maybe it's possibe that someone thinks it "BONKERS" (as he says) in a good way, i dunno.
― jed_, Thursday, 29 July 2010 02:45 (fifteen years ago)
i'll be honest, that paul lester write up really makes me want this album. but then i have been on a golden era ZTT trip of late.the trevor horn styled production excess on we cant fly did it for me, so a whole album of such madness will probably suit me just fine.
― mark e, Thursday, 29 July 2010 07:30 (fifteen years ago)
I really fucking hate the undercurrent of snotty dismissiveness of those Paul Lester columns, it's like whenever he's outside his comfort zone his pieces are drenched in "you're probably not going to like this so let's just have a lol". His Lady Chann piece made me wonder why they don't just rotate the column among writers who know what they're talking about.
― Matt DC, Thursday, 29 July 2010 08:44 (fifteen years ago)
^ would be a great idea.
Anyway, as to the ZTT/Trevor Horn aspect of this album: there really isn't one. That's a completely bullshit comparison. Horn made songs (both good and bad) sound MASSIVE. The Aeroplane album sounds hacked together with reverb fx to make things artificially large.
― Johnny Fever, Thursday, 29 July 2010 09:05 (fifteen years ago)
yeah the lester article reeks of someone skipping through the album one time only, having a chuckle, isn't sure if it's good or not because he doesn't understand this new-fangled modern music thing, remembers the scissor sister getting some acclaim so thinks fuck it and bigs it up from a bizarrely wrongheaded fairground disco/rock opera POV. he's an awful awful writer, one of the very worst on the guardian.
― NI, Thursday, 29 July 2010 09:10 (fifteen years ago)
Nothing stopping a remix collection I reckon: DJ Koze's comp from last year was excellent.
― Tim F, Thursday, 29 July 2010 09:40 (fifteen years ago)
Eh? I don't get that column. In what sense are Aeroplane a "new band"?
― procedurally generated pidyn (Masonic Boom), Thursday, 29 July 2010 09:42 (fifteen years ago)
errm i think overblown pomp IS lester's comfort zone, this is the guy whose favourite album ever is a wizard, a true star.
i haven't heard the aeroplane album yet but he's made it sound appealing to me...
― fisherspwner (braveclub), Thursday, 29 July 2010 09:55 (fifteen years ago)
new band with one member... i guess you're not really a band until you put an album out.
― haido, Thursday, 29 July 2010 10:43 (fifteen years ago)
Seems a willfully rockist and retro definition to apply to a dance artist but hey it's Paul Lester. What do I expect? ;-)
― procedurally generated pidyn (Masonic Boom), Thursday, 29 July 2010 11:00 (fifteen years ago)
it is the guardian, not resident advisor
― village idiot (dog latin), Thursday, 29 July 2010 13:00 (fifteen years ago)
this guardian write-up makes the album sound kind of amazing
One should always take Lester with a massive pinch of salt, but actually all the descriptions on this thread, including from ppl who are slagging it off, make me want to hear this. (Full disclosure: involvement of Bertrand Burgalat is a selling point for me, not a "Run away, run away!" signal)
― Jeff W, Thursday, 29 July 2010 16:26 (fifteen years ago)
i've found it's often the case, you can rave about how good something is until your mouth runs dry and no one will pick you up on it, but the minute you start frothing about how BAD it is literally everyone rushes to check it out
― لوووووووووووووووووووول (lex pretend), Thursday, 29 July 2010 17:13 (fifteen years ago)
1. I want to hear this because of the way the record is being described and the comparisons being made with other acts (that I happen to like) and for no other reason. I'm not interested in rubbernecking a car crash. I'll make up my own mind if it's good or bad.2. Lots of people praising a record on ILM will create traction too.3. Please to check out Yakuza Heart Attack - I think they're great!
― Jeff W, Thursday, 29 July 2010 18:32 (fifteen years ago)
Without Lies = great.
― piscesx, Friday, 30 July 2010 01:16 (fifteen years ago)
Good Riddance reminds me of these 2 things:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQt622_lpWs&feature=related
and
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xeFyD-JYWD0
― piscesx, Friday, 30 July 2010 01:18 (fifteen years ago)
Was not expecting an album that sounded, in parts, like Jim Kerr side-project.
PS Love that All Seeing I track
― The great big red thing, for those who like a surprise (James Morrison), Friday, 30 July 2010 03:44 (fifteen years ago)
jesus i think everyone who listened to and bagged on this album knows and sees the value in things like 'a wizard, a true star' or steinman and whatnot, it's that this album simply uses that as a basis for terrible indie-pop pastiche. don't let some delusional guardian writer fool you, this is modern indie pop through and through and most of it is embarassing. don't be fooled by a list of riyls, all those comparisons are really quite a reach and reek of promo-speak
― a lagoon par la mer (psychgawsple), Friday, 30 July 2010 05:30 (fifteen years ago)
I don't hear any indie pop whatsoever on this album. I hear mid-80s US/Euro AOR like Cock Robin and Foreigner, synth-soundtrackers like John Carpenter, Goblin and Moroder, zouk, Boney M, maybe a hint of new wave - but not indie pop. There are very few references to modern hipster culture here - it's all harking back to mainstream European culture 1977-1992 as far as I can tell. Proabably why it's so cringey to anglophones.
― village idiot (dog latin), Friday, 30 July 2010 14:50 (fifteen years ago)
He's saying it's a hamfisted pastiche of the kind bad indie bands make, he's not saying it sounds like indie pop.
― Matt DC, Friday, 30 July 2010 14:52 (fifteen years ago)
i still don't hear it. maybe (maybe) a hint of YYYs on one or two tracks, but other than that I hear no indie, pastiche or not.
― village idiot (dog latin), Friday, 30 July 2010 15:04 (fifteen years ago)
― Matt DC, Friday, 30 July 2010 15:06 (fifteen years ago)
according to todays CMJ mailout this has been delayed until end of sept (27th as opposed to 6th)
wonder if this involves a quick remix/makeover of a track or 2 ..
― mark e, Friday, 30 July 2010 15:07 (fifteen years ago)
i still don't hear the indie thing, matt
― titchyschneiderhouserules (s1ocki), Friday, 30 July 2010 15:09 (fifteen years ago)
no me neither
― village idiot (dog latin), Friday, 30 July 2010 15:13 (fifteen years ago)
Maybe it just sounds like a bad indie band appropriating overblown 80s kitsch to me because they're so terrible at it. I don't think it's impossible to put together a great record that channels those influences but Aeroplane are pretty bad at it and it's mostly the quality of the songwriting that's to blame.
― Matt DC, Friday, 30 July 2010 15:23 (fifteen years ago)
just want to point out that dog latin is also really feeling salem so grain of salt
― blap...tremendo (deej), Friday, 30 July 2010 15:25 (fifteen years ago)
xp thanks for the backup mattdc. this is what i meant, it reminds me of how indie and britrock bands reappropriate similar things in similarly uninspiring ways (though "we fall over" sounds pretty damn indie/paste magazine-ish to me and "without lies" is indie-electro. is that sky ferreira on both?)
also come now, goblin and carpenter and moroder only sounded like this at their worst, and boney m was a lot more fun (i hear some deodato in "my enemy", but i can't help but imagine that there was an electronic demo of that song at one point that wasn't so overwrought). and i do not hear any new wave in here at all sorry. definitely a touch of aor rock/foreigner tho for sure. the first thing i thought when i heard this was "this sounds like some dollar record from the 80s that i would have regretted purchasing".
― a lagoon par la mer (psychgawsple), Friday, 30 July 2010 15:33 (fifteen years ago)
no way - it doesn't sound like indie rock.
― village idiot (dog latin), Friday, 30 July 2010 15:40 (fifteen years ago)
in seriousness - i'm not necessarily defending this album here...
...just saying it doesn't sound like indie rock.
― village idiot (dog latin), Friday, 30 July 2010 15:42 (fifteen years ago)
He isn't saying it does! This is exasperating...
― Matt DC, Friday, 30 July 2010 15:44 (fifteen years ago)
but it doesn't.
― village idiot (dog latin), Friday, 30 July 2010 15:46 (fifteen years ago)
maybe people would like it more if it sounded more like indie rock.
― village idiot (dog latin), Friday, 30 July 2010 15:48 (fifteen years ago)
are you reading the words in between 'indie' or are you just sorta seeing that word in print and reacting here? no, it doesn't sound exactly like indie rock, but yes it is a lame pastiche of the same types of things indie acts make lame pastiches out of.
you're probably just taking the piss anyways tho so can we just move on?
― a lagoon par la mer (psychgawsple), Friday, 30 July 2010 15:51 (fifteen years ago)
indie rock?
― village idiot (dog latin), Friday, 30 July 2010 15:53 (fifteen years ago)
okay, sorry - it's a slow work day today.
my biggest problem with this album isn't the limp genre experiments or the vapidity of the lyrics or the dearth of b@ng0rz ("My Enemy" aside), it's that Aeroplane's music used to have the most amazingly well-constructed builds and everything on here just kinda happens, then keeps happening for four or five minutes, then stops. I'd be 1000000% on board with an album full of John Carpenter/Alan Parsons/etc. ripoffs if the tracks resolved themselves as effectively as the Das Pop remix or the Coyote remix or the Low Motion Disco remix. but alas.
― TOM SHITTYBISSELL (jamescobo), Friday, 30 July 2010 16:52 (fifteen years ago)
OTM
― jed_, Friday, 30 July 2010 17:00 (fifteen years ago)
Dorian interview with Vito
(Three weeks after we meet, the album leaks online and many fans of Aeroplane's club-oriented output to date bemoan the record's florid guitar solos and vocal melodrama. "I'm reading people's reactions," he tweets glumly. "They are pretty much awful …")
poor vito
― orakle-krake (Gukbe), Friday, 30 July 2010 17:31 (fifteen years ago)
have any other forums/blogs had so many people reacting negatively to this album? wondering if this thread is the main cause of that tweet
― NI, Friday, 30 July 2010 17:47 (fifteen years ago)
Nah, it got ripped a new one on t'Erol forum. I'd think, given the prevalence of well known DJs and producers as lurkers on that forum, that's most likely the source.
― procedurally generated pidyn (Masonic Boom), Friday, 30 July 2010 18:14 (fifteen years ago)
More likely still that Vito typed "Aeroplane album" into Twitter. I just tried that and everything prior to his now famous tweet is uniformly negative.
― Matt DC, Friday, 30 July 2010 18:22 (fifteen years ago)
The thread I saw on Erol's forums looked like it was written by 17 year old electro fans. One guy's main complaint was that there were too many instrumentals on the album.
― groovypanda, Friday, 30 July 2010 20:01 (fifteen years ago)
They are written by 17 y.o. electro fans. But that, unfortunately, is the market most people seem to be shooting for.
― pidyn pitch (Masonic Boom), Friday, 30 July 2010 20:04 (fifteen years ago)
I didn't see this mentioned above, but here is Stephan's first mix as The Magician. I'm only about 5 minutes in and it's pretty good. For those of you crushed by We Can't Fly maybe this will help you feel a little better.
― bmus, Monday, 2 August 2010 19:02 (fifteen years ago)
oh this is fun, thanks!
"beam me up, beam me up, beam me up"
What's that track?
― jed_, Monday, 2 August 2010 19:36 (fifteen years ago)
Midnight Magic - Beam Me Up
So good.
― bmus, Monday, 2 August 2010 19:59 (fifteen years ago)
thanks for the id, great track.
― jed_, Monday, 2 August 2010 22:12 (fifteen years ago)
diggin this. v sad to say i finally listened to we can't fly and it managed to live up to the hype :\
― my objective was to get the ham (another al3x), Monday, 2 August 2010 23:37 (fifteen years ago)
Aeroplane Late July Mix
Featuring the Aeroplane remix of Chromeo's "Don't Turn the Lights On"
― orakle-krake (Gukbe), Tuesday, 3 August 2010 14:14 (fifteen years ago)