birth of the flattened cool: the origins of the indie voice?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Not all messages are displayed: show all messages (273 of them)
Nick Drake's voice was warm and inviting, and his lyrics never less than
earnest. I don't see where his voice maps into this equation you're muddling.

Dave Gilmour's voice (Pink Floyd) is often described as "drab" or
"monotone." I don't hear that, but maybe he's an influence, nevertheless

I'm inclined to think that the "indie voice" is not a genuine phenomenon.
Instead, what you might call "indie" singing comes from some bigger
democratizing principle in modern music. It's okay to be not be that talented,
in some respects. Weekend poets, karaoke fans, and other average joes
who would normally remain nonsingers have latched onto this DIY attitude
and stepped up to the mic. I think today you see a laxness (which is really
just a diverseness; the dedicated, Singers with a capital S are still out there
too) in quality control all across the genre board. I think duke sprinkler used
the word "unashamed."

Of course, I'm sure there ARE plenty of singers who sing "indie" on
purpose. But how many are in truth like Pavement's Steve Malkmus,
who has confessed that he sings "indie" because he can't really
sing in tune.

Squirrel_Police (Squirrel_Police), Monday, 19 April 2004 02:59 (twenty-two years ago)

"I'd love to see a similar discussion of the emo voice..."

The emo voice is the possibly worst thing to happen to music in the past few years, along with the "nasal, whiny pop-punk voice". I'll take the "flat, disaffected indie voice" any day.

latebloomer (latebloomer), Monday, 19 April 2004 03:04 (twenty-two years ago)

Really great thread (great topic for a future EMP panel, maybe), but I think it will always come back to Lou Reed. Been wracking my brain but I think he invented it. Who sounded like that before "I Can't Stand It"? Dylan made it OK to sing with an odd voice, but Lou made limitations seem cool. Leonard Cohen maybe fits in there somewhere.

Mark (MarkR), Monday, 19 April 2004 03:15 (twenty-two years ago)

Lou Reed's talk/singing always sounded like he took after some beat poet/jazz hipster style, but I don't think anybody sang pop music that way before.

Curt (cgould), Monday, 19 April 2004 03:19 (twenty-two years ago)

yes spittle nice one. this is the best thread i've been able to participate on since sexydancer dragged me onto ILX like a month, month-and-a half back now....

duke bleek, Monday, 19 April 2004 04:11 (twenty-two years ago)

I always thought it was a reaction against vibrato, which was associated with "classical" singing and therefore upper class and therefore inauthentic in rock and roll.

Oh yeah, and they just couldn't sing.

The evolution of the "Heroin voice" could be traced also, the relaxed, "I am just about to fall head first into my pudding but I must deliver this phrase before the producer will let me do it" voice (See Billie Holliday, Lou Reed, Mazzy Star, SP* etc)

Orbit (Orbit), Monday, 19 April 2004 04:15 (twenty-two years ago)

Ooo, Lennon's a good one. Not all of his stuff, obviously, but "Rain" for sure, "Norwegian Wood," a lot of Rubber Soul. In contrast to Paul, obviously, who (for better/worse) never put anything between himself and the song.

this comment way way upthread confused me. i'm wondering how you think lennon was distanced from either of the two songs you mentioned, or from other songs of that era. "rain" sounds to me like a sincere delivery of a rather straightforward lyric. "norwegian wood" is a slightly more puzzling lyric, but what is it in the vocal that you read as distancing?

i'd argue quite the opposite -- that paul was the one who was distanced from a lot of his beatles material. he was often great, but at his worst, on something like "rocky raccoon," he comes across to me like he thinks his own songs are jokes, and he's just trying to put one over on us.

but i wouldn't put either john or paul into the "flattened cool" category, whatever we're trying to make it mean. they both had considerable vocal gifts, and they used them to full effect most of the time. they were singing!

fact checking cuz (fcc), Monday, 19 April 2004 04:33 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah the most disippated lennon ever got was on "across the universe."

i do think he's forebear to this kind of thing which i think spittle was getting at, but maybe just in attitude/appearance.

duke blender, Monday, 19 April 2004 04:44 (twenty-two years ago)

hmm, still not seeing the lennon thing, even in attitude/appearance. he sang with real rock and roll exuberance ("bad boy," for example), and he was trying really hard to stamp his songs with the soulfulness of all the R&B singers he loved so much. i can't see what on earth someone like stuart murdoch (and i like a lot of belle and sebastian songs) got from someone like lennon.

fact checking cuz (fcc), Monday, 19 April 2004 04:51 (twenty-two years ago)

(xpost)

Yeah, of course the Beatles were singing. I never meant to imply that anybody wasn't "singing", it's more the how of it. (It's true that several of the people referenced had limited ranges, but that's not exactly a requirement.) I think mid-period-Beatles is when Lennon starts to get arch and disaffected -- it's his moodiest, most mysterious phase (and my favorite Beatles stretch). And I think his singing changed -- partly under Dylan's influence, which he acknowledged, but more generally in what he was conveying with his voice. His sneer on "Rain" is almost punkish ("they might as well be dead"), and "Norwegian Wood" and "Girl" in particular operate from a sort of jaded, knowing vantagepoint -- again, not just in the lyrics but in the vocal approach -- that I think does connect to this other (at that time, emerging) style.

By the way, am I the only one who thinks he burns the house down at the end of "Norwegian Wood"? People always look at me weird when I ask that.

spittle (spittle), Monday, 19 April 2004 04:58 (twenty-two years ago)

hmm, i guess i'm not quite sure what exactly this other style that we're talking about is.

but for flat, affectless singing, noodle vague nailed it by bringing up nico.

fact checking cuz (fcc), Monday, 19 April 2004 05:07 (twenty-two years ago)

susan anway, who sang on the first couple magnetic fields, did the same in a more full-bodied, "singerly" way. she's a good example of a gifted singer putting on the flat to good effect.

fact checking cuz (fcc), Monday, 19 April 2004 05:10 (twenty-two years ago)

magnetic fields records, that is.

fact checking cuz (fcc), Monday, 19 April 2004 05:10 (twenty-two years ago)

I guess I mean that "Norwegian Wood" is deadpan, and sung deadpan. (Especially if you buy the burning-the-house-down reading of it.) And the introduction of deadpan and/or irony to pop/rock singing seems central to the development of this voice.

Magnetic Fields are obviously a motherlode of flattened indie affect.

spittle (spittle), Monday, 19 April 2004 05:36 (twenty-two years ago)

the obvious is being ignored: HEROIN

Orbit (Orbit), Monday, 19 April 2004 05:36 (twenty-two years ago)

"I think mid-period-Beatles is when Lennon starts to get arch and disaffected.."

yes, totally, and what i meant to refer to specifically before. he even put on a few pounds then, right? he got to be a bored 'bad boy', still probably looking for the next inspiration, but:
"oh, i guess i write really good songs, guess i'm making history, zzzzzzz"
and then yes, orbit, on to heroin eventually.

duke plane, Monday, 19 April 2004 05:45 (twenty-two years ago)

no seriously, from the jazz/blues greats that they emulated, to the people who came after them. there is a vocal style that is flat and cool. no vibrato, very relaxed.

the "flat, cool" sound was not an accident, imho. i mean the examples of flat and cool given here are so obvious, i mean nico for god's sake....

Orbit (Orbit), Monday, 19 April 2004 05:59 (twenty-two years ago)

I think 1950s style beat poets had a large influence too.

David Allen (David Allen), Monday, 19 April 2004 06:07 (twenty-two years ago)

otm

Orbit (Orbit), Monday, 19 April 2004 06:18 (twenty-two years ago)

Billie Holiday: the quintessential limited voice, stretched to its limits through the application of ingenuity and craft. Well...and a whole lot of gin.

Yeah but the indie singing we're talking about is a limited voice NOT stretched to its limits through the application of ingenuity and craft. I don't think the typical indie singing style sounds anything like Billie Holiday.

I suspect Orbit is right about the importance of heroin.

Rockist Scientist (rockistscientist), Monday, 19 April 2004 10:24 (twenty-two years ago)

(ILX taken out of context.)

Rockist Scientist (rockistscientist), Monday, 19 April 2004 10:29 (twenty-two years ago)

Johnny Cash? 'I Walk the Line' and Fulsom Prison have Indie flatness in spades.

hinter_land (hinter_land), Monday, 19 April 2004 10:34 (twenty-two years ago)

The emo voice is the possibly worst thing to happen to music in the past few years, along with the "nasal, whiny pop-punk voice". I'll take the "flat, disaffected indie voice" any day.|

Amen.

Matthew Perpetua (Matthew Perpetua), Monday, 19 April 2004 12:24 (twenty-two years ago)

it's the clipped diction of the pop punk singers that annoys me most

"clipped diction" = good name for pop punk band

amateur!st (amateurist), Monday, 19 April 2004 17:38 (twenty-two years ago)

sorry, klipped dicktion

amateur!st (amateurist), Monday, 19 April 2004 17:38 (twenty-two years ago)

it's painful to hear but it certainly cottons to its constituency's actual outlook, don't it? it's like you can scoff at starbucks but it ain't going away. anyone else see the morrissey interview in spin whereby the clown that wrote it attempts to tie his influence to that of today's really important emo artists? "are you aware of the emo movement?" "no, i was born yesterday"
exactly

duke spin, Monday, 19 April 2004 17:45 (twenty-two years ago)

reaching back into the flat, lack of vibrato thing--i think it was function that became form.

they couldn't sing; or they were too blissed out to have intonation (the pudding theory) and that is what became "cool", emulated, repeated, associated with hip--and now we have the result: flat indie voice[tm]

Orbit (Orbit), Monday, 19 April 2004 22:14 (twenty-two years ago)

Richard Hell had kind of an early version of the Malkmus drawl/twang, but I know such a piddling observation is meaningless in the context of this rather awesome thread.

morris pavilion (samjeff), Monday, 19 April 2004 22:17 (twenty-two years ago)

Billie was on the cusp of this -- yearning and a broken heart modulated by world-weariness (Nico was well into the latter realm, of course). That's what I hear, cliched as it must sound.

Collardio Gelatinous (collardio), Tuesday, 20 April 2004 01:05 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't mean to steer this steer elsewhere but can't we discuss the stuff between Beat Happening and Lord Buckley?

sexyDancer, Tuesday, 20 April 2004 05:58 (twenty-two years ago)

just frank zappa then

duke garage, Tuesday, 20 April 2004 06:09 (twenty-two years ago)

Back sleepless demon!

seyxDancer, Tuesday, 20 April 2004 06:12 (twenty-two years ago)

daemon

duke hello, Tuesday, 20 April 2004 06:17 (twenty-two years ago)

I'll crush you with my +2 Gist re-issue!!!

sexyDancer, Tuesday, 20 April 2004 06:20 (twenty-two years ago)

i have the rare 7"... amateur

duke dragoon, Tuesday, 20 April 2004 06:21 (twenty-two years ago)

I'M MELTING I'M MELTING
ARRRRRGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHH
what a world... what a world...

sexyDancer, Tuesday, 20 April 2004 06:24 (twenty-two years ago)

i didn't know you were into lord buckley, i have "blowing your mind (and his too)" somewhere

duke record, Tuesday, 20 April 2004 06:26 (twenty-two years ago)

cuz hez deNAZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

sexyDancer, Tuesday, 20 April 2004 06:44 (twenty-two years ago)

blimey

duke pinfold, Tuesday, 20 April 2004 06:46 (twenty-two years ago)

self-denunciation time: i want to take back all my comments on this thread, however tentative they were, for their bogus musicology

amateur!st (amateurist), Tuesday, 20 April 2004 07:44 (twenty-two years ago)

no no, it's cool -- the whole thread is bogus musicology. what better place for it?

spittle (spittle), Tuesday, 20 April 2004 14:37 (twenty-two years ago)

yes but the ilx cultural revolution is nigh and i want to be ahead of the curve

amateur!st (amateurist), Tuesday, 20 April 2004 14:45 (twenty-two years ago)

uh-oh. is it time for re-education again?

spittle (spittle), Tuesday, 20 April 2004 15:35 (twenty-two years ago)

if ILx is china what is taiwan? we could decamp. plus no way any kind of hard science could wrap itself around this kind of stuff. if you ask me, we're doing fine.

duke come on, Tuesday, 20 April 2004 16:34 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.bekkoame.ne.jp/~haruhisa/Music/Music/TinDrum.JPG

sexyDancer, Tuesday, 20 April 2004 17:53 (twenty-two years ago)

I think you have to look at 'indie singing' in the context of singer vs. songwriter and availability/affordability of technology. During the last few decades, music making and recording instruments and technology became more affordable and more widely available, thus allowing anyone with an inclination - and not necessarily the talent and training - to sing. With the cheap four-track came the glut of indie bands, for better or worse. Also you have to remember that in the first few decades of rock (and still, to a large degree, in pop music today) songwriters wrote the songs and farmed them out to singers. With the cheaper instruments/recording technology, people became both singer and songwriter.
Um, that sounded more pseudo-academic than I intended. Let's just say I heart Stuart Murdoch even though he's sometimes a bit off-key and leave it at that.

queenbee, Thursday, 29 April 2004 18:25 (twenty-two years ago)

one month passes...
Ritchie Valens' "Donna" = the original emo voice

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Monday, 14 June 2004 00:09 (twenty-one years ago)

A whole thread on the subject and NOBODY has mentioned Gary Troxell of the Fleetwoods!?! (They were from Olympia which makes them even more emo than Valens, I guess.)

Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Monday, 14 June 2004 00:37 (twenty-one years ago)

What about João Gilberto? I mean I hear what you're saying about Astrud, but she wasn't a particularly good singer. Maybe that's part of what we're talking about here. Billie Holiday was a master of phrasing so I don't know about her. The emotional nakedness, sure. Chet Baker had this quality too.

I hear the same quality in the Left Banke--"She May Call You Up Tonight." A bit too in Colin Blunstone. And Alex Chilton, too.

eddie hurt (ddduncan), Monday, 14 June 2004 02:16 (twenty-one years ago)

nobody mentioned threepenny opera. sprechgesang. ties in with marlene dietrich, as mentioned. an attack on operatic style.

also, some classic country recordings could be easily mentioned as precursors - "ragged but right", tons of stuff on the anthology box.

but i don't think you can get anywhere with this because essentially they're all pretty different at what they do. if you stop overthinking and just compare julian stroke with stuart murdoch and with laetitia sadier, three huge velvets fans, any common ground is tenuous.

if you listen to a new wave hits of the 80s cd, what you notice is that the singers aren't lacking in dynamic attack or even pipes, what unites them is just weirdness. some singers have really weird voices, or they yelp in an overexcited way, or they drawl, etc. it's analogous to when bop took over big band jazz - quite apart from the strange songs and solos, people talked about bird's harsh tone, dizzy's squeaks, to say nothing of monk or [late 40s] miles.

so if new wave hits have weird singers [of course disco and garage rock had plenty of odd singing voices too, but i think new wave was more about dressing and sounding different], deeper into indie and true punk [people who don't chart] you have further diversity. some of them do indeed sing off key quite a bit - both mark e smith and his erstwhile copycat steve malkmus have claimed they are a bit tone deaf, but the rest of their bands were often out of tune as well, so this must be a bit of a pose and they are going offkey on purpose - when people first hear stuart murdoch, his occasional wanderings offkey leap out and smack them. such a pretty song, why can't the singer sing?

you can't say it comes from lou reed or chet baker or any one guy; it's not as if feedback guitar noise wouldn't exist if not for jimi hendrix. there's always been people in folk music who drawl their songs. and it's not as if all singers in indie rock sound do what you're talking about. the key is: nonconformity. they are all trying to sound a little bit unique. as opposed to a metal band or a pop group, whose songwriting guitarists or keyboard players look for singers who will sound right, correct, normal.

mig (mig), Monday, 14 June 2004 02:34 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.