Rolling Metal Thread 2010

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (4753 of them)

Nightwish fans, check out 1:07-1:14 and 1:26- 1:31:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0JjMBsh8x_g

ksh, Thursday, 29 April 2010 03:47 (sixteen years ago)

What...the...

A. Begrand, Thursday, 29 April 2010 05:38 (sixteen years ago)

just got around to the new overkill. it RULES.

original bgm, Thursday, 29 April 2010 18:19 (sixteen years ago)

Seriously Pitchfork, do you just hate giving metal that much attention? A very deserved 8.4 for the new Alcest, but still won't give it the 'Best New Music' tag.

I guess the better question is, why do I keep visiting that site?

he's always been a bit of an anti-climb Max (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:44 (sixteen years ago)

they obviously dont think their readership will be interested in metal.

pfunkboy (Herman G. Neuname), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:47 (sixteen years ago)

I guess it just irks me because a lot of bands get a boost from getting the BNM tag anymore, and I'd certainly love to see Alcest get the boost in attention (and just maybe income) instead of another boring hipster band.

he's always been a bit of an anti-climb Max (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:47 (sixteen years ago)

countdown to the 1st alcest are a hipster band post ..

pfunkboy (Herman G. Neuname), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:52 (sixteen years ago)

Hahaha yeah, I figured I would just run with that risk.

he's always been a bit of an anti-climb Max (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:53 (sixteen years ago)

Who chooses what gets the BNM tag? I assume it's not the reviewer, so blame the moron who gets to choose.

pfunkboy (Herman G. Neuname), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:54 (sixteen years ago)

I'm assuming its an editorial thing. I know its a stupid thing to care about in the least.

he's always been a bit of an anti-climb Max (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:56 (sixteen years ago)

alcest are a hipster band just fyi xpost

brad whitford's impotent rage (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:56 (sixteen years ago)

yawn

pfunkboy (Herman G. Neuname), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:57 (sixteen years ago)

And....... SCENE.

he's always been a bit of an anti-climb Max (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 29 April 2010 21:57 (sixteen years ago)

Pitchfork has a metal column right? Maybe they should have a Best New Metal tag ;)

pfunkboy (Herman G. Neuname), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:00 (sixteen years ago)

maybe we can have a poll over how Pitchfork should tag new metal releases

brad whitford's impotent rage (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:02 (sixteen years ago)

I figured I'd get my pointless bitching out of the way in this thread, no point starting a whole new thread over it.

he's always been a bit of an anti-climb Max (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:03 (sixteen years ago)

yeah because it would just become yet another pitchfork thread where they discuss the usual shit and ignore your post

pfunkboy (Herman G. Neuname), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:05 (sixteen years ago)

Like I said, its kind of a stupid thing to care about, but I was talking to a dude at my local store and he was telling me that he pretty much has to automatically double the orders for any album Pitchfork BNM'd album.

he's always been a bit of an anti-climb Max (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:07 (sixteen years ago)

Pitchfork has a metal column right?

More like HAD a metal column. The last edition of Show No Mercy was almost a year ago.

wronger than 100 geir posts (MacDara), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:08 (sixteen years ago)

Pardon my redundancy above.

he's always been a bit of an anti-climb Max (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:09 (sixteen years ago)

I never read pitchfork unless a review is linked to from ilm. I dont even know what bands they give a best BNM tag to, but Im not surprised they wont give it to a metal band.

but I was talking to a dude at my local store and he was telling me that he pretty much has to automatically double the orders for any album Pitchfork BNM'd album.

Now I didn't realise a BNM tag was such a big deal. I can see why its sought after then.

I remember way back in the early - mids 90s (before britpop really)if an album got 5 K's in Kerrang or a 9/10 in NME, Our Price in Hamilton would get loads of ppl asking for said album (including myself haha). Half the time they didn't have it and would need to order it in. I think I bought the 1st Marilyn Manson because of a glowing Kerrang review Plus trent reznor had produced it. I probably discovered Dirt by AiC that way too tbf.

So i suppose a BNM tag could help pitchfork readers get out of their comfort genres and check stuff out. Did Boris or Mastodon ever get a BNM tag?

pfunkboy (Herman G. Neuname), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:26 (sixteen years ago)

shows how often I've read it then macdara if they dont even have the column now.
http://thequietus.com/ is good for metal reviews. Even if doran is upset with me for posting on that ilm thread that Kerrang sucks..

pfunkboy (Herman G. Neuname), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:28 (sixteen years ago)

The former P4k metal writer moved his shop to Stereogum.

EZ Snappin, Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:31 (sixteen years ago)

How could a metal band break the mainstream nowadays? Could it get played on commercial top 40 radio without it being a ballad? Does MTV even play music vids now? Is the only way to do it to crossover to pitchfork readers ?

pfunkboy (Herman G. Neuname), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:34 (sixteen years ago)

TBH I thought the last Alcest album was way more Pitchfork friendly than this one, and also a lot better. These things aren't necessarily related.

BUT I am going to see Bolt Thrower & Rotting Christ in 2 days so maybe I'm still metal enough, I dunno.

a fucking stove just fell on my foot. (Colonel Poo), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:38 (sixteen years ago)

I'm skipping the Dublin Bolt Thrower show this Sunday - they moved the start time back by 2 hours so it won't end till 1am. On a Sunday night! I'm not metal enough for that, I've got work in the morning.

wronger than 100 geir posts (MacDara), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:43 (sixteen years ago)

The former P4k metal writer moved his shop to Stereogum.

yeah it's still an excellent column!!

brad whitford's impotent rage (underrated aerosmith albums I have loved), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:45 (sixteen years ago)

Weird - the London gig starts at 5pm!

a fucking stove just fell on my foot. (Colonel Poo), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:46 (sixteen years ago)

xpost

a fucking stove just fell on my foot. (Colonel Poo), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:47 (sixteen years ago)

No bank holiday in Ireland on Monday then I guess?

a fucking stove just fell on my foot. (Colonel Poo), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:47 (sixteen years ago)

Indeed, thanks for the heads up on that EZ, I had no idea he moved!

xxpost

wronger than 100 geir posts (MacDara), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:47 (sixteen years ago)

No bank holiday in Ireland on Monday then I guess?

There is, but not in my line of work.

The start time was supposed to be 5pm here as well, but it got moved back due to 'changes in the ferry schedule' or some bullshit. It's a five band bill, they could have cut someone out or trimmed back the set times or something. Anyway, it freed me up to afford a ticket to see Dinosaur Jr in a couple of weeks' time, so every cloud and all that.

wronger than 100 geir posts (MacDara), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:49 (sixteen years ago)

tbh I figured the 5pm start time was because the London gig is in a student union and they probably have a club night after or something. Doesn't really make any difference to me but my friend has to get back to Milton Keynes after so that could be interesting.

a fucking stove just fell on my foot. (Colonel Poo), Thursday, 29 April 2010 22:56 (sixteen years ago)

you guys should stop talking about pitchfork and listen to the new overkill album instead

original bgm, Thursday, 29 April 2010 23:02 (sixteen years ago)

this album outclasses any of the nu-thrash I've heard by a wide, wide margin.

original bgm, Thursday, 29 April 2010 23:08 (sixteen years ago)

If I've never liked an Overkill album, is this going to change my mind?

EZ Snappin, Thursday, 29 April 2010 23:08 (sixteen years ago)

Let me rephrase - I didn't like their first four records in the 80s and never heard another note. Should I?

EZ Snappin, Thursday, 29 April 2010 23:10 (sixteen years ago)

I'd say "yes" but it's honestly been 10+ years since I've even listened to overkill, so I'll leave that to more knowledgeable posters.

but check out the title track at least:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fAFIkUZqWtY

original bgm, Thursday, 29 April 2010 23:14 (sixteen years ago)

that solo!

original bgm, Thursday, 29 April 2010 23:15 (sixteen years ago)

I'm with you, EZ - I didn't like Overkill in the 80s and the new album, while not bad for old dudes, isn't gonna suddenly convert you.

I'm currently listening to Witchkrieg, the new album by the reconstituted Witchery, now featuring Legion, formerly of Marduk, on vocals. This album has a shit-ton of guest guitar solos by Hank Sherman and Andy La Rocque (Mercyful Fate/King Diamond), Gary Holt and Lee Altus from Exodus, Jim Durkin of Dark Angel, and Kerry King on the title track. So far it's pretty fucking awesome.

Born In A Test Tube, Raised In A Cage (unperson), Thursday, 29 April 2010 23:45 (sixteen years ago)

you're a tough man to please

original bgm, Friday, 30 April 2010 00:06 (sixteen years ago)

That's a pretty good track Alan. Still not going to rush out and pick it up, but much better than I expected based on my memories.

EZ Snappin, Friday, 30 April 2010 00:25 (sixteen years ago)

just fyi, and for the last fucking time, p4k stated ages ago that they gave bnm tags to things that they felt would appeal to the vast majority of their readership. so uh sorry metal albums ;_;

vikings: name your reasons why they are so bad and hated (call all destroyer), Friday, 30 April 2010 00:25 (sixteen years ago)

Then that means they obviously dont think their readership is very openminded, and of course im sure others might point out that if they did give it a BNM tag, then they might still check it out and like it. Otherwise their claims to be not just an indie site ring hollow.

pfunkboy (Herman G. Neuname), Friday, 30 April 2010 00:34 (sixteen years ago)

Why did no one tell me there was a new Karma To Burn album?

pfunkboy (Herman G. Neuname), Friday, 30 April 2010 00:36 (sixteen years ago)

I totally told you there was when I was reviewing it for Decibel. Great stuff, as usual. Picked up an album by the band that a couple of guys did with the son of one of the Kinks, Year-Long Disaster, but my hopes aren't quite as high for that one.

X-Wing fighter in hand, "Godzilla" cranked on the stereo (J3ff T.), Friday, 30 April 2010 00:39 (sixteen years ago)

Yeah it is great as always.

pfunkboy (Herman G. Neuname), Friday, 30 April 2010 00:41 (sixteen years ago)

Why did no one tell me there was a new Karma To Burn album?

You woulda found out soon enough; I'm writing them up in the Bands You Should Know section of my MSN blog in a week or so.

Born In A Test Tube, Raised In A Cage (unperson), Friday, 30 April 2010 00:42 (sixteen years ago)

Not heard of that one, jeff. I do have the 1st cd though which did have vocals. Apparently their record label wanted them to record with John Garcia.

pfunkboy (Herman G. Neuname), Friday, 30 April 2010 00:42 (sixteen years ago)

Nice one , Phil. Do you know how many pageviews your blog gets?

pfunkboy (Herman G. Neuname), Friday, 30 April 2010 00:43 (sixteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.