― strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 15:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― DJ Martian (djmartian), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 15:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 15:25 (twenty-two years ago)
<< / my word is law >
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 15:45 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 15:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dave Stelfox (Dave Stelfox), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 15:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jordan (Jordan), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 15:48 (twenty-two years ago)
I too am a bit lukewarm.
― Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 15:53 (twenty-two years ago)
― toby (tsg20), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 16:39 (twenty-two years ago)
I must hear this band.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 19:34 (twenty-two years ago)
hey john
― jeremyg, Tuesday, 27 January 2004 19:44 (twenty-two years ago)
ok...now pretend i wasn't ever here
― jeremyg, Tuesday, 27 January 2004 19:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 19:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 21:44 (twenty-two years ago)
Prima are your reservations about the transparency of Junior Boys' influences or that people talk about said influences too much?
I think both are a result of - as Tom alluded to - a lot of people wanting exactly this sort of band to come into existence for a long time and either being underwhelmed or predictably overwhelmed now that it has happened. It's too tempting to look at Junior Boys and see the stylistic equation (and either be over-excited or suspicious of that) rather than the group themselves. ie. it's almost too fitting that K-Punk is their biggest cheerleader because they're like the total (mathematical) solution to his problems with the current pop landscape. The tendency is understandable but it can get in the way of whether the music is actually really good or not (I think it is).
Phoebe is unintentionally playing the same game by bringing up Arthur Russell ("my reference points for this group are more obscure and seminal than yours!" basically). I hope it doesn't stifle the group's progress with self-consciousness (Jeremy stop reading this thread now!!)
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Tuesday, 27 January 2004 23:58 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 28 January 2004 00:44 (twenty-two years ago)
― tom west (thomp), Wednesday, 28 January 2004 00:53 (twenty-two years ago)
― prima fassy (bob), Wednesday, 28 January 2004 00:58 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Wednesday, 28 January 2004 01:05 (twenty-two years ago)
"he talks very happily about cultural viruses and very interestingly up to a point but he doesn't think that he himself is a viral contagion; he still thinks that he is the scientist" -- sadie plant on richard dworkins
― prima fassy (bob), Wednesday, 28 January 2004 01:09 (twenty-two years ago)
so right and yet so upsetting!
― jed_ (jed), Wednesday, 28 January 2004 01:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― Stringent Stepper (Stringent), Wednesday, 28 January 2004 10:29 (twenty-two years ago)
And now I am. Hey, very spiffy! Jess's lurv for them is well justified in my eyes. :-) Yay big empty spaces blocked off by beats and things.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 30 January 2004 02:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Friday, 30 January 2004 03:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Friday, 30 January 2004 03:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― cozen (Cozen), Friday, 30 January 2004 03:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 30 January 2004 03:08 (twenty-two years ago)
that's Coloma not the JB'z
― jed_ (jed), Friday, 30 January 2004 03:18 (twenty-two years ago)
― stopsss, Monday, 9 February 2004 17:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― nick.K (nick.K), Monday, 9 February 2004 17:11 (twenty-two years ago)
what track?
― mark p (Mark P), Monday, 9 February 2004 17:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― nick.K (nick.K), Monday, 9 February 2004 18:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Monday, 9 February 2004 18:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 9 February 2004 19:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― nick.K (nick.K), Monday, 9 February 2004 19:25 (twenty-two years ago)
ok ok i'm keeping shtoom from now on til i hear some more
― prima fassy (bob), Monday, 9 February 2004 20:26 (twenty-two years ago)
― prima fassy (bob), Monday, 9 February 2004 20:27 (twenty-two years ago)
― @d@ml (nordicskilla), Monday, 9 February 2004 20:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― nick.K (nick.K), Monday, 9 February 2004 20:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matos W.K. (M Matos), Monday, 9 February 2004 21:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― bnw (bnw), Monday, 9 February 2004 21:17 (twenty-two years ago)
― Yanc3y (ystrickler), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 00:05 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matos W.K. (M Matos), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 00:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― Yanc3y (ystrickler), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 00:09 (twenty-two years ago)
One of the two.
― @d@ml (nordicskilla), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 00:12 (twenty-two years ago)
oh yes/oh dear?
― jed_ (jed), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 00:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― jed_ (jed), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 00:17 (twenty-two years ago)
― @d@ml (nordicskilla), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 00:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― @d@ml (nordicskilla), Tuesday, 10 February 2004 00:25 (twenty-two years ago)