JAW ON THE FLOOR: Starbucks to Release Sonic Youth Celebrity Compilation (WTF)

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (555 of them)

The idea that this should be thought of as jaw-dropping is kind of jaw-dropping. Call me when the Starbucks G.G. Allin compilation comes out.

dlp9001, Saturday, 16 June 2007 15:02 (eighteen years ago)

I'm just disturbed at the idea of Grande latte swillers swaying their hips to a bossa nova version of Teenage Riot.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 16 June 2007 17:35 (eighteen years ago)

But lol elitist/rockist/corny indie fuxxor etc

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 16 June 2007 17:36 (eighteen years ago)

it's the perfect soundtrack to the african teenage riot soldier bio they've been shilling.

scott seward, Saturday, 16 June 2007 17:37 (eighteen years ago)

i think the only reason it's so jaw-dropping to me is that...well, i haven't paid SY any attention since Sonic Nurse, so the fact that they'd be okay with doing something for Starbucks (right on paul mccartney's back, mind you) kind of made me go, "whuh?"

the table is the table, Saturday, 16 June 2007 19:41 (eighteen years ago)

i love you, sonic youth.

this is more punk than punk then back to punk then past it again and then back to it.

pulling a slim moon that's actually FUNNY.

andi, Saturday, 16 June 2007 20:01 (eighteen years ago)

<i>this is more punk than punk then back to punk then past it again and then back to it.</i>

I love how SY has made fans think this is what's going on -- that it's some nod/wink Warholian punk thing, when in fact they've been marketing whores for years now. No diff than all the mindless commercials on television.

QuantumNoise, Saturday, 16 June 2007 21:06 (eighteen years ago)

Sonic Youth is no different than all the mindless commercials on television?

Binjominia, Saturday, 16 June 2007 21:21 (eighteen years ago)

I want to clarify that what I'm aghast at is the inevitably awful music this project is going to produce, not the concept of it being sold in a Starbucks. I didn't really get the hoopla about the new Macca album either.

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 16 June 2007 21:22 (eighteen years ago)

What about those weird tuning? You don't hear that in all of television's mindless commercials.
X-post

Binjominia, Saturday, 16 June 2007 21:22 (eighteen years ago)

Isn't this CD a compilation selected by different celebrity fans? Except for the one new song, hasn't the "inevitably awful music" already been produced?

Binjominia, Saturday, 16 June 2007 21:25 (eighteen years ago)

<i>this is more punk than punk then back to punk then past it again and then back to it.</i>

I love how SY has made fans think this is what's going on -- that it's some nod/wink Warholian punk thing, when in fact they've been marketing whores for years now. No diff than all the mindless commercials on television.

-- QuantumNoise, Saturday, June 16, 2007 9:06 PM (22 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

you are an idiot.

andi, Saturday, 16 June 2007 21:30 (eighteen years ago)

yeah, that's what it looks like, celebrity picks and one new tune:
http://www.pitchforkmedia.com/article/news/43669-starbucks-to-release-sonic-youth-celebrity-compilation (xpost)

I hope the new song is good! I like the idea of them doing a one-off song between albums that won't be some half-assed instrumental thing for an indie compilation. Also depending on what celebrities they ask, the song choice could be pretty interesting.

Alex in Baltimore, Saturday, 16 June 2007 21:35 (eighteen years ago)

oh well fuck me then, bring it on starbuck youth

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 16 June 2007 21:40 (eighteen years ago)

you are an idiot.

-- andi, Saturday, June 16, 2007 9:30 PM

Putting aside the fact that QuantumNoise is picking on you, do you think he's wrong?

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 16 June 2007 21:41 (eighteen years ago)

I drink drip coffee only, black, a lot of it, and Starbucks is above average.

Mark Rich@rdson, Saturday, 16 June 2007 23:04 (eighteen years ago)

I like the idea of them doing a one-off song between albums that won't be some half-assed instrumental thing for an indie compilation.

covers aside, I can't think of a time SY has ever used their whole ass for a comp track.

da croupier, Saturday, 16 June 2007 23:29 (eighteen years ago)

Thurston's "oh yeah we gotta get around to that" tone doesn't promise much either.

da croupier, Saturday, 16 June 2007 23:30 (eighteen years ago)

She knows how to make foam for me
She know how to make foam
Starbucks-power, Starbucks-power, Starbucks-power
Over Me

dlp9001, Saturday, 16 June 2007 23:35 (eighteen years ago)

you are an idiot.

-- andi, Saturday, June 16, 2007 9:30 PM

Putting aside the fact that QuantumNoise is picking on you, do you think he's wrong?

-- BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, June 16, 2007 9:41 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Link

yes! very much so!
really. i haven't played sy in years, but shit like this just reminds me why i kind of love 'em. it's just a laugh. get it or don't (which is fine, if you don't). just don't laugh at someone for laughing.

andi, Saturday, 16 June 2007 23:38 (eighteen years ago)

Or, with record/CD stores closing with alarming regularity, SY might just be exploring another possible venue for selling their product.

Binjominia, Saturday, 16 June 2007 23:41 (eighteen years ago)

And I can't blame any band for that.

Binjominia, Saturday, 16 June 2007 23:41 (eighteen years ago)

Or, with record/CD stores closing with alarming regularity, SY might just be exploring another possible venue for selling their product.

I wonder if they've heard of the internet.

the table is the table, Saturday, 16 June 2007 23:50 (eighteen years ago)

I'm sure they have.

Binjominia, Saturday, 16 June 2007 23:55 (eighteen years ago)

You're suggesting that bands looking for alternatives limit themselves to Internet retailers?

Binjominia, Saturday, 16 June 2007 23:56 (eighteen years ago)

i wonder if they've heard of making a living for years now, off of what they've been doing.

andi, Sunday, 17 June 2007 00:07 (eighteen years ago)

i've always wondered if the sonic youth apologists (contorting themselves into explaining how all these commercial endeavors are, um, "punk") are the same people who think a band like the Who are hopeless corporate sellouts for doing essentially the same things.

Lawrence the Looter, Sunday, 17 June 2007 01:05 (eighteen years ago)

She knows how to make foam for me
She know how to make foam
Starbucks-power, Starbucks-power, Starbucks-power
Over Me

-- dlp9001, Saturday, June 16, 2007 11:35 PM (1 hour ago) Bookmark Link

Please stop it.

Mr. Que, Sunday, 17 June 2007 01:06 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.moviesoundscentral.com/sounds/vanilla_sky/cum.wav

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Sunday, 17 June 2007 01:16 (eighteen years ago)

What was jaw-dropping to me was just that Starbucks would have seen enough commercial potential to be interested in doing this.

Sundar, Sunday, 17 June 2007 01:26 (eighteen years ago)

Sundar making the only sense on this thread so far.

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Sunday, 17 June 2007 01:55 (eighteen years ago)

I drink drip coffee only, black, a lot of it, and Starbucks is above average.

Starbucks, above average?? Are you fucking kidding me? Did you see the study in Consumer Reports magazine where they tested four different coffees from Starbucks, McDonalds, Dunkin Donuts and Burger King? It turned out McDonald's was the best(?!) and Starbucks was the WORST of the four -- and come on, they are the ONE ACTUAL COFFEE SHOP in the study!

Seriously Mr Rich@rdson, I shit you not:
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/businesstechnology/2003553322_webcoffeetest02.html

stephen, Sunday, 17 June 2007 02:52 (eighteen years ago)

it's just coffee, dude, and it looks like you should drink less of it

river wolf, Sunday, 17 June 2007 02:59 (eighteen years ago)

larf

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Sunday, 17 June 2007 03:05 (eighteen years ago)

Starbucks, above average?? Are you fucking kidding me? Did you see the study in Consumer Reports magazine where they tested four different coffees from Starbucks, McDonalds, Dunkin Donuts and Burger King? It turned out McDonald's was the best(?!) and Starbucks was the WORST of the four -- and come on, they are the ONE ACTUAL COFFEE SHOP in the study!

haha, starbucks sucks and CR is like guaranteed non-LCD reliable. what else do you get wrong?

anyway, this is awesome, in no small part because of how many people it will piss off.

gabbneb, Sunday, 17 June 2007 03:07 (eighteen years ago)

LCD reliable?

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Sunday, 17 June 2007 03:31 (eighteen years ago)

he means Consumer Reports sucks too

marmotwolof, Sunday, 17 June 2007 03:40 (eighteen years ago)

it's not necessarily that the fact that sonic youth are DOING it pisses me off.

a conversation:
STARBUCKS EMPLOYEE A sentimentalist, pimpled.
JOHNSON BRADDOCK A man with a stroller, a goatee, a brownstone.

STARBUCKS EMPLOYEE: So, that was non-fat soy caramel green tea mochalatacino frappe?
JOHNSON BRADDOCK: Yeah. Hey, what is this?
STARBUCKS EMPLOYEE: This is from Starbucks' newest CD, by Sonic Youth, called "Schizophrenia is Taking Me Home." I think this is "Catholic Block," picked by Jeff Tweedy. It's only 10 dollars with any drink purchase.
JOHNSON BRADDOCK: Huh.
STARBUCKS EMPLOYEE: I think it's pretty good.
JOHNSON BRADDOCK: Well, let me take that too then.
STARBUCKS EMPLOYEE: Great.
(purchase is made with Gold card, and JB leaves)
STARBUCKS EMPLOYEE: *sighs* Kill me.

the table is the table, Sunday, 17 June 2007 03:40 (eighteen years ago)

i mean, it's just unfathomable to me that this could actually work.

the table is the table, Sunday, 17 June 2007 03:40 (eighteen years ago)

Consumer reports does suck too. What is "LCD reliable" tho.

xpost table, I'm annoyed by the fact that drunks will bring this up with me for the nest 18 months.

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Sunday, 17 June 2007 03:42 (eighteen years ago)

i mean, it is a nice big joke. if i were a starbucks employee and these people walked in, i'd think, "great, now we're getting acid casualties coming in"

http://blogs.walkerart.org/offcenter/wp-content/uploads/2007/01/sy.jpg

the table is the table, Sunday, 17 June 2007 03:48 (eighteen years ago)

three acid casualties and an elf on heroin

the table is the table, Sunday, 17 June 2007 03:49 (eighteen years ago)

NON lowest common denominator reliable? He was making fun of dude for citing CR.

marmotwolof, Sunday, 17 June 2007 03:51 (eighteen years ago)

Yes, that would make sense.

Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Sunday, 17 June 2007 04:15 (eighteen years ago)

When did Renaldo turn into Stuart Smalley?

Pleasant Plains, Sunday, 17 June 2007 04:48 (eighteen years ago)

Sounds like I need to try that McDonald's premium coffee! But where does it say Starbucks came in last in that CP test? If Burger King's "tasted more like hot water" drink scored higher than Starbucks' "strong, but burnt and bitter," I think we have different ideas about what makes good coffee.

Mark Rich@rdson, Sunday, 17 June 2007 05:01 (eighteen years ago)

"three acid casualties and an elf on heroin"

Could be the best SY album title this century!

Soukesian, Sunday, 17 June 2007 08:45 (eighteen years ago)

thurston goldblum

gabbneb, Sunday, 17 June 2007 08:49 (eighteen years ago)

i've always wondered if the sonic youth apologists (contorting themselves into explaining how all these commercial endeavors are, um, "punk") are the same people who think a band like the Who are hopeless corporate sellouts for doing essentially the same things.

OTM.

I'm not pissed that SY are corporate shills. I don't care, really. If Kim Gordon wants to model for companies that reportedly use sweatshop labor (cough: Calvin Klein), so be it. I just tire of how the shilling is framed as something other than it is -- that I don't "get it," if I call it commercialism. There is nothing to get. They're not art performance adbusting punks having an ironic laugh on corporate America. They are shills for corporate America plain and simple. So am I to a certain extent, but if somebody calls me out on it, I say, "You're right." I don't say, "Oh, you don't get the joke, man. I'm punking the system from the inside."

QuantumNoise, Sunday, 17 June 2007 14:28 (eighteen years ago)

the table is the table OTM.

2for25, Sunday, 17 June 2007 14:44 (eighteen years ago)

I don't have a problem with them making their music available as broadly as possible. More power to them! But the cover looks to me like a slam on the people they're selling to, which is just a bummer. Like they're condescending by making their works available to power-coffee drinkers instead of whatever more authentic audience they envision for themselves. And yeah I'm projecting here, but that's what it looks like to me.

dad a, Friday, 23 May 2008 20:49 (eighteen years ago)

Hang on, is that Michelle Williams the actress or Michelle Williams the singer?

(I kind of agree with dad a.)

Sundar, Friday, 23 May 2008 20:55 (eighteen years ago)

Again: It's all in how it's interpreted. Which is the beauty of it, to me.

stephen, Friday, 23 May 2008 20:55 (eighteen years ago)

the cover looks to me like a slam on the people they're selling to, which is just a bummer

does that guy look like the people you see in a Starbucks store? clearly, he is a 'corporate' guy. some people regard Starbucks as a purveyor of 'corporate' coffee.

gabbneb, Friday, 23 May 2008 20:56 (eighteen years ago)

the cover says, "look at us, we're selling out!"

gabbneb, Friday, 23 May 2008 20:57 (eighteen years ago)

I'm going to love it when it's revealed that the "cover" is actually a quick Photoshop done by a Pitchfork news staffer.

jaymc, Friday, 23 May 2008 21:00 (eighteen years ago)

that would be v v disappointing

gabbneb, Friday, 23 May 2008 21:01 (eighteen years ago)

I think they simultaneously like the idea of selling their music in Starbucks, because it will reach a lot of people and they'll make a little money, and also realize the ridiculousness of it, and that they'll catch shit for it. But they've been around long enough and have nothing to prove so they don't really care. So they're making fun of themselves and their fans with that cover also, but hopefully everyone involved is in on the joke and can have a chuckle. It's not an either/or kind of situation. And I think lots of people who go to Starbucks, even heavy users, realize there is something a little comical about the whole Starbucks experience. Hence the number of comedians who have made jokes about there being a Starbucks on every corner.

Mark Rich@rdson, Friday, 23 May 2008 21:03 (eighteen years ago)

^^real talk

jaymc, Friday, 23 May 2008 21:08 (eighteen years ago)

On the back cover of his first major label solo LP, Thurston Moore was wearing a Ralph Lauren Polo pinpoint Yarmouth oxford dress shirt.[2]

Steve Shasta, Friday, 23 May 2008 21:21 (eighteen years ago)

who cares?

stephen, Friday, 23 May 2008 21:48 (eighteen years ago)

Ben Weasel to thread

Mackro Mackro, Friday, 23 May 2008 21:48 (eighteen years ago)

(full disclosure: i own both the Psychic Hearts LP and a similar Ralph Lauren Polo dress shirt.)

stephen, Friday, 23 May 2008 21:49 (eighteen years ago)

JAW ON THE FLOOR

deej, Friday, 23 May 2008 21:49 (eighteen years ago)

~~jaw on the floor lookin boy~~

J0rdan S., Friday, 23 May 2008 21:51 (eighteen years ago)

yes deej, we noticed, thanks for continuing to point it out

jon /via/ chi 2.0, Friday, 23 May 2008 21:53 (eighteen years ago)

ts: repeating lol thread title vs. tedious debate about 'sellouts' and starbux

deej, Friday, 23 May 2008 21:56 (eighteen years ago)

horrible, awful, gay, jaw, on, the, floor

J0rdan S., Friday, 23 May 2008 21:56 (eighteen years ago)

aaaaaaaaaanyway who gives a shit if they are selling via starbucks, let them get money they deserve it

J0rdan S., Friday, 23 May 2008 21:57 (eighteen years ago)

and if youre all up in arms psychoanalyzing the cover you need to take a step back for a sec

J0rdan S., Friday, 23 May 2008 21:58 (eighteen years ago)

Why are you two douchebags posting on this thread if you don't care so much again?

Alex in SF, Friday, 23 May 2008 21:59 (eighteen years ago)

cuz i thought the shock and horror in the op was lol
ill leave it be now tho, be cool

deej, Friday, 23 May 2008 22:00 (eighteen years ago)

Ben Weasel to thread

genuine lols! I wrote to MRR arguing with that letter of his!

sleeve, Friday, 23 May 2008 22:00 (eighteen years ago)

But I like talking about the cover!

cherry blossom, Friday, 23 May 2008 22:03 (eighteen years ago)

Reading the Weasel scribe is the gem of owner the Master Dik 12"

Mackro Mackro, Friday, 23 May 2008 22:05 (eighteen years ago)

owning

Mackro Mackro, Friday, 23 May 2008 22:05 (eighteen years ago)

Hello, just popped in to say: the funniest comment so far has to be

"What do you mean, Starbucks make above average coffee, didn't you see the survey/test panel results?"

Mark G, Friday, 23 May 2008 22:10 (eighteen years ago)

I take it they never got round to recording that 'special' track for this, anyroad.

Mark G, Friday, 23 May 2008 22:10 (eighteen years ago)

um, they did. It's the last track on the CD.

Mackro Mackro, Friday, 23 May 2008 22:12 (eighteen years ago)

oh yeah.

My only objection is that the CDs Starbucks sell aren't exactly 'discount', even though they look cheap.

Mark G, Friday, 23 May 2008 22:22 (eighteen years ago)

HI I AM CORPORATE DRONE I NEBER HERD OF SONIC YOUTH WATS DAT IS IT CLASSIC GENIUS LIKE RAY CHARLES OOH PRETTY PICSHURE

cracked me up

I am excited to buy this. At the Starbucks I stopped at tonight for a delicious iced latte, they had a Doors greatest hits CD and a James Brown greatest hits CD for sale by the register.

Savannah Smiles, Friday, 23 May 2008 22:23 (eighteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.