The XX

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1465 of them)

ok ok look there are plenty of ethereal, enfeebled vocalists i like - for the sake of argument - but come on, this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0IfecPU-Hw

is just.. i mean, i know it's a shitty recording but it reminds of of those "eric clapton shreds" videos where a famous guitarist has been overdubbed with amateur noodling. like.. just.. what?

progressive cuts (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 5 October 2010 16:33 (fifteen years ago)

haha

i dont know if im meant to laugh at that robin s cover or not

its good they have an aesthetic but not everything should be made to fit it

titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Tuesday, 5 October 2010 16:35 (fifteen years ago)

i agree in that i think they should knock the 'we loooove dance music btw' covers on the head (esp. as they keep covering pretty unfuckwithable/untoppable anthems). it's not what attracts or interests me about them (or any other bands who do it).

sock lobster (blueski), Tuesday, 5 October 2010 16:35 (fifteen years ago)

as a different thing from just incorporating that influence into your sound generally

sock lobster (blueski), Tuesday, 5 October 2010 16:36 (fifteen years ago)

^^^which they do well

but yeah, i do not want to hear them fucking up any more songs like show me love (or worse, people actually thinking they are improving them)

titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Tuesday, 5 October 2010 16:39 (fifteen years ago)

Agree the Robyn cover is utter shit.

I'm gonna mention ilxor in everyone of my posts until I get dn'd (ilxor), Tuesday, 5 October 2010 16:42 (fifteen years ago)

Admittedly I think their aesthetic works GREAT for some cover versions (e.g., that Womack & Womack tune) but this one's a dud.

I'm gonna mention ilxor in everyone of my posts until I get dn'd (ilxor), Tuesday, 5 October 2010 16:44 (fifteen years ago)

Agree the Robyn cover is utter shit.

lol

progressive cuts (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 5 October 2010 16:44 (fifteen years ago)

if i didnt know it was actually them id have thought it was an xx piss take

wonder what theyre gonna sound like when they stop delivering all their songs in the same way

titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Tuesday, 5 October 2010 16:44 (fifteen years ago)

Why lol? xp

I'm gonna mention ilxor in everyone of my posts until I get dn'd (ilxor), Tuesday, 5 October 2010 16:50 (fifteen years ago)

Their remix work suggests a few interesting directions they could head from here. I'm very curious to see how much their sound will expand/diversify.

Simon H., Tuesday, 5 October 2010 16:51 (fifteen years ago)

it's a common mistake to be fair, ilxor

this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ia2OkrWNmzE

vs this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ps2Jc28tQrw

progressive cuts (Tracer Hand), Tuesday, 5 October 2010 16:54 (fifteen years ago)

ilxor i'm not sure aaliyah would "overpower" x songs - certainly not the word that comes to mind w/ her

avoyoungdro's number (k3vin k.), Tuesday, 5 October 2010 16:55 (fifteen years ago)

Ahahaha I thought they had butchered the Robyn tune so badly I couldn't even recognize it!! looooooooool

Now I know why I didn't recognize it :(

ilxor EPIC FAIL

I'm gonna mention ilxor in everyone of my posts until I get dn'd (ilxor), Tuesday, 5 October 2010 16:58 (fifteen years ago)

yeah shes not fantasia or beyonce or jennifer hudson by any stretch

mentioned her cos shes right at the opp end of rnb singing, one thats much more sensual and understated than blaring in your face

but even she doesnt really do that slightly-try-hard-melancholy/unwavering fragility thing the xx girl does

titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Tuesday, 5 October 2010 16:59 (fifteen years ago)

In the context of R&B, she does. It's interesting seeing Star Search footage of her as a little girl blaring out standards in the typical kid gospel style, to seeing what happened once she got into the studio with R. Kelly and Timbaland.

THE CHOMPING DUCK GETS HIS FATTY OUT FOR VADAR (HI DERE), Tuesday, 5 October 2010 17:04 (fifteen years ago)

i still believe aaliyahs melancholy (like idk, her at your best you are love remake) more than the xx girls (ill google her name one day)

titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Tuesday, 5 October 2010 17:09 (fifteen years ago)

Aaliyah could have done a lot with/for "Basic Space."

raging hetero lifechill (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Tuesday, 5 October 2010 17:11 (fifteen years ago)

That "Show Me Love" cover is decent for what it is; obv. the original is light-years better.

THE CHOMPING DUCK GETS HIS FATTY OUT FOR VADAR (HI DERE), Tuesday, 5 October 2010 17:12 (fifteen years ago)

i agree in that i think they should knock the 'we loooove dance music btw' covers on the head (esp. as they keep covering pretty unfuckwithable/untoppable anthems).

don't know that they're selling these as "we loooooove dance music" so much as "we like pop songs" - Show Me Love and Teardrops are both international #1s, Aaliyah is a pop star more than a dance artist, Do You Mind is something that happens to be around at the time - yeah they're all danceable or dance-oriented, but more notable for broad appeal than being ball-achingly trendy or whatnot. the influences they take from r&b production really aren't an indie band trying to cop tricks inna Madchester stylee, but simply part of what they've grown up on and internalised imo.

besides, their Teardrops is great and I like their Do You Mind as much as the original. (don't know the OG Hot Like Fire, and think ppl should hold the fury over Show Me Love until they release it as an A-side duet with Florence in 2-part CD single, rather than tagging onto one of their own songs live in an attempt to fill out their set to headliner length)

bitchmaid (sic), Wednesday, 6 October 2010 00:09 (fifteen years ago)

read it as club/party music (ie not their home turf) if u prefer - said it before, just a bit (i say BIT) annoyed by it as a thing, partly because it's such a one way street btw i just started imaging them covering propaganda 'duel' lol

sock lobster (blueski), Wednesday, 6 October 2010 01:23 (fifteen years ago)

yeah but I get the impression it isn't club/party music to them, and definitely not in opposition to them and their turf, but just stuff they like - their home turf I don't think can be defined as gtr-indie? a) they don't sound like other indie bands and b) we barely have enough of their actual material to decide what they do sound like yet...

I'm just surmising from my own listening, rather than any knowledge of their own actual position or opinions. (But the only thing I have seen them say about their sound is that it's defined by their inability and inexperience rather than a deliberate choice to play that way! so maybe if they were more skilled technically they'd be dropping complex dancefloor bangers and we'd call them lame copyists.) but at least with Do You Mind and Teardrops, they seem to have internalised and interpreted the originals into their own style (/level of ability) - there's a lot more musical thought than "ironic indie dude/chick with acoustic guitar covering Britney/NWA."

bitchmaid (sic), Wednesday, 6 October 2010 08:14 (fifteen years ago)

finally heard their do you mind cover too. HAHA. well its ok and even quite nice until the chorus starts.

titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Wednesday, 6 October 2010 08:37 (fifteen years ago)

don't know the OG Hot Like Fire

omg you should get 2 know it. it's on a pretty classic aaliyah album.

"teardrops" is the best xx cover - "do you mind" and "hot like fire" are decent but space/minimalism/subtlety were already such big hallmarks of the originals that the xx don't add too much.

لوووووووووووووووووووول (lex pretend), Wednesday, 6 October 2010 09:14 (fifteen years ago)

no its not about space or minimalism, its about them putting everything through their stupid 'dreamy' filter and making it shit. and their hot like fire remake is actually alright, yeah, compared to some of the dreadful others, but it rips out all the sensuality/sexiness of aaliyahs original.

titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Wednesday, 6 October 2010 09:28 (fifteen years ago)

I had a dream the XX released a new album and it was full of really great, slamming choons and I was all "Oh, they're quite good fun actually" and then I woke up and had to go to work.

village idiot (dog latin), Wednesday, 6 October 2010 11:12 (fifteen years ago)

im discounting any comments lex makes about the xx actually seeing as he is prob trying to court them to come to his night again (obv im also assuming that the xx read ilx but whatevs)

titchy (titchyschneiderMk2), Wednesday, 6 October 2010 11:18 (fifteen years ago)

I had a dream that one of them didn't look like Kelly Osbourne, another one didn't look like the bass player from Phish, and the third didn't look like he was going to rob me for meth money, but here we are.

kkvgz, Wednesday, 6 October 2010 11:55 (fifteen years ago)

omg you should get 2 know it.

just youtubed but got a remix which seems to have Tim grunting more than Aaliyah singing. p sure I like the xx cover better than this! will check album vers later

bitchmaid (sic), Wednesday, 6 October 2010 13:26 (fifteen years ago)

Here's a link to a YouTube of the original: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dLvckcTHoqA

DC_Paul, Wednesday, 6 October 2010 14:53 (fifteen years ago)

that's waay better than the remix. I'm sure that if I'd been familiar with it though, that I'd just like the xx version even more: the Aaliyah delivery of “...kiss ...kiss ...and kiss and kiss and kiss” makes it something of a light fancy, if anything distancing herself in action from the promised passion of the title and verses. The xx’s languorous reading translates it through one of their particular strengths, addressing longing and desire with an adolescent weight that leans more on the feelings themselves, the distraction and discombobulation they engender, than on any specific object of those feelings. (The almost-in-sync delivery of Romy and Oliver is also v effective here.)

bitchmaid (sic), Thursday, 7 October 2010 00:31 (fifteen years ago)

The diff is that Aaliyah and company could sing about being scared or lacking confidence and be confident in saying it. The indie/XX version of that, which works well on their own songs, is a fundamental lack of confidence. Not necessarily in the ability to perform music, but in the sentiment expressed.

mh, Thursday, 7 October 2010 02:11 (fifteen years ago)

I don't really read either of them as being scared or lacking confidence! Aaliyah is being a bit playful, telling the dude to wait a bit bcz she'll be ready soon (but she's almost ready); the xx are achingly ready now, but enjoying wallowing in the anticipation caused by delayed gratification.

bitchmaid (sic), Thursday, 7 October 2010 06:08 (fifteen years ago)

yeah, didn't necessarily means specifically Aaliyah or specifically that song.

mh, Thursday, 7 October 2010 13:55 (fifteen years ago)

romy xx seems to have done vocals on the debut creep single, and deadboy's remix of it is on his (terrific) mix here - http://www.thefader.com/2010/10/07/deadboys-bouncers-dream-mix-mp3/

really interesting to hear her voice out of the usual xx context, it's really effective - really looking forward to that single.

لوووووووووووووووووووول (lex pretend), Friday, 8 October 2010 08:02 (fifteen years ago)

So, when my dad was driving last night, The XX was playing on whatever satellite radio station he was on.

mh, Friday, 8 October 2010 15:23 (fifteen years ago)

saw hamlet at the NT last night and ophelia was listening to the XX in her first scene :-/

jabba hands, Wednesday, 20 October 2010 20:44 (fifteen years ago)

Maybe we're in an Orwellian phase and humanity has always been listening to the xx over the centuries.

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 20 October 2010 20:45 (fifteen years ago)

ophelia otm

boxes of mint aeros I have eaten in a week (sic), Wednesday, 20 October 2010 22:10 (fifteen years ago)

-----spoiler-----

she kills herself

jabba hands, Wednesday, 20 October 2010 22:12 (fifteen years ago)

four weeks pass...

EVERYONE on Facebook has the xx in their liked bands now

ralph NAGLer (admrl), Thursday, 18 November 2010 01:57 (fifteen years ago)

the fuck they do

what's up, my cobbers, we're having Smorgy's tonight! (electricsound), Thursday, 18 November 2010 01:58 (fifteen years ago)

don't u try it, I've kicked people's faces off for saying less

ralph NAGLer (admrl), Thursday, 18 November 2010 02:44 (fifteen years ago)

one month passes...

Drake working with Florence Welch and The xx's Jamie Smith

http://www.nme.com/news/drake--2/54540

just sayin, Thursday, 13 January 2011 21:54 (fifteen years ago)

Oh man, i get the feeling Florence's second album is gonna be a doozy.

Number None, Thursday, 13 January 2011 21:54 (fifteen years ago)

drake + the xx makes sense

was there ever an official release of jamie's single -- i <3d the radio rip

J0rdan S., Thursday, 13 January 2011 21:55 (fifteen years ago)

no, but i assume you've heard his adele remix that sent everyone nuts last week?

it's really nice but the creep/romy xx that STILL NO ONE IS CARING ABOUT is way better

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Thursday, 13 January 2011 21:57 (fifteen years ago)

oh yeah hearing the gil scott-heron remix album didn't really alter my opinion on it

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Thursday, 13 January 2011 21:57 (fifteen years ago)

I thought the Creep single was getting a decent buzz from the FACT crowd?

Number None, Thursday, 13 January 2011 21:59 (fifteen years ago)

haven't seen much of that! it prob got a positive review but not even a hundredth of the buzz that jamie's adele remix did.

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Thursday, 13 January 2011 22:01 (fifteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.