otm but i still just don't see who runs out like "i gotta have wale on my track!" unless they're like charles hamilton or something xxp
― ENBBQ (The Reverend), Tuesday, 12 October 2010 17:26 (fifteen years ago)
really? p much all i remember minus delores tucker stuff is ppl been blown away by this new drawl flow
― waka flocka display name (zvookster), Tuesday, October 12, 2010 12:25 PM (2 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
people who were our ages back then. but read any pieces about it & its like, poor man's slick rick & all that
― trollin trollin trollin we aint slept in weeks (deej), Tuesday, 12 October 2010 17:28 (fifteen years ago)
i forget what it was i read recently that made me realize ppl used to think snoop was kind of a cipher ill see if i can find it
― trollin trollin trollin we aint slept in weeks (deej), Tuesday, 12 October 2010 17:29 (fifteen years ago)
people definitely had the usual gangsta rap content issues ("it aint no fun if the homies can't have none" didn't help) but the rolling stone/ew reviews definitely compliment his skills
― da croupier, Tuesday, 12 October 2010 17:34 (fifteen years ago)
wow really? i'd like to see the link because i thought snoop was so charismatic from the moment i saw the deep cover video
i'm not knocking waka for being morally negative, the breathless nihilism is really the album's strength.
― a prairie based companion (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Tuesday, 12 October 2010 17:34 (fifteen years ago)
thing about Doggystyle was that despite the grim subject partner the album felt like a party (perhaps sans "Serial Killa" and "For All My..."). it became easy to forget that the lyrics were about yer typical gangsterisms.
― melody-hating aggr0 nerd (San Te), Tuesday, 12 October 2010 17:38 (fifteen years ago)
i don't remember the critical tide really turning against the west coast until like, the dogg pound
― da croupier, Tuesday, 12 October 2010 17:40 (fifteen years ago)
"Doggystyle is filled with verbal and vocal feats that meet its three-mile-high expectations." - Rolling Stone
"Snoop's nasal voice swings from playful, sing-songy rhythms to steely-cold toughness, never losing its slinky personality-he's a hustler with charm to burn." - Entertainment Weekly
"His relaxed vocal style is a perfect match for Dr. Dre's bass-heavy producing. The songs on this album are built around '70s-style funk grooves; Snoop's voice is lithe enough to snake its way around the big beats." - Time
― da croupier, Tuesday, 12 October 2010 17:51 (fifteen years ago)
important to also remember gangsta rap wasn't really that old yet in 1993, world wasn't as tired of it and white people weren't as rampantly lampooning it....
― melody-hating aggr0 nerd (San Te), Tuesday, 12 October 2010 17:53 (fifteen years ago)
spin gave waka 7/10 fwiw i dont think big-mag critics are particularly trashing this one either
― trollin trollin trollin we aint slept in weeks (deej), Tuesday, 12 October 2010 17:59 (fifteen years ago)
i mean obviously the appeal is different -- it wouldnt make sense to call waka 'lithe'
― trollin trollin trollin we aint slept in weeks (deej), Tuesday, 12 October 2010 18:00 (fifteen years ago)
so who did call snoop a poor man's slick rick?
― da croupier, Tuesday, 12 October 2010 18:00 (fifteen years ago)
i dont know i cant really look right now @ work but ive absolutely read ppl - esp older rap critics -- arguing he wasnt really all that great, poor man's slick rick / big daddy kane, whatever. i know oliver wang gave chronic & i think also? doggystyle negative reviews at the time
― trollin trollin trollin we aint slept in weeks (deej), Tuesday, 12 October 2010 18:02 (fifteen years ago)
I read one review of Doggystyle who complained of Snoop Dogg's lyrical limitations, but I can't remember what mag it was
― melody-hating aggr0 nerd (San Te), Tuesday, 12 October 2010 18:06 (fifteen years ago)
I mean obviously Snoop was responding to someone when he said "Beats? So that's what makes me now?" on Doggfather (ie, guessing the people who suggested Dre carried most of the load on Doggystyle)
Wang seems mostly ok with him in Classic material: The Hip-Hop Album Guide, dude started writing in 1994 according to his online bio but I dunno what for.
xpost yeah obv he was dissing dre on the album released after dre acrimoniously left death row but before he did, but the idea that Snoop was seen as some worthless hanger-on wasn't a popular one by any means.
― da croupier, Tuesday, 12 October 2010 18:08 (fifteen years ago)
Even xgau, who hates West Coast rap, admitted Snoop's ability to "enunciate while drawling" was unique
― da croupier, Tuesday, 12 October 2010 18:09 (fifteen years ago)
i def hated The Chronic in 1992, btw. But I was a teenager not a rock critic
― Christopher Green Leafy Swagon Indiebro (Whiney G. Weingarten), Tuesday, 12 October 2010 18:09 (fifteen years ago)
Snoop was the first 'gangsta' rapper I ever listened to, and the first artist whose music my mom refused to buy for me.
― melody-hating aggr0 nerd (San Te), Tuesday, 12 October 2010 18:10 (fifteen years ago)
I remember turning on MTV or listening to the local urban station, hoping one of his tracks would come on. remember being ecstatic the first time I saw Doggy Dogg World's video--was home sick from school, and that vid made my day.
― da croupier, Tuesday, 12 October 2010 18:08 (28 minutes ago)
i never said anyone saw him this way? i just compared him to how waka's been received as a rapper
― trollin trollin trollin we aint slept in weeks (deej), Tuesday, 12 October 2010 18:37 (fifteen years ago)
and, imo, its comparable
― trollin trollin trollin we aint slept in weeks (deej), Tuesday, 12 October 2010 18:38 (fifteen years ago)
oliver wang has famously realized the error of his ways re: dre/snoop, btw -- classic material only came out a few years ago!! of course everyone recognizes classic status of those records NOW
sorry, I took this (snoop was a cipher, morally negative, no human complexity, beats were the best thing about it, etc etc etc) to suggest that he was worthless and dependent on the beats to succeed.
xpost where did wang write about the chronic originally for? his bio says he started in 1994, so it couldn't have been too high-profile if it was of the moment.
― da croupier, Tuesday, 12 October 2010 18:39 (fifteen years ago)
i dont know -- maybe it was doggystyle not chronic -- it was one of those two records. but i cant google around for this kind of stuff at work
― trollin trollin trollin we aint slept in weeks (deej), Tuesday, 12 October 2010 18:43 (fifteen years ago)
"sorry, I took this (snoop was a cipher, morally negative, no human complexity, beats were the best thing about it, etc etc etc) to suggest that he was worthless and dependent on the beats to succeed."
it more suggests they thought he was derivitive without offering 'substance' which is more along the lines of what has been said abt waka
― trollin trollin trollin we aint slept in weeks (deej), Tuesday, 12 October 2010 18:44 (fifteen years ago)
first albums are always like that!
― goole, Tuesday, 12 October 2010 18:45 (fifteen years ago)
particularly in gangster rap
― trollin trollin trollin we aint slept in weeks (deej), Tuesday, 12 October 2010 18:46 (fifteen years ago)
which is kinda why the snoop comparison feels arbitrary - I mean if critics are praising Waka for his unique flow then it makes sense, cuz that was Snoop's saving grace from the get-go.
― da croupier, Tuesday, 12 October 2010 18:47 (fifteen years ago)
so are you disagreeing just to disagree then, and hoping the correct argument turns up eventually
― trollin trollin trollin we aint slept in weeks (deej), Tuesday, 12 October 2010 18:56 (fifteen years ago)
um, I'm just saying you're comparing Waka to Snoop by saying Snoop was seen as a hollow, morally bankrupt derivative beat-dependent (as most gangsta rappers initially are). But Snoop was hailed for his unique delivery from the start, was always held out from the pack.
― da croupier, Tuesday, 12 October 2010 19:01 (fifteen years ago)
which wasnt at all what you were saying for 90% of this argument
― trollin trollin trollin we aint slept in weeks (deej), Tuesday, 12 October 2010 19:04 (fifteen years ago)
what was I saying?
― da croupier, Tuesday, 12 October 2010 19:04 (fifteen years ago)
my first post
― da croupier, Tuesday, October 12, 2010 5:34 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark
― da croupier, Tuesday, 12 October 2010 19:05 (fifteen years ago)
― da croupier, Tuesday, October 12, 2010 1:47 PM (18 minutes ago) Bookmark
instead theyre praising it for his unique personality.
― trollin trollin trollin we aint slept in weeks (deej), Tuesday, 12 October 2010 19:06 (fifteen years ago)
^^two diff arguments croupier
if you say so, deej.
― da croupier, Tuesday, 12 October 2010 19:07 (fifteen years ago)
and not to troll, but how exactly would you describe his personality and how it's unique? I'm seeing a lot of "yeah personality sells it" in the thread, but what I've heard doesn't sound that outside the norm.
― da croupier, Tuesday, 12 October 2010 19:11 (fifteen years ago)
― da croupier, Tuesday, October 12, 2010 2:07 PM (3 hours ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink
how is "no one said snoop was a bad rapper" the same argument as "some people said snoop was a bad rapper but they say that about lots of gangster rappers so it doesn't matter"
― trollin trollin trollin we aint slept in weeks (deej), Tuesday, 12 October 2010 22:11 (fifteen years ago)
i dont think your 2nd question is particularly troll-y!! but its also kind of hard! how do you describe too $hort's personality?
imo waka is young exuberant hardheaded raw gangsta rap Id. his personality doesnt seem very constructed or distanced at all from the performance, except in teh way he's constructed a pretty hypermasculine hood persona (which he portrays as being pretty much his ... persona period.) his personality comes through very clearly in a way it doesnt in rappers like Gibbs or KRIT or whoever
― trollin trollin trollin we aint slept in weeks (deej), Tuesday, 12 October 2010 22:13 (fifteen years ago)
im not sure how personalities are supposed to be 'outside the norm.' is miccio 'outside the norm' for ilx? was 50 cent? a distinctive personality doesnt have to necessarily be weird or stand out like that, it could be sorta low-key like curren$y. a strong personality just means that you feel like you're getting a clear picture of the artist not just from what he tells u but by the style & technique in how he tells it, imo
― trollin trollin trollin we aint slept in weeks (deej), Tuesday, 12 October 2010 22:15 (fifteen years ago)
lmao his bet performance
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xf6ixz
― truly blunted rhyme fiend (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, 13 October 2010 01:42 (fifteen years ago)
I never said "no one said snoop was a bad rapper" or "some said he was a bad rapper but they say that about a lot of people." I said people had the usual gangsta rap complaints about his gangsta rap, but he was pretty universally seen as exceptional within the genre for his flow. So saying "Waka's like Snoop" only makes more sense than "Waka's like Spice 1" or "Waka's like MC Ren" or whatever if he's got an ace up his sleeve. You say critics are praising his unique personality - though I only found Sean F's Voice review calling his vocals anything more than Lil Jon fight chants - and so I asked what was so unique about it. Sounds like the deal is he's exceptionally nonchalant and indifferent to craft even for an I Don't Give A Fuck rapper. Okeydoke.
― da croupier, Wednesday, 13 October 2010 01:44 (fifteen years ago)
sounds like your taste in rap is still shitty & your willingness to take it beyond reductive charicature (lol lil boosie sounds like cartman!!!) is still lacking
― trollin trollin trollin we aint slept in weeks (deej), Wednesday, 13 October 2010 01:46 (fifteen years ago)
i dont think 'pretty nonchalant and indifferent to craft' is what i said at all. maybe read again
― trollin trollin trollin we aint slept in weeks (deej), Wednesday, 13 October 2010 01:47 (fifteen years ago)
'waka's like snoop' makes tons more sense than 'waka's like spice 1' or 'waka's like ren' for that matter. snoop is really popular, waka is really popular. not a niche artist. a character that will appeal to a broader audience. spice 1 is one of my favorite rappers but hes totally a niche gangsta rap dude. and ren??? cmon
waka gets a huge amount of hate for his supposed bad rapping, wayyy more than most gangster rapper. this is kind of indisputable! critics IN THIS THREAD are praising his 'unique personality' -- i dont think there's anyone out there who would deny he certainly has a unique um approach. most of them just think its ignorant/offensive/sloppy/unskilled
― trollin trollin trollin we aint slept in weeks (deej), Wednesday, 13 October 2010 01:51 (fifteen years ago)
i just get the feeling that your sensitivity to the rap discourse is about as effective as a cubicle radio antennae
― trollin trollin trollin we aint slept in weeks (deej), Wednesday, 13 October 2010 01:52 (fifteen years ago)
Where does my taste in rap even come into this? the nonchalant thing comes more from Sean F's review than what you wrote, which seemed kinda contradictory. I mean it's not very constructed except in how it's his personality doesnt seem very constructed or distanced at all from the performance, except in teh way he's constructed a pretty hypermasculine hood persona (which he portrays as being pretty much his ... persona period...Sorry I'm being "reductive" and "unsensitive to the rap discouse" compared to that.
― da croupier, Wednesday, 13 October 2010 01:56 (fifteen years ago)
woops i think I melded a paraphrase with a quote in there...his personality doesnt seem very constructed or distanced at all from the performance, except in teh way he's constructed a pretty hypermasculine hood persona (which he portrays as being pretty much his ... persona period.)
didn't mean to make it sound more incoherent.
― da croupier, Wednesday, 13 October 2010 02:02 (fifteen years ago)
oh man that performance is incredible
― Jacques_Lamure, Wednesday, 13 October 2010 02:05 (fifteen years ago)