pitchfork is dumb (#34985859340293849494 in a series.)

the thing about that question nabisco asks is that between the ages of 13 and 27, I am pretty sure my answer would have been "yes, absolutely"

Ah but I am not worked up, otherwise good point! Just my observation.

whoa man no need to get worked up

I realize the ratings are pretty much trivial, and I'm not bashing either record (enjoy both), but how does this *really* make any sense?? I think there have been other cases of maybe Baroness, Converge or someone too un-Pfork-y scoring in the 8.5 realm and not making Best New Music... what gives?

u shld b set on fire

the thing about that question nabisco asks is that between the ages of 13 and 27, I am pretty sure my answer would have been "yes, absolutely"

1. The Cure "Goth Beach Party"
2. Depeche Mode "We're Dead in the Graveyard"
3. Bach "Bach is Fucking Awesome in B Minor"
4. The Cure "Sadness is Contageous"
5. Blink 182 "Take Off Your Pants and Jack It"
6. Prince "holyshitiamsoloingwiththisguitariloveU2much"
7. U2 "Zooropa"
8. Insane Clown Posse "ISP 4: The Faygo Years"
9. Dreamboat Gorilla "Songs from Nantucket"
10. Jewel "Songs in the Key of Teddybears"

Hi Lamp. Howya doin.

iatee, just calm down! Alright?!!?!?!!? GAHHHH!!!

wtf Que

you know I would never in a million years rep for Dreamboat Gorilla

u shld b set on fire

Speaking of fire... the new High on Fire album got an 8.0 but no Best New Music?!?!!!?! OMG WTF DIE P4RK DIEEEEEEEE

http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/13966-snakes-for-the-divine/

who is better ilxor or kshighway

i give 1 an 8.2 the other an 8.4 but only one is a best new poster

just kidding theyre both terrible

http://www.seattleweekly.com/2005-03-16/news/double-zing-ceremony/

just kidding theyre both terrible

― Lamp

i lol'd

1.2

guys

am I gonna have to draw ILX's fire with lurid revelations again

do it

ok well i had a steamy threesome with pitchfork and cokemachineglow - you'll never guess who enjoyed THAT one the most

let's just say that it's called pitchfork for a reason

you what now

you had sex with a website

two websites

I've done that. Not with two, though.

4.3

http://www.ilxor.com/ILX/NewAnswersControllerServlet?boardid=44

7.2

http://m.assetbar.com/achewood/one_strip?b=M%5ea11f09b8576e606bcb5038dfdb92fb821&u=http%3A%2F%2Fachewood.com%2Fcomic.php%3Fdate%3D08232005

no chance of catching logorrhea tho - we all made sure to wear wizard's caps

puff puff: 9.7
LJ: 7.9

http://m.assetbar.com/uua6RGHSf.gif

no cookies for you LJ

well hello, achewood.com

just say the word and there'll be a dvd and a bottle of shiraz waiting for you

look i even brought some truffles

louis do not fuck achewood

but its coding is so shapely

:DDDDDDDD @ tt

i mean you gotta cover assetbar sure but the rest's pretty sweet to look at while yr doin' yr bone

Not really a Pitchfork is dumb moment, but even though I'm not big Shins stan I'm going to want to stab the next person that makes a "Shins will change your life" reference in anything related to the band (i.e. today's Broken Bells review). Its 20-fucking-10, can we stop?

http://alternatebinkyality.files.wordpress.com/2009/09/natalie-portman.jpg

(sorry)

Haha, I probably deserved that. Just sick of that reference still being trotted out.

my main problem with pitchfork today is that it keeps stealing the gdamn duvet

l0u1s jagg3r, Web Site Shagger

Louis Jagger

shagger? dude i make love

according to you

well...if you notice pitchfork loading with an extra spring in its step, it ain't just the season

awesome joke guys, keep it up

dude it's ok...i treated VV v nicely...no need to be jealous, it was mutual attraction