SIMON REYNOLDS DISCUSSES CURRENT DANCE MUSIC IN TODAY'S NY TIMES

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (1037 of them)
SR is writing about the European definition of "dance music", and how well *that* music is faring in the US.

Yeah, and if he wasn't so myopic in his little culture bubble, he probably would've made that clear to his American audience reading it in an American newspaper.

Matthew "Flux" Perpetua, Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:02 (nineteen years ago) link

"What is actually popular in American clubs in place of that music (asnd why this is so) isn't the focus of the article"

hip hop is much much bigger than techno or house music in europe too. let´s not think anything else. I think many of you americans have a warped idea of how popular dance music is in europe. yes, it is more popular than in the us but that doesnt mean much.

Lovelace, Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:03 (nineteen years ago) link

Actually, wouldn't crunk be metal if played by Ye Olde Typical Rock Band? (Assuming you replaced the synth lines with lots of feedback.) Sorry, just a random thought.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:03 (nineteen years ago) link

Reynolds does talk about hip hop, booty bass, crunk etc

true he does...excerpt: in recent years it may have been beaten on the shake-your-booty front by dancehall and Southern rap.

But he doesn't recognize it as being a part of the "dance" genre. Instead he says it's something to be absorbed by dance culture, like rock, to inject it with some newfound vitality.

john'n'chicago, Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:03 (nineteen years ago) link

Yeah, and if he wasn't so myopic in his little culture bubble, he probably would've made that clear to his American audience reading it in an American newspaper.
I think he's made that perfectly clear -- he consistently refers to "electronic dance music" and likens it to the late-90's Chems/Prodigy/Daft Punk/"Ray of Light"/etc. style of music. The context is right there in the first three paragraphs.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:05 (nineteen years ago) link

SR is writing about the European definition of "dance music"

exactly my beef with the whole thrust of the article. i mean, why not examine what moves americans rather than why french house never shook booty in midtown like it was supposed to?

john'n'chicago, Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:06 (nineteen years ago) link

crunk is pretty metallish, ned. all that shouting and grunting! love it!

hstencil (hstencil), Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:06 (nineteen years ago) link

I think many of you americans have a warped idea of how popular dance music is in europe.

This is definitely true for me, but it's mostly from what I've read in Euro publications over the years.

Matthew "Flux" Perpetua, Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:06 (nineteen years ago) link

Lovelace, until I went to college and met a good number of students from outside the United States I had absolutely no concept of any sort of "dance culture" whatsoever, so if it seems like we're overrepresenting the importance of european dance culture, believe me, we're much closer to accuracy than the vast majority of americans think.

djdee2005 (djdee2005), Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:08 (nineteen years ago) link

If the humiliatingly lukewarm response to last fall's comeback albums by the top dance acts the Prodigy and Fatboy Slim is any measure, neither Daft Punk nor the Chemical Brothers ought to bank on teeming throngs at the record stores or a warm radio welcome.

Simon R is of course saying they once were big (in the States) and wonders why there's a disinterest now. That said, I always thought the Prodigy's album wasn't really all that successful. Could be wrong, but that's what I remember.

Isn't he also CLEAR about what he's discussing: the big four (dance acts)? *sigh*

stevie nixed (stevie nixed), Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:11 (nineteen years ago) link

i mean, why not examine what moves americans rather than why french house never shook booty in midtown like it was supposed to?

Because he chose to examine why French house never shook booty in midtown like it was supposed to. Maybe next time he'll write an article about what moves Americans.

Objecting to why it was "supposed to" is another matter altogether ... Reynolds seems to consider it nearly axiomatic, i.e. he starts by assuming (without argument) that it "should" have broken big, and then tries to figure out why it didn't.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:12 (nineteen years ago) link

crunk is pretty metallish, ned. all that shouting and grunting! love it!

Yeah, about what I thought. Metal may not be the specific vehicle but the aesthetic is being carried through. ;-)

That said, I always thought the Prodigy's album wasn't really all that successful. Could be wrong, but that's what I remember.

The Fat of the Land? Debuted at number one here.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:13 (nineteen years ago) link

No, because the reason that the "dance" genre can't make it in the u.s. is because we have our own dance genre in hip-hop/pop!

Some big news for you: Hip-hop and pop are big in Europe too.

Hey, I'm tired of Reynolds and his entire schtick. He really needs to give up the rave ghost. But the critiques in this thread are pedantic bitch-assery of the highest order.

bugged out, Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:14 (nineteen years ago) link

sr needs to go to more ball games, so he can hear junior senior being played.

hstencil (hstencil), Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:15 (nineteen years ago) link

hip hop is much much bigger than techno or house music in europe too.

well no, you sure can't fill any football stadiums with hiphop over here. Fairly routine for trance/hard techno.

Omar (Omar), Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:16 (nineteen years ago) link

I do think that some people on ILM forget about contextual writing, check where this article was published: NY Times aimed at a broad readership - this article was simply to overview some current themes - without great detail.

I am sure if Simon pitched this themed article at a specialist publication - then a more longer, detailed and substantial effort would have been actioned.

DJ Martian (djmartian), Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:18 (nineteen years ago) link

Some big news for you: Hip-hop and pop are big in Europe too.

So? I'm not sure what that has to do w/ hip-hop's club domination in the united states.

djdee2005 (djdee2005), Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:20 (nineteen years ago) link

xpost to dj martian -

well maybe a broad readership isn't interested in music that isn't selling? not that sales should be the only factor in coverage, but given the NYT's increasingly populist bent in the "pop music" section (that's right, music is segregated into "pop" and "classical" again, bye bye clinton nineties), it's just surprising.

hstencil (hstencil), Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:20 (nineteen years ago) link

sorta changing topics (sorta), anybody see that hilarious reality show "the club" on spike tv about this big nightclub in vegas and like paul oakenfold and whatnot? soooo funny.

hstencil (hstencil), Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:22 (nineteen years ago) link

It seems a bit strange to ignore that the biggest reason why Fatboy Slim, Chemical Brothers, Daft Punk, and The Prodigy all had fluke success in the US around the same time was cos major labels and the media in the US had convinced itself that it was the Next Big Thing, so a lot of money and airtime was devoted to it for a little while. It was NOT the result of grassroots popularity, it was very much a decision made from on high, and that's why it hasn't sustained itself in American culture, cos the big money realized that it WASN'T the Next Big Thing and moved on.

Matthew "Flux" Perpetua, Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:22 (nineteen years ago) link

also to backtrack a second nobody answered this:

Even more oddly, others have been looking to rock music for reinvigoration.

why is this odd?

why is it odd that Norman Cook, formerly a bassist in a rock band (albeit a sorta pansyish one) would listen to or be inspired by rock music!

hstencil (hstencil), Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:25 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm not sure what that has to do w/ hip-hop's club domination in the united states.

Point being: If hip-hop/pop big in Europe too, harder to see them as a unique factor holding back dance/electronic in the US. Especially in the case of pop!

I agree with Perpetua's explanation.

bugged out, Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:26 (nineteen years ago) link

Yeah, there was really nothing major going on in 1996 in pop or rock music. As soon as the Spice Girls and nu-metal came around, there was finally something actually clicking with the kids in middle America and the Prodigy were dropped from radio playlists as quickly as they were added.

Mike O. (Mike Ouderkirk), Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:26 (nineteen years ago) link

well maybe a broad readership isn't interested in music that isn't selling?

It seems a bit strange to ignore that the biggest reason why Fatboy Slim, Chemical Brothers, Daft Punk, and The Prodigy all had fluke success in the US around the same time was cos major labels and the media in the US had convinced itself that it was the Next Big Thing

*That's* why a broad readership might be interested. The music was pushed as the Next Big Thing (which a broad musically-curious readership might remember), and now nobody cares about it. There's your article.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:27 (nineteen years ago) link

Its an entirely different situation in the U.S., buggedout. And I'm not sure I buy that hip-hop is as big there as it is here.

djdee2005 (djdee2005), Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:28 (nineteen years ago) link

Definitely not as big. Still pretty popular tho.

bugged out, Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:31 (nineteen years ago) link

Maybe next time he'll write an article about what moves Americans.

but the point of the article is that dance music is barely alive in america. it's not. it's his rather narrowly defined notion dance music that's dead.

john'n'chicago, Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:33 (nineteen years ago) link

Yeah, there was really nothing major going on in 1996 in pop or rock music. As soon as the Spice Girls and nu-metal came around, there was finally something actually clicking with the kids in middle America and the Prodigy were dropped from radio playlists as quickly as they were added.

This is true, although not about the Spice Girls--they were more or less concurrent to the big beat explosion, and had their biggest impact before Fat of the Land went to #1. But nu-metal is a much better example--it's pretty much what people were looking for in big-beat, except more rock, so easier to reconcile. And as Scottpl recently pointed out in his Always Outnumbered review, it often really wasn't that far off from nu-metal. You put, say, Linkin Park's "Faint" and Prodigy's "Firestarter" up against each other, and there's really not too much distinguishing the two.

The Good Dr. Bill (The Good Dr. Bill), Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:34 (nineteen years ago) link

but the point of the article is that dance music is barely alive in america

No, the point is that *particular styles* of dance music is barely alive in America. Against, I think there's confusion because the phrase "dance music" means different things to Americans and Europeans.

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:35 (nineteen years ago) link

Matthew it WAS seen as the Next Big Thing, at the time. i'm amazed it was successful as it was in the US however briefly - but i'm equally amazed at why the US market/media/public(?) has not been able to 'get it' in general. But the US is unique, and is responsible for much of what we hear in terms of invention and/or influence - it's surely just too goddamned HUGE for anything 'foreign' to make a lasting impact anyway (you could include House as 'foreign' despite (because?) it's gya, black origin even).

Stevem On X (blueski), Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:36 (nineteen years ago) link

You put, say, Linkin Park's "Faint" and Prodigy's "Firestarter" up against each other, and there's really not too much distinguishing the two.

or aphex twin's "come to daddy."

hstencil (hstencil), Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:37 (nineteen years ago) link

they're all as different as they are the same

Stevem On X (blueski), Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:38 (nineteen years ago) link

In the UK, there is split between:

e.g on BBC Music
http://www.bbc.co.uk/music/

Dance
House, Trance, Techno

Urban
Hip hop, R'n'B, Garage, Ragga

DJ Martian (djmartian), Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:39 (nineteen years ago) link

i just heard a remix of cornershop in a fox super bowl commercial.

hstencil (hstencil), Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:40 (nineteen years ago) link

Well, Spice Girls were the tip of the iceberg of the late '90s teenpop explosion. 'NSync, Backstreet Boys and Britney all came later and were more popular than the Spice Girls. Actually, Backstreet were '97 too. What I meant was that the Spice Girls' success opened up a market relatively untapped in the '90s compared to every other decade ever, so there was a new thing to hype (or smear, to be more accurate) in the media that was actually pushing more units than the Chems ever could.

But yeah, nu-metal is more important since electronica was being marketed to modern rock radio and alt-rock fans.

Mike O. (Mike Ouderkirk), Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:41 (nineteen years ago) link

Haha, I just heard that Cornershop commercial too! I was about to post about it here. That didn't sound like the Fatboy Slim remix.

Mike O. (Mike Ouderkirk), Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:42 (nineteen years ago) link

'NSync, Backstreet Boys and Britney all came later and were more popular than the Spice Girls.

this was the NeoCons side-project, alongside the slandering of CLinton

and 'dance' as a term for certain genres and subgenres of music is just as hopeless as the terms pop, rock, indie, urban etc. - but i'm still surprised people feel the need to bring up the 'why is it called dance music when we can dance to Britney/rock music as well?' thing again...in 2005!

Stevem On X (blueski), Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:42 (nineteen years ago) link

New Kids on the Block were totally 90s.

hstencil (hstencil), Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:43 (nineteen years ago) link

Hey, I remember 1997/98 pretty clearly, that was a big record-buying time for me, my first year in college.

Fatboy Slim, The Chemical Brothers and The Prodigy both had some huge hits, but I would say that the success of Daft Punk really was only a modest success (which probably set them up to a better long term career, cos they aren't stuck with that nostalgia vibe. Well, that and DP just being way better in general.)

Matthew "Flux" Perpetua, Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:44 (nineteen years ago) link

No, the point is that *particular styles* of dance music is barely alive in America.

4th paragraph:
In the new millennium, the mainstream profile of dance music dipped alarmingly. This downturn occurred on both sides of the Atlantic, but it was particularly precipitous in America

john'n'chicago, Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:45 (nineteen years ago) link

dance music in america: http://www.funpic.hu/swf/numanuma.html

hstencil (hstencil), Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:47 (nineteen years ago) link

American kids dance to Franz Ferdinand. How's that for compromise!

miccio (miccio), Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:47 (nineteen years ago) link

Strictly in anecdotal terms, I remember a lot of people that I knew back then distrusting the "electronica" stuff that was being pushed on them and mocking it. I was very reliant on music magazines at the time, so I bought all of those records cos I was caught up in the zeitgeist of SPIN/Q/Select/CMJ etc.

Matthew "Flux" Perpetua, Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:47 (nineteen years ago) link

DP, definitely weren't as big as the other three ("Around the World" and "Da Funk" were hits, but very, very minor ones), but all were still pretty big. I bought CDs by all four of those artists in the late 90s back when the only music I knew was what I heard off MTV and the radio--the same time I was still buying CDs by Everclear and 702.

The Good Dr. Bill (The Good Dr. Bill), Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:47 (nineteen years ago) link

Simon Reynolds is missing the days he could give EBTG 9 out of 10 reviews in spin.

miccio (miccio), Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:49 (nineteen years ago) link

Daft Punk's big American pop hit is "One More Time" and came out in 2001. Hmm.

Matthew "Flux" Perpetua, Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:50 (nineteen years ago) link

Daft Punk didn't have any rock hooks and thus, didn't get as much modern rock play as the other three (I remember hearing "Da Funk" a few times, "Around the World" even less), but they were always on AMP and were big among people who were REALLY into the Chems/et al at the time (like me). But I think people who mainly liked Nine Inch Nails but owned a copy of The Fat of the Land didn't really care about Daft Punk.

Mike O. (Mike Ouderkirk), Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:52 (nineteen years ago) link

John, when he writes "the mainstream profile of dance music dipped alarmingly",

"dance music" = House, Trance, Techno

(as stated in DJ Martian's post above)

MindInRewind (Barry Bruner), Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:52 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm pretty sure Reynolds gave the Chemical Brothers a 9 out of 10 for the last album in SPIN actually. Are they finally stopping him or something?

miccio (miccio), Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:53 (nineteen years ago) link

And when Daft Punk had a crossover hit, it was on pop radio.

Yeah, it really does have a lot to do with how they were trying to shoehorn this stuff into rock stations, it alienated the core demo of rock stations.

Matthew "Flux" Perpetua, Sunday, 23 January 2005 21:53 (nineteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.