All of the artists in the top 40 on that list except Talk Talk, I think, are included here
― Dan S, Friday, 3 September 2010 05:38 (fifteen years ago)
i love the fact that Pulp came in second, totally deserving and really surprising to me. Pulp just seem more of a British/NME thing, so for Pitchfork to give it that good of placement is sort of cool.
Pavement, Radiohead, My Bloody Valentine, Neutral Milk Hotel and Beck are Top 10 indie = makes sense but Nirvana got robbed.
― Bee OK, Friday, 3 September 2010 05:44 (fifteen years ago)
we got "Gold Soundz" @ #1
huh
― ITS YA BOY (zorn_bond.mp3), Friday, 3 September 2010 05:45 (fifteen years ago)
A hiphop #1 would've been way cooler.
― billstevejim, Friday, 3 September 2010 05:45 (fifteen years ago)
i couldn't sing appx 9 of these 20 songs if you held a gun to my head
― office (max) (Whiney G. Weingarten), Friday, 3 September 2010 05:45 (fifteen years ago)
Like seriously.. "Protect Ya Neck" would've been a perfect #1.
― billstevejim, Friday, 3 September 2010 05:46 (fifteen years ago)
ugh, Neutral Milk Hotel in the top 10 + Pavement at #1 sort of spoils all the fun of the list for me. Shoulda known.
― Johnny Fever, Friday, 3 September 2010 05:47 (fifteen years ago)
"Holland 1945" is really good though..
― billstevejim, Friday, 3 September 2010 05:47 (fifteen years ago)
Oh.. well I know all 20.
― billstevejim, Friday, 3 September 2010 05:52 (fifteen years ago)
pitsfork ha.
uh, seems both solid and honestly representative of their brand as it currently stands. personally bummed to see sonic youth top out at #60 with 100%. it's a good song, but hardly the best thing they did in the 90s (see: kool thing, mote, bull in the heather, the diamond sea and hits of sunshine, just to start with). cruelly understates the shadow they cast over that decade, imo. that oasis and neutral milk hotel are given SO much more credit kinda lays me low.
the diminution of sonic youth is paralleled by the fact that there's zero representation for the rock/punk/metal/psych garbage that's most near & dear to me. i wouldn't have expected to see much of it, but the most obvious omissions include things like the jesus lizard, shellac, boredoms, brainiac, RFTC, skullflower and polvo. no matter how you slice it, a pretty thorough repudiation of the strains of indie rock that i actually give a shit about. but i never turned to pitchfork for that kind of support in the first place, so no surprise. maybe these bands & artists, like the experimental stuff whiney was talking about, belong more to albums than tracks? dunno...
― a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Friday, 3 September 2010 05:55 (fifteen years ago)
man with the exception of stupid ol pavement i fuck with every song on that list
― max, Friday, 3 September 2010 05:58 (fifteen years ago)
the top 20 i mean
jesus lizard and boredoms were both on the list iirc
― Dan S, Friday, 3 September 2010 05:58 (fifteen years ago)
There was a typo.. #1 was actually Sleep "Dopesmoker"
― billstevejim, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:00 (fifteen years ago)
yeah, sorry about the tired/boozy lack of clarity. in my head, i was talking about the top 100, though i didn't actually say that anywhere.
― a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:02 (fifteen years ago)
it's a good song, but hardly the best thing they did in the 90s (see: kool thing, mote, bull in the heather, the diamond sea and hits of sunshine, just to start with).
There's too much of that going on with this list ... picking the "underappreciated" song instead of the more obvious hit. "Say it Ain't So?" "Only Shallow?"
― NoTimeBeforeTime, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:10 (fifteen years ago)
Only Shallow kickstarted that album in the most shocking possible way. Great choice I think...
― Dan S, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:14 (fifteen years ago)
I'm not gonna go through this, is there literally one metal song? And it's Danzig?
― office (max) (Whiney G. Weingarten), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:15 (fifteen years ago)
The most glaring omission was "Let The Rhythm Hit Em."
― billstevejim, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:15 (fifteen years ago)
ban all pitchfork writes from this board for allowing biggie to place outside of the top 10
― "bubbling" pictures for mormon approved j0hn (J0rdan S.), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:16 (fifteen years ago)
Yeah no metal wtf.. Where's "Holy Wars???"
― billstevejim, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:17 (fifteen years ago)
at least aaliyah made it into the top 10
― "bubbling" pictures for mormon approved j0hn (J0rdan S.), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:19 (fifteen years ago)
I'm way more tired of "Say It Ain't So" and "Loser" than "Gold Soundz". Those two songs are still being overplayed on the radio.
― her lover who appeared to come from her behind on a car (KMS), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:20 (fifteen years ago)
like seriously not even being a pedantic "wot u don't listen to carcass" troll about it, but like
what's up dudeshttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jBfygUiS50g&ob=av2e
not much yallhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ESjyB8EMw4w
can i play too?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AkFqg5wAuFk
can i justhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rloidlFbi4w
i meanhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iaysTVcounI
but then alsohttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yPNFVj-pISU
― office (max) (Whiney G. Weingarten), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:21 (fifteen years ago)
it's not exactly like theres some shortage of metal that crossed over into the alternasphere in the 90s
― office (max) (Whiney G. Weingarten), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:22 (fifteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uY3LAFJbKyY
― markers, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:22 (fifteen years ago)
(a song I don't even really like that much)
I'd have to check, but it's probably the worst song on the black album
― markers, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:23 (fifteen years ago)
That's cool, but Holy Wars is a better song than all of those..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f4OPQBNXdfc
and..
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JPUe1nv4gIk&ob
― billstevejim, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:23 (fifteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JfZMXR-a6fg
― office (max) (Whiney G. Weingarten), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:24 (fifteen years ago)
goodnight little dudehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hglVqACd1C8
― office (max) (Whiney G. Weingarten), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:25 (fifteen years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALPH86ybA6U
― billstevejim, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:27 (fifteen years ago)
I like that melvins track. body count too
― Dan S, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:28 (fifteen years ago)
but yeah, even the most indiest, most p4k friendly strains of hard/heavy/noisy music got short shrift. (billstevejim otm - no melvins wtf?) like not only is indie streamlined into its least confrontational, most comforting strains, the slack is taken up by expansion into pop genres that are heavily covered and well-represented everywhere.
i am one of these people who will find something to pout about no matter what.
― a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:30 (fifteen years ago)
if this stuff is really annoying to you (any of you), and barely covers the music you are genuinely interested in, then why bother paying attention to pitchfork?
― sarahel, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:32 (fifteen years ago)
billstevejim otm - no melvins wtf?
That was Whiney.. I was bummed out by no Megadeth or Slayer or Eric B & Rakim.
― billstevejim, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:34 (fifteen years ago)
i think you just broke the code
xp
― ITS YA BOY (zorn_bond.mp3), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:36 (fifteen years ago)
it's a sincere question. it wasn't meant as a "won't you just stfu about pitchfork already" post
― sarahel, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:37 (fifteen years ago)
i don't know. in part because it (pitchfork) so dominates the discourse, and i'm interested not just in music, but in the conversation about music. by that i don't just mean talking about music w my friends, which i do all the time, but the way that cultural "tastemakers" process the idea of music. and ilm is big part of my connection to that ongoing critical dialogue about music. therefore, what ilm talks about, i pay attention to. therefore, pitchfork. and beyond that, i can't pretend that i'm not indie at heart. a big part of my sense of what music is and can mean was formed in the mid 80s by bands like the replacements, husker du, sonic youth, big black, butthole surfers, etc. gotta be true to my roots.
― a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:39 (fifteen years ago)
nicely done.
― ITS YA BOY (zorn_bond.mp3), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:40 (fifteen years ago)
I think it also goes back to what seandalai said upthread, that we care about Pitchfork in a way that we don't necessarily about Rolling Stone or NME, "it's part of the information universe with which we associate ourselves. When they screw up we complain because they could conceivably have done better."
― Dan S, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:41 (fifteen years ago)
so you feel that pitchfork represents your taste - or should represent your tastes?
― sarahel, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:42 (fifteen years ago)
yes to some extent, for me, at least more than other review sites except maybe the wire
― Dan S, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:44 (fifteen years ago)
no. maybe i'm misstating (by habitual rhetorical overkill) the idea that any of this is really annoying to me. it isn't. not at all. i think the pitchfork list is cool for what it is, and don't really care about it anyway. i guess what i'm operating from is a sense that "my music" - the fucked-up, bloody-knuckled strain of indie rock that i've always been most in love with - has become increasingly marginal and even moribund. this makes me feel old and grumpy.
xpost
― a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:44 (fifteen years ago)
Another glaring omission
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5gUFO9vRH_A
― billstevejim, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:45 (fifteen years ago)
marginal to what, what pitchfork covers? i mean, it isn't like pitchfork is the cable company that has a local/regional monopoly. you can find music criticism in other places.
― sarahel, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:46 (fifteen years ago)
lol at galling lack of cannibal corpse
― a dystopian society awaits if we continue on this path. (contenderizer), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:47 (fifteen years ago)
I don't think any of us knows ALL the writers at Pitchfork, but most of us know a few (and it's a different few for everyone), so there's definitely an interest that goes beyond just that of the normal reader. When they, as a collective, fuck up a list in a very little or a very big way, it's kind of like we're slinking around at the back of the bar, laughing with the rest of your friends about how your one other mutual friend is totally blowing it onstage doing a karaoke version of "Total Eclipse of the Heart."
― Johnny Fever, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:47 (fifteen years ago)
or is this just one of those threads where people complain about the results of some poll, the way grumpy old people complain how expensive everything is nowadays - because it is a way of bonding with others?
― sarahel, Friday, 3 September 2010 06:48 (fifteen years ago)
I think what it comes down to, for myself at least, is that Pitchfork is understood to be a tastemaker and canon builder, and that lists like this represent the construction of the 90s canon (for example). People are annoyed or pissed that Pitchfork--for, pick you favorite indie-baiting reason--edited their favorites out of the canon.
― ITS YA BOY (zorn_bond.mp3), Friday, 3 September 2010 06:48 (fifteen years ago)