Throwing Muses: C-o-D

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (540 of them)
For a few years in the early 90s Throwing Muses were my favourite band in the world. I think they were the first band to affect me in *physical* way - like a punch to the stomach. I think roundabout the same time I was reading Camille Paglia, and they made her proselytising of clinical pagan daemonic art seem beautiful and true (Paglia on Emily Dickinson could almost be a great lost freeform Muses review - right down to the Amherst connection). 'Hate My Way' is the peak, probably: majestic in its crippled, stuttering prowl. But as an album, House Tornado is difficult to beat. Even the title is a perfect distillation of the *uncanny* (all that is un-homely, coming home to roost - in the same way that the group blasted open notions of the domestic, folk or country with blasts of noise, weird martial rhythms, the madwoman in the attic). It's an incredible contraption made from wood, electricity and the broken bones of the heart. I'm going to listen to it again, right now.

stevie t, Wednesday, 4 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

No, Pinefox, my classification of The Smiths (the band) sv. The Smiths (the Legend) is not bogus. Throwing Muses, do, however, compare to both of them.

The Smiths (the band) = either "they saved my angsty teenage life" or "miserable whinging git Morrosey and his Elvis-ripping off henchmen" while The Smiths (the legend) = greatest British band since the Beatles, etc. etc. etc. and all the dissecting of the legend and the personalitys that shaped it and so on.

I was comparing TM to the legend, in terms of their status as giants of music.

masonic boom, Wednesday, 4 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I still think the distinction is bogus. People who think of the Smiths as the greatest British band since the Beatles don't think of that as "legend" - it's simply their honest opinion on the Smiths.

Did I say "their"?

the pinefox, Wednesday, 4 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Stevie: RIGHT NOW?

What you say above is eloquent and admirable. I wonder if one day you will be able to convince me of it. And I wonder what it would take.

the pinefox, Wednesday, 4 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

'Ang on, 'ang on. 'Broken bones of the heart'?

the pinefox, Wednesday, 4 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I refer, of course, to "the heart" the legend, rather than the heart, the cardio-vascular organ.

stevie t, Wednesday, 4 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Oh.

I "heart" you, Stevie.

the pinefox, Wednesday, 4 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Phew - there I was worrying that I'd have to waste vital Henman vs Federer time on this thread, scrambling around for the right phrases and so forth and Stevie T goes and articulates almost *precisely* what I loved about Throwing Muses in the period 1989-91.

The physical - yes. "House Tornado" - yes (it made no sense to me and I ignored the tape for weeks; it made sense somewhere near the perimeter of an MoD firing range on Formby beach, late summer '89, wind whipping sand into my headphones).

The most excited I've ever been at a gig - Muses, Trent Poly, Feb '91. The most excited I've ever been about a forthcoming release - "The Real Ramona", Feb '91. The most disappointed I've ever been by an eagerly-awaited release - "Red Heaven", Aug '92.

Right - come on, Roger...

Michael Jones, Wednesday, 4 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Bloody hell, Mike! He's MURDERING him this set!!

the pinefox, Wednesday, 4 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Other thing: I respect greatly your and Stevie's enthusiasm for the band. I like it more (as you can imagine) than your enthusiasm for All Saints (not that it's any of my business what you want to listen to on the bus). BUT I still don't feel that what is great about the band has been articulated. Good things have been said, even if they were about the broken bones of the legendary "heart" (hey - Only Connect to Lou Reed!). It's like the Sutherlands never happened. (I blame Alan Sunderland, as you know; but that's another [David] storey). BUT no, sorry, what you lads are saying about the band doesn't quite square with the memory of them that I have. Which is, um, metallic guitar sounds (but not much exciting guitar playing, save on the aforementioned classic LP that, oops, you don't like) - loping drums - atonal-type vocal style - cut-up-type lyrics - that kind of thing.

It must seem unreasonable of me to nitpick away at it like this. I'm not trying to say they're a Dud. I just don't quite see the Classic bit, either, on the whole.

the pinefox, Wednesday, 4 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I should probably explain why I have such a distaste for Red Heaven (rather than just calling it a disaster). As others have pointed out, it rocks, and it rocks really hard. From that perspective, it does it really well, and I have no complaints with that. Following hot on the heels of The Real Ramona, though, it couldn't help but be a disappointment. The band had shown that they were capable of some really unique songwriting and playing, and that they didn't have to sacrifice melody. By cranking the amps up so high on Red Heaven, they sounded like they were trying to prove something...notably that they still had energy after Donnelly left. I didn't buy it for one second, especially because I found the songwriting on Red Heaven extremely dull and simple. I should also mention that I absolutely lurved Bob Mould at the time, and thought he was the best guitarist around at the time. Even that wasn't enough to make me like "Dio". In an alternate plane where the Muses hadn't just released the most perfect album of their career, Red Heaven may have been okay, but in context it was a bitter disappointment. To me, anyhow.

Sean Carruthers, Wednesday, 4 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I've just reread Stevie T's marvellous paean above for the umpteenth time, and, no, I still don't see it, I mean, hear it. Rock Music. You make it sound pretty interesting.

the pinefox, Wednesday, 4 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

bob mould's contribution to red heaven is entirely forgettable, sounds like he woke up and stumbled into the recording session but 'red heaven' has several wonderful songs especially 'pearl'. my faves are 'real ramona' and the first record, i don't much like fat skier or the last two which sounded a bit too polished and distant. hips and makers is also amazing, especially 'me and my charms' and 'a loon' which are truly breathtaking. i always get annoyed at people proclaiming sleater-kinney some sort of groundbreaking act of girls with guitars making powerful music when kristin and tanya were doing it years before them. i haven't gotten any of the last three solo records but i do like that appalachian folk thing she released only through the internet.

keith, Wednesday, 4 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Who's the wise-ass up there dropping Ut into this conversation? Mark? Bypass the Raincoats entirely, why don't you? And not one mention of Yoko Ono?

"Not Too Soon" sounds totally out of place on _The Real Ramona_. It sticks out like a polished diamond in a pile of tarnished silver dollars. And it's Tanya's best TM offering, by a wide country hectare.

And it's funny that someone (Sean) thinks that _Hips & Makers_ is a back-to-basics move. I felt the same way, but I think that _University_ was actually recorded BEFORE _Hips & Makers_. I forget where I heard that, but I used that information (& that theory) as the foundation for my breathless praise of _Limbo_ on my site.

David Raposa, Wednesday, 4 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

But Pinefox, I thought you were already convinced that it was pretty much impossible to describe WHY you like something in any way that makes any sense to others. I guess this applies to TM as much as anyone.

I can't remember the thread where this discussion took place.

Dr. C, Thursday, 5 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Dr C: yes. It is always difficult (at best) to convince anyone of anything (unless, I suppose, they want to be convinced), and it is difficult to explain why you like sth, esp. if the answer keeps coming back 'Why?'. So in general, I agree with you (about my own inconsistency).

BUT all I was really looking for from our Scouse friends was a (favourable) description which was a little bit 'closer to the music'. Stevie's stuff about Camille Paglia is great - but it's great cos Stevie is great, not (I submit) because TH are great (and CERTAINLY not cos Camille Paglia is great; heaven forfend).

I appreciate that the desire for a description which is 'closer to the music' might be another chimera - another senseless request which our Scouse friends will find it impossible to fulfil. At the end of the day (Clive), I have a feeling that they are talking as much about themselves as about TM - who (I suspect) were very important to them at a certain time in their lives and have thus made a kind of emotional imprint that they can't really explain. That is not a criticism - it might be the best reason for loving a bit of pop music (I think it's my usual reason). It's just that it's not very 'transferrable'. I can appreciate that TM meant something to little Stevie T when he was a wee boy writing vast dissertations for Christopher Bigsby - but I can't hear that in their records. (Or can I?)

the pinefox, Thursday, 5 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Pinefox, at the risk of debating the Smiths off-topic on the far superior TM's thread...

You have clearly forgotten the early 90s, when every band from Suede to Blur was described as "The Best British Band Since The Smiths". That's legendeering on a scale with the B**tles.

Back on TM again, yesterday afternoon at the HMV mega-sale, I actually went and bought a copy of House Tornado and Fat Skiier on CD to replace vinyl back in storage. Damn ILM for influencing my record buying habits!!! Second time this week!

masonic boom, Thursday, 5 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

>>> You have clearly forgotten the early 90s, when every band from Suede to Blur was described as "The Best British Band Since The Smiths". That's legendeering on a scale with the B**tles.

Wrong again.

I have not forgotten the early 90s. At least, not totally. I wish I could remember them a little more vividly than I do - but really, that's another thread entirely.

Your argument now seems to be that because some media people in the early 90s implied that the Smiths were a great band, they're not really a great band - that was just all Legend stuff. Whereas (you asserted above) talking about 'That Miserable Git Morrissey' is not Legend-peddling, but is simply the rough, unvarnished Truth.

From my POV (which as ever is not anyone else's POV), the Smiths are perhaps the greatest British band after the Beatles. Put it another way: they are perhaps the most important band to me ever. This is not much to do with constructing Legends; it's just the way I feel about this band. (I don't ask anyone else to share this feeling.)

I fear that what this 'debate' comes down to is that you don't like the Smiths much, and I do. Fear not, I have no desire to make you like them more.

the pinefox, Thursday, 5 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Actually I like this distinction. The Beatles: nice listen to White Album on a sunday afternoon. "The Beatles": irritating-as-fuck seperate John-Paul-George-Ringo Mojo covers, going over the same bloody story again and again.

Omar, Thursday, 5 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

You are actually wrong, I love the Smiths.

But that does not stop them from having a "Legend" which has far overtaken either their music or their lasting influence. You are just unable to see them because your devotion outweighs your rationality.

masonic boom, Thursday, 5 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I genuinely don't understand why people can't separate the music from the 'legend'. No doubt someone will argue that the music and the legend are in fact one and the same, but I'd disagree. My enjoyment of The Beatles isn't in any way altered by the fact that Mojo and Uncut both ran wank-pieces on them last month, nor would it change if no-one wrote about them ever again. I have the records, that's all that matters. I also don't see how the 'best band ever' syndrome makes any difference. They obviously weren't, and it's pointless to spend time trying to prove or disprove something as irrelevant as this. I guess it may make other bands ape the styles of the 'best bands ever according to legend' , but that doesn't make them any good, or make me like them.

If some people/lots of people/everyone except me/no-one thinks a particular artist is the best ever it couldn't possibly change the way that I think by itself. (However,weight of opinion might suggest that I have another listen and I COULD have been wrong all along : "Loveless". That's different.)

Dr. C, Thursday, 5 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Dr C: actually I do think Beatles = best band ever. (Have said this before.)

Masonic Boom: disappointed by your resort to cheap abuse. I maintain that you are mistaken and your distinction is, in this instance, utterly BOGUS. BUT you were right about one thing earlier: this is the Muses thread and we ought to be discussing them.

the pinefox, Thursday, 5 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

But what does 'best band ever' MEAN?

Dr. C, Friday, 6 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Dr C: I don't know - or, if I do 'know', I don't really want to get into contentious territory and tangled up in definitions. I'm no great Beatles apologist, I own none of their records, and I hardly ever listen to them. I still think they're the best pop group ever. But other people on ILM (eg Nick D) know far more about them (and probably don't think they're best band ever?). Don't mind discussing this further - but perhaps (again) it should be kept off Throwing Muses thread?

Totally sublime, forgive-them-anything-for-that Throwing Muses moment which Scouse worshippers at shrine of Hersh have not mentioned (perhaps don't like?): TWO STEP.

the pinefox, Friday, 6 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Don't have much to say except C L A S S I C.

Melissa W, Friday, 13 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Not much to say - but you said it with such idiosyncratic panache.

the pinefox, Saturday, 14 July 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

one year passes...
I'm just listening to Red Heaven for the first time in years... And I couldn't resist responding to a couple of posts:

Sean Carruthers - Yes it rocks, but thats not its why it holds its own. Yes, maybe they did have something to prove and in my mind they did. The Real Ramona was a great album, but a follow-on would've been impossible. With Donelly onboard, it could've easily turned out to be little more than sugar-coated pop dross. Not that I dislike Donelly's post-Muses ventures, its just that I think another Ramona would've involved too many compromises. Tanya and Kristin were obviously going in different directions.

I agree with Dr C. - Red Heaven is a classic album. Its raw and fresh, like one of them just said "well its just me and you now, lets get down to it". Red Heaven really conveys a sense of rapport, especially Rosetta Stone. Kristin seems to hit upon something that transcends the 'bit'iness of some of their previous outings. To me, it appears as if she finally managed to give all her ambivalence a face of its own. Red Heaven has a very rich character, indeed. If they were attempting to reinstate a more personal and intimate sense of identity, then I think they certainly achieved it.

Given the choice between:-

a) a "chilling and slinky" male fantasy involving Kristin Hersh, ice cream and a black negligee.

and

b) the opportunity to ride along with someone blowing out the cobwebs during a transitional phase in their life.

... I would take the latter ;)

Nat, Saturday, 1 February 2003 14:47 (twenty-three years ago)

... The production is spot on, too :D

Nat, Saturday, 1 February 2003 15:00 (twenty-three years ago)

This thread pops up right as we got the "Reunion Record" in the post, along with the new solo acoustic thing which will be released on the same day. I like the reunion record, good to hear Kristin and Tanya doing those crazy harmonies again. I'm not sold on the acoustic stuff, though. More thoughts later when I've listened to the record more...

kate, Saturday, 1 February 2003 15:02 (twenty-three years ago)

all i've heard is the "univerity" album; and i liked it, but not nearly as much as the rest of you folks seem to like the older releases (not a single full-on dud vote in the thread). am i just familiar with their dud album? should i start checking out the older material immediately?

dyson (dyson), Saturday, 1 February 2003 18:44 (twenty-three years ago)

Classic. They're not without moments that feel redundant (if not totally shticky if you don't know the "legend"), but the guitar-bass-drums save the day when Kristin's vocals become too strident.

I definitely wouldn't say that you're only familiar with the "dud album", Dyson. From what I've heard of her discography it sounds like Hersh started with her most apocalyptic (or grating, depending on your tastes) work and then gradually mellowed, while remaining off-kilter and "in touch with her emotions". I'd certainly give the older stuff a try, but it's pretty up in the air what you'll prefer. I'm not sure myself, but my girlfriend would vote for "The Real Ramona" as her fave.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Saturday, 1 February 2003 18:56 (twenty-three years ago)

Random lines written by Hersh randomly pop into my head almost as frequently as ones written by Howard Devoto. "I'm so glad you could come, now breathe under water"; "I throw your head across the ice"; "I beg your skin, you buy a whore," etc.

Andy K (Andy K), Saturday, 1 February 2003 19:12 (twenty-three years ago)

Hm, those are pretty good.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 1 February 2003 22:14 (twenty-three years ago)

I was absolutely obsessed with Throwing Muses for the second half of the '80s. I'm looking forward to hearing Kristin and Tanya together again...

mike a (mike a), Sunday, 2 February 2003 06:56 (twenty-three years ago)

I'll stand by what I said 18 months ago - _Limbo_ is faboo. Yeah, _University_ is a bit duddish, but then I'm singing that song Andy quoted up there to myself ("I'll climb you as I grow older / By 50 I'll ride on your shoulder"), and there are plenty of non-dud moves ("The Teller" comes to mind). But _Limbo_ is _University_ done up right, and _In a Doghouse_ (collecting the 1st Muses album w/ their demo tape) is even better (albeit different & less user-friendly, which is A-OK), so going there next might be best.

Would someone in the recording industry PLEASE compile all those odd EP / b-side / single tracks onto one accesible compact disc type object? Yo, Ivo! (This is especially urgent & key as I've found a SLSKer w/ the entire TM disco available for D/L - including the new album! - BUT a) they've 600+ people in their queue and b) their D/L speed is 0.8!)

David R. (popshots75`), Sunday, 2 February 2003 17:49 (twenty-three years ago)

Another big-up for Limbo, which is immensely satisfying all the way through (and climaxes with the unlisted track "white bikini sand") but never reaches the dizzy heights of classic early stuff. Criminally overlooked.

Aaron A., Sunday, 2 February 2003 17:59 (twenty-three years ago)

Yeah, _University_ is a bit duddish

David R. is BONKERS.

Andy K (Andy K), Sunday, 2 February 2003 18:16 (twenty-three years ago)

TM (Throwing Muses) = CI (Classic Indie)

Get these and be a better human being:

HOUSE TORNADO + THE FAT SKIER
RED HEAVEN
LIMBO

Then go after all the others. When you're done, start with the Pixies.

JP Almeida (JP Almeida), Sunday, 2 February 2003 19:15 (twenty-three years ago)

I'd have to go with IN A DOGHOUSE for my favorite - it's got most of the original demo tracks, many of which were re-recorded for the first 4AD album. The originals are even scarier and starker than the official versions; these are the recordings that made me fall in love with the band. HOUSE TORNADO ranks as #2 for me, the perfect synthesis of their haunted early material and later, calmer, poppier stuff ("Juno" is still uplifting).

I just saw Kristin play live about a year ago, and she's still got it.

mike a (mike a), Sunday, 2 February 2003 21:27 (twenty-three years ago)

it's all about this!

http://www.inkblotmagazine.com/rev-archive/images/ca_muses.jpg

all! about! this!

Red Heaven is splendid as well, but really, The Real Ramona balances pop and barbed, spiky unease better than any album i've ever heard by anyone ever, FACT.

er...Tanya & Kristin are back working together? Did I miss a meeting? Details, STAT!

Charlie (Charlie), Sunday, 2 February 2003 22:34 (twenty-three years ago)

Charlie - there are rumours that Tanya will turn up for the Astoria gig on the 20 March. I know that would get people excited - everyone loves a reunion - but i hope she doesn't. Her songs were always the weakest on the early albums - like Belly tracks that had found their way back in time. But Throwing Muses are the most underrated band of the last twenty years, I think, and Kristin the best living songwriter. I mean it. No one has her poetry. And don't let anyone tell you that Sunny Border Blue isn't a classic. The music doesn't push towards the unusual so much as early Muses did, of course, but the songs - listen to those songs ...

paul myerscough, Sunday, 2 February 2003 23:03 (twenty-three years ago)

Classic. House Tornado is really great.

Juan (Juan), Monday, 3 February 2003 01:29 (twenty-three years ago)

two months pass...
is anyone else as amazed with the new album as as I am? It seems like it's been a quiet response, and this is their most amazing album in a decade...

It's too different from the first album or 'real ramona' to really allow for easy comparison but... well, I liked 'red heaven' and 'imbo' ok but never ever listen to them. The songwriting here hasn't been so consistently on since the first two albums and eps. I'm 100% re-smitten.

milton, Thursday, 17 April 2003 21:16 (twenty-three years ago)

love them.

but less classic after kristen started taking her meds. or something.

i have "soap and water" in my head all the time.

brian badword (badwords), Friday, 18 April 2003 05:33 (twenty-three years ago)

nine months pass...
Wow, I just saw that Free Kitten apparently covered Belly on some KRS comp!

Jon Williams (ex machina), Tuesday, 3 February 2004 22:28 (twenty-two years ago)

two months pass...
a nice surpise: i found a very old mix tape last night with two t.m. tracks, cottonmouth and dizzy. i've been inwardly humming the later all day. i'm feeling very tender towards them as a result, and feeling very bad that none of my t.m./kristin hersh cds survived a particularly ferocious, bankruptcy-driven purge some years ago.

lauren (laurenp), Friday, 30 April 2004 16:45 (twenty-two years ago)

eleven months pass...
What an odd thread. The impeccable first half of University (second half falters a bit but it's not terrible by any means) and the entirety of The Grotto is killing me today. I haven't heard Red Heaven and I still haven't listened to Hunkpapa in full but everything else is classic to the umpteenth power.

Ian Riese-Moraine. To Hell with you and your gradual evolution! (Eastern Mantra), Wednesday, 13 April 2005 21:56 (twenty-one years ago)

four months pass...
God, I'd almost forgotten about that reunion album...

Thoughts on: Throwing Muses (s/t 2003) vs. Red Heaven vs. 50 Foot Wave - Golden Ocean ?

I've still not heard TM2003 or Golden Ocean ffs. I guess I've been wary, because I'm real picky about the TM output I do like. Ignoring the more average (by their standards, not others) albums (Hunkpapa, Limbo, University, for KH solo I dropped off after Strange Angels sadly) makes them seem SO much more legendary in my mind.

Relative prolificity (and Kirsten not losing the plot) has I'd agree, really hurt their standing compared to other similarly awesome bands.

fandango (fandango), Saturday, 20 August 2005 09:22 (twenty years ago)

50 foot wave >> the 2003 TM album

jimmy glass (electricsound), Saturday, 20 August 2005 11:40 (twenty years ago)

(in sound quality at the very very least)

jimmy glass (electricsound), Saturday, 20 August 2005 11:40 (twenty years ago)

wait David isn't drumming any more?!?

sleeve, Tuesday, 20 May 2025 19:51 (one year ago)

Not on the new album or apparently this tour, at least.

assert (matttkkkk), Tuesday, 20 May 2025 19:54 (one year ago)

gah

sleeve, Tuesday, 20 May 2025 20:03 (one year ago)

I like the new album and very much enjoy her bluesky posting but I LOVE his drumming

sleeve, Tuesday, 20 May 2025 20:03 (one year ago)

am seeing them a week today, hopefully youtube isn't doing them justice

Colonel Poo, Tuesday, 20 May 2025 20:09 (one year ago)

It’s really been bugging me. Dave has been in Throwing Muses since 1983. When there were two of them it was just Dave and Kristin, even Leslie was credited as a guest on Red Heaven. When the Muses coexisted with Fifty Foot Wave the only difference was Dave vs Rob Ahlers. I would never pretend he’s a creative force on par with KH, but god dammit no Dave no Muses. It’s a KH touring band, same as the last TM record is a KH record. I know better than to judge when I don’t know the situation it it feels like it lacks integrity after all these years.

assert (matttkkkk), Friday, 30 May 2025 12:05 (one year ago)

*but it

assert (matttkkkk), Friday, 30 May 2025 12:06 (one year ago)

I think Dave's pretty wrapped up in his graphic design business these days. Last saw him in April after his dad, who was a popular coach and guidance counselor at the high school I went to, passed away.

TO BE A JAZZ SINGER YOU HAVE TO BE ABLE TO SCAT (Jazzbo), Friday, 30 May 2025 12:39 (one year ago)

big sigh. i like dave's style a lot (percussive+graphic). glad i got to see the kristin/dave/barney trio a couple times. i remember kristin posting a lot on her blog around the time of the 2003 4ad album. she would make a lot of seemingly insignificant, but kind of snarky references, to dave. "37 hours" from her sunny border blue album is about him. i've always gotten the impression that he's a fairly private person and, especially in later years, required some coaxing to continue touring.

all of this aside, her songwriting chops have not wavered at all over the years. it's kind of a weird dynamic that the records continue to be good, but the legacy of the band and who's involved in what is getting sticky. unfortunately.

"Don't ask me, I just work here." (Austin), Friday, 30 May 2025 13:03 (one year ago)

do more than 2-3 songs on the new album even have drums?

fluffy tufts university (f. hazel), Friday, 30 May 2025 13:21 (one year ago)

ach, yeah, I should not have said anything when I didn’t know anything

assert (matttkkkk), Friday, 30 May 2025 13:28 (one year ago)

I have a soft spot for Dave because when the Australian label offered phoners to promote University, I got to talk to him for an hour - he blew off the next interview and patiently told me all about the early days. And then when I flew to see them on the tour I spotted him and said hello, whereupon he invited me and my friend backstage and shared the rider. Sorry - I’m sure I have already told this story here.

assert (matttkkkk), Friday, 30 May 2025 13:32 (one year ago)

3 July 2019, as Zing kindly placed my previous telling at the top of the last 100 posts on this thread.

assert (matttkkkk), Friday, 30 May 2025 13:36 (one year ago)

I mean really it isn't Throwing Muses without Tanya Donnelly or Leslie Langston either but that ship has kinda sailed. This is like fourth-era Throwing Muses I guess.

fluffy tufts university (f. hazel), Friday, 30 May 2025 13:40 (one year ago)

I certainly wouldn't NOT see this Muses lineup because there's no David playing, and at least Fred is 'in the family'. The names Hersh decides to put on her projects have become somewhat mysterious to me now; Possible Dust Clouds sounds more like a Muses album than the new one, for instance. there was a point where she said economic conditions kind of dictated this; if an album / tour was a Muses thing, it might make more money but it was also a lot more expensive to tour because she was committed to paying David and whoever played bass more money as well.

I'd still go to this because she will play Bright Yellow Gun while playing a show as Muses, despite who is in the band; but she wont' do that as 50 Ft. Wave or solo (probably).

I? not I! He! He! HIM! (akm), Friday, 30 May 2025 14:42 (one year ago)

two months pass...

I have a soft spot for Dave because when the Australian label offered phoners to promote University, I got to talk to him for an hour - he blew off the next interview and patiently told me all about the early days.

!!!! so jellllllllllll

Stoop Crone (Trayce), Thursday, 21 August 2025 23:42 (nine months ago)

Anyway I came here for the same reason, I was looking up deets of the new tour and was like "wtf is that Doony (her son) on bass? Whats going on where's Dave" and apparently I am not the only one. But then again, I've been aware she plays everything herself for some time now, guitar/bass/drums the lot. So I guess it is sensible. People who had to get f/t careers outside of music cant really just drop everything for a long tour.

I got to see them in 93 - according to Wiki Bernard was the bass player by that point so I guess I never got to see the OG lineup, despite feeling like I recall otherwise. I got a GREAT photo from the 93 gig though, of Kris in that classic "I am not here" stare.

Stoop Crone (Trayce), Thursday, 21 August 2025 23:46 (nine months ago)

Hopefully this'll work
https://i.imgur.com/rcfjhfp.jpeg

Stoop Crone (Trayce), Thursday, 21 August 2025 23:51 (nine months ago)

LOl apparently i'd posted this pic in this thread before (but the links broken so hey)

Stoop Crone (Trayce), Thursday, 21 August 2025 23:57 (nine months ago)

awesome, thanks

sleeve, Friday, 22 August 2025 00:03 (nine months ago)

I remember that stare! I think I saw them at the Corner Hotel on that tour.

assert (matttkkkk), Friday, 22 August 2025 03:16 (nine months ago)

I just found that I have the 11 page transcript of the Dave Narcizo interview sitting in a folder, if anyone was interested - I don't know where one would upload such a thing without shovelling it into an AI slop bucket.

assert (matttkkkk), Friday, 22 August 2025 04:27 (nine months ago)

jeez I'd love to read it, idk just a dropbox link?

sleeve, Friday, 22 August 2025 04:34 (nine months ago)

I squished it down a bit format-wise - will see what I can do.

assert (matttkkkk), Friday, 22 August 2025 04:38 (nine months ago)

No idea how to protect the link from crawlers, but que sera sera I guess. Thanks for the interest! https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/k1t1d5ziioeeb2899s9z5/David-Narcizo-interview-1995.pdf?rlkey=wonc2o113lsx5rwofdszf9ill&st=hudyp3ow&dl=0

assert (matttkkkk), Friday, 22 August 2025 04:42 (nine months ago)

thank u!

sleeve, Friday, 22 August 2025 04:46 (nine months ago)

ditto!
PS yes that photo was taken at the Corner :)

Stoop Crone (Trayce), Friday, 22 August 2025 04:59 (nine months ago)

That was a fab interview Matt, thanks for sharing it x

Stoop Crone (Trayce), Friday, 22 August 2025 05:13 (nine months ago)

:)

assert (matttkkkk), Friday, 22 August 2025 05:25 (nine months ago)

(intro is a bit goofy but hey, it was 30 years ago)

assert (matttkkkk), Friday, 22 August 2025 05:37 (nine months ago)

I'd still go to this because she will play Bright Yellow Gun while playing a show as Muses, despite who is in the band; but she wont' do that as 50 Ft. Wave or solo (probably).

― I? not I! He! He! HIM! (akm), Friday, 30 May 2025 15:42 bookmarkflaglink

fwiw I saw her solo a few years ago and she did in fact play Bright Yellow Gun

Colonel Poo, Friday, 22 August 2025 12:01 (nine months ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.