I didn't say half of that. I used 'dickwad' in response to that note on yr website (These things are neither easy or cheap. etc), like you should be deified for posting a couple tracks. Sorry that wasn't clear.
But I also don't agree that you should make the tracks so readily available; they're not yours. Straight-up posting is too blatant for my tastes--you're assuming some kind of ownership. That's just my opinion though and I wasn't vilifying you for that, just disagreeing.
― mcd (mcd), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 17:54 (nineteen years ago) link
"Yeah, if someone's selling downloads and collecting money for our songs I would be unhappy about that but if they're trading it I don't mind, obviously if I make a thousand records or CDs or whatever, I like to sell a thousand. I don't need all the plastic. Obviously I would like people to support us, that'd be great. But at the end of the day, I'd rather people hear the music. You know I don't own any Bob Dylan music, well actually I think I do, but you know when I was growing up I didn't, but I certainly knew his music because of the radio, I didn't pay for that. I only mention him because I just mentioned him, I'm not saying like "Oh he's a huge Bob Dylan fan", I'm just saying that I do have respect for a lot of his work, and I'm glad to have been able to hear it and I think radio is so crucial to be able to have that. And frankly, though I actually recently got DSL, which has certainly helped in the terms of downloading songs, and I found the process a little bit frustrating because everyone seems to be putting up 'in the joint' or 'get the pay' or whatever, but when I first heard about napster, and those kinds of things, the orignal napster, the idea of having a resource where you could hear music-- it was a giant resource library-- was so intoxicating to me. I thought it was the most amazing thing in the world. Most music will never be made available commercially because it just doesn't make any sense for it to be made available commercially, you'll never sell enough copies to merit it, but I want to hear Hendrix practicing something, I want to hear a weird Al Jolson recording, I want to hear these things. The idea of going to a computer and listening to them once or twice like you heard them on the radio I think is incredible. But if I downloaded something and it just blew my mind, you'd better believe I'd go and try and find the fucking record if I could, if one existed. So from my point of view, any way that Fugazi or any band on Dischord or any kind of underground music, any way we have for people to be able to check it out and have access to the world at large, I'm all for. Obviously the major labels have, at this time at least, have fairly sewn up the avenues of the media, they own it all so obviously they have it all sewn up-- obviously it's not a coincidence that on new years eve ABC TV had their New Year's Rockin' Eve with Dick Clark reporting from Times Square, which is sort of the traditional new years thing, but they also reported in from Disneyworld, but they're owned by Disney! So of course, that's why suddenly disneyland is the same thing as Times Ssquare. It's all so disgusting. So the idea that somebody in wherever, whether they're in a small town somewhere in the middle of america or in Pakistan or whatever, if they're interested, and they want to check out Fugazi, I want it out there. I don't want them to have to pay some service to get to it and listen to it and hopefully that would compel them to do further research. I mean, how cool would it be to know that there's some kid in Pakistan who downloaded all our records and listens to them all the time-- I'm happy, I don't give a damn. I mean the argument against it is always just monetary, and again, that's the least interesting aspect of music for me."
― Harlan, Tuesday, 5 October 2004 17:59 (nineteen years ago) link
― scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 18:01 (nineteen years ago) link
― RayofToday, Tuesday, 5 October 2004 18:01 (nineteen years ago) link
― scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 18:05 (nineteen years ago) link
I was kidding.
Sorry I made the tracks easy to find. Perhaps if I hid a tape under a rock in a field...I'm going to eat some eggs.
― Derek Erdman (Donkey King), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 18:24 (nineteen years ago) link
haha i was wondering if that was some sort of diy joke.
― pfeffernuesse (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 18:28 (nineteen years ago) link
― mcd (mcd), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 18:39 (nineteen years ago) link
a) it has tracks that have NEVER surfaced anywhere,
b) it's been remastered
c) extensive and lovely liner notes
d) knowing Chuck Warner and Bruno Wizard will hopefully profit.
One way Acute has been dealing is trying to have cool liner notes/packages(getting bigger all the time) adding video clips etc. The Prefects CD is 30 minutes long but has a 20 page book!
But following up on the joke...they meant for you to go and do it themselves, not take theirs!
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 19:38 (nineteen years ago) link
and of course, i laud all fans who reissue stuff and get money or long-overdue cred/raves, to people who made coolmusic in the past. be it acute, hyped2death, sundazed, whoever. godd bless you each and every one.
― scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 19:52 (nineteen years ago) link
it's awesome that these tracks are available. i'd never heard them before and now i think they're great. i'm more keen on the singles than the lp though. but they didn't totally lose it as 'grief is very private' is the best track.
― andy leidel, Tuesday, 5 October 2004 20:10 (nineteen years ago) link
Roger from the Desperate Bicyles once wrote me "One thing that would sway us would be the thought that we could still have a positive influence; maybe encourage someone to take control of some part of their life - by musical means perhaps, but not necessarily."
which I take to mean they don't solely see the easy and cheap thing as regarding just writing music, but doing something, anything. Derek certainly has, and in my own way, I'm working on it. But I was kidding when I said "do it yourself, not take theirs!" that part was the joke.
The LP appeals to me in a different way then the early singles, and the Greif is Very Private single is something totally different. The songs of the LP that I love, they don't have the unique sound/arrangement of the singles, but the melodies and songwriting stick with me.
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Tuesday, 5 October 2004 20:23 (nineteen years ago) link
This thread = mostly retarded.
― Candy Appleton, Wednesday, 6 October 2004 07:54 (nineteen years ago) link
Fwiw, I entirely agree with him.
― mark grout (mark grout), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 08:47 (nineteen years ago) link
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 08:53 (nineteen years ago) link
Dave...the Prefects CD is going to be HUGE, relatively speaking! We've got some serious PR behind it and the early feedback has been fantastic, i.e. many many music magazine in the UK and US will be running reviews/articles etc. That's no easy task, getting this stuff in the press. As mentioned before, I have the 2 new Nightingales singles and while the first one I thought was pretty good, the second, Workshy Wunderkind, just totally kills and has made me all the more excited. I've worked before with the fellow who is booking the Nightingales tour here so I'm involved with helping find opening bands and such and will help promote the shows in NYC. I'm very much looking forward to their tour.
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 14:04 (nineteen years ago) link
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 14:05 (nineteen years ago) link
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 14:16 (nineteen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 14:20 (nineteen years ago) link
― Stewart Osborne (Stewart Osborne), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 14:32 (nineteen years ago) link
btw, if anyone was really geeky and curious, yes, I use the convention ACT007 because it sounds like FACT007.
There's a one page article about Acute in the latest issue of XLR8R magazine, the "New York" issue. Good info all around.
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Wednesday, 6 October 2004 16:08 (nineteen years ago) link
They should do - it's in the current set.
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Saturday, 9 October 2004 15:24 (nineteen years ago) link
Personally I'm glad he posted them, 'cause now I get to hear the songs until cheapy vg- copies of the singles come up. I don't do soulseek, or see the real advantage of taking part in file sharing. CDrs suck and I never listen to them no matter how good the music is. That and the sound quality of a lot of that stuff is unlistenable if you're a monkey like me and can't "upgrade" your technology to a reasonable leve. I just take people who I can trust's musical advice, and I guess that's where I learn about a lot of groups I get into. I guess it's good for younger kids trying to get into music who don't have a very big disposable income, but people wearing band shirts and names dropped in thanks lists always did it for me back when I had a $20 a month allowance.
Basically, all I'm seeing here is a bunch of nerds with sand in their vaginas (and someone who doesn't know who Ian Mackaye is, with some Ray Cappo references to boot) 'cause their stock in cool points goes down when more people get into obscure bands with oop records. Unless you were in the band I can't see the reasoning behind assuming how they'd feel about some guy making their songs public domain. I suggest everyone listen to "Street Justice" by the Cro Mags and realize what's really important in life.
― M. Colin Tappe, Sunday, 10 October 2004 01:40 (nineteen years ago) link
DESPERATE BICYCLES “Occupied Territory” and “The Medium Was Tedium” singles (Refill Records, ’78, ’79). I heard about DESPERATE BICYCLES through a friend of mine, and I trust this guy’s opinion on music so much that even though I had never heard DB before, I didn’t think even twice about dropping the $50 it took to get both of these from a UK seller. Honestly, it was one of the best recent record purchasing risks I’ve ever taken, ‘cause these singles hit me really hard. I guess the best way I could describe DESPERATE BICYCLES music would be to have you imagine THE FALL if they were worshipping old ESP Disk “folk” groups (THE FUGS, GODZ, HMR, etc.) instead of CAN. Think really top notch authentic UK post-punk, but lacking any of the obnoxious pitfalls that genre is often guilty of (artistic pretension, watered down lyrics snatched from LOU REED’S wastebasket, aggrandized sense of importance, and general whiney, explicitly anti-rock and roll mentalities). DESPERATE BICYCLES stand head and shoulders above the competition by actually writing good songs which were rich in melody, but also very minimal in arrangement and experimental in their production approach. Take the farfisa and tambourine driven “Medium Was Tedium” single contrasted to the lofi borderline-garage punk of “Skill,” contrasted still with the languid and schizophrenic flipside “Occupied Territory.” These guys cram more original ideas in one song than most bands do in their entire existence, but somehow the songs really are pleasant to listen to without remotely being obtrusively avant-garde like many of their peers.
It should also be noted that DESPERATE BICYCLES wrote lyrics which will give anyone involved in pressing independent records, or seriously pursuing any form of artistic expression, for that matter, a serious hard on. Two of three songs on these two singles DIRECTLY relate to the do-it-yourself ethic of making music. This line from “Skill” pretty much sums up the DESPERATE BICYCLES ETHOS: “You don’t need skill, just the desire/the interest and desire to do what you believe in,” and of course the “It was easy it was cheap GO AND DO IT!!!” chorus/battle cry of “The Medium Was Tedium” speaks volumes as well.
As it stands there is no DESPERATE BICYCLES anthology, or singles collection. The records have never been repressed (to my knowledge this is as per the band’s request) and to my knowledge never even bootlegged. If you find any of their stuff (they had about three or four other singles and an LP) expect to pay a fair price for it, but trust me, it’s a rewarding investment.
― M. Colin Tappe, Sunday, 10 October 2004 01:42 (nineteen years ago) link
cause their stock in cool points goes down when more people get into obscure bands with oop records
You're really directing that sentiment to the wrong group of people. Please tell me you're not aiming that at me in repsonse to my posts above.
And can I make the obvious analogy. If you specifically told the public you didn't want anyone to repress the best of M. Colin Tappe Greatest Hits CD, but somebody went ahead and did it without your permission, AND is making money off of it, that'd be perfectly cool?
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Sunday, 10 October 2004 07:42 (nineteen years ago) link
That someone was me. Does that mean I don't have SIMV? Anyway, my point being Ian Mackaye is not and has never been in the Desp.Bikes, so his opinion, which I share, is not necessarily the DB's standpoint.
I actually don't know who IMcKaye is anyway, and Ray Cappo is also lost on me. But that's not important. Is it?
― mark grout (mark grout), Sunday, 10 October 2004 15:09 (nineteen years ago) link
I've only heard 'The Medium Was Tedium', and now I can hear the rest of their songs.
If a remastered CD comes out I'll buy that.
Who's losing money (apart from Derek E) out of this, you fucking naysayers.
― Sasha (sgh), Monday, 11 October 2004 03:38 (nineteen years ago) link
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Monday, 11 October 2004 14:28 (nineteen years ago) link
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Monday, 11 October 2004 14:45 (nineteen years ago) link
It's a shame that there's certain music that people can't here because the records are prohibitively expensive and there is no cheap reissue, but that doesn't make it ok to go against the bands wishes. The fans don't have some kind of right to the music that supercedes the artists desire to not have their music out there for whatever reason.
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Monday, 11 October 2004 14:53 (nineteen years ago) link
I dunno. I hypocrit cuz I downloaded the tracks? Maybe they don't want to be looked on as 'historical' or what they do nowadays would be 'spoiled' by 'immature daubings' or whatever?
I dunno, I havent played it yet.
― mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 11 October 2004 14:56 (nineteen years ago) link
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Monday, 11 October 2004 15:08 (nineteen years ago) link
― mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 11 October 2004 15:41 (nineteen years ago) link
They did release it then, and they have the right to not release it now. Releasing it then doesn't make it public domain. As I mentioned above, there's lots of grey areas...I never said nobody should be allowed to hear them, I've probably done more then anybody in spreading their music because I thought people should hear these great records, all the time confident that the people I was giving these CDs to would buy the records given the chance and would def. buy a reissue should it happen. I was just naive enough to think nobody would bootleg it. They did, and I felt guilty and still do, so now I fall on the side of not freely trading music that doesn't belong to me. Or I'm more likely to make mix tapes then compile "The complete..." because once you do that, it just makes the bootleggers jobs easier.
For a few years now there's been someone selling Prefects CDs of Peel Sessions and live stuff, as well as tons of other punk stuff, all at considerable profit. I hope even people who are aware of his site still find it worthwhile to buy Acute's forthcoming Prefects CD, if only for the liner notes and the fact that money will go to the band.
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Monday, 11 October 2004 16:01 (nineteen years ago) link
― mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 11 October 2004 16:05 (nineteen years ago) link
I even got a copy of the CD directly to Duran Duran's PR agent who said she'd give it directly to John Taylor, as they grew out of the same Birmingham punk scene. Haven't heard back from Mr. Taylor yet though! At the least I hope he'll find it a kick, in the nostalgic sense.
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Monday, 11 October 2004 16:43 (nineteen years ago) link
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 11 October 2004 17:04 (nineteen years ago) link
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Monday, 11 October 2004 17:22 (nineteen years ago) link
― artdamages (artdamages), Monday, 11 October 2004 20:02 (nineteen years ago) link
― artdamages (artdamages), Monday, 11 October 2004 20:29 (nineteen years ago) link
http://www.carparkrecords.com/acute_US.html
or buy it from our distributor Mordam, or Forced Exposure, Other Music, whatever your favorite retailer is. iTunes and other trustworthy digital downloaders as well.
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Monday, 11 October 2004 20:30 (nineteen years ago) link
― artdamages (artdamages), Monday, 11 October 2004 20:45 (nineteen years ago) link
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Monday, 11 October 2004 21:19 (nineteen years ago) link
I might be pretty dumb, and I don't understand this.
― Sasha (sgh), Monday, 11 October 2004 23:50 (nineteen years ago) link
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Tuesday, 12 October 2004 06:26 (nineteen years ago) link
Sasha, you are correct in your disunderstandment.
If the music is more accessible, more people will get it from the 'free' source, and less people will illegally profit from it. Hray.
But, if the music is more accessible from a free source, the list of people who will not profit from it includes the original artists. Boo.
So now I have the CD, I most probably would not buy the properly remastered version. But I probably would not have anyway.
― mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 12 October 2004 08:57 (nineteen years ago) link
― M. Colin Tappe, Thursday, 21 October 2004 05:03 (nineteen years ago) link
― mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 21 October 2004 06:21 (nineteen years ago) link
http://www.headheritage.co.uk/headtohead/show.php?show=message&id=229475
The reviewer doesn't seem to know who's in the Nightingales, apart from Robert Lloyd, but correctly guesses that Alan Apperley is a lecturer.
― Dr. C (Dr. C), Thursday, 21 October 2004 08:43 (nineteen years ago) link
― Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Thursday, 21 October 2004 14:38 (nineteen years ago) link
eww, this music is fucking shite. there's no reason to hear this bollocks except the fact that someone doesn't want you to hear it. brilliant marketing move, laddies.
i love this pretentious existential explanation for the band: "The Desperate Bicycles were formed for the specific purpose of recording and releasing a single on their own label."
Not to make good music, not to express anything relevant, but simply to release an album. Yes, this has encouraged me to go buy an excessively large Hummer and drive it around just because.
― res, Saturday, 21 June 2008 20:06 (fifteen years ago) link
i'd say "advice on arrest" definitely expresses something relevant, and far from existential or pretentious. try actually listening to them next time.
― r1o natsume, Saturday, 21 June 2008 20:24 (fifteen years ago) link
What's really cool about music is that sometimes some people like it, while other people don't. A little respect for other people's taste and opinions goes a long way. They wrote tons of great songs that mean a lot to a lot of people. It's fine if you don't like them, and I guess it's silly for me to argue on the internet about stuff like this.
It was a pretty big deal, a big conceptual leap back then, that you could just put out a record. They had that idea and decided to do it. It was an influential move, but unlike the bulk of their followers, the music was also fantastic and they continued to write songs, released a few more singles and an LP. Most of it is pretty good to completely awesome, in my opinion, if not yours.
And I like it just because.
― dan selzer, Saturday, 21 June 2008 20:46 (fifteen years ago) link
Is this the thread that is mentioned in the page at the top of the thread that doesn't work when you click on the link on that page?
Because if it is, he's right, it is interesting.
I remember buying the second single from my local record shop and cursing the fact that you must have either lived next to Rough Trade or been a friend of the band to get the first single. Certainly had no chance getting it out in the sticks. It's good to hear it again after all these years.
― Ned Trifle II, Saturday, 2 August 2008 09:25 (fifteen years ago) link
Dug this up for the first time in probably 4 years? Totally enjoying "Cars"
― "lol" as frivolity (Stevie D), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 16:28 (fourteen years ago) link
"Holidays" is easily one of my favorite songs of all time. Can't get enough of it.
― Trip Maker, Wednesday, 5 August 2009 16:38 (fourteen years ago) link
I'm at the "Grief Is Very Private" single and it's quite exceptional. I'm surprised at how fucking good this is.
― "lol" as frivolity (Stevie D), Wednesday, 5 August 2009 16:44 (fourteen years ago) link
There's a Lusty Ghosts song toward the end of this podcast..!
http://www.slumberlandrecords.com/extras/podcast/27
― prior, Thursday, 10 June 2010 14:50 (thirteen years ago) link
the "article" I wrote for Swingset Magazine in 2004:
http://swingsetmagazine.com/2012/06/xerox_music_is_here_to_stay/
I may update it one day with newer info, links, color photos etc, and post to the Acute site, but for now you can look at this and learn nothing new.
― dan selzer, Thursday, 14 June 2012 19:54 (eleven years ago) link
Dan, I don't know if it's already been addressed, but do you have the Evening Outs single and the Peel Sessions of the Desperate Bicycles on your burned CDs and if so, is it possible to receive any copies?
― MaRK A Gjr, Saturday, 23 June 2012 22:19 (eleven years ago) link
the desperate bicycles 7"s were all recently bootlegged with added bonus peel sessions tracks added. no sign of a 'remorse code' bootleg though.
― stirmonster, Sunday, 24 June 2012 17:34 (eleven years ago) link
and, great article, dan.
― stirmonster, Sunday, 24 June 2012 17:57 (eleven years ago) link
Thanks. Hopefully I'll do the updated version eventually.
I have the Evening Outs single and the Peel Sessions. Neither were on the original burned CDs.
― dan selzer, Monday, 25 June 2012 21:41 (eleven years ago) link
Mark, when you email people via ilx, you have to include an email address so they can write back!
― dan selzer, Tuesday, 26 June 2012 12:22 (eleven years ago) link
got the 4 "reissue" 7"s todayfirst single is Smokescreen/Handlebars on one side & Occupied Territory/Skill on the other, 2 great singles for the price of one.second single is Medium Was Tedium/Don't Back The Front on one side & 2 tracks from a Peel Session on the other, a slower & more together sounding version of Smokescreen & (i'm assuming) Teacher's Prayer (the sleeve & label have no info at all!)third & fourth singles are pretty straight repros of New Cross & Grief Is Very Private with sleeves changed/added. have to say stylophone/bass/drums is a great idea for a band lineup.
― zappi, Wednesday, 27 June 2012 15:30 (eleven years ago) link
Rough Trade (and a few other places) are currently selling copies of the Remorse Code LP which are supposedly from a legit warehouse find. It's £24.99. I bought one but I'm now wondering if I'm just falling for a ruse to sell a bootleg at an inflated price.
― Just noise and screaming and no musical value at all. (Colonel Poo), Friday, 11 October 2013 09:31 (ten years ago) link
"warehouse find" often means bootleg but it seems odd that rough trade would go to the length of saying These albums look and play as new but you have to remember they are from 33 years ago. You will not find a better copy if they weren't genuine. do you have a copy or are you waiting for it to arrive? the 7"s that were bootlegged have a sheen on the sleeves that the originals didn't have and this might be the case with this if it isn't actually original.
― stirmonster, Friday, 11 October 2013 09:42 (ten years ago) link
i just bought one so i guess i'll find out soon enough.
― stirmonster, Friday, 11 October 2013 09:49 (ten years ago) link
not sure who actually found them but Paco from La Vida Es Un Mus was selling these online the other day. would be p surprised if he was engaging in any underhand monkey business. decided not to buy one cos I can't rly justify (to myself) either spending that much on an LP or flipping it for a profit
― when I was Ted Croker man I couldn't picture this (DJ Mencap), Friday, 11 October 2013 09:53 (ten years ago) link
Paco sells bootlegs all the time but I guess he doesn't normally claim they aren't bootlegs, just doesn't mention that at all.
― Just noise and screaming and no musical value at all. (Colonel Poo), Friday, 11 October 2013 10:00 (ten years ago) link
yeah that's what I figure
― when I was Ted Croker man I couldn't picture this (DJ Mencap), Friday, 11 October 2013 10:07 (ten years ago) link
Oh, to Stirmonster - no I don't have the copy yet, I just ordered it via mail order.
― Just noise and screaming and no musical value at all. (Colonel Poo), Friday, 11 October 2013 11:13 (ten years ago) link
I was sorely tempted, but since I found that VU single I've been, um, sort of, is 'satisfied' the right word?
― Mark G, Friday, 11 October 2013 11:46 (ten years ago) link
...aaaand order cancelled as product is no longer available
― Just noise and screaming and no musical value at all. (Colonel Poo), Friday, 11 October 2013 13:01 (ten years ago) link
same here.
― stirmonster, Friday, 11 October 2013 13:02 (ten years ago) link
and sold out everywhere else too. bah!
― stirmonster, Friday, 11 October 2013 13:03 (ten years ago) link
Hmm, what are the chances Paco still has a couple of these in his gig distro box... I may be going to one of his gigs tonight...
― Just noise and screaming and no musical value at all. (Colonel Poo), Friday, 11 October 2013 13:06 (ten years ago) link
more of a desperate buy cycle amirite
― gotta lol geir (NickB), Friday, 11 October 2013 13:12 (ten years ago) link
I didn't want it anyway.
― Just noise and screaming and no musical value at all. (Colonel Poo), Friday, 11 October 2013 13:14 (ten years ago) link
Oh great, I just saw this. Three hours and sold out? Bahhhhhhhh.
― emil.y, Friday, 11 October 2013 13:19 (ten years ago) link
And £24.99, while not cheap, is not an awful price for originals, seeing as reissues tend to go 'full artefact' and cost easily that much these days. Obviously if it's a boot then it's a rip-off.
― emil.y, Friday, 11 October 2013 13:20 (ten years ago) link