years ago)
hahahah
DevinRosni Pitchfork gave Waka Flockas's "Flockaveli" an 8.0, but gave Cursive's "The Ugly Organ" a 7.0 when it came out. Cool.
― sour posse (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 28 October 2010 18:38 (fifteen years ago)
lol salem tweeted about it -- they're fans????
salemtrapdoor Funny how Waka Flocka Flame's "Flockaveli" has an 3/5 rating on iTunes (which by iTunes standards, is awful) but an 8.0 from Pitchfork.
― sour posse (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 28 October 2010 18:39 (fifteen years ago)
you really have to wonder if employing deej is worth it
JustPlainAntRVA i quit pitchfork. an 8.0 for waka flocka?!? FOH!
powerfulkittens I'm not gonna read the Pitchfork review of this Waka Flocka Flame album because it'll probably make me want it.
― sour posse (J0rdan S.), Thursday, 28 October 2010 18:40 (fifteen years ago)
haha okay i'm sure i'm being dense here, but half the time i can't tell if these "tweeters" are upset the album got too high a score or too low a score?
― Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 28 October 2010 18:42 (fifteen years ago)
It's hardly surprising that Salem are Waka fans
― Number None, Thursday, 28 October 2010 18:47 (fifteen years ago)
dan what do you disagree with in deej's review
― avoyoungdro's number (k3vin k.), Thursday, 28 October 2010 18:49 (fifteen years ago)
Basically, I disagree with the fundamental premise that this is an album worth listening to.
― lol tea partiers and their fat fingers (HI DERE), Thursday, 28 October 2010 18:55 (fifteen years ago)
I think deej basically says it all in the first sentence:
Flockaveli is for people who find M.O.P. too polite, Silkk the Shocker too relaxed, and Blaq Poet too introspective.
That person is, rather emphatically, not me.
― lol tea partiers and their fat fingers (HI DERE), Thursday, 28 October 2010 18:59 (fifteen years ago)
lol yeah me too
― Great Goulessarian! (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 28 October 2010 19:00 (fifteen years ago)
(I'd dissect more but really it just boils down to everything deej lists as a positive attribute of the album is something I consider to be key in making Waka an unlistenable mess to me, from the messy, overpraised, try-too-hard beats to the unrelentingly ignorant lyrics to the stupid interjections to pretty much everything about dude)
― lol tea partiers and their fat fingers (HI DERE), Thursday, 28 October 2010 19:03 (fifteen years ago)
i think i like it...kinda...sometimes it feels like something that's more fun to talk about than listen to.
― catalina whiney ilxor (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, 28 October 2010 19:05 (fifteen years ago)
i agree that it is fun to talk about but it's like a million times more fun to listen to (especially while drunk)
― humping and bouncing (The Brainwasher), Thursday, 28 October 2010 20:23 (fifteen years ago)