titus andronicus - the monitor

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (438 of them)

this album is top 10 ever for me

"bubbling" pictures for mormon approved j0hn (J0rdan S.), Friday, 3 September 2010 07:09 (fifteen years ago)

i feel like i need to find stickles and hug him but i don't think he showers at all

"bubbling" pictures for mormon approved j0hn (J0rdan S.), Friday, 3 September 2010 07:09 (fifteen years ago)

me and my mans handed our glasses off to our dates to go into the pit during titus andronicus forever

lol

ITS YA BOY (zorn_bond.mp3), Friday, 3 September 2010 07:10 (fifteen years ago)

CONTACTS, SON

"bubbling" pictures for mormon approved j0hn (J0rdan S.), Friday, 3 September 2010 07:10 (fifteen years ago)

glasses define my face dogg there is no doing without

otherwise i can't even be seen ~while~ craning your neck

ITS YA BOY (zorn_bond.mp3), Friday, 3 September 2010 07:11 (fifteen years ago)

lol

"bubbling" pictures for mormon approved j0hn (J0rdan S.), Friday, 3 September 2010 07:12 (fifteen years ago)

*glasses fall down on a photo of h*os*

DEAL WITH IT

is what you're saying

"bubbling" pictures for mormon approved j0hn (J0rdan S.), Friday, 3 September 2010 07:12 (fifteen years ago)

well

ITS YA BOY (zorn_bond.mp3), Friday, 3 September 2010 07:13 (fifteen years ago)

one month passes...

talk about our grandkids
stroke our grey beards
funny we're still doin car bombs
after all these years

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Saturday, 9 October 2010 00:59 (fifteen years ago)

busy tonight with the excerpts, hoos

raging hetero lifechill (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Saturday, 9 October 2010 01:03 (fifteen years ago)

'car bombs' urgh

thomp, Saturday, 9 October 2010 10:48 (fifteen years ago)

so irish

thomp, Saturday, 9 October 2010 10:48 (fifteen years ago)

just want to reiterate: one of the best sets ever seen by a hoos

BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Tuesday, 12 October 2010 07:02 (fifteen years ago)

this album is still pretty cool now I'm giving it another listen

acoleuthic, Monday, 18 October 2010 15:44 (fifteen years ago)

I mean I only gave it a listen coz hoos' current girl sitch reminded me of his posting itt but it's kinda synching up with me too in some weird way

acoleuthic, Monday, 18 October 2010 15:45 (fifteen years ago)

love.

definatelypoopsmcgee (chrisv2010), Monday, 18 October 2010 16:58 (fifteen years ago)

one month passes...

me + one of my bros are seeing these dudes tonight! PSYCHED

just sayin, Thursday, 25 November 2010 11:21 (fifteen years ago)

four weeks pass...

i figured out what was bugging me about "Richard II" which is that the melodic/harmonic structure is like a perfect imitation of old Okkervil River songs. plus the singers sound somewhat similar too.

but yeah anyway this album finally clicked for me and it is glorious

ciderpress, Friday, 24 December 2010 06:19 (fifteen years ago)

I'm three songs in but what's the diff between this shit and stuff like flogging molly or dropkick murphys

guess I should hear the album all the way through first

dayo, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 13:09 (fifteen years ago)

racist

Roberto Spiralli, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 13:18 (fifteen years ago)

more than halfway through and I guess this just isn't my thing

was trying to think why this rock band was getting indie acclaim, and then yeah ppl nailed it upthread, this is who the crits are crowning as the next hold steady, indie palatable bar rock

I guess I like my emotional punk harder/with stronger hooks and more abrasive instrumentation. this album is kind of polite and underwritten.

dayo, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 14:51 (fifteen years ago)

damn i don't think that describes it at all

k3vin k., Wednesday, 29 December 2010 17:13 (fifteen years ago)

yeah, i would not call this album polite

Mordy, Wednesday, 29 December 2010 17:14 (fifteen years ago)

I guess I should qualify that by saying it seems polite when you consider what they're trying to achieve, this balls out catharsis, the singer gets into it but doesn't really get into it, that's cool, but the instrumentation doesn't really pick up the slack

there's not really any aggression

dayo, Thursday, 30 December 2010 01:11 (fifteen years ago)

I'm wondering now if dayo is even listening to the right record, because I don't hear any of his criticisms when I listen to it. If anything, the record seems a little overwritten to me, there are a few places when things could have been a little streamlined to pack more of a punch. And I'm not sure just how much more you are wanting the lead singer to get into it, I mean, dude seems to be throwing a whole lot of himself into it. There are plenty of valid criticisms of this record - a little too precious at times, a wee bit overbearing with the whole Springsteen-indebted rock, among others - but I don't hear any of dayo's complaints among them. But, I'm sensitive because I really love this record and I want more people to discover the exuberance I hear in it.

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 30 December 2010 01:20 (fifteen years ago)

yeah jon I realize that I come at this from a diff background, having grown up with super emotive power pop punk. when I say underwritten, I mean the sing along parts aren't really worth singing along too - they're not hooky enough. I guess I wish the songs were tighter, or made up for their sloppiness in some other way. like a good counterpoint to this record I feel would be the drones, whose songs have that same sort of rambly quality but their's a lot more base-level aggressiveness and viscerality that justifies it

this album seems polite as in it's something that seems like you should be able to mosh to and dance around to, but when you try to jump in there's just not enough sonic OOMPH to carry it

dayo, Thursday, 30 December 2010 01:27 (fifteen years ago)

Okay, I totally get where are you coming from wrt to the "underwritten" now, yeah, this isn't something I come to looking for big sing-alongs (thats been this year's Superchunk, My Chem, and Against Me records), but I still feel a good sense of catharsis in it. I wasn't trying to be harsh with my post, I was just struck by your posts because I had pretty much the exact opposite reaction! I can see where you are coming from now, though I'm still not sure I agree with you on all of it.

one pretty obvious guy in the obvious (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 30 December 2010 04:39 (fifteen years ago)

i'm really stunned by the idea that this record, with its doubletime breakdowns and gang chorus singalongs and fuckin bagpipes and multiple-guitar-solo epics is lacking for any kind of oomph, and i too am coming out of a 90s power punk background

~~confused~~

aka the pope (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Thursday, 30 December 2010 04:57 (fifteen years ago)

FUCKING

k3vin k., Thursday, 30 December 2010 04:59 (fifteen years ago)

BAGPIPES

k3vin k., Thursday, 30 December 2010 04:59 (fifteen years ago)

IT'S STILL US AGAINST THEM, IT'S STILL US AGAINST THEM

markers, Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:03 (fifteen years ago)

hoos

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FEIxbO7g10g

ya mean?

dayo, Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:06 (fifteen years ago)

xp

srsly when i saw them they closed w/that one and the whole club was going apeshit screaming along it was like O_____________________________________________O

aka the pope (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:07 (fifteen years ago)

if I went to a Titus Andronicus show, I hope I would be doing the same!

markers, Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:08 (fifteen years ago)

dayo yes just like that, i feel like titus is the anthemic high energy feel of am! given a stately lit snob strut, or if you like that they have more in common with the pogues than (say) flogging molly or dropkick murphys have in common with the pogues. what they lack in melodic momentum they more than make up in sonic & emotional fury, i think.

aka the pope (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:11 (fifteen years ago)

and plz do not let my previous post imply that i was not screaming along tbh

^______________^ may have been more appropriate but after that many beers it was more like \m/ >_________________> \m/

aka the pope (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:12 (fifteen years ago)

FUCKING

― k3vin k., Thursday, December 30, 2010 4:59 AM (12 minutes ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

BAGPIPES

― k3vin k., Thursday, December 30, 2010 4:59 AM (12 minutes ago) Bookmark

this will always
be correct kev
this will always
be correct kev
this will always
be correct kev
this will always
be correct kev
and that's
o
kay

aka the pope (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:13 (fifteen years ago)

haha hoos see titus andronicus comes nowhere near close to AM! on that front. I think my fondest show memories were seeing AM! around the reinventing axl rose period and climbing on stage and doing the sing along and getting the shit kicked out of me by all these other meathead punks. somehow I just can't see a Titus Andronicus show descending into that level of dionysian formlessness

dayo, Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:15 (fifteen years ago)

for one thing, it's much too midtempo and mannered

dayo, Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:16 (fifteen years ago)

i love these guys, but the show i saw of them was kinda lacking in a real sense of power at least from the audience's end. that said, they were opening for vampire weekend, and i bet if they were playing warped tour it would be explosive

Mordy, Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:17 (fifteen years ago)

haha man i cant ever imagine these dudes playing warped tour

aka the pope (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:18 (fifteen years ago)

which maybe says everything i'm trying to say

aka the pope (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:18 (fifteen years ago)

that like that would never happen, and thats acceptable to me, cause that's not why i listen to them

aka the pope (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:19 (fifteen years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7AgIaF_o40

^^ gives me chills

dayo, Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:19 (fifteen years ago)

titus are playing here with the pogues in march and i am amped beyond words to see em again

aka the pope (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:19 (fifteen years ago)

and AM! is already plenty lit snob stately fuiud

dayo, Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:20 (fifteen years ago)

I want to break something

dayo, Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:20 (fifteen years ago)

UP THE PUNX

dayo, Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:21 (fifteen years ago)

i love Against Me (and Gaslight Anthem) even more than Titus and I think the Warped Tour unnamed dynamic thing might have to do with it

Mordy, Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:22 (fifteen years ago)

i mean i feel like dayo is totally right that what these guys do lacks the melodic momentum, the gasp-out-every-word-from-the-depth-of-the-mosh-pit-ness, of someone like an am! or even a rise against, but again: i think what they lack in that kind of immediacy they make up in richness and attention to detail.

but then, i came to this record with absolutely no idea what it sounded like and literally nothing to go on but

http://i11.tinypic.com/4bfnofo.jpg
― suge knight btw (J0rdan S.), Wednesday, February 24, 2010 5:52 AM (10 months ago) Bookmark

so i didn't have a lot of preconceptions or expectations.

plus the whole 'my breakup was totally just like the civil war, i swear' narrative had more than a few personal resonances for me, what with having a breakup that was totally just like the civil war (i swear) like the week i bought & over the ensuing two months that i processed this record.

aka the pope (BIG HOOS aka the steendriver), Thursday, 30 December 2010 05:29 (fifteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.