This album better be about 1000000x better than that Stars record. (And I loved the previous.)
― Simon H., Monday, 1 October 2007 23:30 (eighteen years ago)
This album better be about 1000000x better than that Stars record.
How have you heard it? I thought there was be no leaks or pre-release listening parties until the 10.10.07 digital release.
― Daniel, Esq., Monday, 1 October 2007 23:54 (eighteen years ago)
Frothing Radiohead fans so excited they can't read properly.
Bless.
― Mister Craig, Monday, 1 October 2007 23:56 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.snorgtees.com/images/CantReadGood_Fullpic_1.gif
― Alex in Baltimore, Monday, 1 October 2007 23:57 (eighteen years ago)
this is freaking awesome
― bstep, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 00:00 (eighteen years ago)
LOL. Okay, yes, I'm a kid who can't read good. And a Radiohead fan.
My bad; I misread Simon's post.
― Daniel, Esq., Tuesday, 2 October 2007 00:00 (eighteen years ago)
Wow, whether it's a good record or not is entirely irrelevant, they've smashed the system!
w00t!!!!!!53!8008!
― Mister Craig, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 00:25 (eighteen years ago)
radioglaad
― johnny crunch, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 01:29 (eighteen years ago)
I guess this means no more groovy MTV music videos, then. :(
― Mr. Snrub, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 02:27 (eighteen years ago)
Who will be the next to venture into the discbox format? I would like a to have a whole shelf of discboxes.
― Mark Rich@rdson, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 02:52 (eighteen years ago)
lol MTV?
xpost
― Roz, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 02:54 (eighteen years ago)
Did anyone here pay for the download (apart from me)?
― Ned Trifle II, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 11:54 (eighteen years ago)
Yes. I also got done for 45p surcharge.
― kv_nol, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 12:21 (eighteen years ago)
i did. i paid 3.14 pounds. first number that came in my head.
― Billy Pilgrim, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 13:06 (eighteen years ago)
£2 (45p)
― Mark G, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 13:13 (eighteen years ago)
£5.55 = £6.00, I forgot about the 45p. I was feeling generous. Now I'm feeling ripped off!
― ledge, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 13:16 (eighteen years ago)
What is the point of paying for it, if they're giving it away for free? Do you think Radiohead needs the money? Do you think they're not going to make a hefty profit on the £40 version?
― Zelda Zonk, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 13:22 (eighteen years ago)
Like others have said, I don't see any reason to pay if I'm a.)going to buy the discbox eventually or b.)going to buy the regular release when it comes out or c.)they are offering it for free (which they are).
― Mark Clemente, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 13:24 (eighteen years ago)
haha guilty conscience much? considering how little i've paid for their last few records (i.e. none), i was happy to chip in a little as a tribute to the clever marketing.
― Billy Pilgrim, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 13:28 (eighteen years ago)
I'm not going to buy any other versions. I am in general willing to pay for hassle-free DRM-free good quality digital downloads. I don't want "the industry" seeing this as a failed experiment in goodwill.
― ledge, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 13:29 (eighteen years ago)
I really don't get why people base their decision on whether or not Radiohead needs the money.
― Dandy Don Weiner, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 13:30 (eighteen years ago)
haha guilty conscience much?
Yeah, I'm guessing most people who've paid are doing so because of niggling guilt at the idea of getting something for nothing. But I see no reason for the guilt. The download is just the loss leader for the discbox. It's a perfectly reasonable commercial strategy. You might just as well chip in a bit extra to Tesco when they offer 2-for-1 deals, or pay Murdoch an extra 50p when he engages in price wars or whatever.
― Zelda Zonk, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 13:33 (eighteen years ago)
Or put it this way: if Radiohead thought it was unfair to pay nothing for the downloads, they wouldn't have offered them for free.
― Zelda Zonk, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 13:36 (eighteen years ago)
maybe they want to see how fair or otherwise people will be, given the chance
― ledge, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 13:40 (eighteen years ago)
maybe they don't know how much to charge and are letting the market decide
― ledge, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 13:41 (eighteen years ago)
You might just as well chip in a bit extra to Tesco when they offer 2-for-1 deals, or pay Murdoch an extra 50p when he engages in price wars or whatever.
No, this is completely different, but I haven't quite worked out how yet.
― Ned Trifle II, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 13:41 (eighteen years ago)
Also ledge otmx3
― Ned Trifle II, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 13:42 (eighteen years ago)
It's not that I feel guilty it's just that I think 30p a track is totally an ok amount to spend. If you want it for free, that's fine too, it's not like Radiohead are laughing behind our backs at us giving them £3.
― Ned Trifle II, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 13:48 (eighteen years ago)
Ok, except that one bloke... http://img.search.com/thumb/d/dd/Radiohead_grass.jpg/315px-Radiohead_grass.jpg
― Ned Trifle II, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 13:49 (eighteen years ago)
I can predict that this album will most likely not be funky
― pj, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 13:49 (eighteen years ago)
Hmmm, I think £20 is a reasonable price to pay for the discbox. I hope Radiohead will be OK with that...
― Zelda Zonk, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 13:53 (eighteen years ago)
I don't understand.
― Ned Trifle II, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 13:59 (eighteen years ago)
i would have paid a little bit but i don't own a credit card.
― Roz, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 14:09 (eighteen years ago)
The money is a way of showing some appreciation of the band's work. That being said, I'd rather download it for free and then pay for it afterwards if I liked it. I suppose they haven't a system in place for that. Having a "donate" button separate from the download-process would probably result in less money, as the way it is now it's easy for people to throw in a buck or two just as a gesture. Oh well, free or not, I haven't enough interest in Radiohead to give this a listen.
― Øystein, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 14:11 (eighteen years ago)
I just mean they've fixed an elevated price on the thing they actually intend to make their money on, they're not giving anyone the "choice" about that. Which of course is fine and totally their perogative to charge whatever they like for what they've produced. I think the "choosing" whether to pay or not for the download is a red herring in terms of their business model. The free download is part of the business model, a promotional tool for the discbox and, more generally, for the Radiohead "brand" which will generate money through merchandise, concert tickets etc.
I don't think Radiohead are all about money, but they're obviously trying to make what they do a commercial proposition and they're trying this new business model which has free downloads built into it as part of the model. For that reason I see no particular reason to pay for the download.
Anyway, God knows why I'm going on and on about this, let's just hope the album is good...
― Zelda Zonk, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 14:13 (eighteen years ago)
I wonder what percentage of people will pay c. a tenner for this, or whatever the standard CD price is these days. I'm tempted to pay a pound, purely to say I bought it but without going overboard.
In any case any money Radiohead DO lose if this goes tits-up is likely to be recouped by a fucking massive tour anyway, isn't it?
― Matt DC, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 14:44 (eighteen years ago)
A poll on what you are paying is here Radiohead - In Rainbows : What Are You Paying?
― Herman G. Neuname, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 14:47 (eighteen years ago)
but touring is traditionally the way bands make money anyway, isn't it? how is this different?
― Dimension 5ive, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 15:14 (eighteen years ago)
Presumably less need to feel obligated to pose next to record execs with gold/platinum awards that they paid for out of their advances.
― Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 15:16 (eighteen years ago)
how much is a pack of cigarettes in the UK in pounds? Or like going to McDonalds?
― M@tt He1ges0n, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 15:55 (eighteen years ago)
Happy Meal = £1.99
― Ned Trifle II, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 15:58 (eighteen years ago)
Just typing that made me feel slightly nauseous.
Ciggies are over a fiver a packet now I think.
― Ned Trifle II, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 16:00 (eighteen years ago)
So I paid halfway between a Happy Meal and a packet of B & H. That makes me feel so much better.
― Ned Trifle II, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 16:01 (eighteen years ago)
ok so that make sense the box isn't that expensive for UK people then...it's more like paying $40 USD, too bad they didn't adjust for exchange rates a bit...
― M@tt He1ges0n, Tuesday, 2 October 2007 16:19 (eighteen years ago)
While we wait, I've started a little something.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 3 October 2007 03:39 (eighteen years ago)
zelda did you pay anything
― gman, Wednesday, 3 October 2007 04:03 (eighteen years ago)
I'm starting to get so excited about this album and I know that's just not rational. I didn't like their last one.
I'm dead intrigued that they've picked up the ball with that song "Reckoner" again, I thought they'd left that one in the dust long ago, quite mysteriously.
― Bimble, Wednesday, 3 October 2007 04:06 (eighteen years ago)
Yo, is it true what I heard that the Radioheads are gonna release a tribute album to Rainbow, and if you get the special 100 quid discobox it comes with a pot of gold?! I hope they cover "Since You Been Gone", that's all. Ronnie James Dio rules!
― Tuomas, Wednesday, 3 October 2007 15:22 (eighteen years ago)
Timely as ever.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 3 October 2007 15:23 (eighteen years ago)