OINK Probs???

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (509 of them)

by uploading i meant putting shit up on oink itself

latebloomer, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 17:26 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QuwwMZKYxag

People, who expected the owner of Oink to have decent-sized biceps?????????????????

Confounded, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 17:27 (eighteen years ago)

must be down to lifting ALL THOSE BAGS OF CASH he was making from hi LUCRATIVE SITE. oh, hang on ...

i know of one valiant editor who is pruning some of the more idiotic lies from PA's copy as i type. i dread what most of the rest of the UK press will print tomorrow.

grimly fiendish, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 17:34 (eighteen years ago)

so many pretty blatant distortions in that bbc report

latebloomer, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 17:36 (eighteen years ago)

The PA one is woeful. They're desperately trying to make it into an INTERNATIONAL MONEY-MAKING operation. The pay off is genius: "Copyright theft is ... vandalising our culture".

stet, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 17:39 (eighteen years ago)

who's saying that?

grimly fiendish, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 17:42 (eighteen years ago)

Geoff Taylor, chief executive of the British Phonographic Industry.

stet, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 17:46 (eighteen years ago)

o, rite. SHOCKAH.

grimly fiendish, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 17:50 (eighteen years ago)

Any precedent for Canadians getting sued?

Simon H., Tuesday, 23 October 2007 17:55 (eighteen years ago)

If I go down for oinking Dan Hartman's "I Can Dream About You" (12-inch version), the world is FUCKED UP

Confounded, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 17:56 (eighteen years ago)

There's precious little reporting going on that I can see. It's just a screed from Mr Police Man and Mr Record company.

Right enough, we don't often bother with what the criminal element says. "I think it's outrageous that they've got this £80m haul of cocaine. It's going to send the price rocketing, and I was going out this weekend".

xpsts

stet, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 17:57 (eighteen years ago)

Haha Confounded.
"Well, y'rronner, I think listening to Dan Hartman was punishment enough."

Le Bateau Ivre, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 17:59 (eighteen years ago)

has anyone ever been prosecuted for using BitTorrent?

Dandy Don Weiner, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 18:01 (eighteen years ago)

oink.justgotowned.com

Le Bateau Ivre, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 18:03 (eighteen years ago)

http://torrentfreak.com//images/elitet.jpg

am0n, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 18:03 (eighteen years ago)

Wow - read that original article on the bust - Interpol led up the raid and arrest - that's one pissed off band!

BlackIronPrison, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 18:18 (eighteen years ago)

http://www.losanjealous.com/img/06/a/neilhamburger.jpg

deej, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 18:18 (eighteen years ago)

^^^this is what i've looked like all day.

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 23 October 2007 18:21 (eighteen years ago)

also BanIronPrison.

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 23 October 2007 18:21 (eighteen years ago)

That BBC report clip on youtube is worth watching for the montage of file footage on music piracy that includes napster, winamp, and a sound clip of 'the real slim shady.'

mh, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 18:24 (eighteen years ago)

"The Day The Free Music Died" will be one headline.

Cunga, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 18:26 (eighteen years ago)

Moo me, UK

James Mitchell, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 18:30 (eighteen years ago)

oink.justgotowned.com

now that we have this we don't need any other music anyway

J0hn D., Tuesday, 23 October 2007 18:35 (eighteen years ago)

http://rawkblog.blogspot.com/2007/10/critical-backlash-why-we-need-oink.html

StanM, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 18:42 (eighteen years ago)

oh god.

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 23 October 2007 18:46 (eighteen years ago)

im grieving oink as much as the next guy, but fuck. what should we expect from a blog called "The Rawking Refuses To Stop!" though.

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 23 October 2007 18:47 (eighteen years ago)

FACT: that article is naive

deej, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 18:48 (eighteen years ago)

i could never get an invite, so i'm glad the fuckers went down

mitya, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 18:56 (eighteen years ago)

fuck, i was going to DL like 3 gigs today for a dj set this week.

and i had just made power user ;_;

gr8080, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 19:01 (eighteen years ago)

A stolen candybar is not a lost sale. The kids with the most candy are hoarding them because they can, not because they're trying to save money on paying for candy. No one is ever going to go out and buy 5-10 snickers bars a week, but that's about how many a good chunk of us download.

forksclovetofu, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 19:09 (eighteen years ago)

i wish i could illegally download a corporate milky way right now

forksclovetofu, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 19:10 (eighteen years ago)

No one is ever going to go out and buy 5-10 snickers bars a week

RONG.

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 23 October 2007 19:12 (eighteen years ago)

snickers-breath

Whiney G. Weingarten, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 19:33 (eighteen years ago)

<i>Along with every other indie college kid, 90% of the shows I go to I wouldn't of gone to if I didn't d/l the album. 90% of the albums I buy I wouldn't have bought if I hadn't downloaded them prior.</i>

!! 'cos no-one went to shows or bought records before oink was invented!

byebyepride, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 19:41 (eighteen years ago)

Limited edition OiNK Snickers bar:

http://www.slashfood.com/media/2007/02/snickersbacon.jpg

StanM, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 19:42 (eighteen years ago)

Home killing is, er, in Soviet Russia, er, oh, nevermind.

StanM, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 19:43 (eighteen years ago)

!! 'cos no-one went to shows or bought records before oink was invented!

doesn't mean it isn't true? i haven't read the article, but just because college kids went to shows without having downloaded the album 20 years ago doesn't mean they still do

lucas pine, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 19:50 (eighteen years ago)

i could never get an invite, so i'm glad the fuckers went down

-- mitya, Tuesday, October 23, 2007 7:56 PM (54 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

^^^ this. Oink Administrator burned me.

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 19:54 (eighteen years ago)

opinion piece on oink from dj rupture

lucas pine, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 20:03 (eighteen years ago)

"Word is the Danish branch of the IFPI has "seriously proposed" allowing peer-to-peer downloading in exchange for a small monthly fee charged to all ISP users."

http://radar.oreilly.com/archives/2007/10/music_industry.html

???

(via Coolfer)

StanM, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 20:06 (eighteen years ago)

DJ Rupture OTM. Especially about digital music having to be talked about in commons analogies now. No scarcity=no money, basically.

stet, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 20:27 (eighteen years ago)

i would pay a small monthly fee to the danish branch of the IFPI to use oink.

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 23 October 2007 20:29 (eighteen years ago)

i would pay a small monthly fee to all of this white girls

s1ocki, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 20:32 (eighteen years ago)

^^also.

J0rdan S., Tuesday, 23 October 2007 20:32 (eighteen years ago)

don't look now, but indietorrents appears to have gone into hiding.

Johnny Fever, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 20:34 (eighteen years ago)

has dj spooky weighed in yet

am0n, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 20:34 (eighteen years ago)

or dj martian

jeff, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 20:47 (eighteen years ago)

hypothetical question cos I'm not very smart with this stuff: if you download but piggyback your wireless, do you technically not have your own isp and therefore potentially get others (you're borrowing bandwidth from) into trouble?

paulhw, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 20:50 (eighteen years ago)

<i>Aside: If Radiohead (the British rock band who achieved worldwide success via a long-term mutually-beneficial relationship with a major record label) were truly radical, they would have posted their new album as a BitTorrent file with a PayPal & bank account link for the fans who felt like paying. Not hosting it on some weird website with an awkward interface & requiring credit card info…</i>

Uh huh...

Eppy, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 20:54 (eighteen years ago)

hypothetical question cos I'm not very smart with this stuff: if you download but piggyback your wireless, do you technically not have your own isp and therefore potentially get others (you're borrowing bandwidth from) into trouble?

-- paulhw, Tuesday, October 23, 2007 9:50 PM (4 minutes ago) Bookmark Link

lol in the uk i think people have been prosecuted for stealing wifi.

they could 'piggyback' piracy + wireless theft rofl

That one guy that hit it and quit it, Tuesday, 23 October 2007 20:56 (eighteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.