it's a good song, but hardly the best thing they did in the 90s (see: kool thing, mote, bull in the heather, the diamond sea and hits of sunshine, just to start with).
There's too much of that going on with this list ... picking the "underappreciated" song instead of the more obvious hit. "Say it Ain't So?" "Only Shallow?"
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:10 (fifteen years ago)
Only Shallow kickstarted that album in the most shocking possible way. Great choice I think...
― Dan S, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:14 (fifteen years ago)
I'm not gonna go through this, is there literally one metal song? And it's Danzig?
― office (max) (Whiney G. Weingarten), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:15 (fifteen years ago)
The most glaring omission was "Let The Rhythm Hit Em."
― billstevejim, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:15 (fifteen years ago)
ban all pitchfork writes from this board for allowing biggie to place outside of the top 10
― "bubbling" pictures for mormon approved j0hn (J0rdan S.), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:16 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah no metal wtf.. Where's "Holy Wars???"
― billstevejim, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:17 (fifteen years ago)
at least aaliyah made it into the top 10
― "bubbling" pictures for mormon approved j0hn (J0rdan S.), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:19 (fifteen years ago)
I'm way more tired of "Say It Ain't So" and "Loser" than "Gold Soundz". Those two songs are still being overplayed on the radio.
― her lover who appeared to come from her behind on a car (KMS), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:20 (fifteen years ago)
like seriously not even being a pedantic "wot u don't listen to carcass" troll about it, but like
what's up dudeshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jBfygUiS50g&ob=av2e
not much yallhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ESjyB8EMw4w
can i play too?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AkFqg5wAuFk
can i justhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rloidlFbi4w
i meanhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iaysTVcounI
but then alsohttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yPNFVj-pISU
― office (max) (Whiney G. Weingarten), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:21 (fifteen years ago)
it's not exactly like theres some shortage of metal that crossed over into the alternasphere in the 90s
― office (max) (Whiney G. Weingarten), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:22 (fifteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uY3LAFJbKyY
― markers, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:22 (fifteen years ago)
(a song I don't even really like that much)
I'd have to check, but it's probably the worst song on the black album
― markers, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:23 (fifteen years ago)
That's cool, but Holy Wars is a better song than all of those..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f4OPQBNXdfc
and..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JPUe1nv4gIk&ob
― billstevejim, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:23 (fifteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JfZMXR-a6fg
― office (max) (Whiney G. Weingarten), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:24 (fifteen years ago)
goodnight little dudehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hglVqACd1C8
― office (max) (Whiney G. Weingarten), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:25 (fifteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALPH86ybA6U
― billstevejim, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:27 (fifteen years ago)
I like that melvins track. body count too
― Dan S, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:28 (fifteen years ago)
but yeah, even the most indiest, most p4k friendly strains of hard/heavy/noisy music got short shrift. (billstevejim otm - no melvins wtf?) like not only is indie streamlined into its least confrontational, most comforting strains, the slack is taken up by expansion into pop genres that are heavily covered and well-represented everywhere.
i am one of these people who will find something to pout about no matter what.
― a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:30 (fifteen years ago)
if this stuff is really annoying to you (any of you), and barely covers the music you are genuinely interested in, then why bother paying attention to pitchfork?
― sarahel, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:32 (fifteen years ago)
billstevejim otm - no melvins wtf?
That was Whiney.. I was bummed out by no Megadeth or Slayer or Eric B & Rakim.
― billstevejim, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:34 (fifteen years ago)
i think you just broke the code
xp
― ITS YA BOY (zorn_bond.mp3), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:36 (fifteen years ago)
it's a sincere question. it wasn't meant as a "won't you just stfu about pitchfork already" post
― sarahel, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:37 (fifteen years ago)
i don't know. in part because it (pitchfork) so dominates the discourse, and i'm interested not just in music, but in the conversation about music. by that i don't just mean talking about music w my friends, which i do all the time, but the way that cultural "tastemakers" process the idea of music. and ilm is big part of my connection to that ongoing critical dialogue about music. therefore, what ilm talks about, i pay attention to. therefore, pitchfork. and beyond that, i can't pretend that i'm not indie at heart. a big part of my sense of what music is and can mean was formed in the mid 80s by bands like the replacements, husker du, sonic youth, big black, butthole surfers, etc. gotta be true to my roots.
― a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:39 (fifteen years ago)
nicely done.
― ITS YA BOY (zorn_bond.mp3), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:40 (fifteen years ago)
I think it also goes back to what seandalai said upthread, that we care about Pitchfork in a way that we don't necessarily about Rolling Stone or NME, "it's part of the information universe with which we associate ourselves. When they screw up we complain because they could conceivably have done better."
― Dan S, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:41 (fifteen years ago)
so you feel that pitchfork represents your taste - or should represent your tastes?
― sarahel, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:42 (fifteen years ago)
yes to some extent, for me, at least more than other review sites except maybe the wire
― Dan S, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:44 (fifteen years ago)
no. maybe i'm misstating (by habitual rhetorical overkill) the idea that any of this is really annoying to me. it isn't. not at all. i think the pitchfork list is cool for what it is, and don't really care about it anyway. i guess what i'm operating from is a sense that "my music" - the fucked-up, bloody-knuckled strain of indie rock that i've always been most in love with - has become increasingly marginal and even moribund. this makes me feel old and grumpy.
xpost
― a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:44 (fifteen years ago)
Another glaring omission
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gUFO9vRH_A
― billstevejim, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:45 (fifteen years ago)
marginal to what, what pitchfork covers? i mean, it isn't like pitchfork is the cable company that has a local/regional monopoly. you can find music criticism in other places.
― sarahel, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:46 (fifteen years ago)
lol at galling lack of cannibal corpse
― a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:47 (fifteen years ago)
I don't think any of us knows ALL the writers at Pitchfork, but most of us know a few (and it's a different few for everyone), so there's definitely an interest that goes beyond just that of the normal reader. When they, as a collective, fuck up a list in a very little or a very big way, it's kind of like we're slinking around at the back of the bar, laughing with the rest of your friends about how your one other mutual friend is totally blowing it onstage doing a karaoke version of "Total Eclipse of the Heart."
― Johnny Fever, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:47 (fifteen years ago)
or is this just one of those threads where people complain about the results of some poll, the way grumpy old people complain how expensive everything is nowadays - because it is a way of bonding with others?
― sarahel, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:48 (fifteen years ago)
I think what it comes down to, for myself at least, is that Pitchfork is understood to be a tastemaker and canon builder, and that lists like this represent the construction of the 90s canon (for example). People are annoyed or pissed that Pitchfork--for, pick you favorite indie-baiting reason--edited their favorites out of the canon.
― ITS YA BOY (zorn_bond.mp3), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:48 (fifteen years ago)
the 90s canon for a particular affinity group, it isn't creating _the_ canon
― sarahel, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:49 (fifteen years ago)
i think it comes down to this
if you care about music crit you care about pitchfork & their lists & what they review & how they review it & what score it gets
if you don't care about music crit you likely don't care about any of those things
― "bubbling" pictures for mormon approved j0hn (J0rdan S.), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:49 (fifteen years ago)
Well of course, but this is ILM--isn't is understood that the "particular affinity group" of Pitchfork is going to have a vast overlap with the "particular affinity group" of ILM?
― ITS YA BOY (zorn_bond.mp3), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:50 (fifteen years ago)
I just think it's fun.. isn't that enough?
― billstevejim, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:50 (fifteen years ago)
i'm pretty sure i'm otm and we can move on
― "bubbling" pictures for mormon approved j0hn (J0rdan S.), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:51 (fifteen years ago)
fuckin guy
― ITS YA BOY (zorn_bond.mp3), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:51 (fifteen years ago)
i care somewhat about music crit, but i don't really care about most of the music pitchfork covers - and most of that is bands/records from my youth, and i don't really care about whether this or that major/large indie label record or song by a band of people i don't know personally makes some website's top 200 of a previous decade.
― sarahel, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:52 (fifteen years ago)
re, sarah: oh yeah, i know. again, i'm not really saying that pitchfork would better if it were different, or raging about the fact that the shit i'm interested in doesn't get adequate coverage. though they're so occasional as to seem dead, termbo do a decent job at hitting like 25% of it, and mosurak/still single bats clean-up for like half of the rest. if i were truly madly deeply serious about the remainder, i'd be reading the wire, decibel and other forums more regularly. but i'm not, and maybe i'm just trying to steer discussion here towards a corner of the indie universe that doesn't get much attention, even on ilm. like how many people post in rolling punk or les rallizes denudes threads?
this is my revenge.
― a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:53 (fifteen years ago)
So I guess the question becomes this: we're all enjoying ourselves to varying degrees for various reasons--why are YOU on this thread afaik xp
― ITS YA BOY (zorn_bond.mp3), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:53 (fifteen years ago)
sarahel is playing the morbs role iirc -- but with more sanity of course
― "bubbling" pictures for mormon approved j0hn (J0rdan S.), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:54 (fifteen years ago)
contenderizer: dusted is pretty solid
z_b: curiosity? maybe unhealthy? idk
― sarahel, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:55 (fifteen years ago)
i think you, sarah, are distinctly and perhaps (close to) uniquely outside the venn diagram, relative to most of the regular p4k thread coffee klatch/bitch fest. i mean, you are just not sufficiently indie.
― a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:56 (fifteen years ago)
no offense...
imidswtpitbh
― ITS YA BOY (zorn_bond.mp3), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:57 (fifteen years ago)
lol - i am insufficiently indie it is true! thank you all for sincerely answering my sincere questions. i feel like i have learned something v important about ilx tonight.
― sarahel, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:57 (fifteen years ago)