Suede

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (929 of them)
I'm back to say their debut may be one of my favorite albums ever. Love the third one, too.

Anyone heard Bernard's solo LP? It was so boring and bland I wanted to fling it in the garbage; traded it in for a couple bucks instead.

Sean, Wednesday, 31 October 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

His solo LPs are terrible, why did he do that? He can't sing you know.

Ally, Wednesday, 31 October 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

He actually carried off fairly well live, but that was an unplugged show and he wasn't straining very much. But yes, when I first heard him sing, I thought it was a bit of a reach...

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 31 October 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Hardcore Suede fans tend to = dud though, I know a few and they're embarassing.

DG, Wednesday, 31 October 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I see, you hate me, DG. *cries*

Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 31 October 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Not you, you silly Raggetty person. People who I know who sign their emails "The one and only trash pop slut", that kind of thing.

DG, Wednesday, 31 October 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Suede were great. My 90s band. Since I missed Moz/Marr & Co in the 80s, Suede had to compensate... Awesome live, if you dig that kind of "You love us and We know it" performances. Meeting them was great. Brett chatted up my girlfriend, and I chatted up Brett. Those were lovely times. I really do believe it is one of the best examples of "love em or hate em" one can think of.
I never played "Head Music" in its entirety, note. But the singles up to and including "She's in fashion" are great. And cd1 of "Lullabies", obviously. And "Stay Together"... Is better than "Whatever"!

Simon, Wednesday, 31 October 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Back in the day I was a downright slavering fanatic, which seems a bit sad in retrospect. Their first four or five singles were absolutely flawless, with nary a dud on them. Everything else up through and including Comiing Up has tended to be patchy, though there's still some good songs to be found.

That said, Head Music was the absolute end for me. It was painfully dull, and the lyrics were so beyond the pale it just seemed ludicrous to keep listening. I tried liking it (in fact I still sort of like Can't Get Enough), but in the end I've lost all affection for them.

Still, I'd probably get the dvd if it wasn't Region 2 encoding.

Nicole, Wednesday, 31 October 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Suede, the Bauhaus of the 90s (the lyrics, the bowie-isms, the hysteria?, maybe better on the music side, but then Brett&co didn't record a standard like Bela Lugosi's Dead...

erik, Wednesday, 31 October 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Insignificant. The fake-gay flip-side of Oasis. But as with Oasis capable of some great songs. I like 'Animal Nitrate', for that tagged- on wank-solo, 'Saturday Night' and 'Beautiful Ones'. Also liked: those hilarious Brett love-handles and Neil Codling was just a classic beautiful "me, I'm very bored" English boy.

Omar, Thursday, 1 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

significant. wow, i get to disagree with Omar! now, i typed a fairly long answer to this, which seems to have disappeared. so a truncated answer will suffice.

i agree with Ally that they became a parody, well rather a facsimile of themselves around Coming Up

i disagree with Ally saying this is a bad thing. For me Coming Up is the best album they did. it has an ease, an effortless, like the pressure to be grandiose a la DMS had been lifted. By The Sea, The Chemistry Between Us absoultely superb. Beautiful Ones and Trash great singles. i like the spangly shinyness of this album, which wasn't present on the earlier stuff. in this way i like to think of it as an anglo Hit To Death In The Future Head. Ilike the fact that Bernard had gone by this point. the adding of Codling - a good move. it is suede being themselves. a parody? yes, possibly. i want to say 'trite in a good way' here. i want to say Bretts singing is very good on this album.

to be honest, this is the only one i play regularly. but Dog Man Star very good too. in places. Wild Ones, New Generation, 2 of us in particular. daddys speeding too. it is grandiose, but i think they aimed high, and only partially succeeded. still, some great stuff on there though.

they seem to have escaped the 90s pretty much unscathed though. in comparison to their contemporaries anyway. but then, who are their contemporaries. surely we're not suggesting blur, supergrass and oasis are we? i do hope not. Pulp, yes maybe. but they have become too closely identified with Different Class. they are unable to escape that moment, it signifies a moment too closely. post DC they have been dirgeful.

i am interested in whether the pinefox is a Suede fan. this seems unlikely, but then his liking of oasis and non-love of nick drake was also surprising.

gareth, Thursday, 1 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

How were they significant, Gareth? They didn't change anything, for better or worse. They didn't do anything which hadn't been done (better) before. You might say they were very good, not that I agree, but significant? No.

Dr. C, Thursday, 1 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I find them well-nigh unbearable now. Dog Man Star is a record I honestly don't think I could ever physically sit through again, even for money. Honestly, there's fuck-all difference between them and Placebo. Isn't glamour and decadence meant to be intelligent and fierce and surprising? Brett Anderson seemed like he'd gone and bought a Decadence Kit from Boots. But like a lot of people I fell for it at the time - now I'm prouder of once being into Carter USM, frankly.

Tom, Thursday, 1 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

For me the magic has worn off and left a lot of rusty glitter. That much is true. No, they don't mean what they did. And so, no, the listening experience is not what it was. (I was never a Fan, wearing the togs, believing the hype, or anything - but I did respect the music, and close-up, live, they were sweatily astounding.)

But I did think them significant. I think they represented a union of 'indie world' and 'media hype' - of alternative and mainstream, more simply - which seems natural now but was genuinely strange then. They did on (retrospectively) a homely scale what Oasis then went and did on an absurd scale. In other words, I think they represent a major stage in The Reclassification Of 'Indie'.

I also think they had good material, and good musicianship. The first LP was a fine debut, but DMS beat it - it was a remarkable record, a masterpiece, within the Suede perspective. If you don't like that 'world' (lyrics, sound etc) then it's just an ugly folly, I daresay, but if you do (as to an extent I did when it came out) it felt like a very major achievement. Better, I'd still say, than Different Class, This Is Hardcore, The Great Escape, Be Here Now and a bunch of other Britpop behemoths. (But not necessarily better than, for instance, Parklife - another record I view as Significant.)

the pinefox, Thursday, 1 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Can we not just forget about this silly little band? Were they really influential? I can't imagine they were. Maybe in some narrow field of idiocy.

Nick, Thursday, 1 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

THE DROWNERS IS THE BEST SONG EVER, WHY HAS NO ONE MENTIONED THIS YET?

Ally, Thursday, 1 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Nick just doesn't want people to be reminded of the fact he looks like Neil Codling.

Nicole, Thursday, 1 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

That’s it, you had to get into their “perspective”, their “Suedeworld”.

I loved the flashness of Coming Up when it came along in the autumn of 96. You just had to admire Anderson’s survivalist instincts despite it being obvious they were never to be centre stage again. It had a cetain romance about it. They went for that deliberately cold, robotic, and mechanized sound with Head Music but what initially to me sounded brilliant soon wore away after a few weeks – it was the Suede LP that was stranded without context.

Saw them from speaker distance in the 100 club between their first 2 singles at the height of the hype and it was fantastic esp. after spending the summer at lank haired grunge gigs. I remember some of the radio interviews around the time of the DMS release. Brett seemed fucked out of it from the drugs but the album seemed like a strange but necessary anomaly in those last months of 1994 amongst the explosion of jungle, trip hop and Loaded culture. Anderson might have been an asshole but rather him than the whining and supercilious musoness of Butler.

Fave songs: The Chemistry Between Us, Wild Ones,

David Gunnip, Thursday, 1 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I actually own The Drowners.

But THEN I SAW SENSE

Nick, Thursday, 1 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

That was around the time Sense and Sensibility came out, wasn't it? Gotta love that Hugh Grant...

Nicole, Thursday, 1 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Pinefox: In other words, I think they represent a major stage in The Reclassification Of 'Indie'.

yes, i believe pinefox is correct here. although curiously i'm not sure whether they reaped the benefit of this or not (i suppose they sold a lot of records).

Tom: Isn't glamour and decadence meant to be intelligent and fierce and surprising? Brett Anderson seemed like he'd gone and bought a Decadence Kit from Boots.

i'm not necessarily convinced of this. why should glamour/decadence be the above? i kind of like the fact that it was a bit faux in that respect. i think of the 'shtick' as being people from seaside towns looking towards metropolis as being exciting and glamourous, rather than glamourous itself. i think this removal, a slight distance if you will, lends it the english quality, as also seen in the obvious comparisons (tindersticks, the bowie of 'london boys', smiths) and also perhaps the less obvious (the sundays - although i'm not sure how i would articulate what i mean here), which for example the lumbering plod of oasis or blur could never hope to achieve.

the production (esp the drums) reminds me in a way of happy mondays (i think it is the big echoey drums, there is an 80s-ness about that)

The one and only trash pop slut, Thursday, 1 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Pinefox: In other words, I think they represent a major stage in The Reclassification Of 'Indie'.

yes, i believe pinefox is correct here. although curiously i'm not sure whether they reaped the benefit of this or not (i suppose they sold a lot of records).

Tom: Isn't glamour and decadence meant to be intelligent and fierce and surprising? Brett Anderson seemed like he'd gone and bought a Decadence Kit from Boots.

i'm not necessarily convinced of this. why should glamour/decadence be the above? i kind of like the fact that it was a bit faux in that respect. i think of the 'shtick' as being people from seaside towns looking towards metropolis as being exciting and glamourous, rather than glamourous itself. i think this removal, a slight distance if you will, lends it the english quality, as also seen in the obvious comparisons (tindersticks, the bowie of 'london boys', smiths) and also perhaps the less obvious (the sundays - although i'm not sure how i would articulate what i mean here), which for example the lumbering plod of oasis or blur could never hope to achieve.

the production (esp the drums) reminds me in a way of happy mondays (i think it is the big echoey drums, there is an 80s-ness about that)

the one and only trash pop slut, Thursday, 1 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Why, Gareth? Well because if it isn't then what's the difference between 'glamour' like wot Brett did and 'piling on the slap and getting off your face' like wot everyone in Ritzys nightclub does?

Tom, Thursday, 1 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

There are different types of glamour and different types of attitude; not all glamour can be Marilyn Monroe; some of it needs to be Patsy & Edina.

I mean, just think of it this way, Brett looked less Instant Decadance than the Manics did. I mean, talk about putting any old clap on and then pretending to be fabulous, lordy.

NICK YOU HAVE NO SENSE.

Ally, Thursday, 1 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I luv Gareth, if the real bloke who signs himself 'the one and only trash pop slut' saw that, he'd be SO pissed off.

DG, Thursday, 1 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

"The Drowners" is my favorite single of the early 90s. Maybe favorite 90s single, period, I'll have to think about that.

A Homosexual Who's Had Several Bisexual Experiences, Thursday, 1 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

To the twelve-year old jamesmichaelward, Stay Together was one of the bestest things ever.

jamesmichaelward, Thursday, 1 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Stay Together was beautiful.

So what does everyone think of the McAlmont & Butler album then?

Ally, Thursday, 1 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I really liked it -- McAlmont is a great singer and performer. BB was a mentalist to think people would rather listen to his irritating weedy voice than McAlmont or Brett.

Nicole, Thursday, 1 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

"McAlmont and Butler" is fantastic. How the hell did Bernard Butler get from that to....ugh...whatever he did afterwards?

Norman Phay, Thursday, 1 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

'Animal Nitrate' was their best song I thought. I want to know whether other people thought that was their best song.

maryann, Thursday, 1 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Of course it's amazing. Some days I prefer "Metal Mickey".

Sean, Friday, 2 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

"What does it take to turn you on...?!" is one the best phrases in pop.

Simon, Saturday, 3 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

But they do a cover of Elvis Costello's "Shipbuilding" that I absolutely love, probably more so than the original.
No way Chris. The one and only version of "Shipbuilding" is and will always be Robert Wyatt's. But nevertheless it is probably the best song Brett Anderson has ever sung. ;-)

alex in mainhattan, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Brett Anderson as shipbuilder = too great a leap of imagination

Nick, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

i actually like two or three tracks off that first bernard butler solo record. am i alone here?

maura, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I think you are Maura. The songs were fine just his thin, reedy voice, oh dear.

Apparently Alan McGhee said he was getting the new Neil Young when he signed him, which makes him an even bigger mentalist than BB.

Billy Dods, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Why, Gareth? Well because if it isn't then what's the difference between 'glamour' like wot Brett did and 'piling on the slap and getting off your face' like wot everyone in Ritzys nightclub does

a good question. i'm not entirely sure there is a difference, or that there should be. but, assuming there is a difference, i think that would be that the 'glamour' in Suede songs is about a glamour far away, unattainable, 'one day we'll get to the big city' again i supposes there is the old 'outsider chic' going on. whereas the ritzys thing, well, thats a 'here and now', an integral part of the working week, acceptance. i do not attempt to big up one at the expense of the other here, or to denigrate anything, but trying to distinguish in some way.

what mcgee said is entirely in keeping with his rather narrow rock oriented focus, suede didn't need BB in the end, but he rather needed them.

gareth, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Brett Anderson as shipbuilder = too great a leap of imagination

Well, he did usually sport a builder's crack, and not to great effect.

Now he looks like Steve Dallas, at least that's funny...

Nicole, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Okay, have to say I love Suede. Always did. Hello, I am a Bowie casualty. Official. All of the albums. Even liked Neil Codling, the world's most unlikely ME sufferer. Always rooted for Brett due to his background!

I'm not really overly concerned or critical about the lyrics because they're supposed to be cryptic, OTT and rub people the wrong way. Bernard Butler really poncey and a bit phobic about Suede lifestyle things but he was the one I saw in Hampstead walking away from Diana funeral motorcade passage so perhaps secret royalist/conservative?

The difference between Suede decadence and Ritzy decadence is the former is queerish and the latter reads no books and loves no art.

suzy, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Bernard Butler really poncey and a bit phobic about Suede lifestyle things but he was the one I saw in Hampstead walking away from Diana funeral motorcade passage so perhaps secret royalist/conservative?

I knew there was something weird about him, this makes sense (and is very funny)...

Nicole, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Nicole, that's not nearly as funny as the Steve Dallas doppelganger effect. But is apt - does everyone know the highly dodgy story of 'bring on the nine-year-old'?

suzy, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Oh yeah, what is that about? Meanwhile Bernie sat in his hotel room, crying into his acoustic. How did this group of people meet anyhow? It makes no sense.

Ally, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Apparently 'Steve Dallas' allegedly had some rather dubious relations with a younger person and when he finished and was informed of his indiscretion, croaked 'bring on the nine-year-old!' This is a widely circulated story for Brit media types!

They met cos: Brett and Justine were at architecture college and togeth-ah for that duration and decided to form band with Mat, Brett's best friend. Drummers were tried, including Mike Joyce from the Smiths, then they got Simon and stuck with him. Bernerd was thrown up by a Melody Maker advert. Rule A is that the last one in on the advert is always the first one chucked. Ally, you won't like this but they wrote a great big long letter to Nick asking for their great hero Momus' verdict on their stuff; he wrote a sniffy one back saying they were so mediocre they'd be massive. Justine left band after leaving Brett for Demon Allbran.

suzy, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

See, I know nothing about Suede's history, specifically about how Bernie hooked up with the band. HIm coming thru an advert makes much more sense than the idea I did have that they were all best chums somehow, cos quite frankly he don't seem like the type to be best chums with Brett Anderson.

Justine should've just stayed in Suede, she'd probably be better off.

Ally, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I always thought Justine was ace - I saw her at Gorillaz after-party and she was lookin' fab and having an upbeat, civil conversation with her ex. Invited me for 'tea' but I've been too chicken to go. I really must. She gets the classic Yoko rough ride for having relationships with guys in groups but is a talented, cool, catalysing girl. She told me a story once about being in school, a posh place where the rich girls sniffed at her for saying she wanted to live in Kensington. She wasn't rich then. Well, her dad made a ton of money in the late 80s and the first thing he did was to buy her a flat there as a fuck-you to the mean girls.

suzy, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

i liked their belgian nu-beat period. "electronic body music" - did anyone actually used to call it that?? i hope not!

bob snoom, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

My problem with Justine wholly stems from the men she chooses to date, they're vile. Plus I really don't like Elastica's music much. Still, better her than Damon "Freddy Krueger" Albarn.

Ally, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Nobody deserves Damon Albarn. End of story.

Nicole, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Oh, I can think of some people I'd force Damon upon.

Ally, Monday, 5 November 2001 01:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Haven’t liked an album since Coming Up. Wonder if I will like this.

piscesx, Friday, 5 September 2025 14:37 (nine months ago)

frankly shocked by how good this is.

J Edgar Noothgrush (Joan Crawford Loves Chachi), Friday, 5 September 2025 16:12 (nine months ago)

On the first listen, I'm not really connecting to it except for Trance State. But that often happens on first listens of new Suede.

The past 2 albums they really have been locking into the short, sharp, post-punk guitars. Right when I was really loving the more keyboard-driven orchestral sounds of The Blue Hour and Night Thoughts. Maybe I need to let go of the expectation that they'll go back to that style. And try to appreciate what they're doing now. (Just as I type that, June Rain came on, which is more of the big, orchestral keyboard-driven Suede I love again, so there's hope!)

I'm hoping it will click with repeated listens. One of the songs really reminded me of Kae Tempest's Diagnoses, which is a good sign.

Etherwave, Friday, 5 September 2025 16:20 (nine months ago)

Seems alright. Totally bewildered by the 5 star reviews of this and Autofiction though

PaulTMA, Friday, 5 September 2025 17:33 (nine months ago)

I absolutely love Autofiction and have high hopes for this new one, based on the feedback here (mostly Ned and Joan Crawford tbh).

better than ezra collective soul asylum (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Friday, 5 September 2025 17:47 (nine months ago)

I thought Autofiction was their worst record so far. Not my cup of tea at all.

Despite low expectations, I was really into the singles Disintegrate and Trance State, but then the Europeans one was ruined by a truly awful chorus.

I would be surprised if this were any better or worse overall than Autofiction, but I'm only hearing good things about it, and the singles are supposed to be among the weaker tracks, so let's find out!

Will probably buy it over the weekend. I have loved this band for a long time but I've been finding things to grumble about with them for just as long (I was describing My Insatiable One as overrated back in 1992), so will report back.

Eyeball Kicks, Friday, 5 September 2025 18:21 (nine months ago)

this album completely knocked me over this morning. still feeling the effects at the end of the day. it's so complete, such a journey - it works in a way nothing has in a long while -- and I'm a big fan of Coming Up. but this really has a cohesion that's rare for me

J Edgar Noothgrush (Joan Crawford Loves Chachi), Friday, 5 September 2025 23:35 (nine months ago)

gotta give this a listen. bummed I missed the 2022 tour. I saw them on their first US tour (with the Cranberries!) and they were so amazing.

I? not I! He! He! HIM! (akm), Sunday, 7 September 2025 21:28 (nine months ago)

Album's pretty great! It's definitely got some Furs/Bunnymen vibes, but it's also really muscular, which requires a bit of endurance. Just one track after the next, bam bam bam, like punches to the face (in the best way).

This band is so good. Back in the UK are they still considered top tier? Because what a gift to have this band not just back in action but still in such strong form.

Josh in Chicago, Sunday, 7 September 2025 22:44 (nine months ago)

I guess it depends on how top tier is defined these days but in terms of veteran bands they've had the red carpet rolled out for them for sure at this point -- tons of major features and high profile gigs and etc. Oasis and Coldplay may suck the air out of the room on the arena level, say, but they're not *not* there in the conversation from what I can sense.

Ned Raggett, Sunday, 7 September 2025 23:05 (nine months ago)

Ned, I didn’t know you lived in the UK!

Etherwave, Monday, 8 September 2025 06:03 (nine months ago)

I'm not sure what 'top tier' means in this context. In terms of selling tickets? In terms of critical appeal?

They're not the kind of band that would sell out a week at Wembley. But they can take over the entire Southbank Centre for a week and sell that out. (I think Suede have always been quite smart in playing venues slightly too small for them, which increases demand and makes gigs feel more exciting.) And 'Southbank centre' is a good measure of the quality of critical appreciation they get. They have definitely attained a 'national treasure' status. They get features in broadsheets with good arts coverage. But not necessarily omnipresent tabloid wallpapering.

I'm still undecided about the album. Another set of listens had me wondering 'have Suede changed or have my tastes just changed?' So I went back and listened to The Blue Hour, and I was immediately sucked back in and immersively overwhelmed and 'oh yes yes favourite band, alltime!' So this is definitely not a 'Suede suck now ugh' complaint, but more 'what is this longterm fan missing, that everyone is raving about on this album?'

Maybe it's that 'muscularity' of the guitars that is failing to connect. It's very 'back to basics' and a lot of twin-guitars only arrangements. When what really got me about The Blue Hour and Night Thoughts was the maturity and range of the orchestral arrangements and the spoken word soundart bits. Where this album is really just pulling back to be a 2-guitars postpunk rock band. All that angularity.

Etherwave, Monday, 8 September 2025 09:00 (nine months ago)

Yeah, which seems to be by design, of course. Also, Brett's lower range (less yelp, more bark) maybe lends itself well to these kind of raw guitar arrangements?

And yeah, top tier as in ticket sales and appeal, yeah. It's hard for me to tell where they stand. because they seem to pick venues strategically. Where does a band like James play these days?

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 8 September 2025 13:41 (nine months ago)

Not too sure about the new album yet (my expectations are getting a bit like when the Manics do a new album), but I'm now seeing them in February - finally - so it'll have the time it needs to sink in.

It's at the Bristol Beacon, incidentally, and tickets didn't sell out immediately. Unlike Pulp/Blur/Wasis their stock with people my age is relatively low. I don't really know anyone under, say, 40 who cares about them too much, besides myself.

you can see me from westbury white horse, Monday, 8 September 2025 13:49 (nine months ago)

Ned, I didn’t know you lived in the UK!

Roffle. Hardly, I’m in SF. But I’m pretty plugged in to The State Of Suede As Such by default at this point.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 8 September 2025 14:19 (nine months ago)

So this is definitely not a 'Suede suck now ugh' complaint, but more 'what is this longterm fan missing, that everyone is raving about on this album?'

I think this is exactly where I'm at, although I was enjoying Antidepressants a bit more today. I really enjoyed Bloodsports, Night Thoughts and The Blue Hour, although all of them had their imperfections. I was quite surprised to see Autofiction get so much love, I feel it is perfectly OK but has too much of this kind of lumpen neo-Suede rocker stuff like '15 Again' and 'That Boy On The Stage - or 'Like Kids' from a couple of albums back. Or the Brian Molko-tier stuff like "will you be my personality disorder" (good riff, though). The new album definitely feels like a more melodic (and superior) take on Autofiction, but the idea that they are gold-level Suede has flown completely over my head. And it's a bit of a shame to be left out. :(

PaulTMA, Monday, 8 September 2025 20:06 (nine months ago)

Brett's lower range (less yelp, more bark) maybe lends itself well to these kind of raw guitar arrangements?

this is a big part of it for me -- he's leaning into how he sounds now. I honestly have had plenty of the old Brett -- his mature voice on this really connects with me, I like the melodies, i like how propulsive the record is overall

J Edgar Noothgrush (Joan Crawford Loves Chachi), Monday, 8 September 2025 21:21 (nine months ago)

Where does a band like James play these days?

This year’s US tour is generally in 1200-1800 cap rooms. Suede’s co-headline with the Manics varied from 1000-2800, from a quick look.

Nancy Makes Posts (sic), Monday, 8 September 2025 21:38 (nine months ago)

I meant back in the UK.

Josh in Chicago, Monday, 8 September 2025 21:58 (nine months ago)

New album rules.

I'm also seeing them in Bristol in February lol xps

groovypanda, Tuesday, 9 September 2025 07:26 (nine months ago)

I feel it is perfectly OK but has too much of this kind of lumpen neo-Suede rocker stuff like '15 Again' and 'That Boy On The Stage - or 'Like Kids' from a couple of albums back. Or the Brian Molko-tier stuff like "will you be my personality disorder" (good riff, though). The new album definitely feels like a more melodic (and superior) take on Autofiction, but the idea that they are gold-level Suede has flown completely over my head. And it's a bit of a shame to be left out. :(

Yeah this really sums it up for me. But it's also why I prefer Dog Man Star to Coming Up. I like their Scott Walker meets Crass material more than the short, sharp, post-punk blasts.

I liked the second half of Autofiction more than the first - Drive Myself Home and the the run from It's Always The Quiet Ones to Turn Off Your Brain And Yell. And I think to make a more compact, focused, melodic album, the left off the bits of Suede that I am most attracted to, which is the meandering, weird Suede.

Etherwave, Tuesday, 9 September 2025 07:52 (nine months ago)

I meant back in the UK.

ah! well, you can probably look it up next time you have five minutes on a bus.

Nancy Makes Posts (sic), Tuesday, 9 September 2025 08:27 (nine months ago)

True, I'm just not familiar enough with venue capacities there, so if, say, Suede were indeed strategically playing venue slightly too small for them, there's no way for me to know that.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 9 September 2025 13:15 (nine months ago)

I don’t know the capacity of every venue in the UK, I just Google ‘[venue.name] capacity -ai’ and it tells me!

My observation that they’re playing venues slightly too small for them comes from a) how quickly they sell out b) how crowded it feels at the gigs and c) the fact that they copped to doing this previously on tours where they were trying to build hype

Etherwave, Tuesday, 9 September 2025 13:20 (nine months ago)

I don't disbelieve you at all, I just meant that if I saw Suede was playing a (I dunno) 3000 person venue in the UK, I wouldn't know if that was too small for them or the right fit. For comparison, James is playing Brooklyn Steel tomorrow. That venue is 1800, which seems about right for James in America. But would 1800 be too small for James in the UK? No idea.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 9 September 2025 13:24 (nine months ago)

James recently played near me in Cardiff Castle (with Shed Seven supporting lol)

Capacity is about 9K/10K but no idea if it sold out

For comparison The National, Pet Shop Boys, Fontaine's DC, Sting, The Human League, Primal Scream and Elbow have also all played there in the last year or two

groovypanda, Tuesday, 9 September 2025 16:08 (nine months ago)

i'm just repeating the "ooh there are occasional post-punk textures on this thing" observation, but it is nice for a suede album to remind me of the chameleons and comsat angels

ivy., Tuesday, 9 September 2025 16:14 (nine months ago)

Ha, yeah, someone in one of the fan groups posted the cover of Strange Times as a reference the other day, rightly.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 9 September 2025 16:18 (nine months ago)

yeah, otm, it's really in that wheelhouse.

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 9 September 2025 16:18 (nine months ago)

The album is starting to click for me, with repeated listens. Headphones really helped. Listening to what the guitars are actually doing. Hearing the fine grain of the 'post-punk textures' - there's a lot more going on in the guitar department than just thrashing and angularity

There's a lot of chorus on the guitars as well as just distortion which comes through nicely on headphones

Etherwave, Thursday, 11 September 2025 14:15 (nine months ago)

"Disintegrate" kind of reminds me (the music not vox obv) of later period Rush, like I could hear it on Clockwork Angels or something

Blues Guitar Solo Heatmap (Free Download) (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Thursday, 11 September 2025 15:33 (nine months ago)

I've u-turned hard on this album now and love it. For a phone-shot video, this is absolutely incredible. Captures Suede at their live best
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XY2ksIuZEhM

PaulTMA, Saturday, 13 September 2025 22:53 (nine months ago)

Ugh, people who stand down the front and film the whole gig on their phones are a PLAGUE and should be taken out back and shot (and also are completely contrary to Suede's entire message which is 'put down your phone and live in the moment')

BUT LAST NIGHT WAS ABSOLUTELY INCREDIBLE. Old men at the top of their game! The lights went down and this faint ominous thudding started, got louder and louder, really menacing sounding in a kind of We Are The Pigs way. Until the band came out and it morphed into Disintegrate - which is absolutely apocalyptic live! Those moments where the thrash of the music stops and Brett gets the entire hall to sing 'come down and disintegrate with me!' - their lyrics often look meaningless when written down, but the way he sings them and gets 1000s of people to chant along is something really powerful.

Good mixture of new material, Ver Hitz!!! and some real deep cuts. (Crackhead! Killing of a Flash Boy! This Time) I will never not sing along to Trash or Metal Mickey.

They really need to get Brett a cordless mic for the moments when he decides to go walkabout. It's fun that he still does it, and those moments of personal connection feel so meaningful. (he is still very, very cute when he smiles that little boy smile.) But I was right in the 4th row and that cable gets really really dangerous when it starts snaking around through the seats.

It's cheeky tho, that they've nicked the Crass logo for their new T-shirt design. I kept doing double takes seeing extremely un-Crass looking people wearing what looked like Crass T-shirts. (I know Brett is a huge fan, but there's not much of an overlap in the fanbase.)

Etherwave, Sunday, 14 September 2025 08:08 (nine months ago)

The Fash had mostly dispersed by the time I got to the SBC apartment from a few straggling drunks dressed up like football louts

But it still felt weirdly Suede in an odd way, picking your way through a litter of broken England flags to get to the gig

Etherwave, Sunday, 14 September 2025 08:22 (nine months ago)

Extraordinary again tonight.

Piedie Gimbel, Sunday, 14 September 2025 23:17 (nine months ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.